Pesticide Poisoning, Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, Lupus, Lyme, Neurological, Mold (Mycotoxin), MS, Metabolic Syndrome & All Manner of Environmental & Legal (System) Assaults Upon Human Health.

Tag Archives: pesticide poisoning


This Essay:  https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/2016/06/07/transgender-gender-asynchronicity-what-causes-it/
Shortlink:  http://wp.me/p2DVqC-87

By Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health [Distinction] 1998; First Class Honors Social Ecology 1999; PhD studies in Sociology 2000 to 2012; University of Western Sydney [Monsanto-critical thesis rejected for examination by University a few months after forming a relationship with the ag giant…])



1.  “Trans”, meaning: Across, beyond, or into another state or place.  And so to “Transgender”…

In terms of the critical and expected assignment of gender in humans we are, in this Essay, therefore looking at those who identify as transgender as claiming to have an internal psychological gender that is away from, or across from, or opposite to, their biologically assigned physical sex. That is, a male mind inside a female body, or a female mind inside a male body.

Now, before we get all complex (sociological and toxicological), let’s drill down to some seeming simplicity.  And what ARE we as animals, as humans?  We are CHEMICALS (and we are also so much more of course…).  And our bodily chemicals are influenced by “unnatural” chemicals: the pollutants that industry has forced upon us all (and which we have accepted, in large part, without a useful understanding of Toxicology).

This Essay, therefore, deals with a great many chemical notions, and how Transgender might be a chemical issue.  But, being human and also being “so much more…”, our chemicals are enmeshed inside a great many sociological, political and religious machinations.  And I must admit to being incensed at a presumptuous and ignorant society, and particularly religion, when it comes to being critical of Transgendered people; of jumping, almost automatically it seems, into a “anything-sexually-unusual-can-only-be-perverse-and-insane” state of that aforementioned presumption.

2.  Note that the bulk of this Essay has been formatted around a number of essay websites and forums I contribute to.  Some sites are religious.  Here, it appears, the whole notion of Transgender is automatically deemed to be almost a heinous “sin” at worst, and the subject matter – almost its very conceptual basis, and most certainly those who claim to be Trans – are thereby seen as worthy of severe criticism by the religious many claiming to speak (and conceive, and prescribe, and proscribe, and BE) on the authority of God (such lofty expectations; such inflationary and inflammatory concepts…).

While I have something of a religious background, I do not present as religious and I do not participate in any form of communal religious gathering (I am psychologically-sensitive to potential cult environments…).  I do not have a fond regard for either Court or political interference in Trans issues, or that insubstantial, self righteous and combative religiosity that is so often on display when the discussion turns to the presumed “disgusting” and “perverted”: SEX and GENDER.  I do, though, most certainly and quietly, appreciate the much more flexible sensibility and inventive breadth of the metaphysical Source and background that I personally believe formats all things (including the Quantum realm, but that’s another story…).

And don’t worry, we’ll soon be getting back to those all-important CHEMICALS…

A further comment on the religious righteous psyche disorder (whoa, I’ve put my foot in it now!) as some extra background to the above.  This disorder is the form of hyper-vigilant religious fascism that is enamored with blustering and whining against the presumed intrinsic GREAT SINS, those being sex, gender and all manner of normal vices for a confused, desperate and brutalized humanity on so many levels. This religious fascism and oversight, and its concomitant demand for an ignorant and permanent rant against, especially, Trans issues, is therefore – by virtue of its uneducated and irrational stance and the spectrums upon which our difficult human existence jitters, jumps, slides and wavers – overtly at war with nearly everyone!  So be careful; they’re watching you!

This self-aggrandizing hyper-vigilance constantly formulates cruel theoretical fixes for “deviants” that verge on the fascist and sub-genocidal in intent and portent.  This negative vigilance anticipates and pontificates a certainty of judgement and wrath against all the perceived grossly imperfect in the world, all the while shallowly boasting spiritual and moral high ground notions of “God’s wrath”, “Christ-likeness”, and other quite abysmally sickly religious concepts that tend to pretentiously glimmer off what is really only a weak and glossy appearance of superficial righteousness  This is a bleating and quite nasty foolishness that always fails to examine its own core excesses and gross, unseen deficiencies (like: h-a-t-e).

So… quickly (so we can get back into all the fun stuff), my sociological, environmental and religious intellectual concerns today lie mainly with the current widespread compromise of scientific, spiritual and political character, thought and action.



Negative impacts against Environmental Health (industrial pollution of our air, food and water, pharmacological pollution from toxic medications, chemical pollution of our food via pesticides and processing additives, and psychological trauma) and human sexual development are linked very dynamically at the epigenetic level. These factors, in the form of hormonal insults, contribute to the formation of Transgender individuals.

I do not pretend to be an expert in LGBTIQ issues (see the following for definitions: http://www.bouldercounty.org/family/lgbtiq/pages/oasosdefinitions.aspx). Nevertheless, my expertise in Environmental Health, in which I have a Degree in Applied Science, has afforded me what I believe to be a reasonable way to approach aspects of causation: a fairly obvious, logical and scientific means by which to examine and understand, especially, the Transgender issue, and hopefully other potentially related issues. While this might sound relatively simple, and toxicologically and physiologically speaking it is amazingly straightforward from this perspective, nothing in this world of hidden and spiky (and too often, tragic) industrial and sociological mechanics is entirely THAT simple.

I have gradually come to see how Environmental Health, industrial pollution, food pollution (deficient nutrition/growth and food additives), pharmacological pollution (prescription and non-prescription medications, and hormonal and other contamination of meat products) and human development are linked very dynamically. However, my initial study of the Trans issue essentially started from a sociological perspective, an area in which I have done nearly 12 years of on/off PhD research.  What I have noted, time and again, is that when you study totalitarianism, the subject leads into a vast arena of human behavior, both corporate and personal.  And when one witnesses a personal kind of ignorance combined with heartlessness in which an individual generates heavy criticism of, say, a mother doing her best rearing her Trans child, one will always see the seeds of potentially greater group fascism that could spring from many more people and governments taking on the same kind of criticism.  Very disturbing.

So criticism that appears to arise out of a complete lack of understanding of the science behind the issue needs to be addressed when individuals express it.

Good quality research that clearly delineates the nature of problems can assist in remedying ignorance. The great potential of enlightenment and compassion can then grow out of that understanding. I have included some brilliant and very recent sociological research findings, and also much older toxicological research findings in this essay to define aspects of the overall nature of Transgender.



A woman and mother posted an article describing her battle with the Transgender issue in her own family.  The reader in question who found the woman’s article offensive made a critical comment or reply to the article.  Please read the following WordPress article and note the critical reply:
https://gendermom.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/my-penis-girl/ (gendermom 2013).

The comment reads as: “Quite disgusting. gendermom is a nutcase at best.” I posted a Reply, but that may not have been accepted by the WordPress website.  Here, following, is an expanded and improved version of what I originally posted in May and then also in June 2016:

The level of insult and aggression in your response obviously means that you’re really unhappy with this particular parenting situation.  If you are not happy, then what would be an improvement in your eyes?  Would you like to see society somehow disinfected of nutcases since you imply that, at worst, gendermom could be a really bad person?

What would you recommend: incarceration of the mother in a psychiatric ward; or perhaps the child should be taken from its mother and placed elsewhere?  Should the child be medicated?  Where does your aggression lead to in terms of fixing such a ‘problem’?  Would you put a mother through the technical fix horror of a child services type of nightmare in order to gain some notion of satisfaction that you carry with you?  You really did imply she might not be worthy of having a child in her care! Your opinion leads horrendously in that direction.  Is your demand for your kind of satisfaction or, by extension, for a larger sociologically and clinically desirable regime of only-normal-parenting-allowed, based on replicable clinical evidence and genuine understanding of proven truth?  Or, should YOU be medicated for being so oddly angry over an issue you know little about?  Or, again, are you actually OK with leaving the child with the mother, but you reserve the right to call her names?

Did you really need to post such a blunt and disparaging insult regarding a woman bravely addressing an extremely difficult parenting issue, and a family situation you don’t even know?

We all now certainly understand that you are righteously offended by those dealing with Transgender issues.  You appear to consider this gender question as reflective of deep psychological aberration, because you called the mother a “nutcase”, and you called her addressing of her child’s gender asynchronicity “disgusting”.  That is a very serious accusation and implication of solid guilt because you have left no room for argument.  So, will that be the way you move forward from here: continuing hurtful insults that attack and diminish every aspect of this mother’s and other Trans peoples’ being?  Would you ever try to force into being that presumption of clinical sanity (the opposite of the “disgusting” and the “nutcase”) you suppose exists and which must predominate regardless of the cost to human lives and minds?  Beware, for that presumption is FASCISM.

Allow me to point out a few truths:

1.  Parenting is never easy, and it is not easy to deal with either physical, sexual or psychological issues of either yourself or your kids, along with the dynamics the world throws at you constantly.
2.  Trans issues’ genesis and orientation are somewhat hard to source and characterize (excepting where Endocrine Disruptor poisoning makes causation a relatively straightforward toxicological rationale), and monstrously difficult to remedy.
3.  Invisible and largely untraceable toxic interferences in our childrens’ development (parents’ medications affecting sperm and ova, vaccine injury and autism, pesticide exposure and anti-social behavior, GMO “food” and digestive and immune dysfunction) add layers of incomprehension to family health and Trans sexual/psych issues.
4.  The persistent spiritual pathology of the immortal shaming and defaming of sex that has plagued this most marvelous and tragic gift from God, a shame burned into the generational nature of humans, all-too-often causes spontaneous and irrational eruptions of shame, disgust and judgement.  Politics, religion and many other arenas typically witness acute episodes of journalistic disclosure where what is automatically deemed to represent wholly inappropriate sexual activities usually sees a quick and deadly focus frame the enemy sex with repudiation and condemnation.  In this instance of the above noted gendermom article, a person has easily rushed to vent their unknowing and inculcated angst – quite unbeknownst to them in terms of this deep sexual sociology (for most people do not perceive these ancient and powerful depths) – against the enemy “sex”, and against strangers without any understanding of their targets’ personal and differentiated existence, or worthwhile appreciation of beneficial and overlapping science disciplines (e.g. toxicology and sociology) and good quality understanding in general.
5.  With the above understanding, we should be able to appreciate that poor old sex always has its odds stacked against it, and we should therefore be able to intelligently and compassionately ditch this common and stupid disgust of sex and its many and variant fractious evolvements and appearances, and leave that out of our evaluation of innocent people who have – as will shortly be shown – been viciously attacked by chemicals and/or other destructive agents.  Their heartrending injury manifestations, and their more than awkward resulting sociological and gender issues, should therefore never be dumbly written off as “disgusting”, or less noble by comparison against anything by any who deem it their perverse responsibility to be gender and moral policemen and to stand in terrible judgement.

Even though faced with so many unknowns in terms of the awkward Trans issue, understanding can still be assertively discerned via quality and unbiased research.

Please note:

The overwhelming evidence in favor of an internal gender identity that may be at odds with genetics or anatomy and that resists change has been abundantly spelled out elsewhere.  However, for those who may be new to the study of gender, I will outline some of the highlights here:

[1] Differences in brain structure between cis- and transgender, where transgender brains have been found more closely to resemble brains corresponding to their identified gender [actual brain structure can intrinsically demonstrate what the true core (mind) gender identity of the person is, while the biological and physical presentation – the physical body – can be the total opposite].

[2] Decades of doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors of all varieties trying and completely failing to change gender identity [presumptuous psychological manipulation working against deep reality].

[3] Experience with people whose bodies were altered in infancy unbeknownst to them but who clung to the gender identity associated with the body sex they were born with [presumptuous biological/physical manipulation working against deep reality].

[4] “Research showing that certain drugs taken during pregnancy appear to increase the chance of the offspring being transgender, even if the offspring is not aware that drug was used [powerful evidence that metabolic/physiological chemical/drug poisoning/contamination interferes catastrophically with human sexual development] (Chase 2016; my additional comments in []).



The reader’s critical comment in question relating to the Trans issue (which may have been regarding an article on “Biological Subjectivism”), was previously listed relating to an article on this web page:
https://share.naturalnews.com/stream. However, the trans article, the reader’s criticism and my response to that criticism all appear to have been deleted. My posted Reply, was (with identifying details omitted, and described as: xxx):

No [xxx], you are applying a religious type of intolerance to your notion that all human sexual issues are purely psychological, that these kinds of “trans” people are inherently and deeply wrong (or, worse, sinful or evil and deserving of some kind of spiritual punishment), and that anyone or any government or organisation that supports them is wrong. That is not true.

As I’ve stated, this world is under attack from toxic chemicals, and the Endocrine Disruptor type of chemicals attack a person’s sexuality and internal identity as the embryo develops (and potentially even before that).  You cannot be dismissive of, or vindictive towards, people who have had their very core being attacked as an embryo by industrial pollution.  A negative attitude toward such victims of industrialization could push a harassed trans individual a step closer to suicide, and would you then want to find out that your lack of support or compassion, or your open antagonism was responsible for the breaking of the last vestige of courageous persistence that person was personally capable of mustering?

Note that a transgender person’s life starts as a confused and innocent child living in the face of what will almost inevitably become a lifetime of snide and even intolerably vicious insults, beatings, death threats (in Brazil right now there is a genocide occurring against transgender individuals), and heartless rejections.

Don’t do this to your brothers and sisters.  We ALL have problems and issues to deal with on this truth depleted Planet, and the last thing any of us need is to be attacked by the very people who are our fellow strugglers, but who choose to wind up attacks against that which they do not fully understand.




An article at: http://www.naturalnews.com/054030_subjective_biology_self-identity_political_correctness.html addressed an issue called “Biological Subjectivism”. The article was titled: “Mental illness on parade: ‘Biological subjectivism’ self-identity lunacy encourages grown men to shower with high school girls as a ‘civil right'” (Monday, May 16, 2016 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger).  My Reply (plus additional material) was:

One should not make the mistake of lumping all Transgender into the “Biological Subjectivism” classification.  That would be an error of corporate, perverse Judeo-Christian proportions where a religious bent irrationally, and all too often unconsciously, tends to presumptuously shame unorthodox sexuality on all levels.  This is an extension of the more diffuse and abstract sexual shame that has generationally followed mankind, a persistently demonically maligned, shamed and defamed greatest gift ever given to humanity.  Fall into this trap, and you are working on behalf of the enemy whose main job description is Maximum Conflict. Transgender(ism) is largely a result of the sins of Big Industry and its global polluting stranglehold on this beleaguered Planet.  We are a Planet in extremis, literally poisoned out of our minds. It is ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR CHEMICALS that are interfering with hormonal and biological development in animal and human populations:

“Pesticides cause gender change” (http://www.gendercentre.org.au/resources/polare-archive/archived-articles/pesticides-cause-gender-change.htm).

“Pollutants may also be causing gender ambiguity in humans” (http://www.theecologist.org/investigations/health/269536/chchchanges.html).

“Despite popular opinion and negative media portrayals which disparage transgendered people as being “mentally ill” or making “lifestyle choices,” an increasing amount of evidence is surfacing which is linking the proliferation of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC’s) to variations in gender identity and sexual orientation (http://wafreepress.org/56/EndocrineDisruptors.htm).

Let us put the blame largely where it belongs: TOXIC CHEMICAL POLLUTION, and the industries (like Big Tobacco and Monsanto) that have known for DECADES just how poisonous their wares are.

Therefore, toxicologically and developmentally speaking, INDUSTRY is to blame for many asynchronous and other departures from the norm. It is toxic industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals – perhaps more specifically the ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR chemicals that we are currently aware of – that are largely at fault for disrupting the normal development of the embryo.  Unless, of course, we actually know very little about these endocrine disruptors, meaning that vast unknown synergies of toxic chemical compounds are likely responsible for most gender and other issues, leaving us and our children with a great many more unpleasant discoveries yet to muddle through.

What we need now is worldwide education that recognizes the tragic nature and origins of asynchronous gender problems, and a parallel recognition that must reign in at least one out of the two main known causes: the abusive pollution that industry splatters all around in their perennial quest for more profits from the sale of chemically engineered trinkets.  Having stockholders in businesses is something that has to GO.  Their collective demand for profit motivates industry to pump out repeat purchase items that ensure a constant flow of toxic chemicals into the worldwide environment.  Everything is connected.  Stockholders that have transgender children might not see this connection though, this being the way this world – programmed for permanent conflict as it is – tends to HIDE how one issue melds into 50 other issues.  It is a spider’s web of conundrums, fueled pervasively by the ongoing criminality of industry’s chemical treason against this entire Planet.


Below, I list another Reply of mine to criticisms levelled at trans people (with editing for improvement) under the website article listed under 3.0 above:

Transgendered people aren’t mentally ill. Their mind/soul/spirit or the core of what makes them mentally male or female is perfectly normal, but it does not match their biological body because Endocrine Disruptor chemicals have created an asynchronicity.  This is a matter of DEVELOPMENT.  We’re all poisoned to one degree or another physically and have various fractures running through our systems, but we can all mostly still function quite well, mentally speaking.  What ADDS to the instability of a Trans person is people accusing them of being “mentally unstable”.  This helps to predispose Trans people toward suicidal ideation because they’re being told, over and over as they grow up (as well as being insulted, bashed up, and raped, and murdered [as in Brazil – especially – right now]) that they’re “sick”.

If you are immersed in negativity it will affect your mind adversely.  That’s one of the prominent reasons why lawyers who are involved in the childish and abusive adversarial system of so-called justice (where typically the Plaintiff or Complainant who might be a raped woman or a chemically poisoned individual is accused of always having been sexually promiscuous [the real implication being “whore”], or of being a liar or a faker/actor) are so prone to suicide..  Lawyers are IMMERSED in negativity.  And so, to diminish every aspect of a person’s being (especially in an adversarial setting where lying is the name of the filthy legal defend-the-well-moneyed-corporate-poisoners-or-rapist-at-all-costs game) is a devastating and terrible thing to do.  And, all too often outside of the strict legal system, that is what people do to Trans people over extended time.

I should add here further that a negative intention is actually quite a powerful dynamic.  To marginalize a group via constant criticism is to actually create a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy.  At a purely psychological level, to hear that one is considered abnormal or corrupt is a poisonous reinforcement of their (assumed) lack of enlightenment and positive potential.  Beyond the purely psychological is a radionic/intentional kind of regime that actually manifests quite toxic psych and spiritual dynamics, and physical outcomes.




Below, I list yet another Reply of mine to criticisms levelled at trans people (with editing for improvement) under the website article listed under 3.0 above:

A new study shows that “gender variance in youth isn’t a phase OR A CHOICE” (Matt 2015a; my emphasis). It’s a matter of the child acting out their genuine identity, “an identity as valid and consistent… [as] those in cisgender [synchronous or typical mind/body synchrony] children” (ibid.). See also the following URL’s for information on this pivotal sociological study: http://www.ncgs.org/Pdfs/Resources/1.44.full.pdf and http://www.jwatch.org/na37578/2015/04/29/identity-gender-nonconforming-children and http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu/pdfdocs/trans.pdf.

The test tests “unconscious thinking” in children and, as such, and because children are brutally honest, gives very real results. Note:

In the recent study comparing gender variant youth with cisgender siblings and children of a similar age, the pattern of data showed that the results of the transgender children were indistinguishable from those of cisgender children, which shows that transgender youth identify with their gender in the same, consistent way as cisgender youth do. For years trans allies and advocates have been saying that being transgender is not a phase or a choice, that it is a consistent and very valid gender identity, but there is now scientific proof to show this to the rest of the world (ibid.).

Lead researcher, Kristina Olson, said:

While future studies are always needed, our results support the notion that transgender children are not confused, delayed, showing gender-atypical responding, pretending, or oppositional—they instead show responses entirely typical and expected for children with their gender identity, the data reported in this paper should serve as further evidence that transgender children do indeed exist and that this identity is a deeply held one (ibid.).


Note: https://www.susans.org/2016/02/29/transgender-kids-allowed-to-live-openly-have-good-mental-health/ (Hoogeweij 2016a); MARCH 9TH, 2016.

Note these new behavioral science research findings: “The findings challenge long-held assumptions that mental health problems in transgender children are inevitable, or even that being transgender is itself a type of mental disorder” (ibid.).

I think this demonstrates quite clearly that the ever-growing consistent theme being uncovered by research now is that transgender is a biological issue, NOT a psychological problem.  You are BORN transgender, and there is nothing you can do about it.  There is nothing to cure psychologically, and the only remediation appears to be total acceptance, and potentially Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) and gender reassignment (surgery) in order to create a more comfortable fit between the industrial pollution, chemically-induced or Endocrine Disruptor-induced asynchronous body and the mind.

The mind is what is preeminent in this tragic equation of interference in human development.  The body is secondary and can be hormonally and surgically manipulated to represent the real internal core person more closely and comfortably.  It is unfortunate that hormone therapy can have some toxic side-effects, and that both HRT and surgery are so expensive.



The following essay developed out of an obvious need to address the actual science of the potentials for the generation of a trans condition, along with other related issues.


What we first need to appreciate here are some very standard basics in terms of function and malfunction occurring in a human body under stress:

When a situation has been evaluated as “stressful,” the body’s biological systems kick in, and we experience a biological response that is called “fight or flight.” The fight or flight response is controlled by two branches of our nervous system, the sympathetic and the parasympathetic nervous system. When a threat or challenge is perceived, the body’s sympathetic nervous system is switched on, raising the level of two hormones, epinephrine and norepinephrine. These hormones cause a series of biological changes, such as increase heart rate, dilation of nostrils and bronchial tubes, raises blood pressure, increases blood flow to brain and muscles, which gear up the body to either flee from the perceived danger, or stay and fight. Once the perceived danger or challenge is no longer a threat, the body’s parasympathetic nervous system kicks in, and returns all body systems back to normal levels of functioning. However, when the body suffers a long period of chronic stress, many of the body’s functions are thrown out of whack, resulting in a depletion of the body’s resources, weakening and possible failure of the immune system, the pituitary gland can not produce enough stress hormones, and other negative health effects (Stevens 2008).

This means severe impacts via stress run very deep into the core of bodily function.

So, the damage to a human system can be very significant. What physiological dynamics could be elicited by such trauma?



Now that we understand the above noted basic stress dynamic, we can see where this can lead in terms of potential mechanisms producing deep effects.

Psyche trauma of the mother before her child’s conception and that experienced while carrying the embryo feeds into this vast Environmental and Human Health equation. Here, both the mother and child experience physiological changes. In other words: “One theory that has been gaining attention in the field of sexual orientation research is that prenatal stress, stress suffered by the pregnant mother, is a possible cause of homosexuality in males” (Stevens 2008). What might be the mechanism for this?

Trauma and stress effects can be transmitted to offspring via epigenetic changes. These are gene activity alterations, rather than DNA sequence changes. This explains the phenomenon of “intergenerational transmission of trauma”, notably present in the children of Holocaust survivors (McKee 2016). So, the mutability of gene activity (called “methylation”) is critically important here:

Methylation turns off certain sections of genetic code. So even though we inherit two copies of every gene – one from our mother, one from our father – whether the gene is methylated often determines which of the two genes will be turned on. Methylation is inherited, just as DNA is. But unlike DNA, which has an enzyme that proofreads both the original and the copy to minimize errors, methylation has no built-in checks. It can change from one generation to the next and may be influenced by diet or environment (Abrams 2007).


The research article: “Prenatal endocrine influences on sexual orientation and on sexually differentiated childhood behavior” (Hines 2011) appears to be a literature review examining “the evidence regarding prenatal influences of gonadal steroids on human sexual orientation, as well as sex-typed childhood behaviors that predict subsequent sexual orientation.” (ibid.)

In summary:

The evidence supports a role for prenatal testosterone exposure in the development of sex-typed interests in childhood, as well as in sexual orientation in later life… given that testosterone plays an important role in the development of most, perhaps all, behavioral sex differences in other species (ibid.).


It appears, however, that other factors, in addition to hormones, play an important role in determining sexual orientation. These factors have not been well-characterized, but possibilities include direct genetic effects, and effects of maternal factors during pregnancy. Although a role for hormones during early development has been established, it also appears that there may be multiple pathways to a given sexual orientation outcome and some of these pathways may not involve hormones (ibid.).

Recall: “many of the body’s functions are thrown out of whack, resulting in a depletion of the body’s resources, weakening and possible failure of the immune system, the pituitary gland can not produce enough stress hormones, and other negative health effects” (Stevens 2008). So DEFICITS in developmental hormones may cause sexuality issues, with the TIMING of those deficits (and the timing of punctuated hormone production) being another associated factor.


Several general principles of organizational influences are worth noting.  One is that they typically occur during critical, or sensitive, periods of development, and these periods occur at times when testosterone is elevated in developing male animals. One implication of this general principle is that the hormone must be present at the appropriate time to have its effect. If it is present too early or too late, the impact will not be the same. In addition, although present only briefly, the impact of exposure to the hormone at the appropriate time can persist across the lifespan. These early, time-linked, persistent effects are thought to occur because hormones direct some aspects of neural development during early life [3], influencing cell survival, neuroanatomical connectivity and neurochemical specification [97] (Hines 2011).

Finally: “Maternal factors during pregnancy” (ibid.) introduce the potential for psyche trauma as an additional influence on sexuality.  Note: “some of these pathways may not involve hormones” (ibid.).

The cloud of potential influences on the developing fetus has thus expanded exponentially, while strictly direct and indirect, more physical chemical influences settle in to a fitting, logical and research supported prescription as a pronounced causative factor in sexuality, and gender dysfunction.



As early as April of 1998, the Journal of the American Medical Association quietly released a special report that revealed puzzling news.  The number of males born in industrialized nations has dropped dramatically since 1970, constituting a serious reversal in earlier trends.  Records up to 2014 show that trend continuing.

Human male births have always held a marginal advantage, probably Nature’s way of insuring that enough of the somewhat more physically vulnerable male infants will survive.  Earlier last century, between 1900 and 1950, typically as many as 106 males to every 100 female babies were born, probably because obstetrical practices improved so much that more male babies survived pregnancy and delivery.  Census figures after 1970 indicate a trend reversal, a significant reduction in the number of little boys born.  Today in industrialized nations, including Canada, the U.S.A., Sweden, and the Netherlands, that ratio has dropped significantly, a shift which over four decades translates to at least one male less in 1000 births or about 80,000-100,000 fewer males in a population as large as the U.S.A.  Over the world that adds up significantly, creating a red flag for humanity.

…While it may seem counter-intuitive, top environmental scientists say these little boys may be being born female.

This disturbing and unnatural alteration in sex ratio represents a potential threat to both our species survival and our cultural norms if the trend continues.  And because scientists have identified a clear and reversible cause for this change, they have designated the shift a “sentinel health event,” a significant and preventable change in world health.  The decline gives no hint of slowing; male numbers appear to be progressively decreasing in proportion to girls.  The culprits?  Synthetic chemicals pretending to be hormones, Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs). (Potter 2017)


Now that we have established a possible mechanism by which epigenetic changes can occur, is there any real evidence of sexuality being influenced by stress?

G. Dörner, a researcher, used the general structure of WWII and focused on Germany.  He attempted a study to see if there was a correlation between extreme stress in pregnant mothers and the rate of homosexuality in males born before, during and after the war:

Out of 865 homosexual males studied, significantly more were of them were born between the critical period of the war (“between 1941 and 1947- with a maximum in 1944-1945”) than in the years before or after the “critical period” (Dörner 1983). These findings spurred a second study by Dörner, which yielded similar results. In this second study, Dörner used a sample of 100 bi- or homosexual men and 100 heterosexual men. In turn, each was asked about possible stressful life events that took place in his mother’s life during her pregnancy with him.  The findings were as follows:

1. Out of 100 heterosexual males only 6 heterosexuals reported on moderate stressful events that have occurred in their prenatal life, while none of them described severe stressful events in prenatal life, even after consulting their parents.
2. Out of 40 bisexual men 10 bisexuals (=25%) described moderate and 6 bisexuals (=15%) even severe stressful events that have occurred in prenatal life.
3. Out of 60 homosexual men 20 homosexuals (=33.3%) reported on moderate and 21 homosexuals (=35%) even on severe stressful events that have occurred during their prenatal life. (Dörner 1983) (Stevens 2008).

An interesting correlation was thus established, at least in terms of these studies with their inherent flaws.

It is clear that there are “multiple pathways to a given sexual orientation outcome” (Hines 2011), however most of the possible pathways appear to be actionable and dynamic within a pre-conception and embryonic/fetal level, rather than impacting after birth.

“NATURE” as it directly impacts on the embryo (including a pre-birth type of “nurture” or psyche/stress influence), rather than a strict form of post-birth “NURTURE” should therefore be viewed as the prime causative regime propelling so many unfortunate children into a tragic and often brutal set of sexuality and gender issues, in a harsh and judgemental world that often does not generally understand that YOU ARE BORN THAT WAY.

It may well be the case that transgender and other LGBTIQ dynamics and outcomes are structured around a combination of chemical pollution (industrial, agricultural, food additives and drug/medication) and psychological stressors, factors that “manufacture” innocents who are born that way.




Note: https://www.susans.org/2015/04/11/fallbrook-california-transgender-teen-dead-in-apparent-suicide/#comment-940 (Matt 2015b); 13 March 2016.

My Reply to the above article:

No school support for Taylor means no understanding and no recognition of LGBTQ issues in an institution that is supposed to “educate”…  So NO education was available, apparently, in-class in terms of sociology issues examined, gender issues, and Environmental Health issues, particularly those such as Endocrine Disruptor chemicals which affect gender. Taylor’s school is tragically representative of too many educational and sociological “black holes”, places of so-called learning where LGBTQ issues, both societal and personal, are neither studied effectively in class or supported via counselling. These are places where abuse reigns free, and the LGBTQ student is left to fend for themselves.

Don’t blame, shame or disparage Trans people, and thus brutally re-crucify your brothers and sisters time and time again, whenever you might make a snide remark or offer a negative look. Is it your responsibility or job description to police sexuality and add to the trauma Trans people have suffered all their lives, leaving them prone to suicidal ideation because of the relentless onslaught they’ve experienced from their peers since earliest childhood?


Note: https://www.susans.org/2015/05/08/teen-commits-suicide-days-coming-transgender/ (Matt 2015c); 8 May 2015.

My Reply (with improvements):

As long as Transgender is erroneously viewed as a psychological problem, group/herd and individual ignorance and lack of education (in LGBTIQ issues, and in the rewarding decency of restraint, learning, understanding and compassion) will fuel the persistent human nature demand for conflict with each other via the dumb excitement and ignorant gratification of a blunt, knee-jerk general theory defense of the stereotypical safety zone of accepted sexual and behavioral normalcy.

In a world infected with massive and increasing industrial loads of toxic chemicals interfering with all environmental and human physiological processes, there is no such thing any more as normal/accepted “sexual and behavioral normalcy”.  We cis-gendered, (presumptuous) self-proclaimed “superiors” can neither hope for, nor demand normalcy in this battered, chemicalized world.  And we should never be aggressive in terms of what we see as normal because then we are essentially fighting and abusing ourselves by extension (and this really IS the definition of “counter-productive”, “dumb”).  Intense psych trauma, even ancient GMO practices and chemical pollution (which has been around since the Romans polluted the whole world with lead from their smelters), can explain a great deal of LGBTIQ presence over time.  All the tortures and stresses that “Nurture” throws at us can then be figuratively added to that great compendium of historical and generational “Nature hurt” that has forever assaulted humankind.



In looking at https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/topic,193485.new.html#new, I penned the following (with improvements):

You all look absolutely great!  I stand in awe of the courage and perseverance you are all demonstrating. I am not Trans myself, but was drawn to the Trans issue:
1.  From my background in Environmental Health and the perspective of what, toxicologically speaking, influences Transgender (https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/)…
2.  From my PhD studies into Fascism and how ignorance can generate immense hostility toward anything considered sexual in nature…
3.  From my further studies into the spiritual motivators of human history and attitudes toward sex, the persistent shaming and defaming of sex, and the locked in, bigoted demand — in this heavily polluted world — that all lifeforms still be “pure”, ONLY male or female.  All this, even though all animal and human sexuality AND reproductivity is industrially under attack, essentially in a disturbing form of orchestrated global Extinction Level Event.  So, WHILE all life processes are under attack in this comprehensive, global fashion, what symptoms should we reasonably expect to appear?

If the Trans issue is caused by interferences in the “CONTINUUM development” of the embryo when CONTINUUM-critical hormonal actions fail at certain, set-in-stone and irreversible points, then you ARE certainly born that way.  You have had no say in the matter.  I feel that this distortion of planetary environmental health has created a tragically difficult sexuality and gender spectrum that struggles to survive just outside the dual, strict default of male and female.  That spectrum or continuum is an expression of the survival hardiness of reproduction.  In other words, if strictly mind-body male or strictly mind-body female is not possible (each of these hard dualities in a chemically and biologically stable world tends toward being inflexibly coded for the purpose and imperative of reproduction), then something rather more challenging will be bravely created and populated instead.  And perhaps also, in looking at all things as a long-term spiritual “positive”, the spectrum is created for the character and education of all who are willing to learn about the spiritual backgrounds of the harsh realities of corporeal life.  I think one needs to be genuinely enlightened to see and value what’s inside a person rather than ignorantly and aggressively discriminate against the Trans phenomenon based on unrealistic demands for strict physical perfection in a grossly contaminated world.

No, you are not psycho, and you do not have a psychiatric condition excepting by virtue of the (sometimes killer) stress imposed by others. They are the ones imposing their CRIPPLING IGNORANCE on you, the struggling HERO (or heroine). You are struggling in a world where toxic technology is largely worshiped in sheer ignorance, and the effects of chemical technologies on sexuality are unknown to most people.



Wed. 13 July 2016

I mostly agree with this NaturalNews post, excepting for Point #1: “He’s a dude pretending to be a woman.” Not only is the quick and unexamined use of the term “dude” a heartless contradiction of another’s statements and presentation, and thereby a direct insult (implying that a biological male is up to mischief and is wilfully, inappropriately and stupidly generating a farce and controversy), but it also implies a pathological form of lying and encodes for a readership (and this is a heavy responsibility: writing for the consumption of many) the negative sensibility of witnessing a sick delusion bordering on a psychiatric condition. This use of an insulting term carelessly oversimplifies and mocks real transgender issues, which are genuine environmental and biological issues. Endocrine disruptor chemicals interfere with the hormonal integrity and development of the growing embryo, so A BIOLOGICAL MALE CHILD CAN BE BORN WITH A FEMALE MIND (http://wp.me/p2DVqC-87). A female body can host a male mind. The latest research proves this occurs. See: http://www.gendercentre.org.au/resources/polare-archive/archived-articles/pesticides-cause-gender-change.htm.

This is, therefore, a mark against a not-so-developed and advanced world where toxic technology is assertively promoted and casually accepted and worshiped. Where pollution tends to be ignored or thoroughly hidden via the pervasive and pestilent leveraged interests (corruption) of industry. INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION, food technologies (linings inside cans, plastic packaging, preservatives and other additives), fabric treatments, synthetic clothing, toxic (flouro) lighting, synthetic makeup, lotions, sunscreens, deodorants and perfumes, vaccines, illicit drugs and toxic medications, EMF/RF pollution, fracking leachate and air pollution…  This great mass of interferences in human bio development cause most trans problems (with severe psyche trauma for the pregnant mother contributing as well and overlapping into causations regarding homosexuality in male offspring).

Now these developmental problems (for those tragically born into this most intense and inescapable trauma most of us cis-gender individuals cannot imagine) are THEN compounded by a largely hetero society that ignores the industrial reality of this pervasive chemicalization of all our inventing, living and doing.   The universal contamination of this entire Planet (not an achievement to be proud of) is all too easily ignored IN TERMS OF THIS GENDER ISSUE.  We, on the side of a world destroying industrial complex, glibly mock the transgendered without studying the science behind the causes.  Critical looks, name-calling, jokes, internet abuse, physical abuse, BLAME, and then even murder (such as the current genocide against trans in Brazil) result from the shallowest addressing of a biological tragedy brought on by a worshiped industry and its contaminants.  Often, this kind of abuse can be filtered through a religious form of devastating presumption, which can be brutally demeaning and even imprudently fascist in its ultimate derivation and dispensation. Give that kind of totalitarian judgement broad political and military power and you will characteristically see pogroms and other sociological nightmares (Holocausts and Inquisitions) rise up.

We should not contribute to a broad and stupid blame game that puts trans teens under so much cumulative pressure that THEY COMMIT SUICIDE!  See again: https://www.susans.org/2015/04/11/fallbrook-california-transgender-teen-dead-in-apparent-suicide/#comment-940 and https://www.susans.org/2015/05/08/teen-commits-suicide-days-coming-transgender/.  How you LOOK at a trans person, your WORDS, INSULTING GENERALIZATIONS, JOKES, SLURS (“she’s a dude!”), NEGATIVE/ATTACKING INTERNET COMMENTS, BLAME RHETORIC, IMPLICATION OF SITUATED INTRINSIC EVIL (what, in a 6 year old trans child insisting they are mentally different to their assigned/biological sex???) and actual PHYSICAL ABUSE all add to the potential of these poor victims of globalist toxic industry to choose SUICIDE to escape their tormenters.  Adding venom to others’ discrimination adds to the potential for OPPORTUNISTIC ATTACKS or worse, an organized pogrom, a pathetic attempt at generating a clinically fantasized form of “purity”.

This particular (Trans) gender issue just goes to show how well toxics manage to hide their actions and leverage maximum social friction and conflict (as if by design…).  If you presume that the repeated social presentation of Trans is, and can only be, representative of a total lie (somehow independently taken on by thousands of people worldwide who do not know each other, and who may be, in fact, only small children when they start consistently and persistently demanding a gender identity at odds with their biology) rather than A GENUINE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM DEMONSTRATING AN UNDERLYING CAUSATIVE TRUTH, then you will be contributing in a wholly destructive manner to the trauma experienced by those being called liars and delusional.  You will have assisted, especially, in the suicide demise of fragile young people trying to make sense out of their tragic immersion in the asynchronous incomprehensibility of their gender plight.

We must not dismiss a trans person bravely struggling with a monstrously awkward issue that we – perhaps as a person luckily assigned a normal, integrated being at birth – would truly not wish on our worst enemy! Imagine: as a small and growing child, and then a confused teen, not understanding why your mentality never comfortably meshed with the body you were born into and the sexual framework you were then expected by parents and society to agree with and engage in all areas of life. Imagine, then discovering that you were, for example, actually a GIRL inside the body of a BOY. What an epiphany that would be! A lifetime’s childhood engulfment inside ABSOLUTE CONFUSION, IRRITATION AND STRESS translated suddenly into SENSE.

Causations in this muddy world of paradigmatic level lies are WELL HIDDEN, so we – as a largely floundering society of ignorant mortals crying out for real sense – can barely ever agree across the board on any subject. We hardly ever manage to find, define and address real cause and effect, and this leaves our desperate attempts to highlight and codify truth as an unfortunate stage and rage of maximum confusion, reactivity and conflict on a global scale.



The following note refers specifically to a statement in the article: NO, GOD ISN’T TRANSGENDER, TIMES OP-ED PIECE IS HISTORICAL REVISIONISM AT ITS WORST, by Robert A. J. Gagnon (https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2016/08/no-god-isnt-transgender).

The important foundational statement in the above article: ““transgender”—which refers to a person’s abandoning his or her birth sex for a self-constructed and distorted self-image”, is completely wrong.

Transgender is a genuine medical and biological problem caused by endocrine (hormone) disruptor chemicals from pesticides, food additives and the like interfering with the normally integrated (synchronous) assignment of brain and body gender in the developing embryo. As such, a critical “asynchronicity” has developed where the biological body does not match the brain gender of the unfortunate individual. In more and more studies now, trans-gender children clearly and consistently demonstrate (without coaching) the clarity and truth of their gender asynchronicity by demanding that they be accepted as identifying with a brain/mind core gender that does not match their physical, biological gender. These kids are not lying, because they have no agenda. They are innocent, and they are simply telling the truth. See: https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/2016/06/07/transgender-gender-asynchronicity-what-causes-it/

It is industrial pollution, or technological pollution, that causes the bulk of transgender.

What the fight against trans reveals, however, just like the perennial fight of the hyped-up righteous religious against homosexuality (which, when caused by massive pre-birth psyche trauma in the mother is yet another example of an individual genuinely being “born that way”), is a very subtle and powerfully convincing obsession with deep conflict and the maintaining of a permanent rage against the perceived universal enemy, sex (the maintenance of a vast lie).  For these highly combative individuals there must always be someone else they are identifying as one of humanity’s intrinsic SPIRITUAL enemies, a type of deviant who is definitely going to hell [2] (this numbering will be explained below).

One could validly assert that powerfully incorporated and instituted lies, in terms of the truly dark and evil potential of this beleaguered world, represent the most important dark prime directive on this planet [1].  And this corporate lying (based in an insatiable and permanent greed for control, money and power) is especially relevant today with the almost nuclear expansion of the realization that everything we’ve been taught (by the world’s ruling families and, hence, their sponsored industries, governments and educational infrastructures) is wrong.  The Bosnian and Antarctic pyramids and a host of other discoveries (free energy, natural cures for diseases, etc.) show us now that all of our historical, physics, electromagnetic, biological and medical orthodoxies are grossly in error, deficient.

The Great Pathological Lie Of The Ages – that there is something intrinsically wrong with sex – is a broad sexual avenue of thorns that hooks many people into a permanent war against (always) “other” groups of people with horrible sexual issues.

The Great Pathological Lie Of The Ages
is that there is something intrinsically
wrong with sex, and this broad avenue
of thorns hooks many people into a
permanent war against (always) “other”
very naughty people with sexual issues

In this perverse spiritual dynamic souped up to maximize conflict, the enemies of righteousness become your own people: your brother, your sister, uncle, and anyone that appears to confirm that we are in the disgustingly distorted End Times.  Sexuality and gender are typically used and abused by all who participate in the immortally persistent shaming and defaming of sex (the greatest gift of God to humanity) on all levels [3], to doggedly confirm the existence of a great well and prime signature of pre Return perversion.  With this strategy duplicated each generation, you could characterize the demonic realm as sitting back and laughing at all the “good” humans righteously rampaging on their behalf, gasping and suspecting all the “other” (again) filthy humans “over there” in Perversion Land of being notoriously evil and recalcitrant sex perverts gathering their forces to defile as many people as possible before the Return of Christ.

So, what I am suggesting above is that there exists at least 3 major “Prime Directives” of the demonic realm:
[1] Permanent Support of a Global, Institutionalized Umbrella of Lies
[2] Permanent Conflict and Accusation
[3] Permanent War against Sex

All the above-noted cacaphony of biting represents a sexualized, demonizing and conflictual negative spiritual orthodoxy that no-one with any reasonable depth of intelligence should believe from the perspectives of:
1. a conflict dynamic that challenges and makes a lie out of – by virtue of the obscene levels of religious venom generated – the very core teaching of God’s unassailable compassion and Love;
2. especially in terms of Trans, our now more advanced understanding of Environmental Health and the impact of pollution on embryos.


What I have noticed lately online is that the ingrained, conflictual, obsessive compulsive, let’s-burn-them-all-at-the-stake, negatively discriminatory opinions of the religious in terms of sexual subject matter (the droning historical defamation against sex) will not accept information and understanding.  There you find the real recalcitrance of a blind form of presumption, a personally institutionalized WRONG “knowing” that is properly identified as, in fact, sheer ignorance, a raft of adversarial ideas blindly accepted, and a personal sexual belief system of unbridled BLAME never really questioned.  This speaks of a lack of spiritual meta systemic self analyses: thinking about our thinking that is negatively spiritually influenced by the power of living (though deathly), unexamined orthodoxies of perception and interpretation.

Outwardly, this self righteous discrimination is more visible as an automatic claiming of some kind of moral high ground via a “spiritual/moral” form of hyper vigilance: a puritanical form of religiosity and certainty of knowing/feeling/indignation; a personal expectation that sexy enemies are surely always just around the corner, and simmering in their own juices as they wantonly assist in attacking and eroding civilization. This overall problem of presumption describes a lack of awareness of the corporatization and mode of truly evil evil.  It describes a blanket choice made in favor of particular, distorted and delusional issues rather than a framing and core appreciation of the broad and powerful base of God’s Love and our altruistic potential.

The Trans phenomenon, via the
agency of the Internet, represents

The growing Transgender phenomenon should never be automatically and shallowly interpreted as confirming evidence of a prophetically expected, gender dysphoric explosion of sexualized perversion in the End Times, a volcanic and prophetic upwelling of filthy sexual lava that threatens our schools, restrooms, personal sexuality and crotches, and our delicate religious sensibilities. The Trans phenomenon is, in fact, via the agency of the Internet, representative of THE RELEASE OF A BURIED PROBLEM, and should be heartily welcomed!

Apart from the inevitable historical appearances of gender dysphoria in an always distorted world, there has been a massive time lag between the spread of endocrine disruptor chemical pollution in this modern chemicalized age and its gradual, insidious insertion into our (and the animal kingdom’s) metabolic frames of reference, or critical lines of developmental communication, TO THRESHOLD LEVELS OF EFFECT.

This world has been too dumb and industry has kept toxicities too well concealed, for us to collectively understand the planetary environmental health implications of what many have assumed was solely a psychiatric problem and a marker of civilization decline and prophecy.  We have remained uneducated, unsophisticated, and reactively abusive, particularly in terms of religion and the Trans issue, hence why so many Trans people have felt the need, in terms of family tolerance and personal safety, to remain hidden away for so long.  For shame!  All those who revel in their luxurious cis-gender normalcy (who have minds that match their biological designation) should wake up to the real world of chemical toxicities and appreciate the entire concept of Environmental & Human Health, and embryonic sexual development.

The dark, corporatized and militarized perversion of Science, overt and covert Government totalitarianism, Law Enforcement out of control, Medicine and Big Pharma bias and profits, Food Processing additives, Drugs, Mining, and especially Agricultural Practices (e.g. toxic pesticides and GMO) possess infinitely greater potential for sickness, disease and Extinction Level Event planetary destruction than any psychological, sex related subject of supposed End Times moral doom!  The Transgender issue inside and outside of religion has been wholly inaccurately interpreted, co-opted and “zombie-fied”, and would be infinitely more accurately understood as a challenge to uneducated cis-gender people’s awareness of Environmental Health, and their personal genuine internalization of concepts of true, compassionate love.

Transgender is not a perverted
signature of degeneracy on a global
religious moral compass and End
Of The World timeline

Transgender is not a psychiatric issue, excepting where the uneducated, conflict-addicted, irrational, dumb and vicious abusers of all subjects sexual or gender oriented convince, for tragic example, a young Trans person that they are so distorted, worthless and evil that they should kill themselves (a typical, brutal and maniacal Facebook rant).

Transgender is not a perverted signature of degeneracy on a global religious moral compass and End Of The World timeline.  Transgender is not a planet or morals destroyer.

Transgender is an industrial issue (we are so dumb with our science we poison everything including gender assignment in the womb).

Transgender is a technological issue, a chemical pollution issue, a biological issue, an hormonal issue, a human/embryonic developmental issue, a medical issue.

Transgender is neither a moral nor a Court issue.

And, like everything else human, Transgender is immersed inside difficult social issues that often lead people into incorrect interpretations.  Transgender is ultimately, in the end analysis, a supreme test of Intellect, Character and Love for everyone.  We are all in school.  Do our grades show we dumbly favor a permanent war against innocents brutalized by chemicals in utero?

A contributor to another Gagnon (2015) essay’s Comments section (https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/10/how-should-christians-respond-to-the-transgender-phenomenon) stated the following: “My argument though for the church is that we do need to be loving, we do need to call sin, sin… God is going to judge the selfish man in the same way he will judge the gender dysmorphic…”.  Also: “It is not our job to judge these people and tell them they are condemned…”

My response to the above was:


BTW, we are already in hell last time I checked…

Also, you said: “God is going to judge the selfish man in the same way he will judge the gender dysmorphic”.  Note you said (for emphasis): “he will judge the gender dysmorphic”. You sound pretty certain of that.

And THEN you said: “It is not our job to judge these people and tell them they are condemned”.

“…AND TELL THEM THEY ARE CONDEMNED”??  YOU’VE JUST TOLD THEM!!  Way to go “NOT” judging Trans people!  You are capable only of very thinly veiling your UTTER HATRED of Trans people and the sins you imagine they’re all getting up to…

My larger response was (with additional material added for this Essay):

What sin?!!  Who is sinning when they are born with a mind that does not match their body?  The true “sin” belongs with the industries that have generated the Endocrine Disruptor chemicals that have caused the in utero hormonal shift leading to gender dysphoria.  The true “sin” lies where Monsanto and the like have created Agent Orange, PCBs, Glyphosate (often called “Satan’s Molecule”), and GMO pollution: THAT is true, greedy, anti-environmental, anti-public health, anti-Planetary health “sin”, indeed a kind of global treason against the entire Planet and all who live on it.

However, I think what you might be calling “sin” is the superficial appearance of homosexual attraction, and then the physical act of sexual intercourse that religious people typically get really, really obsessed with…  Here, for example, a Trans MTF (Male To Female) person who has not had their penis surgically removed might engage in anal intercourse because their core (true, fixed permanent, actual, mental, spiritual) FEMALE mind is heterosexually attracted to a cis-gender (“normal” biological) male.  So, in reality, the true mental and spiritual core of this religious dirty dynamic (as you see it) is, in fact, a heterosexual relationship, even though both participants have biologically male bodies and therefore, due to no fault of their own, can only engage in actual ANAL intercourse if intercourse is part of what they wish to share with each other (not all Trans relationships have overt sex as a feature).

So, there’s the “rub” (pardon the naughty pun…).  Will you obsess over the material DETAIL of anal intercourse (which, BTW, a great many heteros absolutely love) to the exclusion of what is the actual central, loving, mental dynamic occurring between the two people?  Will you play a very nasty take on “God” and:
1. REVILE these people, or
2. DEMAND they split up, or
3. DEMAND psyche counseling for either or both, or
4. DEMAND incarceration in a psyche ward and the forced administration of psychoactive medication or chemical castration or electroshock ‘therapy’?

Will YOU as the critic become the true psychiatric case in this overall equation of morally policing, identifying and disinfecting supposed perversion?

How will you get the power yourself, or support that ‘cleansing’ power being given to… WHOM? To what authority? And will that authority be benevolent, or totalitarian and scarifying? How will they know when to stop ‘cleaning’ the perversion?! Recapping: how will you ensure that all the so-called Trans perversion can be authoritatively cleaned up… so that you can be happy and unthreatened on Planet Not-Your-Cup-Of-Tea? Do YOU really want to step into the breach and add your clinical, warped, OCD distaste and, indeed fascism, critically interfering brutally with the kindergarten “school” framework we are part of? Are you really THAT intelligent and masterful?

If you are going to IGNORE what I have shown as the true toxicological and developmental realities of the global, industrial, Environmental Health Trans situation – that their plight is not of their making, that they’re INNOCENT, and that they have an intrinsic RIGHT to be who they think they are and be in relationships – then you can only be to one degree or another, at worst aggressive (deludedly fascist), and at least monumentally insulting (like refusing to call the Trans person what they wish to be addressed as). You will then heartlessly be adding to the daily torments of repudiation and abuse Trans people have to endure. Your comment, or frown, or noticeable negative attitude “on that day” may be the straw that breaks the camel’s back ON THAT DAY in that poor tortured soul’s life. Suicide.

And you would call yourself good and religious, when you have expressed such self confident, overweening levels of sheer, unbridled ignorance about this Trans issue? Do you not know that the Love of God comes before ALL else? Even before your presumptuous and self righteous co-opting of God, and declaring (for Him) His unwavering support for your tiny and nasty human perspectives and causes. Even before your most horrendously erroneous judgement that seeks to somehow technically “fix” or punish (preempting God) the naughty, perverse, sexy, Trans “problem”…





On https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2015/11/understanding-gender-dysphoria-a-reply-to-gagnon#comment-2849886618, a reply was made (to a comment I had previously posted) thus:

“To prevent “suicidal ideation” we promote silly lies.  Sounds like a great plan for humanity’s future.  The Truth sets us free, not lies.  “But the truth hurts too much!  It makes me want to die!”  Guess what?  We all suffer from that.”

My reply (with additional material) to the above was:

xxx, the truth is that toxic hormone disrupting chemicals cause Transgender.  You seem to be missing that critically important point.  You seem to believe still that Transgender is a psychiatric issue, and that I am promoting the concealment of a vast psychiatric problem through “silly lies” that hide the truth, and which then cause reality problems with Trans.

First, if you are happy to not be, in the first order of things, mercifully compassionate toward their situation instead of demonstrating a blockish confrontation and recalcitrance that essentially tells the toxicological gender victim that you don’t care if they are suffering, then you must have some measure of personal confidence in your unassailable stance.

However, I would suggest that this level of humility would be advantageous: “I don’t know a lot about toxicology and embryonic development, so I will study this hormone disruptor side of the pro argument in favor of Trans before I unleash any further condemnation toward Trans.”

Secondly, you must also be confident in being thus recalcitrant, or obliquely dismissive, or even somewhat harsh and uncompassionate toward Trans.  In other words, you must know something of an authoritative nature or a  determined Biblical source that supports a necessary “MY demand for my truth [despite sociological research and toxicological/drug evidence to the contrary; see below] – and if necessary an abrasive repudiation of patient compassion – above all else” position.

At church, or at work, would you greet a Trans person the way they wish to be greeted?  No?  Some say they would not use a gender changed name or the gender pronouns that a Trans person would wish to be addressed as.  What a slap in the face that would be!

In that case you would be achieving less than a Walmart greeter.

Is your church entrance or workplace going to become a nasty place where Trans are weeded out and treated with contempt?  Exclusion creates anathematized minority groups that can be singled out for “distinctive” or “special attention”…

Sexually, or gender-phobic, or religiously-framed and justified violence is on the same vicious human nature spectrum as religious presumption, religious disdain, religious intolerance, and incorporated/organized (even textually institutionalized) religious hatred, condemnation, and beheadings.

And all this represents a “straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel” dynamic.  It involves the extreme end of that spectrum, the end that leads to the religiously attractive and convincing seeking of that vast and righteous, quickly sliding (like a sudden landslide) abomination: the technical, clinical “fix” (the supposed small “perfection” of the strained gnat through human effort), but which abruptly slides into a Final Solution for the supposed problem.  There is not much distance (in terms of the speed at which inflammatory issues can evolve) between the repudiation of undesirable Trans persons and a genocidal pogrom.  Politically and religiously, especially today in the face of fast-paced false flag events, BLAME can be easily applied to any minority group through intense and repetitive argument and edict.

One of the worst and least appreciated negatives of not compassionately addressing Trans, or banning Trans, or beating up Trans, or murdering Trans (as in Brazil), or burning, shooting or beheading ANY defined or suspected “guilty” category of people, is that these actions are slate wipers of both human diversity and opportunities for people to commune and learn and grow in understanding.  While fear, revilement and separation reign supreme, connection, empathy, compassion and cooperation cannot ensue.

If you separate away from a people, or if you kill off a people, you will then culture, as a function of that blind separation, the grey homogeneity of a vastly lesser experience of life (less people = less reproduction = less personalities = less creativity = less learning) in that arena being addressed by the disaffection, detachment, or slayings.

The raw ground material (within this continuum of opportunity or deficit) for developing character in the living is in all those peoples (an infinitude of potential interactions, surprise and innovation) who are deemed difficult and undesirable.  The genocide of difficult issues thus reinforces the habituation of the blunt elimination of possible interactions, responses and learning as minds that should be ebulliently creative fall to the ease and trauma of the simplicity and brutality of the “fix”, the scouring actions leading to the silence and void coming out of the resulting incarcerations, or chemical castrating, or sidelining and minimizing, or tortures and deaths: the homogenous horror of mass deficits.  “Greyness” characterizes this kind of world as it has done so under any form of totalitarianism.

On a very side – but actually related – note, the demonic realm of immortal sameness is said to be “grey”, hence why conversation between vampires in movies and TV series often intersects the observation that short-lived human passion is so appealing to them.

Note: the “sociological research and toxicological/drug evidence to the contrary” noted above was the material I put in SECTION 1.0, at the beginning of this Essay.



My following comment (with additional material added) immediately below this paragraph is in reply to a forum contributor’s notes on the subjects of: “Kevin Jennings, GLSEN and Fistgate”.  This person’s comment was deleted (along with mine) apparently for being too long, though the highly personal nature of their comment may have contributed also. This person noted that he was a child prostitute in New York in the 60s.  He felt that the research I have used in this Essay to support my case for Transgender being a biological and not a moral or psychiatric issue is as bankrupt as the research that appeared from the 60s onward, research that – according to him – supported aspects of a highly perverse “men “liberating” boys sexually”” mentality.  He noted, with great concern, that boys can be brainwashed by repeated indoctrination, and that the “Kevin Jennings, GLSEN and Fistgate” issue was an horrific governmental and institutionalized extension of such doctrines that arose out of said bankrupt research.  He was therefore not a fan of research and appeared to be very emotionally biased in that regard.  My answer to his sad revelation is:

Yes, I agree that neuroplasticity can achieve amazing brain structure and function transformations (including spontaneous and slower forms of healing as many medicos will sometimes obliquely and reluctantly admit), even diabolically horrible permutations from distorted “education”.  And I’m sure that what you say is happening in American schools (I’m Australian, so don’t have your local background knowledge) must be, to one degree or another, occurring.  That’s because CONFLICT and confusion is a prime directive for genuinely real and resident dark forces on this miserable “possessed” world.  So, anything that causes life-long confusion, trauma and conflict will be promoted and given great power by those forces.  But the Transgender I’m aware of is not that which arises out of a brain that is “malleable and changeable not only by repetitive behavior, but by repetitive thoughts, which means that sexual behavior and sexual thoughts change the brain”.  The Trans I refer to throughout my statements is the Trans and dysphoria that appears spontaneously and honestly in affected children, and that which cannot be resolved, then, BY coercion or manipulation of any variety (as so often occurs when parents try to force a preferred gender identity in their highly resistant and assertive child).

“…anal intercourse is ALWAYS a sadomasochistic act…”  Your comment sounds a bit like a Universal law and I don’t believe many Trans (or cis-gender heteros for that matter) would necessarily agree with that given their passion and certainty for their gender asynchronicity (but I don’t have on-the-ground, intimate knowledge of this because I am neither a gay male, nor Trans).  I do feel that many hetero couples would be upset if you somehow made anal sex illegal (I jest), because the female anus can have a great many nerve endings around and in it making it possible for some ladies to orgasm via anal penetration.  Sex is what you make of it, and you do admit that anal sex can be very pleasurable.  I note here that the whole of a woman’s body is an erogenous zone, so no body part is off-limits for sexual pleasure.

Yes, I’m sure the entire notion of “men “liberating” boys sexually”” is ESPECIALLY utterly reprehensible to you, given your sad background.  Any kind of fraud against children and their innocence is abominable.  You have obviously been heavily traumatized, and perhaps it has left you with block reservations, limitations and broad, automatic and explosive presumptions (congrats, though, if you have been able to function effectively in this world; quite an achievement).  I sense a negative mental block is represented by your statement: “Now they are teaching boys in sex ed these ridiculous fairy tales that you are now telling me about transgendered when I haven’t yet recovered from the existential nausea that the phony scientists promoting gay sexual acts as a good impose on us, and are now being taught as a good to children in schools, violently putting those children at risk.”

Your trauma and your ongoing and difficult recovery (more power to you), though exceedingly regrettable, should not be permitted to cause – via the anvil of heavy emotional distress – a censure of future enlightening educational possibilities, such as good quality SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH THAT IS UNCOVERING A HIDDEN ISSUE DESPERATELY NEEDING COMPASSION.  What is being reformatted here by these amazing new research findings is that dumb form of erroneous presumption that all-too-often backgrounds and perpetuates popular opinion.

It may be that your background makes it impossible to accept that gender asynchronicity can happen.  You may be making a direct association between what you believe about homosexuality and what you presume regarding gender dysphoria issues, and such are the limitations of traumatized minds.  These kind of blocks tend to hem in our thinking (or, better, reacting) and obstruct us from unfettered, independent and innovative thought.  We are all very restricted in what we can endure, process, unlearn, and learn anew. And I still can’t fathom how you relate the traumas of the particular homosexual experiences that were forced upon you to Trans.  To me, the two are entirely different issues, unless I have particular and heavy limitations in my thinking in this area.

And, yes, literary agents and industry sponsored science will both tend to do their utmost to present a wholly distorted image of reality, as is the case on this, the “Planet of the Lies”.  That biased reality may generate sexual convenience for a powerful group.  That reality, that popular and institutionalized indoctrination, may make a lot of money, hence why anyone else generating an actual contrary truth (or even just facts) will likely either be defamed and lose their job, or even be assassinated (as occurs globally regarding natural disease cures and free energy inventions).  But not all scientists and literary agents are corrupt.  And bad science in the 60s etc. does not of itself generate an immutable law making all sexual and gender sociological studies beyond that time automatically flawed and corrupt.  When you have sociological studies allowing uncoerced children to assert their own honest minds, then you’re on to something very interesting.

I Googled “Kevin Jennings, GLSEN and Fistgate” as you suggested, and yes: disgusting. Corporatized evil. And I have found a copy of Jennie Livingston’s documentary, “Paris is Burning”, and look forward to watching it.


Human Nature rides on a continuum, or sits on a spectrum of behavioral potential.  The small things become much larger if the freedom and power to act on those small things are magnified.  So, if we demonstrate fine character in small things, then we will likely demonstrate fine character if we are given greater responsibilities.

Conversely, if someone with an antagonistic attitude toward a group, only has the power to write (and perhaps unfortunately influence [OR, put another way, give opportunity for those possessing similar poor character to reveal themselves, and be tested more overtly in their further development, or decline]), and in that small matter they demonstrate a continuing abusive attitude toward people, then you would NOT want to give that person any kind of absolute authority.

Character revealed in small matters (Luke 16:10 and 19:17; I Cor 6:2; Mat 25:23; Luke 12:48), if abusive, exposes an individual (and hopefully not a group) as the kind of person who inwardly wishes to possess (“possess” here being a very appropriate word, in terms of subtle and persuasive, yet inwardly raging, demonic influence), fashion and ventilate the vengeance reserved for God alone, now, in this age, which is not appropriate because none of us have the spiritual credentials for that level of judgement.


We are witnessing brutal attacks on the viability of this Planet on all levels.  This especially:

  1. via the monumentally vicious fascist dynamics of pollution through industrially imposed fracking on private lands (as an example of mining totalitarianism),
  2. via sickening (literally) GMO transgene and pesticide contamination of the global environment (as an example of agricultural mad “science” totalitarianism),
  3. via toxic chemical pollution which is threatening the intrinsic reproductive viability of mankind in toxicologically and metabolically distorting ways that cannot be remotely compared to the frequently raised point and observation of a general lack of reproduction via homosexuality,
  4. and via the global wireless pollution pandemic of EMF and RF contamination with the explosion of cell phone and satellite dish technologies (which cause the blood-brain barrier to leak), just to name a few threats.  These are monsters of threats to the whole of Mankind and the entire Planet.

And Transgender is NOT one of them.  Transgender is NOT and cannot ever be construed as a sexual perversion because a chemically distorted, catastrophic gender assignment accident from pollution or toxic medications resulting in a gender asynchronicity CAN ONLY CREATE INNOCENT VICTIMS.  Victims, not sexual monsters that need to be identified, blamed (for something, maybe everything?), harassed, and perhaps even put down.

When looking for blame, cumulative concerns over moral issues can be easily inflamed by the politico-religious desperation of times typically experienced inside collapsing civilizations, and this is exactly what we see today (and have witnessed throughout history). When globally powerful industries see a clash of civilizations just ahead, expect religion and monolithic government to combine. Before these much greater nightmares appear, and within our current much smaller – but no less virulent – demand today for some form of totalitarian religious technical fix to insubstantial perceived “sexual threats”, are located the metaphysical seeds that threaten the lives and liberty of LGBTIQ minorities, but NOT on a basis of Love.

Religion and politics can justify ANY variety and level of penalty for whatever kind of sin it believes is present, or whatever perceived threat can be fabricated.  Inquisitions and pogroms without a doubt are a potential end game for an obsession with control and a fixation on man-made sexual and gender “perfection” (strangely demanded in a grossly imperfect world, something that truly speaks of a “clinical fix delusion”).  But this kind of man-made and ungodly fantasy and wrangling can only be imagined and imposed (without any possibility of “success”) via the worst of brutalities.  And here we often fail to recognize that smaller worries over the world’s favorite shame and defame subject, “sex”, are a signature of two critically important contributing dynamics:

1. A small but convincing attitude of “doing God’s work” in condemning an assumed sexual perversion is on a continuum or spectrum of fascist disorders that become all the more pathological and dangerous the more people share the alarm and desperation of the times.

Note also that some people vicariously experience feelings of sexual arousal and, all-too-often and infinitely worse, fleeting but eruptive notions of addictive superiority with the generation of a herd-approved form of “righteous” (guiltless, virtuous, worthy) condemnatory zeal. A powerful emotional “flush” or surge of delight and assumed power can signify this psychosomatic response. This addictive arousal and inflationary notion of moral high ground, elitism, superiority and zealousness is ultimately a distorted intellectual, emotional and physiological reaction that becomes, after the experience, insubstantial and hollow, hence why the “fix” of further condemnation opportunities will be persistently sought after. That kind of zeal is incorrectly attributed to the working of God and should serve as a warning to the flushed religious elites that they are being misled by empty feelings.

2. Being thus misled (as humanity as a whole has been misled for thousands of years as it has dumbly “ascended” into authoring – via the crucible of industry – a full on planet-destroying Extinction Level Event) resonates as a signature of an immortal form of persuasive evil that has stalked human nature from the beginning. What the most honest research shows is that we humans started off smart, and then gradually imploded. As Orsen Wells once said: “I started at the top, and worked my way down”. This kind of creeping spiritual degeneracy is apparent when logic, good sense, understanding corporate human nature, compassion and Love all go out the window, forcing – literally – spiritual reason and spiritual viability to have to defend themselves, WHICH THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO DO in a so-called enlightened “Christian” setting. “The greatest of these is love” (I Cor. 13:13). The fact that this Biblical logic of Love is rejected so easily and comprehensively via the vehicle of self-assured volcanic presumption and a concomitant complete lack of toxicological and developmental understanding, and an almost pathological, obstinate unwillingness to recognize this amazing new knowledge (a resistance to good research), shows clearly that something beyond basic, internal human weakness is prevailing over us all, a venom of cruel metaphysical intentions reaching levels, at the close of this industrially, politically and religiously degenerate global civilization, of profound ferocity.


Note: https://www.susans.org/2016/03/09/indonesian-lgbtq-community-living-fear/; 9 March 2016 (Hoogeweij 2016b).

There are invisible forces propelling nations that are culturally inclined towards internal pogroms. This intra-conflict deflects criticism and generates approval. The Holocaust generated its general theory “criminals”, and then Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and the mentally and physically impaired suffered mightily from their label.

The LGBTIQ community are all-too-often made the scapegoats for perceived pressures.  Would that the LGBTIQ-oriented children of all anti LGBTIQ government and religious officials combined their respective voices and called for compassion rather than irrational, inflationary angst, blame, shame, opposition and repression. Would that this kind of universal statement suddenly and comprehensively shocked the drama-fascists in government and religion into a state of reality and, at the very least, a fair and compassionate, realistic and RATIONAL recognition of gender identity and sexuality issues.

When we start assertively talking about God condemning this or that we are always thus situated on a slippery slope.  I believe vengeance and condemnation are truly God’s (because we simply can not handle either competently), and I sincerely hope I will never knowingly participate in the hyper-vigilant rhetoric of the “gentle” slopes leading self-righteously down toward condoning spiritual life-threatening  accusations of spiritual culpability, or worse, genocide.  There’s not much difference between agreeing with others on the condemnation of what we perceive to be a sexual perversion (and Transgender is anything but) deserving of hell fire and demanding the beheading of a heretic.  These fanatical herd mentalities are both on the same spectrum.


Abrams, Michael 2007 [Online], “The Real Story on Gay Genes, Homing in on the science of homosexuality – and sexuality itself”; Tuesday, June 05, 2007; Source: http://discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/born-gay; accessed: 5 June 2016.

Chase 2016 [Online], “Flat-Earth Transphobia”; Source: https://www.susans.org/2016/06/01/flat-earth-transphobia/; JUNE 1ST, 2016; accessed: 2 June 2016.

Dörner, G., & Schenk, B., et al. 1983, “Stressful events in prenatal life of bi- and homosexual men”; Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology 81(83-87).

Gagnon, Robert A. J. 2015 [Online], “HOW SHOULD CHRISTIANS RESPOND TO THE TRANSGENDER PHENOMENON?”, FIRST THINGS, 16 October 2015; Source: https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/10/how-should-christians-respond-to-the-transgender-phenomenon; accessed: 17 August 2016.

Gagnon, Robert A. J. 2016 [Online], “NO, GOD ISN’T TRANSGENDER, TIMES OP-ED PIECE IS HISTORICAL REVISIONISM AT ITS WORST”, FIRST THINGS, 15 August 2016; Source: https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2016/08/no-god-isnt-transgender; accessed: 17 August 2016.

gendermom 2013 [Online], “My Penis Girl” / June 27, 2013; Source: https://gendermom.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/my-penis-girl/?replytocom=1785#respond; accessed: May 2016.

Hines, Melissa 2011 [Online], “Prenatal endocrine influences on sexual orientation and on sexually differentiated childhood behavior”; Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011 Apr; 32(2): 170–182; Published online 2011 Feb 17; doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.006; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296090/; accessed: 5 June 2016.
[3] reference: Arnold AP, Gorski RA. Gonadal steroid induction of structural sex differences in the central nervous system. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 1984;7:413–442. [PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6370082)%5D
[97] reference: McCarthy MM, De Vries GJ, Forger NG. Sexual differentiation of the brain: mode, mechanisms, and meaning. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT, editors. Hormones, brain and behavior. Academic Press; San Diego: 2009. pp. 1707–1744.

Hoogeweij, Naomi 2016a [Online], “Transgender Kids Allowed To Live Openly ‘Have Good Mental Health’ “; FEBRUARY 29TH, 2016; Source: https://www.susans.org/2016/02/29/transgender-kids-allowed-to-live-openly-have-good-mental-health/; accessed: 7 June 2016.

Hoogeweij, Naomi 2016b [Online], “Indonesian LGBTQ community living in fear”; MARCH 9TH, 2016; Source: https://www.susans.org/2016/03/09/indonesian-lgbtq-community-living-fear/; accessed: 7 June 2016.

Matt 2015a [Online], “New Study Shows That Gender Variance in Youth Isn’t a Phase”; BY MATT ON MAY 12TH, 2015; Source: https://www.susans.org/2015/05/12/new-study-shows-gender-variance-youth-isnt-phase/; accessed: 7 June 2016.

Matt 2015b [Online], “Fallbrook California Transgender Teen dead in apparent suicide”; Source: https://www.susans.org/2015/04/11/fallbrook-california-transgender-teen-dead-in-apparent-suicide/#comment-940; accessed: 7 June 2016.

Matt 2015c [Online], “Teen Commits Suicide Days After Coming Out As Transgender”; Source: https://www.susans.org/2015/05/08/teen-commits-suicide-days-coming-transgender/; accessed: 7 June 2016.

McKee, Lyra 2016 [Online], “The Ceasefire Babies: Why did the suicide rate in Northern Ireland soar following the Good Friday Agreement?”; Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-ceasefire-babies-why-did-the-suicide-rate-in-northern-ireland-soar-following-the-good-friday-a6831046.html; Monday 25 January 2016; accessed: 5 June 2016.

Potter, [Dr.] Melody Milam 2017 [Online], “Are Toxic Chemicals Turning Boys Into Girls?”; GreenMedInfo; Tuesday, March 28th 2017; Source: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/are-toxic-chemicals-turning-boys-girls-0; accessed: Wed. 29th March 2017.

Stevens, Amanda 2008 [Online], “Prenatal Stress and Homosexuality”; November 11, 2008; Source: http://healthpsych.psy.vanderbilt.edu/2008/PrenatalStress.htm; accessed: 5 June 2016.

Yarhouse, Mark A. 2015 [Online], “UNDERSTANDING GENDER DYSPHORIA: A REPLY TO GAGNON”, FIRST THINGS, 5 November 2015; Source: https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2015/11/understanding-gender-dysphoria-a-reply-to-gagnon#comment-2849886618; accessed: 18 August 2016.

Murray Thompson
* Full-time studies in Traditional Chinese Medicine (Chinese Medical Theory, Chinese Herbs & Acupuncture): Brisbane College of Traditional Acupuncture 1981.
* Professional Artist (Photo-realism & Impressionism: Landscapes & Animals, Oils & Acrylics).
* Website Construction; Website Graphics; Proof Reading.
* Private/Public Study: Dr. Brian Liu (Dip. Acupuncture – Sydney): Acupuncture Massage & Muscle Testing 1986-1988.
* Certificate of Completion, Health Care Worker, Professional Business Colleges of Australia (PBCA) – Blacktown, Sydney 1993.
* Advanced Certificate Farm Technology (Highest Pass for Plant Production Subjects) 1994, Richmond College of TAFE.
* BAppSci Environmental Health 1998 (Top of Degree; Award: Best Overall Graduating Student by Australian Institute of Environmental Health, NSW Division) / Hons I Social Ecology 1999
* Ex Sociology PhD Student (University of Western Sydney PhD Scholarship; PhD studies for 12 years; Thesis all but finished: University failure to enable Big Pharma/Ag-critical Thesis examination), University of Western Sydney).
* Current Research – 1. Environmental Health: Pesticide/Chemical Applications, Movement & Residues; Endocrine Disruptors, Trauma & Gender Dysphoria (e.g. Transgender); GMOs/Endotoxins; EMF/RF; Scalar/Radionics/Geopathic Dynamics (Energy [Plant/Human] Medicine); 2. Japanese/Asian Sociology: Trans or “Newhalf” Sexual Culture.




Research Consensus On Pesticide, Endotoxin & Transgene Mobility, Exposures & Toxicity, Environmental Insults, Pandemic Ramifications (Extinction Potential) & Our Dying Civilization. Briefly: The Right Type of Farming & Innovative Non Or Low-Toxic Herbicide Alternatives For Plantations & Crops As A Small, Pleading Signature of Good Sense & Potential.

By Murray Thompson (Bachelor of Applied Science Environmental Health 1998 [Top of Degree Award, Australian Institute of Environmental Health, New South Wales Division]; First Class Honours Social Ecology 1999; Ex-University of Western Sydney PhD Scholarship Sociology Postgraduate Student)

WEBSITES: http://poisonedpeople.com; http://poisoningandlegalaction.com; https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/; http://murraythompsongraphics.x90x.net/ This Essay will be periodically updated (comments for improvements welcome).

PLEASE NOTE:  I cannot get WordPress to paste an explicit copy of my text file.  WordPress first off leaves out the major formatting of indented quoted material (which I can repair) and absolutely will not save heading position corrections properly.

ESSAY URL: https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/chemical-gmo-apocalypse-industrial-bad-science-corruption-fascism-pesticide-chemical-gmo-transgene-pollen-endotoxin-pollution-human-health-behavior-meta-implications SHORTLINK URL: http://wp.me/p2DVqC-50

Updated:  1 August 2014.


“More people have died because of chemicals than during

World War II” (Ollivry 2013).


Pesticides, like nuclear radiation, represent Extinction Level Event (ELE) material toxins and anti-life dynamics at work.  As scientists, industries and whole consumerist cultures, we have oddly chosen mass morbidity and death on so many levels while still professing an opposite desire to somehow evolve into something better.  In a swarming corporate rush to grab power and profit we have side-stepped genuinely sustainable, green and life-giving productive means of development in favor of that which can only make us sick and sicker.  So, how DUMB are we?  How BLIND are we?  The answer lies in how SCIENTIFIC we are…

Human development is not a straight-line, nor is it simplistic. There exists a hidden confusion of inherent contradiction inside this great story of a so-called ascendant sentient species. And just when we thought we had conquered everything after the Renaissance, we strangely — and at this late stage in our advance (or decline) — chose an ultimate and certain annihilation over life-giving enlightenment. Missed it by much more than “that much”.

And, even though this Essay represents a largely physical study of Life and Anti-Life on Planet Earth, we can discern, when expanding our vision out much further beyond our tiny individual lives, that a great metaphysical Death Wish (something well beyond mere temporal human thought) is leveraging frightening unknowns in the lives of all peoples. Hence, the toxins, exposures, sickness and corporate intrigues we constantly study and comment on to the point of tedium.

We must wonder if we are all propelled by irresistible immortal forces to poison ourselves out of existence with nuclear radiation, pesticides, pollution, flouride and GMOs! These exotic substances are attacking the viability of Life On Earth, or reproduction. Rapidly advancing global toxicological signatures clearly show there exists the consistent certainty that immediate and long-term environmental and human health markers are now being diminished across-the-board at an accelerating rate. After-the-fact research cannot keep up with the features of destruction that these immensely toxic chemicals leave in their wake.

We have lost control of our thinking and our technologies. Pesticides (generally speaking, but a little more pertinent to this study: herbicides), migrate to poison the natural environment (especially soils), finding us and poisoning our reproductive and other potentials wherever we are. Hence, the emphasis in this report is on the modern, enhanced potential for famine, pandemic and extinction dynamics. So pervasive is this technological stress, that the revealed extensive damage to our Planet’s biosphere demands that we innovate entirely outside industry sentiment and influence, and comprehensively reconstruct the pesticide paradigm (if not all human technological fix conceptualization), using, as a weak base standard at the very, very least, the Precautionary Principle.

Glyphosate, and GMO crops and plantation trees and their associated extensive problems are particularly examined in this study using research that indicates a measure of just the tip of the iceberg in terms of these “Dimensional Rift” kinds of toxic insults on Planetary health. Natural herbicide alternative treatments are briefly addressed.


The main (subjective & immediately ‘appealing’) features and errors in the broad (yet shallow) justification for extensive pesticide (including herbicide) use appear to be:

1. Cosmetic appeal (dead or absent weeds) and the diminishment of weed growth and damage (e.g. along sealed roadsides), even if the weeds tend to hold the soil together.

2. Pest ‘health’ concepts and seeming logically reasoned imperatives. The problem here however is that these notions are usually internally flawed because they derive from short-term, symptomatic and technological fix worldviews and responses to multiple other flawed human systems working in concert against human health. Here we witness the broad replacement of a genuinely functional Nature in cities and in agricultural regions, and the loading of these environments with exotic chemicals. These toxic impositions favor ecological dynamics that are well and truly out of balance and distorted with multiple, intertwining chemical and energic insults simultaneously impacting on so many levels and layers of life systems that all we usually end up doing is jumping from one dumb technical quick fix reaction to a stress symptom to another reaction (like experimenting on a patient with medications). There is no real and integrated core sense of order or restitution derived from this materialistic, “one-dimensional”, and mechanistic linear thinking style.

3. Assumed crop growth benefits, but without reference to fully informed, ecologically sustainable and critical long-term soil and environmental health imperatives. Here, institutionalized economic, industrial growth, and impatient profit and control worldviews have unfortunately classically worked against planetary health in favor of (again) short-term profitability notions that ignore:

a/ long-term TOXIC outcomes and

b/ longer-term EXTINCTION TRENDS (the latter is automatically seeded by the former). Critically, spray protocols reference outdated regulatory regimes that are toxicologically and ecologically dumb and inept, and which lead to criminal impositions on human health.



Simplistically, second generation synthetic pesticides’ (Muir 2012) increasing dominance in the world, and the easy spray regimes and protocols that facilitated their ready commercial/public access and use, essentially formed out of the following very general dynamics (not in any particular order):

a/ Our almost uncensored trust in science’s “invisible helpers” (chemicals) on the back of the Renaissance and then the mechanical marvels of the Industrial Revolution (we were a bit innocent and infatuated with ourselves and our inventive capabilities).

b/ Cheaper food (from initial gains made through pesticide use), the availability of apparently effective and inexpensive synthetic pesticides (especially DDT), a lack of documented injuries or deaths, an initial reduction in insect-borne diseases, and apparent safety in contrast to earlier uses of arsenic (Unsworth 2010) were all persuasive arguments in favor of the continuing development and use of pesticides.

c/ The prospect of massive industry profits through quickly applied and quick kill (convenient) chemical ‘fixes’.

d/ Then… came industry’s (and their growing armies of beholden science and political hordes’) avoidance of what they increasingly suspected or overtly knew about chemical toxicities, whereupon developed the necessary “Don’t Mention The War” corporate mentality that officially recognized only the deceptive embrace of rosey chemical potentials re-worked or fabricated as spin, often seen as blatant lies in advertising and MSDS’s. Note:

…industry regulators in Europe have known for years that glyphosate, originally introduced by American agricultural biotechnology giant Monsanto in 1976, causes birth defects in the embryos of laboratory animals…

Even so, the commission’s health and consumer division published a final review report of glyphosate in 2002 that approved its use in Europe for the next 10 years…

…Earth Open Source said that government approval of the ubiquitous herbicide has been rash and problematic.

“Our examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the current approval of glyphosate and Roundup is deeply flawed and unreliable,” wrote the report’s authors. “What is more, we have learned from experts familiar with pesticide assessments and approvals that the case of glyphosate is not unusual” (Graves 2011).


“We can’t figure out how regulators could have come to the conclusions that they did [regarding the safety of glyphosate] if they were taking a balanced look at the science, even the science that was done by the chemical industry itself” (Graves 2011, quoting John Fagan, doctor of molecular and cell biology and biochemistry, and one of the founders of Earth Open Source).

e/ Our general and uninformed demands as spoilt consumers for technical/chemical wonders and symptom fixes, and the inherent toxic backgrounds to these synthesized wonders that we (the people) weren’t necessarily aware of.

For example:

• lead in paint;

• PCB’s;

• DDT;

• Agent Orange;

• Thalalidomide;

• Sulfanilamide;

• 2,4-D;

• flouride (see: http://dianabuckland.webs.com/);

• mercury fillings

• Stilnox/Ambien/Zolpidem, Warfarin, Heparin/Lovenox, Pradaxa, Plavix, Paracetamol, Phenazepam (Edlund 2011);

• Propoxyphene/Darvon, Meperidine/Demerol, Guaifenesin/Dilaudid with Hydromorphone, Oxycodone/OxyContin, Tylenol with Codeine, Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen/Vicodin/Norco (Stoppler 2014);

• NSAIDs or Advil/Aleve/Ibuprofen/Naproxen, Cox-2 Inhibitors or Celebrex/Celecoxib (Collins 2011);

• Vioxx, etc.

See “NIOSH List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings 2012” at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-150/pdfs/2012-150.pdf. See also the huge listing of medications associated with heart attack at: http://medsfacts.com/reaccover.php?pt=ACUTE%20MYOCARDIAL%20INFARCTION.

However, we should have cautiously and intelligently realized a long time ago, as we began pumping millions of pounds of pesticides into the environment, that the toxics that didn’t obediently stay put at the application site went somewhere (migrated), and did something (poisoned other things), and often persisted and then bioconcentrated (built up in an organism’s tissues), and biomagnified (amplified in concentration up the food chain) (Muir 2012), and even became something else (changed into even more toxic “metabolites”). Since we ultimately sprayed pesticides onto the ground, at the very least we should have suspected that: “Pesticides and fertilizers applied to lawns and crops can accumulate and migrate to the water table” (Source: http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/groundwater-contaminants.html). We should have been much more protective and anticipatory regarding the health of our groundwater and our rivers.

I would suggest that a water table and its associated streams are in a state of constant interplay. Further, and dismissing for the moment the concept of chemical diffusion that sees toxins migrating uphill in plumes and even AGAINST water flows (see Endnote #1), the state of a river DOWNSTREAM from a herbicide spray application site must be considered in terms of applied (escaped) chemical affecting wildlife and aquatic life, including platypus (in Australia) and fish stocks. Here, outdated or orthodox/traditional toxicological regulatory regimes tragically fail to anticipate new understanding and thereby continue to allow pesticides to be used almost universally with few real (substantial) restrictions:

“Pesticides are having an effect at 10 to 100 times lower concentrations than traditionally thought,” says Kefford.

He says when authorities try to protect our streams and rivers from pesticides they rely on thresholds, under which it is assumed pesticides have no effect.

For example, the European Union recommends the use of a commonly-used safety factor of 100.

This means if a negative effect on an aquatic organism is only seen at a particular concentration of pesticide, then a safe level of that pesticide is regarded as being one hundredth of this concentration.

But, says Kefford, the latest evidence suggests that this safety factor is too small (Salleh 2012).


Rachel Carson in Silent Spring in 1963 warned us many years ago about the damaging and unimagined effects wrought by very low level original applications of poisonous chemical substances, such as DDT, entering the food chain. We now know that it is worse even than that. Even minute doses, that appear to be safe to humans, accumulate through prolonged usage to toxic levels, and worse, interact to cause epigenetic cancers and other pathologies. Government testing does not take these cumulative and epigenetic effects into account – and it should.10 (Bound, Biggs & Obendorf 2012).

The above understanding more than strongly suggests that a much larger and broader burden of sub-surface morbidity exists (at least initially as a silent epidemic of sub-clinical poisoning presentations) as a direct and evolved function of an infinite number of small, cumulative exposures to pesticides and other industrial toxins. As well, this much more informed comprehension and acceptance of the deadly reality of technological poisons demands that all pesticide use be severely reduced, if not completely eliminated, immediately and globally. Therefore, all spray regimes need to be thoroughly reevaluated and reconfigured in terms of the CERTAINTY of life-form poisoning and compromise by pesticide. Expanding: short-term spray drift and long-term vapour drift or volatilization, surface flow transport and groundwater/underground water contaminant transport, chemical diffusion and intrusion/trespass onto properties adjacent to spray sites (especially pesticide-chemical diffusion and environmental trespass into residential concrete slabs) should be recognized as a “given”. We didn’t know:

…in a large population with an increasing number of chemicals, there will come a point at which the least protected (biochemically) will be adversely affected while others are not. As the dosage increases, greater numbers will be affected, in ways no longer defined by the toxicity of the individual chemicals (Donohoe 2008).

In other words, there will be synergies amongst the chemical contaminants. The “adversely affected” have what is often called Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. It is worthwhile here to explain this condition in some detail:

Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) is an acquired condition in which the sufferer becomes sensitised or abnormally reactive to volatile chemicals following prolonged, recurrent or high dose exposure to volatile chemicals. The most distinctive symptom is “cacosmia”, or a heightened sensitivity and lowered threshold to odours that most of the population find inoffensive or would not notice.

Multiple chemical sensitivities is a condition that primarily affects the nervous system, particularly the brain, and most often has characteristic symptoms, including:

* decreased short term memory,

* poor concentration,

* weakness,

* fatigue,

* dizziness, and
* altered emotional states (emotional lability, often oscillating between anxiety and depression).

Recent published studies demonstrate alterations of SPECT brain scans, central evoked responses (especially visual and auditory), and altered autonomic nervous system function. The mechanisms of such damage remain unclear at present, but direct neurotoxicity is regarded as the most likely cause. There is no current evidence that the condition is reversible, and MCS appears to represent a form of subtle toxic brain damage with the potential for lifelong disability.

The sufferer’s history and clinical state should meet the criteria laid down by Cullen et al, that multiple chemical sensitivities is “… an acquired disorder characterised by recurrent symptoms, referable to multiple organ systems, occurring i[n] response to demonstrable exposure to many chemically unrelated compounds at doses far below those established in the general population to cause harmful effects. No single widely accepted test of physiologic function can be shown to correlate with the symptoms (Cullen M. R. The worker with multiple chemical sensitivities: An overview. Occup Med 1987;2: 655-661). (Donohoe, No date).

And: This and subsequent publications suggest that the critical defining features of multiple chemical sensitivities are that:

* it is an acquired disorder; * sufferers have recurring symptoms; * symptoms involve more than one organ system; * reactions and exacerbations are triggered by many chemically diverse substances; * reactions persist after separation of the person from the original causative agent(s); * reactions and exacerbations occur at very low dose of exposure. (ibid.)

These chemical mobility, exposure and injury truths further demand the heavy, indeed single-minded, promotion of any viable and non-toxic pesticide alternative technologies.

As well, this level of commitment would represent an informed level of innovation and a conscience-driven revolution that, of course, contradicts a mountain of institutionalized inertia, comfort and vested interests. It represents: “systemic changes needed to protect future generations” (Sutton 2009:8) and “…a paradigm shift in the field that integrates various disciplines involved in the study of environmental contamination…” (Crews & Gore 2011).


Pesticide mobility, exposures and injuries sit very uncomfortably with industry (although not as uncomfortably as with those, like me, who have been rendered permanently chemical sensitive. Industries don’t want to know about chemical toxicities or, better put, don’t want WE the public to know or care.


However, for the sake of knowledge (let alone justice) past spraying incidents need to be “dug up” (a bit like landmine reclamation…). Note the movie “Erin Brockovich”. Pesticide release and associated injury complications should be evaluated in terms of testing for spray residues and metabolites in any drinking water source. Some companies in Australia test water sources at the Australian Government Analytical Laboratories, but what standards do AGAL administer?

I wonder if, ideally, pesticide residues and possible metabolites should be at least partially identified/calibrated prior to water/soil sampling (with appropriate lab work in relation to local meteorological, plant, soil and geological conditions) so that soil and water analyses is more effective (knowing what to look for, as well as being flexible enough — given the test trials and implications — to be able to identify possible new or unanticipated pesticide-geological chemical combinations and metabolites).

It should be noted here that the Earth’s crust goes down a long way, and great ignorance exists as to geological and plant/animal/other lifeforms at these lower depths. Suffice to say that pesticide infiltration at these depths will not enhance any aspect of “Life Below Earth”, and that we have already lost much unrecoverable knowledge in terms of deep-life geological conditions by virtue of profoundly intrusive planetary pollution.


Any concerns over indications of the potential poisoning of residents adjacent to spray locations should be followed up by epidemiological and other surveys (hospital admissions, medical records, interviews, etc.). This occurred in terms of the Castlereagh Human Health Study (http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/global/MAIN-Global-Toxicity-Chemicals_A-Worldwide-Nightmare.pdf), which was done in Sydney in relation to pronounced animal and human morbidity surrounding the then named Castlereagh Liquid Waste Disposal Depot (now Castlereagh Waste Management Centre).

Although the Report was something of a whitewash, the correct statistics (ignored by the Report) showed there existed statistically significant morbidity in human populations, particularly between the waste depot and the Hawkesbury River (where the liquid waste plumes tended to move). Landholder experiences over extended time demonstrated clear problems with domestic and farm animal health (particularly after rain where raindrop impact caused burning lesions on animals’ legs and profound levels of stress to the point where a horse impailed itself on a fence while being “burned” [M. Streicher, pers. comm. 1995]). These toxic outcomes were supported by University of Western Sydney Degree student bore water testing showing excessive cadmium levels (Thompson, et.al. 1998) and a later assessment of professional bore water test results (Thompson 1998/2010). And although Epidemiology is a difficult discipline: “Epidemiologists sum it up this way: If they can detect a problem, you know you have a true catastrophe” (Heath 2013).

Of course surveys and studies further alert people to class action scenarios in this unfortunately litigious society, so would be unlikely to be carried out voluntarily by industry. Public upset usually has to motivate those who seek your votes to get a study underway.

In terms of your own local information gathering, one could pick up valuable clues from visitors to your area of chemical contamination concern. Ask them if their children, while holidaying or visiting in that area, have exhibited the classic symptom of pesticide poisoning for kids: anomalous abdominal pain (Dr. Brendan Grabau 2005, pers.comm.). Ask this anyway regarding permanent residents. Their children could generate a trend in abdominal pain that can indicate long-term problems that need investigating. If they haven’t demonstrated these symptoms, however, the new toxicology still does not discount the possibility that poisoning has occurred, but that symptoms have been masked by presenting as sub-clinical. This is importantly understood now, as well as the cumulative and synergistic effects of multiple tiny exposures to multiple toxins over extended time.

Why did the discipline of toxicology have to change in recent years?

…the current system is not based on fundamentally sound science. Our existing commercial and regulatory enterprises are all geared to produce and to accept descriptive data from high dose animal tests… (Boekelheide 2008).

The next part of this same quote is wrong:

…and the process of interpreting this information has, to a large extent, effectively protected our health and safety for many decades (ibid.).

Why wrong?

As of 2005, there were 82,000 chemicals in commerce, with approximately seven hundred new chemicals being introduced per year.[4] There is little publicly available safety data for most of these chemicals, and many of them are produced in quantities of a million pounds or more per year (Zurlo 2012; referencing at [4]: National Research Council, Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2007)).

The new toxicology regime will involve:

…toxicity testing based on human cell systems that will be more predictive, have higher throughput, cost less money, be more comparable to real-life exposures in humans, while using many fewer animals. This vision, embraced by leading scientific and regulatory groups, is a paradigm shift from animal-based to human-based testing that signals a major change in focus and promotes the development of new approaches to understanding the toxicity of chemicals in humans (ibid.).


The old paradigm, developed over four centuries ago by Paracelsus, was that ‘the dose makes the poison’. However, for exposures sustained during early development, another critical, but largely ignored, issue is that ‘the timing makes the poison’. This extended paradigm deserves wide attention to protect the foetus and child against preventable hazards (Grandjean, et. al. 2007).

Or, in more detail:

…a growing number of studies show that many environmental toxicants can have significant consequences, including dysfunction and disease, at very low-level exposures. Many of these low-dose studies (including with the pesticides hexachlorobenzene and atrazine) demonstrate that “the timing of exposure is critical to the outcome and that exposures during early life stages (fetal, infant, and pubertal) are particularly important. This recognition of critical windows of vulnerability not only demonstrates the developmental basis of disease but also that the timing, as well as the dose, makes the poison.” In addition, the effects of environmental toxins on the human hormone system, for example, are frequently non- linear such that “high doses may not be appropriate to predict the safety of low doses when hormonally active or modulating compounds are studied.” Birnbaum describes this body of research as responsible for disruptive “paradigm shifts in our understanding of the relationship between environmental toxicants and disease” (Quotes and information attributed to Linda Birnbaum, Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Pesticide Action Network Updates Service (PANUPS) 2009).

As noted above, an epidemiological survey can uncover statistically significant burdens of chemically-induced morbidity (the disease state of an individual or the incidence of illness in a population), however LITIGATION REPRESENTS SUCH AN EXCEPTIONALLY UNTIDY, CONFLICTUAL AND ADVERSARIAL POTENTIAL THAT ALL EFFORTS SHOULD GO INTO THE R&D OF ALTERNATIVE WEED ERADICATION METHODS RATHER THAN PAYING FOR THE COLLEGE EDUCATIONS OF LEGAL TEAMS’ CHILDREN. 3.2.3 NO REGULATION, NO CONTROL, NO SENSE As industries and businesses and even whole techno-driven cultures, we may find it inconvenient to recognize the weight of scientific evidence in favor of the toxicity and uncontrollable nature of pesticides, nevertheless the following should prompt any NORMAL human being (one who is not insanely predisposed to putting industrial vested interests or employment ahead of the health future of their progeny and the ecological integrity of this planet) to seriously question our pitiable love affair with these deadly substances:

(Reuters) – Atrazine, one of the most commonly used and controversial weedkillers, can turn male frogs into females, researchers reported on Monday (Fox 2010).

Given this DISTURBING type of toxicity, just how smart are we, really, as a supposed sentient species?:

ONLY one in every 100 of the 50,000 industrial, agricultural and veterinary chemicals available for use in Australia today has ever been tested for its potential danger to people’s health and the environment (Jopson & Pollard 2007).

In the US:

90% of 23,971 PMN [new chemicals still within the Premanufacture Notification process] chemicals approved by EPA between 1976 and 1994 were approved with no restrictions on their proposed use and production and with no requests for additional test data, regardless of the amount of data submitted (Chemical Industry Archives 2009).


In practice, almost 80% of chemical additives directly—intentionally—added to food lack the relevant information needed to estimate the amount that consumers can safely eat in FDA’s own database and 93% lack reproductive or developmental toxicity data, although FDA requires feeding toxicology data for these chemicals (Neltner, Alger, Leonard & Maffini 2013).


Eight chemicals have been under review by the Australian regulator the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) for more than 13 years, and some up to 15 years, with use continuing in the meantime (News.com.au 2011).

In Tasmania (Australia):

“State chemical use rules are so lax on approvals and policing, such that it may not be known which lands or land-owners have been recent users of a detectable chemical … What is more important – bureaucratic convenience, political embarrassment or community & environmental health?” (Quote attributed to Dr. Leaman; SourceWatch.org 2013a).

Small wonder that the following is typical of our chemical experience:

At least 17 pesticides are suspected carcinogens, and 48 have been flagged as potential endocrine disruptors which can interfere with hormones in animals and humans, leading to birth defects and other developmental disorders (ibid.).


False claims about the safety of pesticides, combined with flaws in the federal registration process, raise serious concerns about increased exposure to environmental chemicals, when there is lack of information on their reproductive and endocrinological effects, synergy, bioaccumulation, and continual low-dose exposure (Knight 1997).


…policy makers in other countries trust FDA and wrongly assume their assessments are valid. They’re disproved when independent studies are matched against industry-run ones. The differences are startling. The former report adverse affects while the latter claim the opposite. It’s no secret why. Agribusiness giants allow nothing to interfere with profits, safety is off the table, and all negative information is quashed (Lendman 2014).

And even if some regulators maintained at the very least a better appearance or semblance of genuine ‘control’ over substances that, by their very nature, are utterly UNCONTROLLABLE once released to the ground, water and winds, not all regulators or countries necessarily show the same levels of… intelligent concern and restraint?:

A so-called expert independent panel for FSC International has again changed the criteria for determining which pesticides should go on the FSC ‘highly hazardous’ or HHP list. As a result, simazine and terbuthylazine have been removed from the list and no longer require an FSC derogation for use in plantation establishment…

The author also notes that the FSC has listed online a proforma for comments on the latest parameter revisions to be submitted by early August, yet the May document is stated Final Report. That suggests that the FSC is not serious about external input, or the May document would be a Draft. This sort of behaviour and the notification failures are perfidious and arise, in the author’s opinion, from the over-riding arrogance of the FSC and their refusal to acknowledge external criticism…

The second new listing example is ludicrous. The chemical is azafenidin, developed by DuPont, but it was withdrawn globally over a decade ago, when the US EPA identified a secondary metabolite harmful to female reproductive health. It is on the Superseded List in the British Crop Protection Council’s Pesticide Manual. A search did not reveal any evidence that it has been re-introduced. The FSC’s listing is not simply inane, it is insane.

There are numerous other examples in the latest listings where a single parameter is used to justify the inclusion, but often there are over-riding factors including other parameters that are ignored.

Clearly, the armchair idealogues working with the FSC have bastardized the science (Tomkins 2013).

And in (forum) response to the above article: These chemicals are not dangerous to trees but only to people. FSC certifies forests not human beings. Why should FSC care if its global genetically-modified tree plantations are sprayed with chemicals that turn boys into girls? (Stevens 2013; my [ ] emphasis). However:

After many years of community outrage over the use of biocide chemicals in commercial forestry, the Tasmanian government initiated a quarterly water monitoring program for 55 rivers, with 19 chemicals tested… The transport of chemicals resulting from aerial chemical spray drift and contamination of both ground and surface water has been highlighted on numerous occasions (SourceWatch.org 2013a).

If only our stewardship of this planet was fully, ecologically sound. That means NOTHING gets poisoned. Note on page 2 of the document, http://www.twff.org.au/documents/twffprosilvapol.pdf (accessed: 6 Feb. 2014):

With regard to the general principles of sustainability, the following are essential elements of the productive function: • Maintenance of the soil fertility • Guaranteed continuity of the forest ecosystems and timber production • Maintenance of the natural energy and mineral cycles…


India is one of the world’s largest users of pesticides and a highly profitable market for the corporations that manufacture them. Ladyfinger, cabbage, tomato and cauliflower in particular may contain dangerously high levels because farmers tend to harvest them almost immediately after spraying. Fruit and vegetables are sprayed and tampered with to make them more colourful, and harmful fungicides are sprayed on fruit to ripen them in order to rush them off to market…

Kasargod in Kerala is notorious for the indiscriminate spraying of endosulfan. The government-owned Plantation Corporation of Kerala aerially sprayed the harmful pesticide on cashews for a period of over 20 years. Consequently, it got into rivers, streams and drinking water. Families and their children have been living with physical deformities, cancers and disorders of the central nervous system ever since…

According to the writer Marie-Monique Robin, whoever controls the food (and pesticide) business controls the world. And Monsanto, backed by the US Government, is setting out to do this through its genetically manipulated (GM) seeds and its pesticides and weedicides.

This is the company [that] has been responsible for manufacturing polychlorinated biphenols that cause cancer, dioxins that lead to chloracne, GM bovine growth hormone that produce mastitis in cattle and genetically modified organisms containing insect toxins, including GM corn, GM soya and Bt cotton, which are strongly associated with a range of health hazards. It also produced Agent Orange which the US dropped on Vietnam to destroy jungle and consequently led to mass death, disease and deformities. In June 2001, adding insult to injury, Monsanto was accused by farmers of Ninh Thuan province of pressuring them to use genetically modified seeds that resulted in corn and maize crop failures and economic ruin. In Indonesia, the corporation bribed more than 140 government officials to have its Bt cotton released without an environmental risk assessment (Todhunter 2012).


…pesticides are strongly linked to birth defects… science will not solve this problem for us. Isn’t it time to consider a human rights approach, an ethical challenge to the poisoners?… The old science-based strategy has failed us. Perhaps a new, precautionary path can get us where we need to go. The precautionary principle says, ‘When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically’ (Montague, 2001).

Or, put slightly differently, the Precautionary Principle:

…or precautionary approach states that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking an action (Wikipedia 2014a).

So, how does Big Biotech manage to sideline the Principle?

Big Biotech has effectively been in the same position that Big Tobacco was in previous decades — able to defend themselves with the “there’s no conclusive link” argument that sidelines the precautionary principle to embrace the cost-externalising rationalisation that’s typical of the corporate world (Mackintosh 2011).

“There’s no conclusive link” means… We don’t want to know, we don’t want YOU to know.


There exists in this world powerful forces pushing us toward the full expression of a background totalitarian scheme embracing all life-forms. It is a gradualistic scheme in terms of its expression over extended time, and it takes on many forms.


And, while Big Poison classically and weaselly obfuscates their monumentally heavy responsibilities through the exhausting repetition of “a universal propensity to radical evil” (Hanson, No date), it excitedly, resolutely, incomprehensibly, and VENOMOUSLY acts on extinguishing viable human life on Earth. Herein lie core attitudes (amplified today way beyond the norm for human greed and unexamined thought), central themes of corporate expansionism that have classically worked for the over-ripe development and calling in of the use-by date of every past civilization.

This essay — while focusing most intently on the material extinction trends set in place by toxic technologies — also maturely posits the existence of a hyper-conflictual background meta trend, or a coherent and motivating background theme, dynamic, or causal agent facilitating a human history of negative outputs: illness, shock, accidents, grief, divorce, marriage…, misunderstanding, hatred, conflict, aggrieved good, greed and corruption of power, violence, rape, psychological abuse, poverty, inequality, vested interests, conflicts of interest, perverted legal and judicial systems, egoism, loss of potential and opportunities, injustices, ignorance, deception, injuries, accidents, Great Disappointments, cultism, murders, wars, genocide, extinction/death (somewhat like moral physical and metaphysical evil [http://www.philosophyonline.co.uk/oldsite/pages/evil.htm]).

“Nothing will shake a man-or at any rate a man like me-out of his merely verbal thinking and his merely notional beliefs. He has to be knocked silly before he comes to his senses. Only torture will bring out the truth. Only under torture does he discover it himself” (C.S. Lewis, A Grief Observed).

This transcendent-historical meta trend is CONSISTENT over time, extending beyond the limitations of individual human life (our minds appear to have been hacked for millennia). It demonstrates a pattern of evil intent and forethought, execution and maintenance, and purposefully applied power. It is descriptive of a PLAN. Most people living temporal and difficult lives are generally largely unaware of meta themes that stand outside of human mortality. Consistent and acute themes of shelter, family, security and survival; and worse: advancement, accumulation and greed; and worse still: empire, are all set against the distressing prospect of advancing age and debility and the growing potential of permanent injury (such as stroke) or sudden death, all make their mark on overburdened minds, so this leaves precious little room for the development of mature meta-thought that stands outside of individual material life and, indeed, the human presence on this Earth.

However, with observation, converging weights of congruous, repeating and reproducible evidence demonstrate the existence of toxic meta themes even in the essential violence of Nature, and especially inside human thought (especially, again, corporate cognition), themes and powers balanced by heavy and deliberative censorship working against chaos and utter annihilation. The emphasis and nature of those toxic themes also tend to demonstrate how close to the end of a civilization the themes portend. Some of the more obvious evidences are:

a/ The appearance and now total loss of control of nuclear technology: note the immeasurable contamination spreading out from Fukushima (see: http://www.ibtimes.com/fukushima-radiation-now-global-disaster-japan-finally-asks-world-help-two-years-too-late-1416058, http://airth.org/fukushima/index.htm and especially: http://www.scoop.it/t/mapping-participating-fukushima-radiation-maps/ and http://buzz.naturalnews.com/000021-Fukushima-radiation-Pacific_Ocean.html).

b/ Massive increases in exotic and synthetic chemical usage, especially the amplifying use of pesticides and concomitant diseases, and then also the diminishment or outright destruction of sociological (especially farming) frameworks (especially seen in India and anywhere where small farms are replaced by Big Ag), the pandemic of toxic insults arising from MASS MEDICATION such as flouridation (see: http://dianabuckland.webs.com/) and chlorination, and especially again the pesticidal emphasis on the planet killer chemical, glyphosate.

c/ The even more insidious development of corporately sponsored and empowered aberrant thought resulting in the hideously irresponsible insertion of GMOs into world food chains. These GMO contaminants favor:

• an inexorable and unavoidable decline in human health, including resurgent old diseases and anomalous new diseases (suggestion: do a Google Search on “Has Polio Returned To The US?”, and also see: http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/healt-cn.htm & http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2749484.html);

• declines in the quality of human mentality (rage, and criminal/sociopathic behavior [Hatherill 1999]) and diminished and distorted reproductive coherence [see: http://www.akaction.org/tackling_toxics/body/reproductive_health.html and http://www.mnn.com/family/babies-pregnancy/blogs/how-chemicals-affect-your- reproductive-health]).

It is almost as if the last two developing extinction measures listed above (b/ and c/) filled in for a strategic gap formerly left somewhat vacant after the temporary demise of the Cold War. Global quick kill measure potential, such as Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) nuclear warfare declined at that point.

However, this deficit was then slowly and very effectively compensated for by industrially-fueled widespread mass medications such as pesticide, flouridation and water sanitization experiments on all and sundry (human guinea pigs) in terms of devious appeals to food production needs, and environmental and human health imperatives. The attitude was: we don’t know the long-term effects of these medications, but let’s apply millions of pounds of the toxics anyway and make lots of profit to funs our elite lifestyles.)

Eventually new, sparkling and ascendant herbicide and GMO technologies have taken center stage in this hateful global play that chemically excoriates real victims. And now, today, we also see the results of the steady revival of the great nuclear threat with the bleeding of nuclear materials (Fukushima) and technologies well beyond the borders and former exclusivity of old nuclear powers (USSR, USA, India, etc.) and into the arms of multiple terrorist threats.

With inevitable crop nutritional declines factored into pesticide contamination and GMO toxicities, the industrial slow death strategy satisfies the needs of any demonically back-grounded, but human-mediated Extinction Level Event worth its salt: that multiple overlapping impacts of these types will ultimately engage massive redundancy through parallel and synchronous appearances of global deficits such as famines and pandemic plagues as an automatic consequence of the metaphysical prompting and perversion of history and the decline of whole cultures.

I imagine that the host of deluded industrialists and elites currently trying to take over the world and clinically control all weather, food, water and life (via chemtrails, Big Ag and shadow depopulation) incidentally manage to rationalize the profound conflict they have authored by proxy: that their health, lifestyle and favored progeny will still amazingly manage to (somehow) manifest and optimize from within a shattered global environment and dying world; and their massive profits will (somehow) continue to obediently and mysteriously hemorrhage into their bank accounts, while they and theirs remain (somehow) toxicologically untouched in their penthouses consuming, of course (somehow), only organic, healthy and uncontaminated produce. Incomprehensible and internally conflicted domination and poison strategies, all the while while they defile.

A long-term industrial slow death meta strategy (or, in more materialistically defined terms: a perfectly consistent and generationally repeating ‘accident’ or disease of human nature)? These kinds of ‘accidents’ and developments usually end up with pogroms and concentration camps. How long before we see the complete censorship of the Internet in favor of industrial interests, and even multiple assassinations of medical, ag and environmental activists (see: 3.3.3, below)?


What other evidence could be slowly introduced to support this meta notion? Starting off, somewhat materialistically:

Another 200 chemicals are known to cause clinical neurotoxic effects in adults. [p.2167]

The combined evidence suggests that neuro developmental disorders caused by industrial chemicals has created a silent pandemic in modern society. Although these chemicals might have caused impaired brain development in millions of children worldwide, the profound effects of such a pandemic are not apparent from available health statistics. Additionally, as shown by this Review, only a few chemical causes have been recognised so the full effects of our industrial activities could be substantially greater than recognised at present.

The consequences of a pandemic of developmental neurotoxicity extend beyond descriptive data for incidence and prevalence of clinically diagnosed disorders.1,3 Increased risk of Parkinson’s disease97 or other neurodegenerative diseases98 is a further potential consequence of the pandemic. [p.2174] (Grandjean & Landrigan 2006)

What’s that? A hint? A neurotoxic dumbing-down of society? Surely noone could actually plan THAT? And:

An article in the journal Hortscience in 2009 indicated falling nutritional values as a result of industrialised agriculture, and various studies point to the health risks from intensive, industrial methods as chemicals and the impact of genetic modifications become prevalent within the food chain…

There are also concerns over dead soil. The Navdanya organisation in India found that Bt-cotton had significantly reduced vital soil enzymes and bacteria, so much so that within a decade of planting GM cotton, or any GM crop with Bt genes, the destruction of soil organisms could be complete, resulting in dead soil unable to produce food. [see Endnote #2 for explicit details]

The biggest beneficiaries of what is currently happening are the likes of Monsanto, Syngenta and Cargill and the associated pharmaceuticals industry, which rakes in massive profits from trying to ‘cure’ us of the resultant diseases. Look no further than the 2009 documentary ‘The Idiot Cycle’ to see the link. The biggest losers are ordinary people and our health along with the many Indian farmers in particular who have been forced into debt and committed suicide en masse (Todhunter 2012).

And THERE’S the perfect clue for the perfect dynamic of the perfectly continuing pay packet: Create disease (and helpful intellectual dumbing-down) through aberrant human hygiene, mass medication and agricultural/GMO technologies, and then offer expensive symptomatic pharmaceutical relief for the accelerating explosion of morbid symptoms amongst the cannon fodder.  The perfect pitch sales circle.  Chemicals + Wrong Information = Delusion & Ignorance = Wrong Choices = Disease = Appeals To Symptomatic Relief & Toxic Medication Prescriptions & Mega-buck Sales = More Disease = Mega-Mega-buck Sales = Elite Lifestyle (& Organic Food) For The Elite Only.  Therefore, no natural cancer, Alzheimer’s, arthritis, MS or other cures are permitted inside this exotic chemical paradigm. And:

When India’s seed economy was forced by the World Bank to become globalized in the late 1990s, economic conditions within the nation’s agricultural sector almost immediately took a nosedive for the worst. …nearly 25 years later, the devastating effects of this corporate takeover of Indian agriculture has resulted in countless suicides, 200,000 of which have occurred just in the past ten years. …many Indian farmers have lost their farms and land over the past several decades. One of the primary causes is failed investments by farmers that banked heavily on the success of newly-introduced GM crops. Multinational biotechnology giants like Monsanto and Syngenta promised farmers that GM crops would bring incredible yields at lower costs, and save the country from poverty. But in reality, many of the crops ended up failing, leaving millions of Indian farmers with absolutely nothing (Huff 2011).

And the failures have not just occurred in India:

A new report is challenging the biotech industry line that GM crops will benefit farmers.  Seeds of Doubt, published by the Soil Association, says that increased yields and profits and reduced agrochemical use have not materialised for farmers in the US, one of only four countries where GM crops are grown commercially.

The only independent research looking at the impact of genetic engineering on yields has found that they actually decrease by around 6 per cent, while agrochemical use has increased as farmers apply greater amounts of herbicide to crops that are resistant to it.  Profits are being eroded as market prices decrease, because the GM ‘brand’ has lost its international market.

The Soil Association commissioned the report because of concerns about the future of organic farming in the UK.  It’s now clear that there is no place for GM technology in organic agriculture. When it was first being discussed, ministers said they would ensure that organic farming was not
compromised by the introduction of GM crops. Now, the Government wants to find out what levels of contamination are acceptable.

The lessons from North America are disturbing.  Canada has lost its entire organic oilseed rape industry to GM contamination in a few, short years, and the Saskatchewan Organic Directorate has launched a lawsuit against the GM company responsible (http://www.organicconsumers.org/, no date).

And from the actual report, this:

Perhaps the greatest achievement of the biotechnology industry has been in creating a myth and then transforming it into a political orthodoxy.  It has managed to persuade some of the world’s most powerful governments that the ‘white heat of biotechnology’ can bring benefits of higher yields, lower chemical use, food security and, critically, profitability for farmers.

Those who have signed up seem enthralled by the apparent potential of genetic engineering to improve on nature.  Yet, despite growing public alarm (generally dismissed as irrational fears born of scare mongering) the accuracy of these claims has not, until now, been put under the microscope.

In undertaking this study of the actual impact of the commercialisation of GM crops in North America, the Soil Association has gathered sufficient evidence to challenge the fundamental proposition that GM technology represents progress.

The evidence we set out suggests that, in reality, virtually every benefit claimed for GM crops has not occurred.  Instead, farmers are reporting lower yields, continuing dependency on herbicides and pesticides, loss of access to markets and, critically, reduced profitability leaving food production even more vulnerable to the interests of the biotechnology companies and in need of subsidies (soilassociation.org, 2002).

And further:

There have been many arguments justifying the incorporation of GMOs into the food supply.  However, there is evidence that GM foods have an increased risk of causing allergic reactions, and uncontrollable cross-pollination depletes crop diversity which has resulted in resistant “super-weeds” and “super-pests.”  It’s clear that the primary benefits of GM seeds are to the seed and pesticide companies, not to growers or consumers.  And many risks are as of yet unknown. The best way to avoid GM foods is to choose organic foods (eatherbs.com 2013).

And when farmers and farms fail, it is easier to come in and grab the land:

State and private investors, from Citadel Capital to Goldman Sachs, are leasing or buying up tens of millions of hectares of farmlands in Asia, Africa and Latin America for food and fuel production.  This land grabbing is a serious threat for the food sovereignty of our peoples and the right to food of our rural communities (farmlandgrab.org 2010).


Every day there are new stories of companies buying up farmlands. Malaysian palm oil giants buying up lands for plantations in West Africa. Wall Street bankers taking over cattle ranches in Brazil. Saudi businessmen signing land deals in the Philippines. The latest dataset on land grabs claims that 10 million hectares of land have been grabbed by foreign companies on average every year since 2007.

The result is that a small number of people are taking over more and more of the world’s farmlands, and the water that goes with it, leaving everyone else with less, or none at all. As the world plunges deeper into a food crisis, these new farmland lords will hold sway over who gets to eat and who doesn’t and who profits and who perishes within the food system (GRAIN 2012).

Corporate fangs dripping blood… And, even more to the GMO point:

Fresh doubts have arisen about the safety of genetically modified crops, with a new study reporting presence of Bt toxin, used widely in GM crops, in human blood for the first time.

Genetically modified crops include genes extracted from bacteria to make them resistant to pest attacks.

These genes make crops toxic to pests but are claimed to pose no danger to the environment and human health. Genetically modified brinjal, whose commercial release was stopped a year ago, has a toxin derived from a soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).

Till now, scientists and multinational corporations promoting GM crops have maintained that Bt toxin poses no danger to human health as the protein breaks down in the human gut. But the presence of this toxin in human blood shows that this does not happen (Sharma 2011).

And, even MORE to the utterly irresponsible and corrupt conflicts of interest GMO dynamic:

This technology is being promoted, in the face of concerns by respectable scientists and in the face of data to the contrary, by the very agencies which are supposed to be protecting human health and the environment. The bottom line in my view is that… (Quote attributed to Dr. Suzanne Wuerthele, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) toxicologist; EuphoricOrganics, No date).

Continuing the above quote:

…we are confronted with the most powerful technology the world has ever known, and it is being rapidly deployed with almost no thought whatsoever to its consequences (Quote attributed to Dr. Suzanne Wuerthele, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) toxicologist; Marsh, No date).


And, even MORE to THE health authority and corporate link theme:

More seriously, in 1989 there was an outbreak of a new disease in the US, contracted by over 5,000 people and traced back to a batch of L-tryptophan food supplement produced with GM bacteria. Even though it contained less than 0.1 per cent of a highly toxic compound, 37 people died and 1,500 were left with permanent disabilities. More may have died, but the American Centre for Disease Control stopped counting in 1991 (Organic Consumers Association 2006).

And the wider environment consideration:

The introduction of crops genetically engineered to tolerate glyphosate poses an additional threat to plant wildlife. Some crops have wild relatives with which they can cross pollinate. There is therefore a risk of introducing engineered genetic material into the wild population (Buffin & Jewell 2001:22).


The failure to test may provide some protection in the courts against lawsuits by those maimed or crippled by the foods. Most ill effects from food and allergies are not easily quantified until after the disaster. At best, there may be a small but marked increase in autoimmune disease and allergy associated with the foods. At worst, major outbreaks of illness could be observed and will be difficult to trace to the unlabelled foods (Quote attributed to Prof. Joe Cummins, Professor Emeritus of genetics at the University of Western Ontario; ibid.).

And beyond…

This bad science has become both master and handmaiden to unaccountable business corporations driven solely by profit. Together, they will effectively control every aspect of our lives, from the food we eat to the healthcare we can have, the babies we can conceive and give birth to, the human beings we can clone. In the process, they may ruin our food supply, destroy biodiversity and unleash pandemics of drug and antibiotic resistant infectious diseases. They will also undermine every single moral value and ideal that makes us human (Ho 2000).

The above just touches on the subject of GENETIC ENGINEERING CREATING BIOWEAPONS (see: http://globalresearchreport.com/2014/01/04/whats-the-scoop-on-genetically-engineered-and-pandemic-viruses/#sthash.ldoAy31M.dpbs; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014), and expands on the industrial slow death meta strategy of the Perfect Circle. Note:

Bioterrorism exists, perhaps, because science promotes it with genetic engineering research! Ever think of it that way? Humankind, including technology scientists, need to evaluate where technology is taking us because civilization can be sacked either by accident, inadvertent scientific snafus, or sheer and deliberate design. That apparently has happened before, as civilization is a continuum, which science and humans ought to consider seriously from some ancient civilizations’ texts (Frompovich 2014).

So, now, massive corporate greed in terms of ‘small’ plans like owning all food production and water distribution can be augmented by visions of total Earth ownership and stewardship through planetary bio-engineering, and indeed bio-anything (1), so bioterrorism can now be obliquely inserted into the elites’ we-own-all-your-asses ‘skillset’ as yet another means by which the total destruction of a whole Planet can be masterminded, but somewhat below the level of critical, intellectual, activist and immersive consciousness of most poisoned, morbid symptom attention-diverted people not aware of meta plans for, ultimately, Anti-Life on Earth (2). There are TWO PLANS listed just above. The material one (1), and the meta-physical one (2). The latter funds the former, and the latter merges seamlessly and invisibly into the background of the former. And the bio-awful just gets worse:

Ron Fouchier from the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands and Yoshihiro Kawaoka from the University of Wisconsin intentionally developed a militarized strain of H5N1 avian flu capable of easily transmitting among mammals…

…they essentially discovered a way to potentially spark a global flu pandemic with the potential to kill or seriously injure billions of people (Huff 2013).


Pesticides, nuclear power technologies, growth hormones in intensive animal production, and Genetic Engineering to name just a few of the monsters we make. They all represent the core problem of science and industry taking to themselves the supreme authority to ignore Nature, to create new or heavily altered (GMO) lifeforms, to manipulate and invade ecological fabrics or human bodies (e.g. influencing/dictating chemicalized interferences such as leveraged or forced infant/child vaccinations, flouridation [see: http://dianabuckland.webs.com/%5D and psychotropic drugs), and to demand lots of money for products (medications) it says will cure the ills that arise out of technology’s mass-medication of this Planet:

Isn’t GE and GMO ‘technology’ the new god of science that creates organisms, which do not appear in Nature, that are intended to become patented assets for vested interests… (Frompovich 2014).


GMOs have been deployed to privatise knowledge and seeds through Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), which include patents and copyrights. While on the one hand this is blocking public research on plant breeding, on the other it is denying farmers the right to save seeds and to share knowledge and continue the evolution of the seed. IPRs also deny the collective, cumulative innovation of indigenous cultures and promote biopiracy (Shiva 2014a).

And, in consideration of how fascist the new Biotech is becoming:

…will virus and biological genetic modification become similar to what happened early in the 20th century when physicians went hog-wild using children in orphanages and state-run-institutions in New York, Pennsylvania, and other states as human guinea pigs to further what had become the new sciences of “eugenics” and vaccinology? (Luther 2014)

Its seems that this scenario is all too possible given the following. Note the article titled: “Violence and Aggression against Human Rights in the Wake of Agribusiness” (July 12, 2005):

The agribusiness sector concentrates land, water, and income. Its production is mainly for export, creating profits for a privileged elite at a very high socio- environmental cost. The irrigation of monoculture consumes 70% of the country’s water. Its machines are substituted for manual labor in the countryside, in a country [Sth. America] whose greatest problem is unemployment. In the states where agribusiness has expanded, privately-sponsored violence is growing, along with repression through the power of the Judiciary (http://www.landaction.org/display.php?article=272; accessed: 18 Aug. 2008).

See: http://www.landaction.org/spip.php?rubrique35 for multiple examples of agri-business’ military, police, national guard and mercenary fascism against (especially) indigenous protests over corporate land-grabs and pollution of native lands. And:

The fourth violation of the freedom of knowledge and knowledge sovereignty is preventing the evolution of public knowledge about how life works, how we can produce more and better food ecologically through the control of scientific publications as well as the media to promote an obsolete paradigm of genetic reductionism and mechanistic science, and repeatedly making false claims to miracles through genetic engineering (Shiva 2014a).

OK, ignoring my meta-theories above for just a moment, big business might be totalitarian, but hasn’t it always been this way?

The largest German daily newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung has today published a shocking article that reveals how Monsanto, the US Military and the US government track both anti-GMO Campaigners and Independent Scientists who study the dangers of GMOs.

In a very detailed article the Süddeutsche Zeitung journalists reveal information on how the US Government “advances the interests of their corporations” using Monsanto as an example.

The article states: “It is noticeable that anyone who criticizes Monsanto has their life made very difficult or an invisible hand ends their careers. But who is this Anyone? Targets are scientists such as the Australian Judy Carman. She has made a name for herself with studies of genetically modified organisms. Thus, several websites on which Carman published her studies are regularly the target of hacker attacks – Evaluations of IP protocols show that not only Monsanto regularly tracks the pages of these sites, but also various institutions of the U.S. government, including the military. These include the Navy Network Information Center, the Federal Aviation Administration and the United States Army Intelligence Center” (Sustainable Pulse 2013).


“We have documented time and time again scientists who have been fired, stripped of responsibilities, denied funding, threatened, gagged and transferred as a result of the pressure put on them by the biotech industry,” he added (Quote attributed to Jeffrey Smith, Institute for Responsible Technology; Graves 2011).


On January 4, 1993, 300,000 Ogoni (Nigerian) people gathered to peacefully protest Shell’s environ-mental devastation of their homeland [the Ogoni live in a small area – 404 square miles – in the oil rich Niger Delta]. It was the largest demonstration ever against any oil company. Since that day when the Ogoni began their campaign of nonviolent resistance, over 2,000 of them, including Ken Saro-Wiwa, have died at the hands of a military that is armed by and paid for by Shell (http://www.remembersarowiwa.com/ 2008):

Shell and Chevron are in the spotlight this week, with shareholder meetings and a historic trial.

On May 13, the Nigerian military launched an assault on villages in that nation’s oil- rich Niger Delta. Hundreds of civilians are feared killed by the Nigerian military. According to Amnesty International, a celebration in the Delta village of Oporoza was attacked. An eyewitness told AI: “I heard the sound of aircraft; I saw two military helicopters, shooting at the houses, at the palace, shooting at us. We had to run for safety into the forest. In the bush, I heard adults crying, so many mothers could not find their children; everybody ran for their life.”

Shell is facing a lawsuit in U.S. federal court, Wiwa v. Shell, based on Shell’s alleged collaboration with the Nigerian dictatorship in the 1990s in the violent suppression of the grass-roots movement of the Ogoni people of the Niger Delta. Shell exploits the oil riches there, causing displacement, pollution and deforestation. The suit also alleges that Shell helped suppress the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People and its charismatic leader, Ken Saro-Wiwa.”

In 1998, I traveled to the Niger Delta with journalist Jeremy Scahill. A Chevron executive there told us that Chevron flew troops from Nigeria’s notorious mobile police, the “kill ‘n’ go,” in a Chevron company helicopter to an oil barge that had been occupied by nonviolent protesters. Two protesters were killed, and many more were arrested and tortured.

Oronto Douglas, one of Saro-Wiwa’s lawyers, told us: “It is very clear that Chevron, just like Shell, uses the military to protect its oil activities. They drill and they kill” (Goodman 2009).

What does Monsanto DO? What are its characteristics, it’s ‘legacy’?

• GMOs

• rBGH or Bovine Growth Hormone (causes extreme distress in cows and is linked to numerous cancers in humans)

• Aspartame or NutraSweet, Equal (causes 94 health issues)

• Roundup (toxic) • Petroleum-Based Fertilizer (destroys soil integrity)

• Atom bomb and nuclear weapons (Monsanto’s Thomas and Hochwalt Laboratories contributed to plutonium purification and techniques to refine chemical triggers in atomic weapons)

• Polystyrene (5th worst generator of hazardous waste)

• Saccharin (carcinogenic)

• PCBs (Cancer: Monsanto knew about PCB dangers from 1956 on…)

• DDT (toxic) • Dioxin (toxic)

• Agent Orange (hundreds of thousands of deaths and birth deformities, human health issues known by Monsanto when it sold Agent Orange to the US government for its war effort in Vietnam) (Fractured Paradigm 2013).

The above represent a consistent pattern of forethought, or a PLAN, not just a series of super-nasty business practices and decisions. The materialistic or physical PLAN is for domination and profit, forever, while the meta-physical PLAN (the one that backgrounds the first) is for total Earth destruction.


If non-stop liars and purveyors of planet-killing technologies like Monsanto and the like are giving the rest of industry a bad name, then why doesn’t industry itself pull together and bring these fascist companies into line? Could an internationally leveraged credit and penalty system be fashioned around a Truth in Research and Precautionary concept? Truth is rewarded, while if a tipping scale (not balance) of peer review finds research truth callously flaunted by rigged results and blatant lies, then a $10 Billion fine is imposed for each infringement. Perhaps better still, a significant infringement (or catalogue of consistent transgression) could see the dismantling of the company, with the assets transferred to companies demonstrating ethical behavior.

If a company’s IP address is established as the source of a hack, then severe penalities should be metered out by the international authority. Though, wouldn’t this international organisation be infiltrated and taken over? Is this too big of a job, too big of an ask. Am I suggesting, really, that the corrupt pretend to censor the corrupt because there is too much corruption? My PhD Thesis (see Endnote # 10) suggests very strongly that there are fatal flaws in the human mind, flaws that cannot be healed by human power. Nevertheless, this is no reason to allow the fully corrupt to do as they will. Perhaps TRYING to be good is THE preeminent reason for this unique, first taste of sentience?


Let’s go a little deeper. Do dirty business tactics really reflect on GMO technology itself? If GMO tech is so inherently or intrinsically wrong, then in what central or core way is it?

“As geneticist Dr Mae Wan Ho said: “Instead of the linear, one-way information flow envisaged in the central dogma from DNA to RNA to protein and ‘downstream’ biological function, there is intricate cross-talk between the organism and its environment at all levels, with feed-forward and feed-back cycles in the epigenetic and metabolic networks of molecular interactions that mark and change genes as the organism goes about its business of living  The organism is doing its own natural genetic modification with great finesse, a molecular dance of life that’s necessary for survival. Unfortunately, genetic engineers do not know the steps or the rhythm and music of the dance” (Quote attributed to Dr. Mae-Wan Ho; Shiva 2014b; original source: Ho 2013)

Despite the above, isn’t GMO technology just simply somehow “better” in some way?

US farmers and scientists are growing increasingly concerned about glyphosate’s detrimental effect on soil quality.

Monsanto is recommending additional soil inputs to counter the mineral deficiencies in plants caused by glyphosate – an example of the unsustainable nature of GM technology.

It’s worth bearing in mind… that the yield increases attributed by one commentator to GM are in fact the result of conventional breeding improvements. The GM traits are put into the best germplasm, and the best germplasm is a product of conventional breeding.

A recent study showed that the mostly non-GM farming practiced in the EU was more productive in terms of yield improvements than the GM farming practiced in the US (GMWatch 2013).

Lower yields not a problem for you on your farm? Look at your children, and then read this:

After feeding hamsters for two years over three generations, those on the GM diet, and especially the group on the maximum GM soy diet, showed devastating results. By the third generation, most GM soy-fed hamsters lost the ability to have babies. They also suffered slower growth, and a high mortality rate among the pups.

And if this isn’t shocking enough, some in the third generation even had hair growing inside their mouths—a phenomenon rarely seen, but apparently more prevalent among hamsters eating GM soy (Smith 2013).


The Argentine government helped pull the country out of a recession in the 1990s in part by promoting genetically modified soy. Though it was something of a miracle for poor farmers, several years after the first big harvests residents near where the soy cop grew began reporting health problems, including high rates of birth defects and cancers, as well as the losses of crops and livestock as the herbicide spray drifted across the countryside (Graves 2011).


The following headings are taken from my below-listed WordPress Essay: Direct Links Between Pesticide And Disease. Traveller/Backpacker Pesticide Deaths In South-East Asia. Pesticide Deaths (Human And Animal) Worldwide. Pesticide Deaths And Non-English Speaking Pesticide Use In Australia. Global Disease Patterns on the Tail of Massive Pesticide Use. See: http://wp.me/p2msN0-L for my Essay titled: “DOMESTIC OR COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE USE: COULD YOU KILL OR BE KILLED?”


What type of farming should we ultimately strive for?

…a new UNCTAD report which states that farming in rich and poor nations alike should shift from monoculture towards greater varieties of crops, reduced use of fertilizers and other inputs, greater support for small-scale farmers, and more locally focused production and consumption of food. More than 60 international experts contributed to the report, launched last week (LRAN 2013).


Such are the commercial dynamics in this frantically greedy transnational biotech-infused globalist world that the Precautionary Principle does not even get a “look in” when no realistic restrictions on pesticide use are set. This almost total lack of accountability represents no less than the dumbest, most embarrassing and most avoidable Extinction Level Event in the history of Planet Earth! And yet to now try to close the stable door after the toxicological horse has already bolted and galloped past Mars appears to be politically and industrially impossible. Yet, THAT is precisely what is demanded: A SAVING WORLDWIDE TOXICOLOGICAL REVOLUTION, on the back of a profound change in our science, on the back of a profound change in human attitudes.

The generationally consistent, seemingly immortal industrial arguments supporting “progress” or global chemical trespass at any cost are violent, and yet intrinsically weak and unexamined. Supreme corruption and power gluttony here sees industrial and legal/judicial elite power, presumption and wages/rewards contrasting starkly against the usual status of the disenfranchised chemically-raped cannon-fodder poisoning victim: no legal leverage inside a system favoring the might of government and industry.

Industrial, we-own-the-world-and-can-damn-well-do-whatever-we-like (judicial-type) arguments appear to originate via a repeating, pestilent mentality that is anything but weak. Human corporate thought manifests in history as a ‘guided’ quantity, coached through increasing orders of pestilent rationality and organised destructiveness over time as if motivated by some kind of intrinsic background metaphysical dynamic that drives our worst attitudes and notions of invention.

These attitudes are found to be so demonically venomous that they relentlessly superinduce us to repeat error and seek greater, more perverse, intrigues. Therefore, we are always poisoned and brutalized, pushed ahead of a goose-stepping global bad science menace, without any respite from this Toxic Long March. This annihilatory immortal evil now imposes on us a human nature funded pesticide/fertiliser/hormone/additive/GMO/medication oblivion so pervasive and so woven and locked into our every concept and function of modernity that it appears only the imposition of a likewise immortal REVOLUTIONARY will from outside our dark human thoughts could possibly save us. Philosophers and the religious often appeal to this kind of saving grace.

Neither human rights or the industry “owned” EPA/USDA/FDA/AMA/APVMA etc. variants have any worthwhile influence inside the new fascism of the global political bowl of biotech spiders that DESPERATELY wishes to fabricate its horrible version of a brave new depopulated and ‘cleansed’ world where industry controls all information, commerce and law (see Endnote #7). It seems we have to learn passionately difficult lessons on this Kindergarten Earth via the terrible crucible of industry/political bias, subversive advertising/propaganda and mass poisoning in this 21st century era after the earlier, more in-your-face, 20th century Nazi version of pure evil sought to OWN THE WORLD through invasion and slaughter.

is this any way to treat a planet_small

“Owning”, now, at this time in history and especially in terms of gross genetic interference (the making of GMO DNA monsters), translates to potentially 2 billion deaths in the next series of worldwide pandemics, soon to appear. Note: “Most of the infectious human diseases today in fact emerged from animals at some point in time; and they now account for over one million deaths and more than one billion illnesses annually” (Karesh 2013). (Also see: http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/healt-cn.htm and http://www.news-medical.net/health/Future-Pandemics.aspx). Also:

At a 25% mortality rate the H7N9 avlian flu, combined with modern transportation systems and metropolitan areas housing tens of millions of people, there is serious potential for a globally significant catastrophe.

Should this virus increase its transmission rate we could be looking at a scenario where a billion or more people contract the virus around the world.

The math is straight forward. One in four will perish.

While we’ve had pandemic scares in the recent past, this one really has researchers and global health officials spooked (Slavo 2014).

Could it get any worse? What about an ‘enhancement’ of the current global HIV pandemic storm?

New evidence raises the possibility that the CaMV 35S promoter in practically all transgenic crops grown commercially may enhance multiplication of disease-associated viruses including HIV through induction of proteins required for their transcription (Ho & Cummins 2009:172).

Note too:

Everybody knows a global pandemic is coming sooner or later. Humanity is practically begging
for one with its destruction of the ecosystem, chemical intoxication of the population and
reliance on immune-suppressing medications and food additives.

The very structure of human society — with high-density cities and rapid air travel —
creates a “perfect storm” for the spread of infectious disease. (Adams 2014)


Everything is connected. There is no separation of parts. Everything together acts like a plan because intentionality is found in all design. What occurs in one area resonates throughout and affects everything else. What you do in terms of destructive technology “here” affects “there”. Nothing escapes the attention of toxic invention… Now that might resonate as an old hippy-ish kind of sentiment, however the new physics shows this to be absolutely true.

Ultimately, pesticide/herbicide use:

1. Is destructive to broad ecological frameworks (the negative effects fan outward). Glyphosate is toxic to fish, aquatic organisms and beneficial insect species (Leu, 2007; van der Werf, 1996) (***Interestingly, a test for the presence of Glyphosate in water and urine is now available. See Endnote #3.***) or, multiple layers of the Web of Life;

2. Destroys our critical soil resource (and most valuable material heritage) by wrecking soil composition (glyphosate is toxic to earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, micro-organisms, and arthropods [ibid.]) and ALL life that depends on soil (which is… EVERYTHING);

3. Generates botulism and other pathogenesis potentials (see: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396248; http://www.gmfreecymru.org/pivotal_papers/crucial38.html; and http://www.netwerkvlv.nl/downloads/2012-Krueger,%20M-glyphosate%20effects.pdf) which spread from soil to plant to animal to human;

4. Creates an ever-enlarging population of those with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance). Note: “Most tragically, suffering, illness and disease surround us today in a way we would not have imagined a half century ago. We have banished some diseases only to have them replaced by a grumbling yet profound toxicity which is stripping our children of their rightful future” (Donohoe, 1998:38).

5. Provides the chemical trespass injury fodder for destructive and stressful adversarial confrontations in toxic (and often heavily corrupted) legal settings (see: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/essays/essay3-diminishing-returns-of-complexity.pdf);

6. Creates monstrous disease scenarios via increased use through herbicide tolerant GMOs:

Lappe and Bailey (8) reported that glyphosate fed to animals at high levels was shown to cause liver toxicity. In a case control study in Sweden published in the journal Cancer, Hardel and Eriksson (9) found that exposure to glyphosate revealed increased risks for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The introduction of glyphosate tolerance to crops has expanded the use of this herbicide. These preliminary studies on glyphosate could be a forewarning that unsuspected hazards may accompany glyphosate resistant crops (Krimsky 2002:244).

7. Sets up impossible meta-poisoning (even pandemic) scenarios that will be more than an “Inconvenient Truth” to everyone concerned (see: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/essays/essay1-worldwide-disease-pandemics.pdf).

Toxic, exotic, synthetic chemicals will give us techno marvels while killing our children and grandchildren. A bad deal all round.

to safeguard_small




We are stampeding multiple attacks on the ecological integrity of our world. The rush for dumb profit is searingly obvious. The intellectual demand that all stand aside in favor of very bad science is completely fascist.


In terms of the invasion of habitats, it’s not just our pesticide chemicals going on ahead of us on the wind, spreading into pristine habitats and upsetting eco-dynamics. This includes our pollution wastes funding pathogenic alterations: developing REMOTE DRUG/PESTICIDE RESISTANCE waiting for a physical release, waiting for the bulldozers to come in. There’s that GREAT INSULT: it’s US physically entering or invading environments anf then destroying those environments, thus becoming subject to CLOSETED PATHOGENS that introduce new diseases to the human race: “…this might be because we disrupt habitats and come into contact with animals we haven’t been in contact with before” (Smith quote: Jha 2013). The appearance of AIDS and other emerging diseases (as ‘releases’ from a damaged biosphere [Preston 1994:29-30]) and global warming as a function of our greedy and inappropriate world-girdling interference, clearly describes the longer term outcomes of the imposition of perverse global economic theory.

Lyme, as a further specific example, seems to arise, like many environmental imbalances, out of disturbed and chemically affected environments. That is, Lyme demonstrates well “a developing model of infectious disease that shows that most epidemics — AIDS, Ebola, West Nile, SARS, Lyme disease and hundreds more that have occurred over the last several decades — don’t just happen. They are the result of things people do to nature” (Robbins 2012) in their typical fracturing of the Web of Life where diseases escape from nature and turn into pandemics (ibid.). Also: “We like to think we discover viruses, but it’s also the viruses discovering us” (Woolhouse quote: Jha 2013).

Particularly, the above theme appears to have coherence in terms of plantations, at the very least in terms of the toxic overload of the invaded environment, and at most in terms of gross environmental instability leading to potential pathogen release into human populations:

The hellish landscape that results from clearfelling – akin to a Great War battlefield – is generally turned into large monocultural plantations of either radiata pine or Eucalyptus nitens, sustained by such a heavy program of fertilisers and pesticides that water sources for some local communities have been contaminated by ATRAZINE, A CONTROVERSIAL herbicide linked with cancer and banned in much of Europe. Blue-dyed carrots soaked in 1080 poison are laid on private plantations to kill native grazing animals that pose a threat to tree seedlings. The slaughter that results sees not only possums, wallabies and kangaroos die slowly, in agony, but other species – including wombats, bettongs and potoroos – killed in large numbers, despite being officially protected species (Flanagan 2007).

And, please slowly absorb this quite spectacular assessment:

We started to see a range of really unique, interesting diseases that were afflicting platypus and wallabies and wombats. And later on, of course, now we’re seeing this horrendous infectious, transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils…

…is it something that we, as human beings, may have done to subtly modify the environment to allow for this relationship to change. Because what disease in wildlife populations tends to be is a harbinger of instability, of a breakdown in normal cycles of a population reaching a stable balance with other animals interacting with their ecology. And perturbations, whether they are human induced, or the fact that we’ve actually through our agency allowed for the introduction of new pathogens. This is the brave new world that we face in the 21st century.

We use poisons to suppress the wildlife that we think are nuisances. We start to use chemicals to support the growth of our particular commodities…

We have a sort of a blind faith that the regulatory processes are going to protect us. And yet, at a sub jurisdictional level Tasmania [Australia] is giving us a lens into a brave new world that is going to be potentially more ridden with cancer and disabling diseases that are going to be linked to in, you know, minute quantities of chemicals that are changing, genetic triggering events within our bodies. Epigenetic factors, hormone disrupting factors…

Surprisingly, you know, and perhaps not surprisingly, we’re finding that [Tasmanian] devils have got residues of significant synthetic, organic pollutants that are from the products that we as a human species contaminated into their environment. And they are, because of their role as a top order carnivore, they’re bio-accumulating those chemicals. We’re talking about dioxins, PCBs, fire retardant chemicals, the PBEDs, the organo chlorines. Now, some of these chemicals are linked to a range of maladies, including carcinogenesis and the potential to impact on cell development and expression of hormones and what have you. So, what we’ve got to really think about is this background impact of these chemicals having an instigator effect on the expression of the index cases of this cancer? And is it changing the immune system of these devils as well. And these are factors that I think really make the devil almost a shocking animal to be like the canary down the mineshaft, the coal mine.

You’ve got to ask yourself the question, why, why all of a sudden do we have all this pathogen stress on wildlife?… …in the last thirty years we’re seeing a range of new diseases coming into our wildlife populations. And it’s impacting on their survival. And with the continuations of the habitat fragmentation and habitat destruction that I was telling you about earlier, this is causing these animals to be under more stress. So the diseases are transmitting more easily in some cases. Stress factors, exposure to chemicals, exposure to other things within the environment may be tipping the balance towards disease expression…

And it’s usually the voiceless, the wildlife, that are your earliest indicators that something is going wrong. There’s something rotten in the state of Tasmania. When wildlife start to develop a range of maladies, it’s saying something is unstable in the ecology. It’s not just that the chemicals are the trigger of that, it’s saying there are multiplicity of factors building here which need to [be] explored and that’s where the Marcus Scammell [see below] example of putting all the cards on the table is really relevant. We must have a dialogue which is asking the critical questions.

…if we continue to do what we’re doing to it, we will destroy it and we will destroy the wildlife, the biodiversity and we’ll probably destroy public health as well (Obendorf 2010).


Dr Bleaney, Marine Ecologist Marcus Scammell and local oyster farmers paid for testing of the George River after concerns arose about human and oyster health.

Dr Bleaney says the tests show the river contains a toxin that comes from a type of plantation tree that’s been introduced to the State, Eucalyptus nitens.

Environmental toxicologist Christian Khalil tested the water on human cells and told Australian Story whatever was in it was toxic to skin, liver and lung cells (ABC News 2010).


When you see large numbers of dead animals occurring all of a sudden, it is screamingly obvious that you have something wrong. That is not a natural event. Animals don’t lie. Ninety per cent of those oysters dropped dead after one rainfall event. They don’t lie. The Tasmanian devils aren’t lying when they’re sitting up and saying we’re sick. They really are sick. In Alison’s population of humans there’s a variety, a much bigger variety of illness than you would normally observe, that you would normally expect. And it’s not that there’s one particular type of cancer that’s sky rocketed; it’s that she’s got so many unusual cancers. They all started to emerge in that north-east corner at about the same time. And it was around about that time that the plantation industry was really starting to take off (Scammell 2010).

As a preface:

Endotoxins are the cell-wall components of gram-negative bacteria, and these compounds are released after the death of the bacteria (Banhazi, et. al. 2008:28).

In addition:

In March 2010 Bleaney and Scammell released the research findings of their research on the identification of a previously unknown group of toxins in freshwater in the George River catchment… The presence of a range of pesticides registered for use in commercial agriculture and forestry were intermittently detected, the commonest being alpha-cypermethrin, atrazine, simazine, glyphosate, the phenoxy herbicides – 2,4-D, MCPA and metsulfuron-methyl. From water testing came the discovery of several unknown chemicals in the water samples. The presence of these chemicals in water samples made it hazardous to marine and freshwater organisms and to human cell lines. The structure and pharmaco-toxicity of these chemicals is still the subject of research.

The laboratories participating in research and analysis of untreated water from the George River (the drinking water catchment for St Helens, NE Tasmania) concluded that there are toxins in the George River that will kill aquatic organisms and human cells. The laboratories have further determined that the toxins appear to originate from a non-native eucalypt (Eucalyptus nitens) grown in plantation monocultures.

Tree seedling breeding programmes advertise that clonal propagation technologies are used. Also, the current literature on commercial tree biotechnology regularly includes terms such as ‘selective breeding’, ‘elite trees’, ‘enhance pest and environmental tolerance of plantation trees’, ‘genetic enhancement’, ‘supply and propagate superior germplasm’, ‘determine the genes controlling critical wood quality factors’, and include references to areas such as ‘gene association’, ‘gene tagging’ and ‘gene knockouts – RNAi’ technologies… In the 1990s the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxin gene was incorporated into E. globulus and E. nitens and a synergistic effect of the Bt protein and the volatile oil, cineole was shown to exist… Expressed Bt endotoxin was damaging to the midgut allowing cineole to enter the insect haemolymph and exert a toxic effect at lower concentrations than occurred when Bt endotoxin was not present (SourceWatch.org 2013a).

Some say that genetic manipulation of Eucalypts has not occurred in Australia. However, the following quote from a statement made by the then (1992) Prime Minister of Australia, Paul Keating, says something:

I am pleased today to congratulate the CSIRO on the development of a genetically
engineered eucalyptus tree.

CSIRO scientists successfully transferred a gene from a bacterium into cells from red
gum. Each “transgenic” cell has already re-generated into a young river red gum, growing
in sterile conditions in a laboratory.

Genes have been transferred successfully into other plant species, but this is the first
scientifically confirmed genetic transfer into the river red gum.

The harmless bacterial gene transferred into the gum tree by the CSIRO’s Divisions of
Forestry and Plant Industry is simply a “marker” to show that the technology works.

Next, the scientists plan to repeat these experiements using two temperate eucalypts
(Eucalyptus nitens and globulus) both of which are important commercial plantation trees
in Australia. (Keating 1992)

The letter goes on to assert that the technology is safe, and will not result in the escape of genes into wild tree populations.



If you want to feel much safer, then read the other side of the coin, see: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=10658. And, although page 2 of this report (see: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=10658&page=2) notes the theme “plantations being toxic” (essentially in terms of being used as a negative slogan by environmentalists), one should not just assume that a plantation can be toxic just through the pesticides it may use. What about transgene escape?

There are several important biosafety concerns regarding the release of Bt rice. One of the major environmental concerns regarding the release of transgenic crops is the potential escape of transgenes into wild rice populations (Snow 2002, Ellstrand 2003). Wild relatives host a large assemblage of arthropods, many of which are not pests. Therefore, transgene escape into wild plant populations could affect arthropod biodiversity, abundance, food web structure, and food web stability in natural ecosystems. Transgene flow could occur if Bt rice were released for commercial growth in the countries where wild rice and its relatives co-exist with cultivated rice crops. (Cuong, et. al. 2010:1).


Invasive escape of the transgene can occur at three levels. First, the transformed species itself can escape cultivation and become a weed. That concern is rooted in the experience with exotic tree species in plantation forestry. In the southern hemisphere, for example, at least 19 species of pines have escaped cultivation and invaded other habitats during the past 3-4 decades, at great economic and ecological costs (Richardson 1998). Second, the transgene can be transferred to nontransgenic individuals of the same species through pollination. Recent examples of sexual gene transfer from transgenic to nontransgenic crops (Reiger et al. 2003) or wild-type species (Quist & Chapela 2001) underscore that concern. Third, the transgene can be transferred to a wild relative through out-breeding (van Frankenhuyzen and Beardmore 2004:1170-1171).

On the third point above, please note:

…transgene escape can easily occur via gene flow and may result in potential ecological and biodiversity consequences if significant quantities of transgenes constantly outflow to non-GM crops and weedy /wild relative species (Lu 2008:72).


Another example involves the escape of transgenes from glyphosate-resistant (a herbicide) bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) in the United States. Reichman et al. (2006) detected transgenic hybrids with weedy Agrostis species some 3.8 km downwind of transgenic field trials, in federally-protected grassland. The ecological consequences of such outcrossings are uncertain, yet any decrease in genetic diversity would lead to a change in community structure with the introgressed regions. As a result, in 2007 a federal judge ordered a temporary halt in new approvals of GM field trials, citing an inadequate environmental review of the potential environmental impacts (Quist 2010:12-13).

Further still:

Two incidents of transgenic contamination of wild relatives have been studied in some detail – the transmission of an herbicide-tolerance gene from oilseed rape (canola) to weedy wild turnip hybrids in Canada; and the detection of herbicide-tolerant grasses up to 21 kilometers from a test site in the US state of Oregon…

The incidents of contamination listed in the side box show that gene escape and GE contamination cannot be prevented once GE crops are released. This in turn suggests that the widespread planting of GE trees would over time lead to a persistent contamination of the world’s native forests, with disruptive ecological consequences”.

With current rates of deforestation contributing 20% of global carbon emissions annually, the massive increase in deforestation that will accompany the rise of wood- based agrofuels production will have significant impacts on climate, belying the argument that cellulosic agrofuels will be part of the solution to global warming.

In conclusion, the massive increase in logging and the planned use of genetically engineered trees that will accompany the production of wood-based “second generation”agrofuels make this so-called “alternative energy”one of the foremost threats to forests and forest-dependent peoples across the globe (www.globaljusticeecology.org 2008:3,10).

As an aside, given that “Global warming is at large the result of deforestation, desertification and incessant environmental pollution” (Eshetu, et. al. 2005), the removal of natural forests should be largely prohibited, and the often associated poisoning of whole landscapes by pesticide should be, once and for all, censored.


…Strauss et al. (1995) stated unambiguously, “Gene flow within and among tree populations is usually extensive, which makes the probability of transgene escape from plantations high.” Timmons et al. (1995, 1996) expressed a similar conclusion for Brassica. Likewise, the ecologists Kareiva et al. (1994) concluded that “the escape of transgenic pollen is inevitable.” Williamson’s (1994) analysis of historical records of deliberately introduced organisms, concludes that nearly all escape, and of these 10 percent become established (Raffa, et. al. 1997:251).

If the above is bad, then this is much worse because numerous experts:

…have identified possible adverse effects of escaped transgenes. Some examples include creation of new (or enhanced) pests, harm to nontarget species, and disruptions to biotic communities, natural food webs, and ecosystem processes.

In each of these cases, there are well established mechanisms by which such adverse consequences might arise, and substantial literature providing precedents from analogous introductions. Examples of possible mechanisms include: 1) enhanced competitiveness of a genetically engineered organism (due to pest resistance or physiological environmental tolerance of stress) that displaces existing or subsequent beneficial organisms (Ellis et al. 1984; Moamad et al. 1984); 2) reductions in seed dispersal, pollination, or biodiversity by insecticidal transgene products (Simmonds 1976; McGranahan et al.·1988); or 3) acquisition of traits that enhance competitive status by existing weed species (Windle and Franz 1979) (ibid.:251-252).

Now, let us contrast GMO transgene escapes to pesticide:

A single molecule of DDT [1,1,1,-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane] remains a single molecule or degrades, but a single crop allele has the opportunity to multiply itself repeatedly through reproduction, which can frustrate attempts at containment (Ellstrand 2001:1543).

Given the toxicity of GMO products, GMO stands as an absolute hyper-infectious PLANET KILLER, just a slower and off-greener version of a nuclear holocaust, and with the added interest of likely massive ecological instability and famine preceding the end of the nightmare. And what about in situ and introduced GMO pathogens?


‘Enhancing’ pest tolerance? What ELSE could a released endotoxin gene ‘enhance’? Note that: “Researchers have determined that microbial contamination, in the form of bacterial endotoxins… [see Endnote #8] and B-1,3-glucan… [see Endnote #9] are linked with SBS [Sick Building Syndrome] in living quarters and office buildings (Wan & Li 1999b: 172)” (Thompson 2000:9). Also:

Other factors may contribute to the symptoms associated with poor indoor air quality, including the presence of organic compounds causing sensory irritation or an unpleasant odour,7 and airborne bacteria and their products including endotoxins.8 (Royal Commission On Environmental Pollution 2007:197)

BACTERIAL ENDOTOXINS essentially equal MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION, which can equate with BIOAEROSOL TOXINS (which, overall, include also mold mycotoxins) causing respiratory problems, nausea (Thompson 2000:9, referencing Koskinen et al. 1999:143-144 [see Endnote #10]) and non-respiratory issues such as “aches and pains, nerves, headache and eye irritation” (ibid. [see Endnote #11]). The fact of the SBS in humans means that, not only do symptoms manifest as a response to toxic chemical vapor (Volatile Organic Compounds, or “VOCs”) exposures from synthetic materials (such as synthetic carpet, particle board, glues, paint, etc.) in the home or office, but that — in terms of the external sourcing of an additional chemical culprit — endotoxin may have migrated into buildings. That is, the endotoxin is AIRBORNE. This is a serious matter in terms of GMO plantations:

Exposure to bioaerosols may occur in many different occupations, especially those in which stored products are handled or where aerosols are created as a result of leaks from equipment intentionally or accidentally contaminated with microorganisms or during particular operations as, for instance, in laboratories and during post-mortem or surgical procedures (Lacey & Dutkiewicz 1994).

The analogue of the above occupational exposures in an open/external environment could be:

• Storms and high winds (including trees blown down or branches snapped off)

• Harvesting operations

• Post harvesting cleanup

• Pollination

• Even ‘passive’ (nothing in particular overtly happening other than GMO plant growth and normal total plant immersion in, and responsiveness to, the local and extended environment).

In regard to the last point, please note:

Members of the Myrtaceae family and most of the world’s plants exchange gases and moisture through stomatal openings which may open and close in response to climatic

…stomatal opening also influences the emissions of a range of terpenes…

…The authors demonstrated that volatile emission changes as a function of stomatal opening or closure. T hey showed that more soluble compounds such as alcohols and carboxylic acids are controlled by stomata. Specifically, they showed that large morning bursts of aldehydes were related to stomatal opening after closure during the night (Gibbs 2006:86).

Many other gas emissions are shown by this author to occur in plants, including alcohols, carboxylix acids, linalool, 1, 8-cineole, monoterpene, ocimene (especially in Pinus pinea), acetic acid, terpenes (including Sesquiterpenes from Eucalyptus viminalis), and eucalyptol, (ibid.:86-90). Note further:

Rogge et al. analysed fine particles from plants in a simulation representing natural leaf abrasion by wind… Fine particles less than two microns shed from the leaves were extracted and analysed by GC/MS…

Particulates from plants can act as vectors for terpenes. Logically, when fungi grow on substrates containing terpenes, there would be some uptake of terpenes and distribution into fungal spores, contributing to the set microscopic particles found in the air. (ibid.:91).

And, by extension, the above particulates will contain GMO endotoxin that will escape AND pollute:

The application of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and the growing of genetically-modified
crops are currently practised to control infestations of crop-eating insects. The
increasing use of these biopesticides could lead to an increase in Cry1Ab endotoxin in
both terrestrial and aquatic environments (Douville, et. al. 2005).


Acute and chronic airway inflammations caused by environmental agents including
endotoxin represent an increasing health problem (Togbe, et.al. 2007:768).

And what of fungi growing on GMO pollen and the other substrates on and emanating en masse as airborne particulates from GMO plantation crops? Given that fungi can feed off dead matter and also act parasitically (ibid.:92), WHY SHOULDN’T FUNGI TAKE ON GMO CONTAMINATION? Note GMO Accident #1:

There is now another fungus, among us this one being an escapee from a genetic engineering laboratory at Lincoln University in New Zealand. The refugee fungus, named Beauveria bassiana, occurs naturally in soils throughout the world and has been employed by mankind as a biological insecticide to control a variety of pests. In a classic case of mistaken identity, scientists confused the GMO fungus with its wild strain already present in the environment. As a result, despite constant reassurances given the public that potentially dangerous organisms are contained securely within research labs, this experiment was not conducted within the required and approved genetic modification containment facilities. The buildings suspected of the leak have been shut down until the severity and extent of the situation are fully understood. Don’t hold your breath, though; almost two weeks after the incident, investigators are still at a loss as to how it occurred. To top that off, both the university and research agency involved had been previously implicated or found responsible for other GE experiment breaches. So much for safeguards and assurances. Tragically, self- propagating genetic pollution is permanent. It cannot be recalled from the environment (Allen 2013).

Note further GMO Accident #2:

1.Horizontal gene transfer at plant-surface sites

Comment by Ignacio Chapela, Berkeley/Tromsø

The careful and understated presentation, beginning with the title, belies research results that I think should be considered a major landmark in the growing evidence demonstrating how little we know about the ecological consequences of transgenesis, in particular the potential for horizontal gene transfer in real field situations. It also shows a definite and probably very important source of concern, the real possibility that DNA vectored into plants could move out, with full reproductive capacity, via a microbial route into the genomic environment far and beyond the immediate space and phylogeny of the host plant. Any environmental evaluation of field releases should now be required to seriously consider this possibility.

The research for this paper is carefully conceived and conducted, using various sources of confirmatory evidence. The frequency of “spontaneous” transformations out of the bacterium and into the fungus (2 out of 17, 1 out of 15, 10 out of 31 and 14 out of 42 trials in various repetitions) is exceedingly high. Although the paper demonstrates the transfer “only” from whole bacterial cells onto fungal spores (or hyphae), a precautionary approach should dictate that the possibility be also considered that transfers could occur through back-transformation, since much of the Agrobacterium wherewithal necessary to accomplish it is present in the transgenic plant. It is also known that whole Agrobacterium can “hide” through the process of regeneration of plants out of callus in the transgenesis process, providing accessible cells for the transformation, and of course encounters of Agrobacterium and different fungi (and other organisms?) at a plant-wound site must be considered common in the field (Chapela, No date).

The above, CRITICALLY IMPORTANT, Chapela article also notes: “For the full text of this important new paper: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013684 University of Bristol press release: http://bit.ly/bezdRp” (ibid.). Note further GMO Accident #3:

2.Bacteria spread genes to fungi on plants Tom Marshall Planet Earth, 27 October 2010 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0013684

A bacterium that’s used to modify plants’ genes can also change the DNA of completely different lifeforms in the wild, new research shows.

If the bacteria come into contact with particular fungi at a wound in a plant’s outer skin, the fungi can come away with new genes from the bacterium. If these help it survive, they could become a permanent part of its genetic makeup.

This is a way genes could potentially escape genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and move into other living things. It underscores the need to make sure these microbes are removed completely from genetically-modified plants before they leave the lab. It also shows that genes can move between organisms in more ways than has previously been assumed.

‘This study suggests that the encounter between this bacterium and a fungus on the plant surface may lead to gene flow in a previously overlooked way, potentially leaking GM genes into the natural world,’ says Professor Gary Foster of the University of Bristol, one of the study’s authors.(Marshall 2010).

And here is an EXTREMELY interesting comment:

And if you hear anyone say the genes won’t spread unless they occasionally confer an advantage, meaning natural selection will take care of the problem so who cares, here is why that is wrong: The genes can be thought of as a virus and the life form merely a host. All they have to do is survive long enough to spread into a new plant.

That whole patch of host plants can die for all this independent pseudo-organism (the string of GMO genes) cares- it is still surviving. GMO genes are going to transcend what we thought of as fitness- they are a fundamentally new kind of life (http://www.gmofreeportland.com/ 2010).

If all environments integrate and are essentially seamless enabling continuous communication, why would we ever conclude that there is an impassable barrier that prevents endotoxin or GMO-infused particulates from exiting a GMO plantation tree and becoming airborne (a bit like the myths that demand that Bifenthrin — a synthetic pyrethroid termiticide — and also glyphosate stay put once applied (see: http://www.docshut.com/ksuutp/bifenthrin-toxicity-mobility.html; http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/reports/MurrayThompson_The-Mobility-Persistence-&-Toxicity-of-Bifenthrin.pdf; http://www.slashdocs.com/mtwrrp/bifenthrin-toxicity-mobility.html; or http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/pesticides/MurrayThompson_The-Mobility-Persistence-&-Toxicity-of-Bifenthrin.pdf)? Continuing with endotoxin. First:

Elevated levels of endotoxin have been measured in agriculture (6), the biotechnology industry (25), office buildings (37), and swimming pools (21) (Walters, et. al. 1993:996).

How widespread are industry exposures?

Exposures to bioaerosols in the occupational environment are associated with a wide range of health effects, including infectious diseases, toxic effects, allergies, and cancer [Douwes er aJ.,2003]. ‘Workers from a large number of industries are potentially at risk including workers in agriculture, meat production, food and animal feed industry waste recycling and composting industry detergent industry wood and paper industry metal machining industries, biotechnology industries, the medical and public health sector, as well as, veterinarians, pet shop keepers, laboratory animal workers, etc.

Another example is exposure to high levels of microorganims and endotoxin such as occur in waste recycling workers (e.g. waste sorting, organic waste collection and composting; [van Tongeren et al., 1997; Douwes et ai., 2000; Wouters et aI., 2002]) causing airway inflammation and respiratory conditions such as “organic dust toxic syndrome”, asthma, and “extrinsic allergic alveolitis” [Poulsen et aI., 1995; Thorn and Rylander, 1998; Douwes et aI., 2000; Wouters et aI., 2002] (Douwes, Thorne & Heederik 2003:39).

Why should we really worry?

There is increasing evidence that diseases caused by organic dusts are mainly of an inflammatory nature. Among the many agents present in organic dusts, bacterial endotoxin is a major candidate for the inflammatory reaction” (Thorn 2001).

…it is now appropriately recognized that exposures to biological agents in both the occupational and residential indoor environment are associated with a wide range of adverse health effects with major public health impact, including contagious infectious diseases, acute toxic effects, allergies and cancer (Douwes, Thorne, Pearce & Heederik 2003:187-188).

Given that:

Insertion of a gene taken from the fast-growing Arabidopsis weed, has created GM- Eucalyptus trees growing 5 metres a year, with 20%-30% more mass than their un- modified counterparts”, and that “They are 27 metres high in 5.5 years [87] (SourceWatch.org 2013b)…

…I strongly suspect that enhanced growth in a GMO plant will make that plant’s endotoxins and other GMO particulates more available for escape to the surrounding environment. How so? First, and more generally, again, everything is CONNECTED:

Headwater streams are intimately connected with the adjacent terrestrial environments. By-products from commercial crop fields have been shown to enter the draining water catchments throughout the agricultural mid-western U.S….

Crop plant residues from Bt corn are known to contain this toxin[96][97] [“bacteria- derived o-endotoxin Cry1Ab, derived from Bacillus thuringiensis”] and recent research has shown some adverse effects of Bt corn by-products on stream organisms.[98]…

…the presence of the toxin in plant residues is potentially significant to macroinvertebrate consumers inhabiting these aquatic systems (SourceWatch.org 2013c).

Further, in terms of ecological attacks, it is known that:

A variety of studies have shown that B.t. applications can disturb insect communities. Research following large-scale B.t. applications to kill gypsy moth larvae in Lane County, Oregon, found that the number of oak-feeding caterpillar species was reduced for three years following spraying, and the number of caterpillars was reduced for two years.68 Similar results were found in a study of caterpillars feeding on tobacco brush following a B.t.k. application to control spruce budworm in Oregon.69 In untreated areas, the number of species was above 30 percent higher, and the number of caterpillars 5 times greater, than in B.t.k.-treated areas two weeks after treatment. The number of caterpillars was sill reduced in treated areas the following summer. In Washington, B.t. applications in King and Pierce counties to kill gypsy moths reduced spring moth populations by almost 90 percent.70 In addition, one rare species appeared to have been eradicated from the treatment zone, and moth populations were “heavily impacted in an area more than double that which was actually sprayed” as moths moved into the treatment zone from surrounding areas.70 In West Virginia, applications of Foray 48B reduced the number of caterpillar species and the number of caterpillars. The year following application, the number of moth species and the number of moths were both reduced. A recent (1994) study in four different Oregon plane communities found that total weight of caterpillars was reduced between 90 and 95 percent by B.t. treatment; the number of caterpillars was reduced by 80 percent; and the number of caterpillar species was reduced by over 60 percent.72 (Swadener 1994).

Also, aquatic insects, birds and shrews were found to be impacted by the toxin (ibid.). Second, and a little more specifically in terms of a RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SHREDDING GREEN WASTE AT MOUNTS PLANTATION, EAST ALLINGTON:

Pathway… Air transport then inhalation… Agitation of composting material causes the release of airborne microorganisms and dust. Continuous exposure to bioaerosols can be harmful to human health (Pope 2011).

Thirdly, and a little more specifically:

Potential human health impacts are only beginning to be known. These health risks include exposure to hazardous chemicals that are applied to plantations of transgenic trees and harmful effects of inhaling pollen from trees that produce a Bt toxin (a o- endotoxin, such as Cry1Ab or Cry1Ac (CHK)…

A series of studies published by scientists from Cuba and Mexico found that Cry1Ac is a potent systemic immunogen (e.g. evokes an immune response), as potent an adjuvant as the cholera sub-toxin, binds to gut cells and is capable of causing changes in the permeability of the gut (e.g. Vasquez- Padron et al., 1999a, 1999b, 2000)…

Finally, the risk of immune response via inhalation is larger than the response from ingestion as inhaled substances are not exposed to gut digestive enzymes as they go directly into the circulatory system… (Global Justice Ecology Project, et.al., No date:1)

Note also:

We do not think that the human health data that EPA currently has are adequate. In particular, EPA seems to have ignored a crucial study that suggests that the Bt delta endotoxin is an inhalant allergen, which could present risks, in an occupational sense, to farmworkers and millworkers that are exposed to dust from the processing of Bt crops (Hansen 2000).

And further, what does escape from crops or a plantation can be trangenically highly mercurial, perhaps including being unpredictable in ways similar to how pesticides can morph into even more toxic metabolite configurations, and certainly being unquantifiable in terms of ultimate impact:

…the phenomenon of post-translational processing, which consists of the modification of a protein after it has been translated from the genetic message. And such post- translational processing can have a significant impact on the structure and function of a gene. Furthermore, post-translational processing can differ between organisms, so that the same gene expressed in different genetic backgrounds may have the same amino acid sequence but may differ in structure and function. Examples of such processing includes glycosylation and acetylation (ibid.).

Put another way:

Further evidence that most if not all commercially approved transgenic lines are genetically unstable and non-uniform has come to light. The transgenic lines fail to satisfy the current EU Directive requirements for proof of genetic stability and uniformity, and are hence illegal. Dr. Mae-Wan Ho reports.

In a recent study [1] on five commercially approved transgenic lines carried out by two French laboratories [2], all five transgenic inserts were found to have rearranged, not just from the construct used in transformation, but also from the original structure reported by the company. This was clear evidence that all the lines were genetically unstable…

The studies also revealed a discrepancy in regulatory practice. UK’s Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP) and the Belgian authority both appear to have allowed Monsanto to submit new molecular data on Roundup Ready soybean when independent analysis revealed its insert had rearranged (Institute of Science in Society 2003).


This everyday extreme variation is proof of the instability of transgenic genomes, their propensity for ongoing mutation, and their changeability in response to environmental factors (“Russ” 2014).

And in terms of tree plantations:

Trees are being primarily engineered for insect resistance (with the Bt gene), tolerance to glyphosate, reduced lignin, and faster growth. The escape of any of these traits into native forests (considered inevitable given the unreliability of sterility technologies), is likely to unleash devastating impacts on native forest ecosystems. Potential impacts include: Contamination with the Bt-toxin insect resistance will decimate insects sensitive to Bt-toxin, such as Lepidopterae (butterflies and moths), and potentially their predators (Hilbeck, 1998) and further impacting on bird populations, ultimately disrupting forest ecosystems for which insects are an integral component. Contamination with the low-lignin gene resulting in forest trees that cannot resist insects, disease or environmental stresses like wind. Escape of the gene for faster growth leading to transgenic trees out-competing native trees and plants for light, water and nutrients and leading to soil loss and desertification (Global Justice Ecology Project, et.al., No date:1).

All the above means nothing less than mass transgene ESCAPE:

…there is general agreement that the most serious concerns arise when genetically engineered organisms could cause self-perpetuating injury to commercial or natural ecosystems beyond the immediate area of release (Raffa, et. al. 1997:250).

And here’s an indication of toxicity to Multiple Chemical Sensitive individuals (like me):

Among the issues are the possible spread of allergens, the invitation which herbicide tolerant crops give to over-use of herbicides, possible adverse effects of new toxins (such as the Bt endotoxin) on some people, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance which may be fostered by the use of antibiotic resistance genes in almost all transgenic crops (Sierra Club 2014).

…animal studies of the effects of Bt published in Natural Toxins found that Bt remains active in mammals that have eaten it and may in fact bind to the intestines, leading to “significant structural disturbances and intestinal growths (Global Justice Ecology Project,et. al, No date:1).

I am one of the MCS “some people”. POLLEN INCLUSIONS

And if the occupational environment is a rural area, then how can people on farms and in towns be protected from the bioaerosols emanating from, for example, a pine or Eucalyptus nitens plantation during storms or operations? The answer is, they can’t. As a matter of the simple and overtly obvious in terms of an organic bioaerosol and wind, locals where I live have testified to almost suffocating on pine tree pollen in the spring. They have experienced a range of morbid irritation symptoms over a period of weeks from the pollen (such as allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis), but the most obvious dynamic is barely being able to breathe out in their paddocks when the wind whips up a massive cloud of pollen as they race back to the house for shelter. It is possible, given the magnitude of these monoculture cloud events, that someone could experience an asthmatic attack or heart attack:

Precocious pollen production has important implications for fertilization and pollen dispersal from young, dense stands. Increasing levels of airborne pollen raise concerns for escalating rates of human respiratory disease (Ladeau & Clarke 2006:541).


“We have no control over the movement of insects, birds and mammals, wind and rain that carry pollen and seeds. Genetically engineered trees, with the potential to transfer pollen for hundreds of miles carrying genes for traits including insect resistance, herbicide resistance, sterility and reduced lignin, thus have the potential to wreak ecological havoc throughout the world’s native forests[“]. –Dr. David Suzuki, The Suzuki Foundation” (Global Justice Ecology Project, EcoNexus, Friends of the Earth International, Global Forest Forum and World Rainforest Movement, No date).

Engineering trees to produce Bt toxin could be far more dangerous. Pines are known for heavy pollination, spreading pollen for hundreds of kilometers. Establishment of plantations of pines that produce Bt pollen could potentially lead to widespread outbreaks of sickness…

G. Sing et al. (1993) found pine pollen in Northern India more than 600km from the nearest pines. Pollen models created in 2004 by Duke University researchers demonstrated pollen from native forests in North Carolina in the U.S. traveling in air currents for more than 1,200km north into eastern Canada. This means that transgenic trees cannot be regulated only at the national level. Transboundary contamination of native forests with transgenic traits is virtually assured (Global Justice Ecology Project, et.al., No date:2). PESTICIDE INCLUSIONS

As a small recap, agricultural and plantation operations can be toxic from the pesticide/herbicide perspective:

Spray operators have been shown to be dermally exposed to paraquat by walking through recently sprayed vegetation and into their own spray, regular adjustment and unblocking of spray nozzles and leakage, and overfilling of knapsack spray tanks. Carriers also received measurable dermal exposure from walking through recently sprayed vegetation and accidental spillage when carrying and loading (Chester & Woollen 1982).

Herbicide applications cannot occur without exposures occurring, both for the operator and the public (via spray drift and volatilization drift). Herbicide use is inherently a messy and highly toxic procedure. Spills will occur, blockages of equipment will occur that need to be unblocked, and people WILL be exposed even to just that spray that has been’competently’ applied without drama. The exposure and poisoning of agricultural or plantationoperators and even people nowhere near the application site does not stop, however, with them:

Several studies link pesticide exposure by both parents and children to leukemia. The pattern of disease suggests that some damage to chromosomes may occur before the child is born (3)…

Several studies have linked leukemia to pesticides. Two recent reviews concluded that pesticide exposure may be a cause of leukemia (10)(11). These reviews report that most, though not all, studies find leukemia was more likely in children whose fathers were exposed to pesticides at work than other children.

Children of fathers with jobs including pesticide exposure had a 2.7 times higher risk of leukemia when compared to controls (17) (www.envirohealthpolicy.net 2001).

And a little more specifically:

The current chronic kidney disease epidemic, the major health issue in the rice paddy farming areas in Sri Lanka has been the subject of many scientific and political debates over the last decade…

Here, we have hypothesized the association of using glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the disease endemic area and its unique metal chelating properties. The possible role played by glyphosate-metal complexes in this epidemic has not been given any serious consideration by investigators for the last two decades. Furthermore, it may explain similar kidney disease epidemics observed in Andra Pradesh (India) and Central America. Although glyphosate alone does not cause an epidemic of chronic kidney disease, it seems to have acquired the ability to destroy the renal tissues of thousands of farmers when it forms complexes with a localized geo environmental factor (hardness) and nephrotoxic metals (Jayasumana, et. al. 2014:2125-2126).

Note also these studies: Séralini, G.; Cellier, D.; de Vendomois, J. New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 52, 596–602. Benachour, N.; Sipahutar, H.; Moslemi, S.; Gasnier, C.; Travert, C.; Seralini, G.E. Time- and dose-dependent effects of roundup on human embryonic and placental cells. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 53, 126–133. Benachour, N.; Seralini, G.E. Glyphosate formulations induce apoptosis and necrosis in human umbilical, embryonic, and placental cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 97–105. Gasnier, C.; Dumont, C.; Benachour, N.; Clair, E.; Chagnon, M.C.; Seralini, G.E. Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines. Toxicology 2009, 262, 184–191. Also:

Throughout the first years of life, children undergo rapid growth and development, and their complex, delicate developmental processes may be easily interrupted and derailed by pesticides. A single pesticide may affect multiple processes and multiple pesticides may affect a single process (Miller et al 2002). Exposures are especially damaging during critical windows of vulnerability in which children are particularly susceptible to damage.

These windows occur from the period around conception until adolescence, depending on the organ system; organ systems undergo rapid change and extensive growth both prenatally and in the first few months after birth, in some cases even for years. But the unborn foetus and newborn are at greatest risk, and interference with their developmental processes can lead to lifelong alterations in behaviour, growth and development, and disease occurrence (Watts 2013:36-37).

Pesticide exposure damage transmits through time and across generations (note other comments in this essay regarding epigenetics). What might just be very appropriate at this point is a very large epidemiological survey of morbidity in children whose fathers/mothers are subject to pesticide handling at work (how many industries would cooperate with this, and how many workers who became involved would be penalized by their employees?). How many “children of the corn” and plantation children would register as bearing a statistically significant amplification of cancers over a control group? However, would it be too embarrassing for too many attempting to measure just how much pain there is out there in our little kids? Could we care enough to reveal whatever the ugly truth is likely to be? Would we, as caregivers of the next generation, want to be burdened with knowing just how much potential has been lost in our little ones due to the supposed NEED to spray toxics with the unexamined assumption that this will make things grow better and earn the company more (what more could you corporately wish for?). What if MORE is actually LESS? And when LESS is measurable in the death of a child here, there, and everywhere, from Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, how will we quantify THAT KIND OF “LESS”? Will we still stupidly spout the “balance the pros and cons” techno-chemical philosophical mantra when the LESS is FINALLY intelligently understood to represent A MOVEMENT TOWARD EXTINCTION? BIOSOLIDS, RUNOFF, DUST & HUMAN EXPOSURES

Here, I am looking at the potential for biosolids applied to plantations to affect human health, either by contact with biosolid pathogens on site or later, after pathogen migration. Agricultural and plantation operations can be toxic from a biosolids perspective:

Application of… [wastewater treatment] biosolids to pine plantations is a practice increasing worldwide due to the benefits of biosolids as a soil amendment. The regulations allow biosolids that may contain pathogenic organisms to be landapplied. In the case of pine plantations, the general public is not physically excluded from the area resulting in a situation arising whereby exposure of the biosolids to members of the general public can occur. This potential exposure results in a human health risk becoming present.

Instances of pathogen survival post-application of biosolids have been observed indicating that the risk to human health is certainly present… The airborne pathogen risks through the formation of biosolids dust and the occurrence of plantation burns that may cause pathogens to become airborne in the smoke of a burn, were investigated. E. coli, Salmonella spp. and Clostridium perfringens were the pathogen indicators selected for this study.

The results show that the pathogen levels in the land-applied biosolids pose a risk to members of the public and plantation workers via direct exposure for the first 3 months post-application. After 2 months E. coli was observed to have undergone significant die-off, Salmonella spp. was observed to be at undetectable levels after 3 months. However 11 months post-application in the following winter season, Salmonella spp. returned to high levels that would pose a human health risk. Clostridium perfringens remained at high levels throughout the 1 year monitoring period. During this initial monitoring period, a relationship between moisture content and pathogen populations was observed. Salmonella spp. indicated the strongest relationship with a return in its population from undetectable levels to high levels when an increase in moisture content was observed.

The formation of biosolids dust was an issue raised, and more specifically whether pathogens could become airborne with the dust… Clostridium perfringens was the exception as this pathogen was observed to survive within biosolids dust.

The pathogen risk from direct exposure is present for all individuals who come into contact with the biosolids during the initial 3 months post-application and, due to pathogen re-growth or re-colonisation, the following winter season when moisture levels are increased (Levitan 2010).

This thesis noted that only occupational exposures were likely, however the admission that people could enter plantations automatically means that the public is exposed as well. It should be further considered that movement of pathogens from plantations with surface runoff and groundwater poses risks to creeks and rivers, and human health recreational activities and drinking water also. With canoeing and other activities, contaminated water could be transported to homes where pets or children could gain access. C. perfringens in airborne dust sourcing from biosolids dust could pose risks at distance from the plantation application site, and even during/after a fire or rubbish burn, likely because “C. perfringens spores can survive high temperatures” (CDC 2014). HORIZONTAL Bt GENE TRANSFER ON THE HEELS OF TRANSGENIC MANIPULATION

Here, I am briefly looking at the potential for horizintal gene transfer to create environmental health problems. The implication here is that pathogens from biosolids could accommodate this transfer. Note the following:

Bacillus thuringiensis is the most widely applied biological insecticide… …plants engineered with the cry genes encoding the B. thuringiensis crystal proteins are the most widely cultivated transgenic crops… Escherichia coli engineered to produce the B. thuringiensis insecticidal toxin killed gypsy moth larvae… (Broderick, Raffa & Handelsman 2006:15196).

I believe that information located elsewhere in this Essay (e.g., below) and the above portends the extremely high likelihood that naturally resident bacteria or that introduced via human activities will horizontally take on B. thuringiensis encoding and result in the decimation of massive insect populations. If E. coli can be encoded via manipulation, then that type of gene transfer (and more) will be able to take place spontaneously in nature. This will result in an entirely uncontrollable series of disastrous genetic events affecting soil health, insect and insectivore health, not to mention pollination.


Our data indicate that consecutive cultivation by genetically modified cottons with
Bt and CpT I genes can result in persistence of Cry1Ac and CpT I proteins and
negatively affect soil microbial and biochemical properties (Chen, et. al. 2011:67).


…these [transgenic Cry] toxins may accumulate in the soil in an active form and this may affect soil invertebrates not normally in contact with Bt toxins. Finally, the remote possibility of horizontal gene transfer to other bacterial organisms must also be considered given the greater persistence of the DNA in the environment (Lorenz and Wackernagel, 1996). Assessment of these risks requires both rigorous and independent scientific examination (Sanchis 2010:226).

It should be noted that the warning “rigorous and independent scientific examination” (ibid.) comes well after the technology has already been put to worldwide use… One sees these kind of after-the-fact warnings in scientific literature all the time. For example: “known horizontal transfer activity” and “We recommend including the above-mentioned items into the premarket safety assessment of genetically modified crops carrying transgenes…” (Kleter, Peijnenburg & Aarts 2005:326). These quotes demonstrate clearly that we are interferring deep inside Nature with no realistic or worthwhile reservations whatsoever. There is no censorship of human invention. Only the chase after mega dollars.


What is the potential for pest infestations and disease to rampage through (and beyond) monoculture plantation crops in the event of the development of widespread insect resistance to GMO plants? What about recombinant DNA dynamics?

The potential for insects to evolve resistance to GM insecticidal plants is considered to be one of the main threats to this technology, since resistance to Bt sprayable products has been demonstrated (Ferre, Van Rie & Macintosh 2008).


…the continued exposure of pests to Bt toxins has selected for many resistant insects (Tabashnik et al. 1990; Talekar & Shelton 1993; Tabashnik 1994; Bauer 1997; Tang et al. 1997; Speight et al. 1999). Such resistance is thought to have developed through continued exposure to sprays on non-transgenic crops, and where these sprays have persisted in the soil following application (Saxena et al. 1999) (Coventry 2001).


In transgenic virus-resistant organisms, recombination between viral transgenes and invading viruses could lead to increased virulence and undesirable effects on wild hosts existing in natural habitats (Snow et al., 2005). Little is known yet on the regulation and activities of the pathogenic microorganisms and viruses inserted in the transgene construct (e.g., CaMV) (Quist et al., 2007), which increases the uncertainty about how they could impact wild fauna and farm animals (Catacora-Vargas 2011:25).

Imagine the famine that would ensue if corn and cotton crops worldwide engage disease and/or insect infestation after their pests gain resistance. Worse, imagine the impact on public health after a potential synergy occurs between ‘normal’ exposures to endotoxin aerosols and the diseases exploding out of the pest resistance? That is: massive and widespread insect devastation of crops releasing monstrous (but likely mostly invisible) organic dust clouds of endotoxin. Famine would follow and would be concurrent with the diseases that would opportunistically amplify on the basis of a low-level immune dysfunction in immune compromised people exposed to the GMO endotoxins for years. Imagine the overlapping devastation. Parallel pandemics (there is much more that could be factored into that nightmare scenario). Just as a small example of how impossible it is to put controls on GE and have any confidence in human ingenuity, note this information:

There is a possibility, however, of gene transfer from B.t. cotton to wild or feral cotton relatives in Hawaii, Florida and the Carribean (epa.gov 2001).

Continuing with the GMO escape theme and ignoring pesticide toxicities for a moment. What else should give us ‘confidence’ in GMO technologies?

A large-scale application of transgenic Bt-plants may result in long-lasting negative impact on the environment. First, the cultivation of these plants leads to accumulation of Bt-toxins in soil. Second, the decomposition of transgenic plants takes significantly longer time compared to that of isogenic lines. Third, the biological activity of soils under transgenic crops is lower than in the control plots. The transfer of o-endotoxin-encoding genes to the genome of agricultural crops affects simultaneously several entirely different traits of genetically modified plants, thus exerting pleiotropic effects. This gives rise to a paradoxical situation: the genetically engineered crops selected on the trait of resistance to herbivorous insects of the order Lepidoptera become more attractive for herbivores from the other order, Homoptera (Victorov 2008).

A little more on “pleiotropic”, and also highlighting a critical aspect of the aberrations in thought that are now standard inside the insane world of toxics ‘regulation’:

Unintended crop attributes. ‘Pleiotropic effects’ may occur when new genes are inserted into plants to give the plants desirable new traits (i.e. more than one change may occur in a plant as a result of the new gene). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) policy regulating transgenic crops assumes that pleiotropic effects will not occur, and that genetically modified crops are ‘substantially equivalent’ to conventional crops. This policy was implemented despite concerns raised by government scientists that it failed to adequately address risks to the environment or to animal and human health posed by pleiotropic effects.

Memos written by FDA scientific staff indicate that pleiotropic effects may indeed occur when new genes are inserted into food crops: “Until more of these experimental plants have a wider environmental distribution, it would be premature for FDA to summarily dismiss pleiotropy” and “Pleiotropic effects occur in genetically engineered plants… at frequencies up to 30%. Most of these effects can be managed by the subsequent breeding and selection procedures. Nevertheless, some undesirable effects such as increased levels of known naturally occurring toxicants, appearance of new, not previously identified toxicants, increased capability of concentrating toxic substances from the environment (e.g., pesticides or heavy metals), and undesirable alterations in the levels of nutrients may escape breeders’ attention unless genetically engineered plants are evaluated specifically for these changes. Such evaluations should be performed on a case-by-case basis, i.e., every transformant should be evaluated before it enters the marketplace.” Instead of heeding theses concerns, FDA issued biotech food rules that assume no pleiotropic effects will occur, therefore no additional safety testing of transgenic crops is required (Grubinger 2000).

And, in terms of GE trees:

Besides destroying native forests for eucalyptus plantations, the commercial use of cold-adapted eucalyptus could result in the escape of these GE trees (via seed or asexual vegetative reproduction) into ecosystems and forests where they could out- compete native vegetation and displace wildlife. Furthermore, the southern US, where establishment of commercial GE eucalyptus biofuel feedstock plantations is now being considered, is known to be subject to strong storms, including tornadoes and hurricanes, which have the potential to distribute eucalyptus seeds over very large areas from tens to hundreds of kilometres (Petermann 2008).  MY SYMPTOMS

As an aside, I have experienced a significant and distressingly painful increase in joint and muscle myalgia in the 13 months I have lived in south to south-west Tasmania after moving from a township to a rural location surrounded by E. nitens and pine plantations (not one of my best decisions).  Overt joint inflammation in the knees, right hand and elbows have also featured, along with a considerable increase in chronic fatigue.  As well, increasing chest congestion with myself and my son posts up suspicions of bioaerosols affecting our respiratory systems.  This is a particular area of concern in terms of my health that cleared up considerably (along with 30 years of asthma) when I first moved from the Sydney Basin’s perennial recirculating air pollution to New Norfolk in Tasmania, but which has now reappeared (along with the other above- and below-listed aggravated symptoms) in my current rural/plantation setting.  My asthma is not aggravated in this plantation setting, but respiratory mucous production and joint pains certainly are.  To my untrained medical mind this speaks of a strictly toxic rather than particulate air pollution issue.

So here, in a (supposed) “clean air” setting I am experiencing an anomaly: respiratory symptoms that I have historically experienced in my lifetime only associated with heavy air pollution reappearing in what should be a relatively pristine setting.  I believe anomalies are critically important in that they represent signatures or maps, and ones that should not be ignored.

Another concern: Our water supply arises from a stream immediately adjacent to plantation areas that may well have been sprayed with herbicides in past decades (and which therefore may harbor a significant reservoir of toxic chemical residue) and which are potentially earmarked for future spraying (hopefully not).  My neighbor has suggested that significant spraying has taken place throughout the pine plantation because the plantation exhibits almost no blackberry infestation, this being a very typical and common signature of most other disturbed and waste areas in this location.  Due to his concerns he decided to stick with rain water instead of tapping into the perennially available stream water.

As a result of my research, and in contradiction to most authoritative pronouncements, I now have some considerable concerns about the E. nitens plantations (including domestic nitens plantings) in particular because I am (along with my pesticide poisoned son) incredibly and spontaneously chemical sensitive (from initial pesticide poisoning in Sydney; see: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/reports/MurrayThompson_Symptoms-From-Original-Poisoning-17.pdf).

Essentially, I am a barometer of environmental and chemical vapor conditions around me. For example, I can walk up two streets in a township near here and experience horrible chest pains, while not experiencing those pains at all along other streets. If I wear a good quality chemical filter in a respirator, I will not experience those pains in those two streets at all. The streets are on the opposite side of a hill where a waste dump is situated and may well have a direct link via an underground gravel seam (or similar) to leachate sourcing from the dump. This occurred historically and very notably in Sydney at the Castlereagh Waste Management Centre in north-west Sydney (see: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/castlereagh/Toxic-Chemical-Leakage-Outside-Waste-Depot.pdf).

Still continuing with my now extended personal issue: there are plenty of Eucalyptus nitens in our area, so my aggravated joint pain and inflammatory symptoms could potentially be the result of, not necessarily only the likely low level residues of pesticide spray applications that have occurred both commercially (plantations) and via domestic use, but also endotoxin aerosol exposures from the nitens plantation and domestic trees as well, if indeed they are GMO (see below).  I have to ask: and what of the internal (DNA, etc.) nature of the pollen coming off these trees? Recall the Raffa, et.al. (1997) and Global Justice Ecology Project, et.al. (no date) quotes in previous sections.

A worthwhile point to contemplate here in terms of logic and general wisdom: If you molly coddle and manipulate (and by analogy, extreme-breed German Shepherds with bad hips and bulldogs that can’t breathe) a monoculture of trees; that is you plough the road ahead of their planting with pre-emergent herbicides, and then you spray again to ‘protect’ the seedlings from grass weeds, flat weeds and woody weeds with herbicides that promote the development of pathogenic soil conditions…  Why would these seedlings not develop immune dysfunction and become a reservoir for developed pathogenic states? What then of the bioaerosols that are discharged from such a sickened monoculture? Would they not be inherently pathogenic to wild life and humans alike, even without an additional GMO status?

I feel that the accurate stereotype of the closeted child — kept indoors from earliest childhood in a “bubble” and prevented from exercising against the vicissitudes and pressures of the outside world — adds valid theoretical and analogical notional content to a monoculture regime dynamic that sees trees set up with a too easy (and artificial) life (a monitored, contrived, ‘adjusted’ and toxic life), one poisoned and sickened through being protected and doctored too heartily by misinformed and institutionalized commercial good intentions.

My son and I are located smack in the middle of a contrived bubble of plantations. Our Sydney Specialist, Dr. Mark Donohoe, has suggested:

Mr Thompson and his son, Daniel, suffer severe and disabling chemical sensitivities,
including sensitivities to a broad range of environmental chemicals such as solvents,
paints, terpenes, glues, cleaning chemicals, chlorine and chlorinated products, plasticisers,
fragrances and more.  Of particular concern at present is Mr Thompson’s adverse
reactions to the specific terpenes found in Eucalyptus nitens plantations and the surrounding
area. His health has deteriorated markedly with worsening of his respiratory
and joint/muscle inflammation and pain. (Donohoe, Medical Letter, May 12, 2014)

Shallow and preconceived prescriptions for advancing human activities and profit often produce immature and uni-dimensional approaches to growing biomass.  This is where we see an overabundance and concentration of species not seen in Nature. Plantations.  Too many of one species is like an unbalanced infestation and infection, and so small wonder that monocultures are subject to the ravages of disease and linked to human disease outbreaks.  Further, an overabundance of natural (?) emissions from such monocultures will not be adequately processed because the natural scheme of the greater Web of Life (or, diversity, variability, and integratedness) has been replaced on too large a scale by a simplistic vision that leaves out Nature’s buffer wisdom: it’s sophisticated physiological power.

After a few decades of outright destruction (poisoned and destroyed soil, statistically significant increases in human disease incidence including heightened and looming epigenetic pandemics, wild animal extinctions, etc.), however, it’s always good to see improvements made to these impoverished systems of human conceptualization.  A small sampling: this is where weed rows are permitted to grow between crops, where native trees are planted on both historically cleared land (especially to reduce salinity) and former plantations, and wildlife corridors are reinstituted.  COMMERCIAL CONTRIVANCES & PREDICTABLE OUTCOMES

It should also be noted that life, commerce and technologies are dirty and complex, and are therefore over time always plagued by inevitable accidents. Pesticide spills can occur during normal spray operations that can add to the chemical burden being absorbed by the pesticide application site and extended region of potential chemical influence, spills that most people never hear of (sometimes these incidents are not reported or documented; see Endnote #5). In terms of the Bleaney/Scammell issue above:

It turned out that five weeks prior to that flood event [linked with the oyster
deaths] there had been a helicopter crash carrying pesticides and herbicides in the
upper catchment, apparently aerial spraying trees. And this was the first that
I’d heard about plantations in that area. When we started to look at the size of the
plantations it became apparent that here was a very large source of potential toxic
chemical (Scammell 2010).

As well, with any commercial activity, machinery can spill fuel, oil or brake fluids during these operations, and these contaminants can migrate into streams or concrete slabs especially — but not exclusively (see Endnotes #1 and #4) — downhill from those operations.

As a matter of reminder and recommendation here (where the investigations and discoveries and repudiations of findings never really end), the essential plea in this section is the avoidance of “large acreage, fast-rotation toxic monoculture eucalypt plantations -dependant on pesticides – in our upper and mid water catchments” (TasmanianTimes.com 2011). Although the nature of the problems might not yet be absolutely certain (invisible chemicals and their sponsored imbalances require many veils to be removed in order to reveal concrete epidemiology), the certainty of destabilization of ecosystems in favor of aberrant GMO monocultures should stand as an obvious signature and self-evident warning, wherever these commercial activities have occurred, of inevitable wide-ranging ecological and human health issues arriving after the fact of the bad science stampede.

Could anyone predict the consequences of interferring with the genetics of a plantation species? Yes. You can know now (because of the internal consistency that exists within the heavy burden of after-the-fact research that swings around all our necks) that the consequences of a GMO-ANYTHING will be toxicologically negative in the EXTREME. The negative effect(s) will exist on a continuum somewhere between certain human/ecological morbidity (where even ‘minor’ morbidity is a subtraction from your or Nature’s optimal potential) and an outright parallel pandemic storm.

Endless postmortem analyses ultimately splatter from the fan (and government/industry repudiation of independent eco and human health reports) when we, as a rampantly commercial culture, surrender so utterly and unthinkingly to a glossy infatuation with interference in Nature. When we throw so many commercial invasion/development, GMO and chemical fix spanners into Nature’s works via let’s-get-rich-from-this-and-let’s-worry-about-the-effects-later types of innovation and invention (blundering), all that REPEATS over and over is the usual litany of resulting human health impacts, expensive discovery of causes, victim stress and debility, hand wringing, hired repudiation and official reversals, legalities, politics… and on and on. And yet, all this waste of energy and health potential could have been avoided if we had UTTERLY PRECAUTIOUSLY examined our thinking first before acting on bad science, and then decided we’d be smarter by not throwing the spanners at all!

In other, less discreet, words: we intelligently decided we would not technologically shit where we eat, sleep, reproduce, live, work and holiday…  THE HUMAN HEALTH BIO-TERRORISM EXPERIMENT: GMO MASTER CONSPIRACIES

The consistency of operation of a corporation tells you what its character and intentions are. Its actions are a roadmap leading to a series of destinations:

The data is startling and confirms a clear conclusion. The proliferation of untested, unregulated GM foods in the span of a decade is more a leap of faith than reliable science. Microbiologist Richard Lacey captures the risk stating: “it is virtually impossible to even conceive of a testing procedure to assess the health effects of (GM) foods when introduced into the food chain, nor is there any valid nutritional or public interest reason for their introduction.” Other scientists worldwide agree that GM foods entered the market long before science could evaluate their safety and benefits. They want a halt to this dangerous experiment that needs decades of rigorous research and testing before we can know.

Unchecked and unregulated, human health and safety are at risk because once GMOs enter the food chain, the genie is out of the bottle for keeps. Thankfully, resistance is growing worldwide, many millions are opposed, but reversing the tide won’t be easy. Washington and Ag biotech are on a roll with big unstated aims – total control of our food, making it all genetically engineered, and scheming to use it as a weapon to reward friends and punish enemies (Lendman 2014).  BACTERIAL-ENDOTOXIN TESTING

And, insofar as the existing lack of standardization in airborne endotoxin testing is concerned, the following should be carefully noted:

Some authors suggest that endotoxin exposure may be underestimated because part may be non-soluble and therefore is not detectable because it is not extracted in aqueous media.

Eduard et al.55) studied the solubility of the endotoxins from Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, determining the amount of 3-OH-FA by GC/FID in the soluble and insoluble fractions separated by centrifugation; it ranged from 9% to 83% and they suggested that the LAL test may underestimate endotoxins in environmental samples because the non-soluble fraction remains undetected.

Rylander56) suggests that the Limulus method detects only about a third of the biologically active endotoxin and that the remainder is present inside the fragments of dust particles/bacterial cells, but still able to exert effects when deposited in the lung. If substantial differences in the proportion of soluble endotoxins in different work environments is confirmed in future studies, the contribution of non- soluble endotoxins must be taken into consideration56) (Paba, et. al. 2013:249).


…plate counts are subject to error because bacteria exposed to the air may remain viable yet lose the ability to form colonies, i.e., they become viable but nonculturable. If airborne bacteria exhibit this phenomenon, colony formation data will significantly underestimate the bacterial populations in air samples. …culture techniques did not provide an adequate description of the bacterial burdens of indoor air (i.e., less than 10% of the aerosolized bacteria were capable of forming visible colonies). It is concluded that total cell count procedures provide a better approximation of the number of bacterial cells in air and that procedures other than plate counting are needed to enumerate bacteria in aerosol samples, especially if the public health quality of indoor air is to be estimated. Indoor air pollution, both bacterial and abiotic, has become a very serious concern (25). …building air is recycled through buildings, resulting in increased numbers of bacteria in the air (26, 28), with the result that ca. 10 to 25 million workers in the United States show symptoms of “sick building… (Heidelberg, et. al.:1997).

I believe that the above issues of endotoxin exposure and bacterial count under-estimation will leave initial excursions into the area of bioaerosol emanation from GMO plants favorable for those hoping that this potential, unexposed, does not add to the already long list of intrinsic GMO faults and liabilities. However, I have no doubts that later research will demonstrate that GMO bioaerosols will be seen to be contributing to Sick Building Syndrome worldwide. What might disturbingly relate to the above issue is this research, especially the CAPACITIES of “non-culturable bacterial enteropathogens” (Colwell, et. al. 1996):

Vibrio cholerae O1 can enter a state in which they remain viable but are non- culturable. Presumably, such bacteria can be pathogenic if they retain the capacity to proliferate in the human intestine following ingestion. Two groups of volunteeers were given inocula containing viable but non-culturable V. cholerae O1 of the attenuated vaccine strain CVD 101 (viable CVD 101 organisms readily colonize the human intestine). Volunteers in one of the two groups excreted viable CVD 101, demonstrating that, in the environment of the human intestine, previously non-culturable vibrios can regain the capacity to multiply. These observations support the proposition that viable but non-culturable bacterial enteropathogens may pose a potential threat to health (ibid.).

And, although the immediately above relates to waterborne pathogens, I see potential for pathogenic bio-aerosols (including non-culturable live bacteria, and not just endotoxins; and one should also not forget the pollen component of Primary Biological Aerosol Particels (PBAP) with high allergenic potential (Pöhlker, et. al. 2013)) from GMO plants to:

1. be inhaled by animals and humans,

2. be underestimated in enumeration,

3. remain somewhat latent inside human hosts (where the bacteria could also ultimately migrate between organ systems).

None of this is good news for GMO .

The KEY POINT is: “Life finds a way” (Jurassic Park, 1993). And the “life” modern GMO science makes is monsters, morbidity and extinctions.  BRIEF: PLANTATIONS & ASTHMA

I have left out of the following quoted material information regarding other natural irritants for asthma, of which there are many. In this study the natural chemicals emitted from pine trees produce human health issues. Note:

New Zealand’s incidence of asthma is similar to Australia’s…

New Zealand logging has been a well established industry for more than a century because of the rich endowment of large trees with valuable timber. Planted forests account for 1.7 million hectares and most of it is radiata pine which provide a steady source of pinene and sesquiterpenes as well at flowering time especially. One third of the planted forests are in the central north island.

Figure 6.01 shows a map of high asthma areas…

The areas in the North Island correspond with the forestry areas especially (Gibbs 2006:267-268).

What I wish to highlight here is that you cannot logically expect to get away with the monoculture paradigm without incurring a raft of penalties. We have seen that the invasion of Nature can generate many critically serious problems in terms of disease and even pandemic potential. And this is even without the introduction of GMO plants into the overall unexamined and stampeding mix of perverse human development disasters. And then, when we push this presumptuous envelope further to include:

1. chemically dependent monocultures (see below), with this approach to agriculture and forestry being representative of an extreme corporate demand for technological fix control (denying the truism that “you cannot fix problems with the same mentality that created them” — Einstein paraphrase) and concentration of earning potential, and

2. the additional monumentally ignorant rush for assumed genetic superiority…

…all we are doing is hosting a feverish obsession in the impossible (one that controls US), and all we can accomplish from this is THE USUAL: a passing train wreck of nonsense experimentation that hopes for what it cannot possibly have.




The politics of the matter:

A photograph in a brochure of the important South Esk catchment vividly illustrates part of what is happening in Tasmania’s water catchments.1 The surrounding terrain was cable logged of all vegetation and a plantation of young eucalyptus established that is regularly sprayed with known harm-causing chemicals. These chemicals inevitably enter the water supply. This same brochure reveals:

In the last four years alone, these rivers have been contaminated with poisonous
pesticides: the Duck, Inglis, Bird, Jordan, Montagu, Prosser, Rubicon, South Esk,
George, Little Swanport, Macquarie, Great Forrester, Brumby Creek, Derwent and Liffey … …forestry plantations are now growing in 44 of the State’s 48 water catchments. … …Water testing by our state government is done sporadically and pesticide detections
rarely result in investigations to find their source

Poisoning water supplies and destruction of soil quality because of chemically dependent monoculture plantations needs to be stopped, as does the continued slaughter of our native forests. The health of people in Tasmania is subject to unreasonable risk by virtue of toxins in our water.2 Yet a Government report cleared the George River (at St Helens) of any toxins, eliciting this response from Dr.Lohrey: ‘This is one of the most dubious reports I have read in a long time. It appears to have been written and made public with one aim in mind – to stifle community debate about water quality in the George River.’3 (Bound, Biggs & Obendorf 2012).



Once released into the environment, only with extreme difficulty and great expense can these exotic and highly toxic herbicide chemicals and their often more toxic (and all-too-often, UNKNOWN) metabolites be monitored or tracked (lab tests are expensive, and will not necessarily identify all chemical culprits). And, further, most of the herbicide chemical ultimately wastefully and dangerously passes by its target plant:

95% – 98% of applied pesticides miss their target, reaching nearby people and wildlife, waterways, soil and air (Miller G.T., 2004).

Pesticides uniformly end up elsewhere (usually where we are and beyond…) via spray drift or “volatilization drift” (Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=pesticide-drift). For example:

“Atrazine can be transported more than 1,000 km (621 miles) from the point of application via rainfall and, as a result, contaminates otherwise pristine habitats, even in remote areas where it is not used,” they [researchers and colleagues from the University of California Berkeley] added, citing other researchers.

“In fact, more than a half million pounds (227 tonnes) of atrazine are precipitated in rainfall each year in the United States” (Fox 2010).

Also, from Australia:

We have been impacted by Plantation aerial spraying a cocktail of chemicals and have Simazine (“A pre-emergence, translocated, root absorbed soil-residual herbicide” [Source: http://www.herbiguide.com.au/Descriptions/hg_Simazine_Flowable_500.htm%5D) in our farms water supply 3 years after the event… Authorities do not enforce the laws and the regulators (APVMA) allow chemical use without stipulating MRL. In our case we find Simazine has no maximum residue level in soil. Water limits are also not clearly defined, eg. 10ppb for catttle 20ppb for humans. Yet in America the limit is 4ppb. Its all a bit hit and miss, and we agree with your articles that we will destroy the earth with chemical poisoning before climate change does, Although we suspect chemical pollution will assist climate change to act faster’ (Anonymous post made to my poisonedpeople1 WordPress account, 2014).

And following up after the above comment, an email:

Recent chemical testing by EPA confirms Simazine (banned for use in Agriculture in the EU) is still flowing off the plantation and through our property albeit [in] low levels (ibid.).

Plantation owners beware. You are leaving yourselves open to litigation if you cannot control the trespass of your chemicals! Note:

Most sprayed plantations lead to pesticide pollution of neighbouring streams. Is the plantation owner accountable for this pollution, or is the spraying contractor or the pesticide manufacturer responsible?…

In September 2012, a contractor aerially spraying over Hancock pine plantations in central Victoria [Australia] was fined $10,000 for spray drift which spread over 200 hectares of neighbouring King Lake National Park and Black Ranges State Forest. The spray event occurred over a 10 day period in April 2010 over lands adjoining several plantations. The vegetation that suffered from the spray drift was recovering from the 2009 bushfires which devastated much of the region. It has since been determined that eucalypts that regenerate after bushfires are far more sensitive to the herbicide glyphosate than previously realised.

Who is ultimately accountable for a spray incident that goes wrong in an FSC certified operation? Hancock themselves were not fined but the contractor working for them was.

If a spray contractor follows current label rates for glyphosate, this may be far more toxic in fire damaged landscapes than previously realised. Will glyphosate labels now have to be amended to incorporate this new possibility? (Amis 2013).

Aerial spraying:

It is too early to tell how extensive the problem will be, but I have looked at several cases involving several hundred acres each. In some, the pilot could not believe the herbicide behaved in the manner that it did. In others, the ground applicator believed the setup he was running would not result in drift under any conditions…

In a couple of the situations I have looked at already, the drift produced symptoms for 2 miles. The applicator has a good reputation and during the time the applications were made, it was not particularly windy. The applications were made over wet soil…

I will remind everyone again of several things. First, there is a 10-mph wind restriction on most glyphosate applications this year.

Second, you cannot blow it toward rice — it will go farther than you think. It does not have to be very windy for it to go a mile or more from an aerial application — especially over a wet soil.

Third, even if you are running air induction tips and low drift in a ground rig, you cannot apply it adjacent to a susceptible crop with the wind blowing across the susceptible crop (Baldwin 2007).

Spray drift damaging a neighbor’s crops?

I’ll tell you how bad one situation was. The farmer and I were looking at his fields, and I was afraid he was going to cry. I knew if he did that I would so I jokingly asked if he were a “drinking man.”He said, “Yes, as a matter of fact I have a couple of warm ones in the back. “His fields looked so bad they made a hot beer actually taste good! (Baldwin 2006).

Drift and migration?

The origin of pesticides detected at the control sites situated within sub-catchments containing land uses not likely to use certain pesticides is unknown. The movement of pesticides is not limited to downstream, as aerial or groundwater drift can potentially transport pesticides upstream or across sub-catchments (Mossop, et. al. 2013:6).

This is scary. What does the above REALLY say? That chemical herbidides are a BAD IDEA and technology from top to bottom and left to right and inside out. The concept of synthetic pesticides represents absolute rubbish science, and it is an affront to human intelligence that so much research goes into analyzing the drift, migration and damage caused by these obscene toxins. Look at what we have to deal with:

The source of phenoxy herbicides at control sites is unclear… (ibid.:49).

Metalaxyl was also detected in low concentrations at the two least pristine potato farming control sites. Potential sources for this are aerial drift or application within the catchment for a non-potato use… (ibid.:48).

The presence of oxychlordane, a metabolite of the banned organochlorine chlordane, is likely to be a legacy of past use in the catchment… (ibid.:49).

The source of tebuconazole in Middle Creek is unknown, though given it can be administered via spraying, there is some potential for aerial drift into the catchment… (ibid.).

The product can be applied through boom or aerial spraying, which could have resulted in aerial drift from a neighbouring catchment into Middle Creek. Alternatively, there is potential for simazine to be transported via groundwater. The process of groundwater movement is generally quite slow, often resulting in long lag times of movement following application. When in groundwater, the half-life of simazine is increased and can be in the order of years (Comber 1999). The source of simazine in Middle Creek requires further investigation (ibid.).

Nickel was also found to be elevated at several sites in the potato farming study area, particularly at the impact sites, however it is not considered to have a high toxicity. The exact source for nickel is unknown, however it may be a natural occurrence. The ISQG guideline for nickel is considered conservative, with samples across the state often exceeding the trigger values (CAPIM, unpublished data). Similarly, the source for isolated exceedences of cadmium, chromium and antimony is unknown, however these are considered to be of low concern (ibid.:50).

Of low concern? I beg to differ: Nickel toxicity: “Nickel (Ni)is a nasty toxic metal and a known carcinogen. It is one of the metals we see most commonly in toxicity tests. It appears stuck onto DNA, stuck on to translocator protein and is often present in blood at high levels. Nickel is a problem because it “looks” like zinc…” (drmyhill.co.uk 2012).

Cadmium toxicity: “Cadmium and its compounds are highly toxic and exposure to this metal is known to cause cancer and targets the body’s cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, neurological, reproductive, and respiratory systems” (www.osha.gov, No date).

Chromium toxicity: “Major factors governing the toxicity of chromium compounds are oxidation state and solubility. Cr(VI) compounds, which are powerful oxidizing agents and thus tend to be irritating and corrosive, appear to be much more toxic systemically than Cr(III) compounds, given similar amounts and solubilities. Although mechanisms of biological interaction are uncertain, this variation in toxicity may be related to the ease with which Cr(VI) can pass through cell membranes and its subsequent intracellular reduction to reactive intermediates” (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ 2008). Cr(VI) was the subject of the movie Erin Brokovich.

Antimony toxicity: “Antimony potassium tartrate… Very hazardous in case of ingestion. Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of inhalation. Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (permeator). Severe over-exposure can result in death” (ScienceLab.com 2013).

Also: “Industrial chemical and pesticide. Has been used as an anti-parasitic drug… The most toxic trivalent antimony compound. A potent emetic. Ingestion of 0.2 g has been reported to be fatal (Miller, 1982)…” (inchem.org, No date)


And, further to the above-listed damage to the environment and human health: Pesticides can migrate through plastic water piping (http://www.health.qld.gov.au/ph/documents/ehu/15078.pdf; see: Endnote #4). Pesticides can infiltrate metal joints in water pipes (as petrol does when it leaks from underground storage at petrol stations, contaminating nearby water pipes in residences), and often can be transported into residential living spaces via water vapour moving in from external locations through the micro-pores and fractures in residential concrete slabs:

Baroghel-Bouny (1994) among others showed that water transport occurs in porous cementitious materials through different modes: vapor diffusion, liquid water and air pressure driven transports (Lamour, Haouas & Moranville 2004).



If you understand that residential concrete is very porous and will draw water from all surrounding areas as well as from below the slab. If this migrating water or moisture passes through any chemicals it will be carried up in to the home to be evaporated into the air (Source: Nelson, C. 2004, Email from admin@concretesealers.com).

It is literally a matter of water vapor picking up the pesticide and then diffusing through the slab into the living space of the residence (house, unit or villa) above the slab. Note also McGrath (2000) who shows that large amounts of water can move through concrete (even apparently dry concrete) in a vapor, gaseous or dissolved ion state (in any direction, depending on flow direction dynamics set up by cooling and heating cycles) from a region of high concentration or high chemical potential through to low concentration or low chemical potential via diffusion. McGrath clearly shows that concrete cannot keep out any chemical contaminant unless it is specially treated:

On the largest scale water or chemicals may move through cracks, rock pockets, construction joints and other large defects or joints in the concrete structure. This scale of flow is of primary importance with respect to “waterproofing” and involves keeping water out or in… (McGrath 2000).

It is therefore clear that chemicals can be transported through concrete in either a liquid or vapor form. The back section of our current House is on a concrete slab and will be available to any chemical applied nearby (and, note too, that “nearby” becomes much farther away when even the minutest amounts of chemicals load a chemical sensitive individual with what he ‘needs’ to go into toxic shock). Ultimately the perpetual dangers of pesticide migration and the subsequent contamination of structures and pipes clearly shows that herbicide applications demonstrate a clear lack of immediate and long-term worth (acute poisoning, longer-term and cumulative poisoning, potential toxic shock, and disastrous epigenetic implications for future generations), are inherently wasteful and represent dangerously obscene, short-term technological fix weed eradication concepts working unsustainably against critical long-term soil health and human health and reproductive imperatives.


Herbicide-resistant weeds are on the rise. There are at least 6 glyphosate resistant weeds in Australia now (Annual Ryegrass, Barnyard Grass, Fleabane, Great Brome, Liverseed Grass, & Windmill Grass [Source: http://glyphosateresistance.org.au/GRARG%20Register.pdf%5D), and well over a dozen in the US. Note that: “nearly half (49%) of all US farmers said they had “glyphosate resistant weeds” on their farms in 2012…” (Source: http://www.news24.com/Green/News/US-superweeds-epidemic-implicates-GMOs-20140113). However, the above notes may be inaccurate:

No-Till Farmer, May 2012 reported, “..at least 21 varieties of glyphosate-resistant weeds have been identified in the U.S.” and “Between 2005 and 2010, the resistance problem mushroomed, with some Midwestern states reporting millions of acres of glyphosate-resistant weeds, mostly marestail and waterhemp.” Worldwide the concern is greater with 357 biotypes and 197 species of weeds now reported resistant to glyphosate. (http://www.weedscience.org/In.asp) (Andersen 2013)




Alternatives to toxic herbicides need to be found in order to reduce poisoning, injury, suffering and debility, and legal nightmares that ventilate all manner of legal and judicial unethical tactics, discrimination, and corruption. Further, the herbicide-mediated destruction of critical soil reserves (and, ultimately, crop productivity) worldwide is a trend leading into famine scenarios. Note that Roundup and other herbicides also kill off desirable microbial populations while perversely enhancing the reproductivity of pathogenic microbial populations in soil. Critically:

…the actual “kill” mechanism of the “herbicide” glyphosate, the active ingredient in RoundUp, comes from soil borne pathogens promoted by glyphosate after killing the beneficial microbial competitors and weakening the plant’s immune system (Andersen 2013; quote source: http://cabecahealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/FoodPlaguePrimer.pdf; accessed: 25 Jan. 2014). See Endnote #6.


…evidence began to emerge in the 1980s that “what glyphosate does is, essentially, give a plant AIDS.” Just like AIDS, which cripples a human’s immune system, glyphosate makes plants unable to mount a defense against pathogens in the soil. Without its defense mechanisms functioning, the plants succumb to pathogens in the soil and die. Furthermore, glyphosate has an impact on microorganisms in the soil, helping some and hurting others. This is potentially problematic for farmers, as the last thing one would want is a buildup of pathogens in the soil where they grow crops.

…Huber says these facts about glyphosate are very well known scientifically but rarely cited. When asked why, he replied that it would be harder for a company to get glyphosate approved for widespread use if it were known that the product could increase the severity of diseases on normal crop plants as well as the weeds it was intended to kill. Here in the U.S., many academic journals are not even interested in publishing studies that suggest this about glyphosate…

If Huber’s claims are true, then it follows that there must be problems with disease in crops where glyphosate is used. Huber’s second letter verifies this, saying, “we are experiencing a large number of problems in production agriculture in the U.S. that appear to be intensified and sometimes directly related to genetically engineered (GMO) crops, and/or the products they were engineered to tolerate — especially those related to glyphosate (the active chemical in Roundup® herbicide and generic versions of this herbicide).”

He continues, saying, “We have witnessed a deterioration in the plant health of corn, soybean, wheat and other crops recently with unexplained epidemics of sudden death syndrome of soybean (SDS), Goss’ wilt of corn, and take-all of small grain crops the last two years. At the same time, there has been an increasing frequency of previously unexplained animal (cattle, pig, horse, poultry) infertility and [miscarriages]. These situations are threatening the economic viability of both crop and animal producers (Richardson 2011 [I heavily recommend reading this article]).

And, more generally:

Glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide, is destroying human and animal health as a result of disruption of gut bacteria. Two key problems caused by glyphosate in the diet are nutritional deficiencies, especially minerals and essential amino-acids, and systemic toxicity…

An increase in the incidence of Type 2 diabetes, obesity and autism has been reported in Scotland. Similar increases have been seen globally. The herbicide glyphosate was introduced in 1974 and its use is accelerating. The manufacturers claim it to be safe, but none of the Regulatory Agencies are monitoring glyphosate levels in groundwater. By courtesy of independent researchers around the world we present evidence that glyphosate interferes with many metabolic processes in plants, animals and humans, and glyphosate residues have been found in all three. Glyphosate is an endocrine-disruptor (as are many herbicides) it damages DNA and it is a driver of mutations that lead to cancer. We present graphs from the US which correlate glyphosate application and the percentage of GE soy and corn crops to the incidence and prevalence of various diseases in those on a Western diet. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients are very strong and highly significant for obesity, diabetes, autism, thyroid cancer, liver cancer, deaths from Parkinson’s, Senile Dementia and Alzheimer’s, inflammatory bowel disease and acute kidney failure. We present Cancer Research UK graphs of upward trends in cancer incidences between 1975 and 2009, which are in line with the US graphs. Other consequences are gastrointestinal disorders, heart disease, depression, infertility, birth defects and other cancers (Mason 2013:2,1).

Further to this issue of cancer in the journal article titled “Cytotoxic and DNA-damaging properties of glyphosate and Roundup in human-derived buccal epithelial cells”:

Comparisons with results of earlier studies with lymphocytes and cells from internal organs indicate that epithelial cells are more susceptible to the cytotoxic and DNA- damaging properties of the herbicide and its formulation. Since we found genotoxic effects after short exposure to concentrations that correspond to a 450-fold dilution of spraying used in agriculture, our findings indicate that inhalation may cause DNA damage in exposed individuals (Koller, Fürhacker, Nersesyan, Mišík, Eisenbauer & Knasmueller 2012:805-813).

This clearly shows that concepts/regulations/laws/protocols that posit or hypothesize safety for human health below a specific concentration for ANY orthodox pesticide/herbicide/synthetic chemical are patently INCOMPETENT. Roundup is advanced by Monsanto as being very safe. Monsanto even described Roundup as being as safe as salt, however: “In 1996 New York State’s Attorney General sued Monsanto for describing Roundup as “environmentally friendly” and “safe as table salt.” Monsanto, while not admitting any wrongdoing, agreed to stop using the terms for promotional purposes and paid New York state $250,000 to settle the suit” (Graves 2011; see: http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/fraud.pdf). And yet in extremely diluted form, as shown above, Roundup has been found to clearly NOT be safe. This new appreciation of the likely levels of morbidity that could and do occur with exposure (note that you generally get sick on a continuum before you die, so death is always a possibility after initial poisoning) that was FORMERLY classified as “safe” does not even begin to address:

• multiple individual exposures to different chemicals (additive effects),

• exposures occurring over extended time,

• synergistic effects within those multiple exposures, over time (greater than the sum of the individual exposure effects),

• a second substance increasing an effect generated through a first exposure substance (a bit like an enzyme), but not causal itself (Note: “Unfortunately, few chemicals have been tested to determine if interactions occur with other chemicals” [HESIS 2008]),

• Tiny exposures adversely affecting those with MCS.

• Genetic AND epigentic effects from exposure

On the last point, note:

In vitro, animal, and human investigations have identified several classes of pesticides that modify epigenetic marks, including endocrine disruptors, persistent organic pollutants, arsenic, several herbicides and insecticides. Several investigations have examined the effects of environmental exposures and epigenetic markers, and identified toxicants that modify epigenetic states. These modifications are similar to the ones found in pathological tissue samples (Collotta, Bertazzi & Bollati 2013).

There were significant increases in the incidence of total diseases in animals from pesticide lineage F1 and F3 generation animals. Pubertal abnormalities, testis disease, and ovarian disease (primordial follicle loss and polycystic ovarian disease) were increased in F3 generation animals. Analysis of the pesticide lineage F3 generation sperm epigenome identified 363 differential DNA methylation regions (DMR) termed epimutations. Observations demonstrate that a pesticide mixture (permethrin and DEET) can promote epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult onset disease and potential sperm epigenetic biomarkers for ancestral environmental exposures (Manikkam, Tracey, Guerrero-Bosagna & Skinner 2012).

Our conflictual pursuit of profit at any unexamined cost has left unfathomable damage in its wake. And the new toxicology is helping to devastatingly reveal how utterly vulnerable we are to the least amounts of synthetic chemicals we splash around. What we now know is that WE ARE ALWAYS POISONING OURSELVES AND OUR CHILDREN WITH THE CHEMICALS WE USE. What the following quote shows is that we now cannot stop poisoning future generations and that continually unfolding incidences of adult onset Russian Roulette disease will tragically appear without warning in lives that may not have sustained specific and notably heavy toxic exposures within their experience:

Environmental factors during fetal development can induce a permanent epigenetic change in the germ line (sperm) that then transmits epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult-onset disease in the absence of any subsequent exposure (Manikkam, Guerrero-Bosagna, Tracey, Haque & Skinner 2012).

Back to glyphosate generally:

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup®, is the most popular herbicide used worldwide. The industry asserts it is minimally toxic to humans, but here we argue otherwise. Residues are found in the main foods of the Western diet, comprised primarily of sugar, corn, soy and wheat. Glyphosate’s inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is an overlooked component of its toxicity to mammals. CYP enzymes play crucial roles in biology, one of which is to detoxify xenobiotics. Thus, glyphosate enhances the damaging effects of other food borne chemical residues and environmental toxins. Negative impact on the body is insidious and manifests slowly over time as inflammation damages cellular systems throughout the body (Samsel & Seneff 2013).

Trees engineered to resist glyphosate-based herbicides (e.g. RoundUp) also pose a threat. Charles Benbrook found use of glyphosate-resistant crops resulting in 300-600% increases in the use of the herbicide. Studies in Oregon found that glyphosate exposure significantly increased the risk of late term spontaneous abortions and De Roos and other authors found an association between glyphosate use and the cancers non- Hodgkins lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

RoundUp is known to persist for up to 360 days in some ecosystems, and is commonly found as a contaminant in rivers. Additionally, studies have found that inhaling RoundUp is much more dangerous than ingesting it orally. RoundUp is commonly sprayed from the air where it can drift into nearby communities (Global Justice Ecology Project, et. al. No date).

Rampaging immune dysfunction in humans is a silent pandemic. But that story is only the tip of the iceberg. Crops and plantations that have not been sprayed or which have not been sprayed for a significant period are not exempt from glyphosate and other pesticide contamination arising from other locations. These are points of origin for herbicide drift and new disease outbreaks which could generate, over time, cumulative SATELLITE herbicide dynamics, including immune function retardation, leading to either quick satellite infection or satellite threshold breaches and consequent individual and local disease outbreaks. Note:

There are fundamental differences in the way chemical pesticides are used by the Australian plantation industry compared to agriculture. Use in plantations is usually confined to the first two years of a plantation crop cycle (for example a 10-year crop cycle for pulpwood or a 30-year crop cycle for softwood sawlogs); for the rest of the life of the plantation pesticide application is very limited and generally only occurs in reaction to pest or disease outbreaks (Jenkin & Tomkins 2006).

I believe that the “only occurs in reaction to pest or disease outbreaks” (ibid.) pesticide application dynamic will become more and more common as the general ecological strata of the planetary Web of Life achieves more damage and destabilization. Plant, animal, fungal and human disease outbreaks will increase, which will then see quick and heavy emergency appeals to mass medication (e.g. vaccination) and pesticide fixes, but these responses will only further retard overall global lifeform immune function. This represents an accelerating and broad ‘nuclear explosion’ of chemical interventions as authorities are called in to respond and treat more and more disease outbreaks with the same mentality that created them. As such, the chemical interventions are based on old and patently wrong notions that drugs/chemicals and modern medical care have improved human life expectancy:

In all, 86 per cent of the increased life expectancy was due to decreases in infectious diseases. And the bulk of the decline in infectious disease deaths occurred prior to the age of antibiotics. Less than 4 per cent of the total improvement in life expectancy since 1700s can be credited to twentieth-century advances in medical care (Garrett 2001).

My very great concern here is that human, animal and plant immune dysfunction occurring now, EVERYWHERE on the back of industrial pollution and GMO contamination, has established a global web of ecological destabilization and infection susceptibility, leading to what is now unavoidable: massive, ocean-jumping inflammatory pandemic certainties. Note:

…the globalization of trade has substantially expanded markets for industrial pollution” (Davis & Stainthorpe 2002:65).

…author Laurie Garrett discusses the outbreak of Bolivian Hemorrhagic Fever in Machupo, as mice were discovered to be the transmitters of the disease. Garrett points out, however, that the infrastructure of the area, decimated by industrialization, played an important role in the increase in the mice population…” (BookRags.com 2014a)

In the Preface, Johnathan Mann of the Harvard School of Public Health discusses how our time in history will be tracked by newly emerging epidemics, such as the human immunodeficiency virus. The vulnerability of the world is increased due to modern travel, huge populations, trading of goods and services, and simply the penetration of modern society into even the most remote areas of the world (BookRags.com 2014b).

The “filoviruses”:

It is the human slate-wiper, the invisible ultimate death, the filovirus named Ebola…

It leaves one to think that Mother Nature will have her revenge on those who make a mockery of her… perhaps the human race, as well, which is destroying the very loins that gave birth to us, the African rain forest.

Are Ebola, and the other filoviruses, antibodies against the “human virus” that is swiftly and thoughtlessly destroying Mother Earth? Are these viruses the “check” on the human K-species that we have been expecting?

Ebola is a deadly virus to humans and primates, and its origin has yet to be uncovered. There is no cure for any of the Ebola sisters: Ebola Zaire, Ebola Sudan, Marburg, and the most recent Ebola Reston because of their mutation ability. As for there being a solution to the problem, it may lay in the reduction in human interference in nature and destruction of our own universe or perhaps the end of the species that has become such a nuisance to Nature. Scientists, perhaps, should make developers and loggers aware of such consequences, before its too late (Preston 1992).

These monstrous, acute pandemic scenarios go way beyond the scale of the ‘silent’ epidemics that are already horribly resident:

Pesticide exposures seem to give rise to Parkinson’s (REHN #635) – a horrible degenerative disease of the nervous system. Pesticide exposures diminish children’s memory, physical stamina, coordination, and [the] ability to carry out simple tasks like drawing a stick figure of a human being. (See REHN #648.) Pesticide exposures seem to make children more aggressive. Pesticide exposures seem to contribute to the epidemic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ADHD) that has swept through U.S. children in recent years. (See REHN #678.) (Montague 2001)


Indeed, according to Dr. Seneff, glyphosate is possibly “the most important factor in the development of multiple chronic diseases and conditions that have become prevalent in Westernized societies,”including but not limited to: Autism Allergies Cancer Parkinson’s disease Cardiovascular disease Infertility Multiple sclerosis Obesity Depression Alzheimer’s disease Gastrointestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, chronic diarrhea, colitis and Crohn’s disease ALS, and more

The rate of autism has risen so quickly, there can be no doubt that it has an environmental cause. Our genes simply cannot mutate fast enough to account for the rapid rise we’re now seeing. The latest statistics released by the CDC on March 20 show that 1 in 50 children in the US now fall within the autism spectrum2,3, with a 5:1 boy to girl ratio. Just last year [2013] the CDC reported a rate of 1 in 88, which represented a 23 percent increase since 2010, and 78 percent since 2007. Meanwhile, I remember when the incidence of autism in the US was only 1 in 100,000— just short of 30 years ago! (Mercola 2013)

And, if there was another classification available in terms of “pandemic”, then it would have to be this:

…In a breakthrough moment of truth for the CDC, the agency now openly admits that prescription antibiotics have led to a catastrophic rise in superbugs, causing the death of at least 23,000 Americans each year (an estimate even the CDC calls “conservative”).

This is the conclusion of the CDC’s new Threat Report 2013 [http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/], a document that for the first time quantifies the number of fatalities happening in America due to antibiotic- resistant superbugs.

What’s truly astonishing about this report is that it admits, in effect, that modern medicine is a failure when it comes to infectious disease. The whole approach of fighting bugs with isolated chemicals was doomed to fail from the start, of course, since Mother Nature adapts to chemical threats far more quickly than drug companies can roll out new chemicals…

…due to the disastrous failure of antibiotics combined with the widespread suppression of human immune function (due to drugs, heavy metals, environmental chemicals and more), superbug deaths will quickly accelerate, reaching 100,000 deaths per year by 2020, nearly rivaling the number of Americans already killed each year by FDA-approved prescription medications (Adams 2013).

And, what happens when superbugs are already resident in the hospital that you need to visit?

“To reiterate,” says Brad Spellberg of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, “these people come into the hospital for a heart attack, or cancer, or trauma after a car accident, or to have elective surgery, or with some other medical problem and then ended up dying of infection that they picked up in the hospital.  The number of people who die from hospital-acquired infections is unquestionably much higher now, and is almost certainly more than 100,000 per year in the United States alone” (Buhner 2012).

It is as if we are being purposefully set up for the PERFECT (plant/animal/human) disease STORM, worldwide. And the endless analyses/studies and justification for the continued use of toxic medications (instead of herbal alternatives) and toxic pesticides (instead of non-toxic alternatives) goes on, and on, and on. We are literally “monitoring our own extinction” (Prof. Stuart Hill [University of Western Sydney], 1999, pers. comm.).


Note the literature on glyphosate persistence and mobility:

The experimental findings, combined with transport studies on other strongly sorbing pesticides in the literature, support the hypothesis that transport of glyphosate may be caused by an interaction of high rainfall events shortly after application on wet soils showing the presence of preferential flow paths (Vereecken 2005).


…glyphosate leaching seems mainly determined by soil structure and rainfall. Limited leaching has been observed in non-structured sandy soils, while subsurface leaching to drainage systems was observed in a structured soil with preferential flow in macropores, but only when high rainfall followed glyphosate application (Borggaard & Gimsing 2008).


…urban populations are more at risk from [glyphosate] run-off from roads and from spraying of noxious weeds in, or close to, streams (Mason 2013:22).


This is one of the few works related to the analysis of glyphosate in real groundwater samples and the presented data confirm that, although it has low mobility in soils, glyphosate is capable of reaching groundwater (Sanchis, et. al. 2012).


We conclude that phosphate application can cause system pH change with various extents in the soil, which subsequently contribute to glyphosate mobility in different degree (Zhao, et. al. 2009).


Weekly air particle and rain samples were collected during two growing seasons in agricultural areas in Mississippi and Iowa. Rain was also collected in Indiana. The frequency of glyphosate detection ranged from 60 to 100 percent in both air and rain. “According to the report, as linked on the website Green Med Info:

“The frequency of detection and median and maximum concentrations of glyphosate in air were similar or greater to those of the other high-use herbicides observed in the Mississippi River basin, whereas its concentration in rain was greater than the other herbicides” (Disponible en Español 2011).


There is limited experimental evidence of either root to root transfer or true soil residual uptake of glyphosate. It is assumed that all cases of potato seed contamination with glyphosate are due to foliar uptake in the mother crop. • Contamination of the mother stock may be due to:

* Spray-tank or -line contamination with glyphosate due to poor washing out. * Drift from use in neighbouring crops or other vegetation (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2008).


ALTON, Iowa — The puny, yellow corn stalks stand like weary sentries on one boundary of Dennis Von Arb’s field here.

On a windy day this spring, his neighbor sprayed glyphosate on his fields, and some of the herbicide blew onto Mr. Von Arb’s conventionally grown corn, killing the first few rows.

He’s more concerned, though, about the soil. During heavy rains in the summer, the runoff from his neighbor’s farm soaked his fields with glyphosate-laden water (Strom 2013).


Recent studies have cast important questions over the extent to which glyphosate is immobile in soil. One such study has shown that glyphosate can readily desorb from soil particles in some soil types and can be highly mobile in the soil environment” (Buffin & Jewell 2001:15-16).


The use of glyphosate in forestry and agriculture has indirect harmful effects on birds and small mammals by damaging their food supplies and habitat… Roundup containing POEA is lethal to the tadpoles of three species of tree and ground frogs in Australia. The Australian government has banned the use of these products near water… Sub-lethal doses of glyphosate from spray-drift damages wildflower communities and can affect some species up to 20 metres away from the sprayer… The use of glyphosate in arable areas causes dieback in hedgerow trees… Glyphosate residues were found in lettuce, carrot and barley when they were planted a year after glyphosate was applied… In the UK, levels of glyphosate above the EU limit have been detected by the Welsh Water Company every year since 1993. The Drinking Water Inspectorate recommends that glyphosate be monitored, particularly in areas where it is used by local authorities on hard surfaces…

In the field, long persistence of glyphosate has been observed in a number of studies. AMPA has been found to be even more persistent than glyphosate, with a half life in soil between 119 and 958 days7. In water, glyphosate has a long persistence in sediments. Records of glyphosate persistence include47: • 249 days on Finnish agricultural soils. • between 259 and 296 days on eight Finnish forestry sites. • between one and three years on 11 Swedish forestry sites. • 335 days on a Canadian forestry site. • 360 days on three Canadian forestry sites. • two Canadian studies found glyphosate persisted 12 to 60 days in pond water following direct application • glyphosate residues in pond sediment were found 400 days after direct application with the formulation Accord • glyphosate was found to persist for more than one year in studies of pond sediments in the US • studies in Norway have detected glyphosate in surface and ground waters48 (ibid.:1- 2;15-16).


Glyphosate… Persists and accumulates in soils and plants with a half-life reported to be 22.5 years”(Advanced Biological Concepts, No date).


In Hawaiian sugarcane soils, glyphosate was broken down by half in times varying from 18 days to 22.8 years (54) (Julius 2002:7).

The PERSISTENCE of glyphosate (and its consequent buildup over repeated sprayings) is supported:

Glyphosate has a reputation of being nontoxic to animals and rapidly inactivated in soils. However, recent evidence has cast doubts on its safety. Glyphosate may be retained and transported in soils, and there may be cascading effects on nontarget organisms. These processes may be especially detrimental in northern ecosystems because they are characterized by long biologically inactive winters and short growing seasons…

…studies on herbicide residues in boreal environments have demonstrated that glyphosate and the main metabolite of glyphosate degradation, 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3- oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid (AMPA), can be traced from soils even years after the last spraying [15,17,18]…

…the effects on nontarget organisms are likely to be more pronounced and long lasting in northern ecosystems because of increasing use of herbicides in forestry and agriculture, as well as the cold climate comprising a challenge to glyphosate degradation in the soil. The global issues are analogous to those of excessive use of antibiotics: we must avoid the loss of the long-term efficacy of the world’s most important herbicide (Helander, Saloniemi & Saikkonen 2012:1-2, 5).

Note that this issue will automatically result in a gradual buildup of glyphosate and AMPA over the years. It appears that a “tipping point” or threshold will eventually be breached in treated soils, thus bringing about the stated problems according to Prof. Huber above. And while low volume and concentration applications of glyphosate product might not immediately generate overt and measurable soil microbial issues, a gradual buildup or an undiluted spill of herbicide could do MUCH more:

…a high concentration of glyphosate (100 x field rate) simulating an undiluted chemical spill substantially altered the bacterial community in both soils. Increases in total bacteria, culturable bacteria, and bacterial:fungal biomass were rapid following application. Culturable bacteria increased from about 1% of the total population in untreated soil to as much as 25% at the high concentration by day 7, indicating enrichment of generalist bacteria. Community composition in both soils shifted from fungal dominance to an equal ratio of bacteria to fungi. Functional diversity of culturable bacteria, estimated by C substrate utilization, also increased at the high glyphosate concentration… Apparently the herbicide resulted in an across-the-board stimulation of bacteria… (Ratcliff, Busse & Shestak 2005).

What must be ELIMINATED now is “the destructive and water-poisoning monoculture plantations that have caused so much damage to the water table, to water supplies, and to public health already” (Bound, Biggs & Obendorf 2012). What is NEEDED now is “Forestry reform that acknowledges and values bio-diverse regeneration forestry plantations, that mimic the distribution and ecology of native forests and that not rely on toxic chemicals for their health and growth… The ENGOs must… rule out monocultures. That is basic” (ibid.). Further:

There is a place for replanting bio-diverse regeneration native forests that seek as far as is possible to restore and grow healthy forests approaching their original conformation. This type of forestry is an entirely different kettle of fish to the chemically dependent monoculture plantations of trees that develop poisonous leaves and are bred to be pulped. Bio-diverse regeneration forests are self-regulatory but they are not considered the foundation of a sustainable timber industry because:

Providing companion plantings that deter pests, plus a tolerance of a low level of pests, were all part of a tried-and-true method of control that long predated the war on nature. The trouble was that corporations couldn’t make money from these approaches. With the illusion of a quick and permanent fix, the pesticide companies had set us on a cataclysmic course.9

In other words, giant corporations are determined to make money regardless of the social and ecological costs. Put this with Mike Bolan’s above exposure of the pulp and paper industry [see: http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/clean-water-needs-revised-forestry- operations] and we see the explanation for Tasmania’s water problems (ibid.).


And, what of the toxicity and mobility of herbicides that do not contain glyphosate? (Due to constraints, this section is heavily abbreviated.)  Sulfometuron

Note the following:

Sulfometuron has long soil residual activity and may move off-site in wind-blown soils (UC Davis Weed Research and Information Center 2013).

Sulfometuron appears to be similar to glyphosate in terms of its residual nature, at the very least. Sulfometuron related herbicides are: Broadstrike, Chlorsulfuron, Crusader, Eclipse, Ethoxysulfuron, Express, Flame, Harmony M, Imazapyr, Intervix, Iodosulfuron 100, Iodosulfuron 50, Lightning, Logran 750, Londax, Mesosulfuron 30, Metsulfuron-methyl, Monza, Muster, OnDuty, Raptor WG 700, Sempra, Spinnaker, Sulfometuron, Titus, Trifloxysulfuron (HerbiGuide, No date). Note:

Sulfometuron methyl-containing herbicides cause eye discomfort, tearing, and blurred vision. In laboratory tests, sulfometuron methyl caused anemia, atrophied testicles and testicular lesions, and increased the incidence of fetal loss. A sulfometuron methyl breakdown product causes DNA damage in the colon of laboratory animals.

Because of limited monitoring, little is known about how often sulfometuron methyl contaminates rivers and streams. However, the U.S. Geological Survey found this herbicide in rivers in the Midwest, and the U.S. Forest Service found it in streams following forestry applications.

Enough sulfometuron methyl to kill desirable vegetation can persist in soil for a year after application.

Minute amounts of sulfonylurea herbicides disrupt plant reproduction. For example, sulfometuron methyl’s chemical relative chlorsulfuron reduces fruit production in cherry trees. This reduction is caused by amounts equivalent to 1/1000 of the typical agricultural rate. Experiments with peas, canola, soybeans, and smartweed had similar results.

Drift from roadside and noxious weed applications of Oust have resulted in widespread crop damage totaling millions of dollars (Cox 2002).  Haloxyfop-R methyl ester in Verdict 520 Herbicide

Basic Tox of Haloxyfop: Risk of Serious Damage To Eyes

The toxicological studies were generally performed with pure (>98%) racemic haloxyfop
or haloxyfop-P methyl ester or with neat substances. The toxicokinetic studies
indicate that absorbed methyl ester will rapidly be hydrolysed to the parent acid and
the S-form haloxyfop present in racemic haloxyfop will instantaneously undergo
stereochemical inversion to haloxyfop-P. Therefore, the various compounds used for
testing are assumed to elicit the same systemic effects following administration and
these effects can be attributed to haloxyfop-P. The absorption is rapid (> 80%) and
the excretion extensive. The acute oral toxicity is moderate i.e. LD50 is around 300
mg/kg bw and the dermal toxicity low LD50> 2000 mg/kg bw, proposed classification of
Xn, R22 “Harmful if swallowed”. No acute inhalation toxicity studies are available.
Neither racemic haloxyfop nor haloxyfop-P methyl ester was irritating to skin and
haloxyfop-P methyl ester was not a sensitizer. Haloxyfop-P methyl ester is not
irritating to the eye whereas racemic haloxyfop induced signs of irritation in the
conjunctival sacs and iris and caused corneal opacity covering up to 100% of the
cornea in all animals. Signs of irritation (corneal opacity) persisted for 21 days in
un-rinsed eyes racemic haloxyfop is therefore irritating to the eye and the
classification of Xi; R41 “Risk of serious damage to eyes” is proposed. The relevant
short term NOAEL is 0.5 mg/kg bw/day based on the 1-year dog study which would also be
said to cover the effects observed in the 90-day studies in the dog and monkey at 2
mg/kg bw/day (EFSA Journal 2009:3).

AOEL (Acceptable Operator Exposure Level)

The Acceptable Operator Exposure Level using UK-POEM, in being exceeded at a level of 169%, does not bode well for either the dispenser of the chemical, bystanders, or the public (particularly close-by residences).   Note:

The dermal absorption is 7% and 12% for the concentrate and the diluted product,
respectively. The AOEL is exceeded (169%) according to the UK-POEM even with PPE
(coverall) but is below according to the German model if PPE (coverall and gloves) is
applied (12%). The estimated worker and bystander exposure is below the AOEL (ibid.).

Risk Assessment for Herbivorous and Insectivorous Birds and Mammals

High long-term risk, especially where mammals are breeding, has been identified with the use of the herbicide. Note:

The first tier risk assessment for herbivorous and insectivorous birds resulted in TER
values above the Annex VI trigger indicating a low risk. For medium herbivorous and
insectivorous mammals the acute risk is considered to be low, while a first tier high
long-term risk was identified. The Member State experts in EPCO 22 did not accept a
proposed refinement using a higher endpoint from a 16-week dietary study. It was
agreed to use the endpoint of 1 mg/kg bw/day from a 2-generation reproduction study.
Furthermore, since the half-life for residues in vegetation was observed to be longer
than the default value, residue decline data for each crop should be used in the risk
assessment. The resulting TER values were foreseen to be below the Annex VI trigger
indicating a high risk… (ibid:5).


The symptoms of toxicity in rats are reduced food intake and reduced food consumption.
They may also cause liver and kidney damage…

Reproductive Effects: In rats, oral doses of 10 and 50 mg/kg/day of haloxyfop-
ethoxyethyl from days 6 to 16 of pregnancy reduced the number of live offspring per
litter and caused vaginal bleeding in the mother…

Teratogenic Effects: Oral doses of 50 mg/kg/day of haloxyfop-ethoxyethyl in rats
between days 6 and 16 of pregnancy caused developmental abnormalities in the
offspring’s urogenital system and death to the fetus…

Oral doses of 7.5 mg/kg/day of haloxyfop-methyl given to rats from days 6 to 15 of
pregnancy caused delayed bone formation in the offspring…

Organ Toxicity: Doses of 100 mg/kg/day of haloxyfop-methyl caused kidney damage in
adult rats (8). Doses of 0.6 mg/kg/day for 2 years in mice caused reduced body weight
gains and increased liver weights in mice. In dogs, 5 mg/kg/day causes a significant
decrease in serum cholesterol, as well as a decrease in thyroid weight… (Extoxnet

The USEPA put it this way:

Reduced relative kidney weights in F0, F1, and F2b adults; Reduced fertility in the
F1/F2b generation (USEPA 2012).

Aquatic Organisms Risk

Haloxyfop-P methyl ester is very toxic to aquatic organisms, fish being the most
sensitive group of organisms (EFSA Journal 2009:6).

Haloxyfop-ethoxyethyl is moderately to highly toxic to fish. The LC50 (96 hour) is
0.54 mg/l for fathead minnows, 0.28 mg/l for bluegill sunfish, and 1.8 mg/l for
rainbow trout. The LC50 (48 hours) for Daphnia is 4.64 mg/l (6) (Extoxnet 1996).  Clopyralid 750g/kg (Group I) in Clomac Forestry Herbicide and Other Products

Official documentation almost hints that Clopyralid is nearly as pure as driven snow, but the real facts and genuine research show up a great deal more dirt. Note:

Health Efects: Causes severe eye irritation and may cause some skin sensitization.
Environmental Efects: Toxic to some beneficial insects. It is very persistent and
moves quickly through soil…

…is slightly toxic to birds…

Some developmental and reproductive effects have been observed in laboratory animals.
Changes to liver and kidney weights as well as, hyperplasia of the stomach lining were
found in rats fed moderate to high doses in a 2-year study… A one year study with
dogs showed increased liver weights and decreased red blood cell count at all but the
lowest dose tested… Another study found that weights of rabbit fetuses decreased at
both low and high doses of clopyralid. Skeletal abnormalities were also observed in
these fetuses at all doses and at the highest dose, accumulation of excess fluid
around the brain was evident, which resulted in small brain and enlarged skulls…

The EPA has identified several endangered species of plants and other non-target
species that are vulnerable to clopyralid, including five species of rare cactus…

Clopyralid is persistent in soil, with recorded half-life of 2-14 months… it does
not readily bind to soil and is highly soluble in water. As a result, it is very
mobile in soil and has the potential to move towards groundwater and contaminate
surface water. Clopyralid has even been found in soil water samples taken at depths of
6 feet, up to 30 days after initial surface treatment… Since microbial activity
decreases with depth, clopyralid has the potential to persist longer at lower soil
depths. Persistence of clopyralid in vegetation was evidenced by the contamination of
composts from harvested lawn and grass clipping sprayed with clopyralid. Clopyralid
has been detected in vegetation 365 days after initial treatments…

In 2000, greenhouse and garden crops were severely injured after application of
compost and manure in Spokane, Washington. Upon investigation it was found that high
concentrations of clopyralid were present in composts made from lawn clippings,
straw, and leaves collected by curbside programs… The Spokane area had a large
residential population that utilized lawn care services, most of whom applied
clopyralid as part of their weed control scheme. Clopyralid, which does not breakdown
during the composting process, stunts the growth of crops such as potatoes, tomatoes,
peas, beans, le􀄴uce, pepper, alfalfa and sunflowers at very low levels- even as low
as 1ppb… Organic farmers were also severely affected since they rely of manure and
composts to supply soil fertility. In 2002, the state of Washington banned the use of
clopyralid on lawns and turf in order to keep the chemical from contaminating compost
supplies… That same year, California found that 65% of the composts samples tested
positive for clopyralid, which led to the cancellation of residential uses for
clopyralid in the state (Beyond Pesticides / NCAMP, no date).


Monitoring data indicate that the general population may be exposed to clopyralid via
inhalation of ambient air, and ingestion of drinking water (Toxnet 2013).

These above-listed critical problems with Glyphosate and other herbicides not only indicate a slower moving pandemic of human morbidity, but they also specifically highlight the powerful potential for acute, threshold breaking pandemic scenarios, and leave us all with no excuse whatsoever for the continued use of herbicides!

We may well ask: “How can we move, as a global community, beyond the chemical devastation that is bearing down on us?” (http://www.mcs-international.org/, No date)


8.2.1 MULCH

Please note that the Mulch strategy listed below should be read in terms of the above section titled: ENDOTOXIN BIOAEROSOLS.

First, if enough mulch is applied, weeds will be suppressed. In the case of pine plantations, site preparation might need to be refined (see below). Grass weeds might be mostly eliminated if an extensive mulching operation could then follow and be configured to tap into the pre plant stage (note the below listed possibilities in terms of Corn Gluten Meal [CGM]: trials might be needed to investigate this product’s potential for pre-emergent weed suppression when mixed in with mulch or, likely more possible, its use as a post plant weed control). This might mean using the harvest rubbish to generate the mulch on-site when all the equipment and manpower is focused there. Note:

Elders Forestry has piloted a system of taking harvest residues deposited at harvest landings after in field chip operations and mulching and re-distributing them across the site to provide a mulched layer which suppresses weed growth (Forest Stewardship Council, No date #1)

Hopefully this means the operation posits the most efficient and cost-effective strategy as well, and especially so if this substantial stage then eliminated the need for separate pre-emergent or post plant weed control (either aerial or manual). Not being an expert in this industry (which sometimes means that you are not restricted by limiting knowledge orthodoxies), I can only hypothesize what may or may not be effective. Note:

Cultural Weed control Reduce chemical input at plantation establishment by: – Achieving rapid initial growth – reduces the time availability for weed species to become established – Good site preparation – good site preparation reduces weed growth, maximises the seedling opportunity to survive and grow, disadvantages existing weeds, and reduces the risk of poor planting technique – Planting espacement – close spacing reduces weed capacity to survive (Forest Stewardship Council, No date #2).

Note also:

Experimenting with polymer coated fertilisers that can be placed in the planting hole in direct contact with the root ball. Early indications are that this may lead to rapid initial growth and hence reduce the need for post plant weed control and browsing animal control (Forest Stewardship Council, No date #3).

What are the possibilities of including CGM as a fertlizer with the seedling root ball? It may suppress grass weeds while simultaneously stimulating seedling growth.

8.2.2  STEAM & FLAME

The deep penetration of steam into the soil profile is undesirable because this will result in the killing off of soil microbial populations. However, steam can kill off above-ground foliage.

In tests/trials: “Both steam and flame were more effective on certain erect-growing broadleaved weed species than on prostrate growing weeds and grasses… Cost estimates of propane use were $41 to 56 ha-1 and $26 ha-1 for the steam and flame treatments, respectively.” (Shrestha, et. al., 2011). Given that grasses remain an issue with these treatments, an effective pre-emergent treatment appears essential before seedlings are planted.

Further: “The benefits of Thermal Weed control are numerous and vary from a competitive alternative to chemical use to the added benefit of providing organic farmers with a way to rid their crops of weeds without disturbing the soil thereby minimising erosion and water loss” (Source: http://www.batchen.com.au/thermal-weeding; accessed: 27 Jan. 2014).


Note: “A little more than a decade ago, an Iowa State University researcher, Nick Christians, accidentally discovered the herbicidal properties of corn gluten meal. Corn gluten meal is a by-product of the milling of corn and was found to inhibit root growth and also contains 10% nitrogen by weight, thus making it an ideal naturally occurring “weed and feed” product… Among the weeds controlled with pre-emergent application[s] of corn gluten are crabgrass, dandelions, pigweed, and purslane to name only a few. Corn gluten meal is applied to the soil and affects the roots of germinating seeds. It does not affect established plants and therefore can be safely used in turf, ornamental, vegetable, and flower garden situations.” (Link 1999).

To stop feeder weed roots from emerging, try spreading CGM in the same manner as a dry fertilizer (Wagner 2014). Corn gluten is available in granules, pellets or powder. Repeat: it will not kill established weeds or plants (Francis 2014).

However, it should be observed that “…the nitrogen in CGM will benefit existing weeds as well as desirable plants. Therefore, inadequate weed removal prior to treatment can actually result in an increased weed problem” (Chalker-Scott, no date). Further: “CGM is not selective and can inhibit germination of desirable plant seeds as well as weeds… Other environmentally friendly weed-control treatments (such as sub-irrigation, mulch, or soil solarization) are cheaper and often more effective than CGM.” (ibid.)

For excellent research on CGM, see: http://www.hort.iastate.edu/research/gluten.


A mixture of vinegar, salt and dish soap can kill already emerged weeds (Wagner 2014), and could potentially be used prior to planting. Vinegar alone “(Acetic acid) has been found to be (a) useful herbicide for broadleaf weeds and grasses. Generally the acetic acid content in vinegar is about 5% but a level of 10% is needed to treat most weeds” (Farmstyle, no date). A higher acetic acid content than is found in normal vinegar can be found in products available from farmer’s stores (Beaulieu 2014).


Note: Pine oil can be described as a mildly antiseptic phenolic disinfectant (Wikipedia 2014b). It is also “an essential oil obtained by the steam distillation of needles, twigs and cones from a variety of species of pine, particularly Pinus sylvestris” (ibid.).

Further: “Oil based Herbicides are based primarily on pine oil. These sprays remove the outer wax layer of the plant causing it to dehydrate. These sprays also reduce the viability of any weed seeds in the soil that are contacted by the spray. Some of these sprays are registered for use in organic farms” (Farmstyle, no date).

There are some health issues related to pine oil: it has a low corrosion level, but it is an irritant to the skin and mucous membranes and may elicit breathing problems or central nervous system depression (Wikipedia 2014a). Nevertheless, pine oil offers up potential in terms of a worthy, much more natural alternative to orthodox herbicides.


Note: “Organic herbicides are fast acting (15 minutes) when temperature is high (especially if humidity is low). The short time-frame for effective kill means field workers can observe the effect of their actions without having to return to the field a week later (as with glyphosate)” (TMOrganics 2012). In quick summary, expense and the required high water volumes are disadvantages. Advantages are: safety for operators, and quick action and effect (ibid.).


“BioWeed” appears to be a substantial and innovative product. See: http://www.certifiedorganics.info/prodbwcindex.html for details. Also available are: “Weed Zap” (with cloves and other ingredients), “Slasher” (a synthetic pelargonium oil), and “Yates Vinegar”. (TMOrganics 2012)


Steam treatment of weeds can be enhanced: “There is some encouraging evidence to support organic additives with steam, such as fish oil, vinegar, cloves, eucalypt, salt and pine oil to improve efficacy and increase systemic penetration” (J. Winer, Weedtechnics.com, Email, Jan. 2014). This approach to taking out weeds requires ground applications and ready water access. Weedtechnics is happy to “undertake trials and pilot programs” (ibid.) if your company has an interest.


Homeopathy in agricultural settings can potentially reveal ways to bolster soil health and plant health. Note: “Important benefits of agrohomeopathy include economic savings and preservation of the natural ecology. Agro-homeopathy can reduce costs from agrochemicals, and it will not damage the organism, the ground under the plant or its surrounding area and the water that serves as the solvent in the dynamizations” (Moreno 2008).

See: http://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/agro-homeopathy-an-alternative-for-agriculture/; http://homeopathyplus.com.au/agrohomeopathy-an-introduction-to-healing-plants-and-planet-with-homeopathy/; http://earthhaven.ca/homeopathy-for-plants-c372.php; http://www.narayana-publishers.com/Homeopathy-for-Farm-and-Garden/Vaikunthanath-Das-Kaviraj/b8241.

It would be a very intelligent company indeed that mastered the art of dealing with environmental health, human health, soil health, plant health and weeds (for none of these are SEPARATE ISSUES) in an entirely non-toxic and ethical fashion.


GENUINE SUSTAINABILITY (rather than runaway herbicide use and irresponsible franken-GMOs framing exclusive, fascist and globalist delusions of food control and massive profits) is the name of the (future, inclusive, democratic and local) game NOW. Why not generously enhance the organic profile of the soil you plant in via excellent composting and mulch creation techniques? That is, build up the health of the soil and the robustness of the crop or plantation product you are developing rather than waging a chemical war against weeds and, by extension, each other and the entire life support system that is this Planet?:

Ecological agriculture is highly productive and is the only lasting solution to hunger and poverty… We need once more to feel at home on the earth and with each other (Navdanya, No date).

We cannot coexist with PESTICIDES and GMOs!


We carry a deadening weight with us from the Industrial Revolution, a dragging burden of toxic assumptions. Quick and impatient chemical and pharmaceutical “bullets” and alluring chemical/product features characteristically stampede our weak and unexamined innovations into our childrens’ and grandchildren’s DNA, brains, future fitness and whole potential. That weight has already, and will further, materialize and amplify as a host of fitful problems jumping frighteningly far ahead of us in time, scheduling a succession of nightmares. Our toxic future is already here, already framed, and we feel it now in our bones, brains, joints, sperm and inside our fractured and sick metabolisms.

If the battle against weeds, pests and assumed issues is only ever fought in a retaliatory or negative, shallow-dimensional technological fix sense, or a toxicologically ignorant sense, or inside a proud and hacked mental framework where we presumptuously assume the immortality of our place in the world, then the destruction of the future is certain. Soil composition and microbial health in agricultural settings will be degraded. This will lead to the consequent weakening and defilement of crop nutrition and health, the programing of disease in stock, the degrading and corruption of plantations and forest ecosystems, the overall devastation of global environmental health, and the more direct sickening of human health and reproduction. If we are only capable of dumbly appealing to toxic chemicals and GMO “foods” as a way forward, then we are not growing but rather waging WAR against the NATURAL WORLD that frames all our best potentials. The only disappointing outcome possible for a global brute-techno ascendancy and stifling of living systems will be OUR CANCER-RIDDEN AND STERILE GREAT-GRANDCHILDREN. And then… NOTHING.

Our local error-prone, convenient (lazy) and careless ‘thinking’ reactions and, worse, GLOBAL ELITIST SCHEMES, are taking us on MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) trajectories. We need to heavily examine those trajectories to see what manner of shiny yet deceitful beast they are, and to appreciate how to change them FOR THE SAKE OF OUR ONLY HOME, our children, and our grandchildren. Look into their little faces… We only get one chance, NOW… ONE WORLD, ONE AMAZING AND HORRIBLE HISTORY.

The loss of material (environmental and human health) potential to toxic chemicals and aberrant agricultural/plantation practices is much more than just an increased predisposition for cancers and eventual human extinction. Every single loss demonstrates a failure to make the right decisions and generate positive character. Every morbid illness of every poisoned person (http://poisonedpeople.com) is a reflection of destroyed character, the greatest loss humans can experience.

What stands in the way of the RIGHT to real life — health and freedom — are the black conscienceless spider eyes of the Biotech Giants. All of ethical and moral motivation and understanding should work together to educate the world about the fatal dangers of bad science:

We’re fighting for our right to live! (Emmerich & Devlin 1996)

However, on the bright side, Big Biotech’s Bad Boy Plan is not as big as the bigger POTENTIAL that sees positive human character spectacularly gleaned out of global adversity, character that — by its very non-material disposition — posits an infinitely greater future expression of transcendent possibilities. There are many that believe this hologram Earth and Universe feature as an infinitely complex staging ground for exponentially expanding creativity of a type this world has yet to witness, an infinity of expressive opportunity seeded inside of a great and largely unknown meta-purpose set for humanity way beyond the blindness and tragedy of a frustrating and disappointing material existence. Winston Churchill had it right:

…I will say that he must indeed have a blind soul who cannot see that some great purpose and design is being worked out here below… (Churchill 1941).


Emmerich, R. & Devlin, D. 1996, Quote from U.S. President’s speech in movie: Independence Day; 20th Century Fox.

Adams, M. 2013 [Online], “The coming plague will not be stopped by drugs: CDC now admits era of antibiotics at an end as bacteria out-wit drug companies”; naturalnews.com; Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/042095_superbugs_antibiotics_coming_plague.html; accessed: 7 Feb. 2014.

Adams, M. 2014 [Online], “In search of Ebola cures: Chinese medicine, western herbs, sanitizing chemicals and immune boosting strategies”;  naturalnews.com; Source:  http://www.naturalnews.com/046260_Ebola_natural_cures_medicinal_herbs.html; accessed 1 August 2014.

Advanced Biological Concepts, No date [Online], “A Fact Sheet on Glyphosate: Provides no benefits to the consumer, only risks!”; Advanced Biological Concepts; Source: http://www.abcplus.biz/Categories.aspx?Id=Glyphosate_GMO_Fact_Sheet; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2008 [Online], “GLYPHOSATE DAMAGE IN SEED POTATOES”; Source: http://www.potato.org.uk/sites/default/files/%5Bcurrent-page%3Aarg%3A%3F%5D/GlyphosateNotemay08.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Allen, S. 2013 [Online], “Genetic Jailbreak: GMO Fungus Escapes in New Zealand”; http://www.responsibletechnology.org/; Source: http://www.responsibletechnology.org/posts/genetic-jailbreak/; accessed: 9 Mar. 2014.

Amis, A. 2013 [Online], “Plantations and Forest Stewardship Council Audits”; TasmanianTimes.com; Source: http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php?/article/plantations-and-forest-stewardship-council-audits/; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Andersen, A. 2013, Food Plague: Could our daily bread be our most life threatening exposure?; Amazon Kindle Edition (http://www.amazon.com/Food-Plague-Could-threatening-exposure-ebook/dp/B00CKEZ1SU/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1390618844&sr=1-1). Also see: http://www.acresusa.com/food-plague-could-our-daily-bread-be-our-most-life-threatening-exposure. Actual quote source:
http://cabecahealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/FoodPlaguePrimer.pdf; accessed: 25
Jan. 2014.

Baldwin, F. 2006 [Online], “Most due to glyphosate: Spray drift injures Arkansas rice”; Delta Farm Press; Source: http://deltafarmpress.com/most-due-glyphosate-spray-drift-injures-arkansas-rice; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Baldwin, F. 2007 [Online], “Glyphosate drift problems blowing into Arkansas rice”; Delta Farm Press; Source: http://deltafarmpress.com/glyphosate-drift-problems-blowing-arkansas-rice; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Banhazi, T.M., Seedorf, J., Rutley, D.L. & Pitchford, W.S. 2008 [Online], “Identification of Risk Factors for Sub-Optimal Housing Conditions in Australian Piggeries: Part 2. Airborne Pollutants”; in Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 14(1): 21-39; Source: https://eprints.usq.edu.au/18899/1/Banhazi_Seedorf_Rutley_Pitchford_JASH_v14n1_PV.pdf; accessed: 1 Mar. 2014.

Baroghel-Bouny V. (1994), Caractérisation microstructurale et hydrique des pâtes de ciment et des bétons ordinaires et à très hautes performances, Ph. D. thesis, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, LCPC Paris, pp. 467.

Beaulieu, D. 2014 [Online], “Vinegar As a Natural Weed Killer”, About.com Landscaping; Source: http://landscaping.about.com/od/weedsdiseases/qt/vinegar_weeds.htm; accessed: 21 Jan. 2013.

Beyond Pesticides / NCAMP, no date [Online], “ChemicalWatch Factsheet  A Beyond Pesticides/ NCAMP Factsheet  Clopyralid”; Source: http://www.beyondpesticides.org/pesticides/factsheets/clopyralid.pdf; accessed: 16 April 2014.

BookRags.com 2014a [Online], “The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance Summary & Study Guide Description”; Source: http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-the-coming-plague/; accessed: 8 Feb. 2014.

BookRags.com 2014b [Online], “The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance Chapter Summary & Analysis – Preface and Introduction Summary”; Source: http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-the-coming-plague/chapanal002.html; accessed: 8 Feb. 2014.

Borggaard, O.K. & Gimsing, A.L. 2008 [Online], “Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: a review”; in Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Apr;64(4):441-56; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18161065; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Bound, M., Biggs, J. & Obendorf, D. 2012 [Online], “Clean water needs revised forestry operations”; TasmanianTimes.com; Source: http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/clean-water-needs-revised-forestry-operations; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.
References cited in the quotes:
1. From a brochure Warning! Poisoned water? Authorised by Dr. Andrew Lohrey and widely distributed in Tasmania;
2. Alison Bleaney, ‘Chemicals: The dismal failure’ Tasmanian Times, 7 May 2012;
3. Andrew Lohrey, ‘Panel report dubious: designed to stifle public debate,’ Tasmanian times,2 July 2010, http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php?/article/george-river-toxins-rerport-dubious-designed-to-stifle-debate/;
9. Tim Flannery, Here on Earth, Text Publishing, Melbourne, 2011, p. 168.
10. Alison Bleaney, ‘Chemicals: The dismal failure’ Tasmanian Times, 7 May 2012. http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php?/article/how-chemicals-affect-us/.

Braback, L., Breborowicz, A., Julge, K., Knutson, A., Riikjarv, M-A., Vasar, A. & Bjorksten, B. 1995, “Risk factors for respiratory symptoms and atopic sensitization in the Baltic area”, in Arch. Dis. Child. 72: 487-93).

Broderick, N.A., Raffa, K.F. & Handelsman, J. 2006 [Online], “Midgut bacteria required for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal activity”; in PNAS, October 10, 2006 vol. 103 no. 41 (http://www.pnas.org/); Source: http://www.pnas.org/content/103/41/15196.full.pdf; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Brunekreef, B., Dockery, D.W., Speizer, F.E., Ware, J.H., Spengler, J.D. & Ferris, B.G. 1989, ‘Home dampness and respiratory morbidity in children’, in Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140: 1363-1367.

Brunekreef, B. 1992, “Associations between questionnaire reports of home dampness and childhood respiratory symptoms”, in Sci. Total Environ. 127: 79-89.

Buffin, D. & Jewell, T. 2001 [Online], “Health and environmental impacts of glyphosate: The implications of increased use of glyphosate in association with genetically modified crops”; Pesticide Action Network UK / Friends of the Earth; Source: http://www.foe.co.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/impacts_glyphosate.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014. [References cited in the text: 7. World Health Organisation (WHO), 1994. Glyphosate. Environmental Health Criteria 159. The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). WHO, Geneva; 47. Reviewed by Cox, C., 1995b op cit 12.; 48. ENDS Daily, May 26th 1999.

Buhner, S.H. 2012 [Online], “Herbal Alternatives to Antibiotics”; Mother Earth Living; Source: http://www.motherearthliving.com/health-and-wellness/alternatives-to-antibiotics-zm0z12aszdeb.aspx; accessed: 10 Feb. 2014.

CDC 2014 [Online], “Food Safety Clostridium perfringens”; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Source: http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/clostridium-perfingens.html; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Chalker-Scott, L. no date [Online), “The Myth of Weed-Killing Gluten: “Corn meal gluten is an effective organic herbicide””; Source: http://puyallup.wsu.edu/~linda%20chalker-scott/Horticultural%20Myths_files/Myths/Corn%20gluten.pdf; accessed: 24 Jan. 2014.

Chapela, I., No date [Online], “Ignacio Chapela on new landmark study on gene leakage”; http://www.gmwatch.org/; Source: http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/12615-ignacio-chapela-on-new-landmark-study-on-gene-leakage; accessed: 9 Mar. 2014.

Chemical Industry Archives 2009 [Online], “The Most Poorly Tested Chemicals in the World”; Source: http://www.chemicalindustryarchives.org/factfiction/testing.asp; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Chen, Z.H., Chen, L.J., Zhang, Y.L. & Wu, Z.J. 2011 [Online], “Microbial properties, enzyme activities and the persistence of exogenous proteins in soil under consecutive cultivation of transgenic cottons (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”, in PLANT SOIL ENVIRON., 57, 2011 (2): 67–74; Knowledge Innovation Project, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Project No. KZCX2-EW-413, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project No. 40101016; Source: http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/35214.pdf; accessed: 28 March 2014.

Chester, G. & Woollen, B.H. 1982 [Online], “Studies of the occupational exposure of Malaysian plantation workers to paraquat”; Br J Ind Med. 1982 February; 39(1): 23–33; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1008923/; accessed: 23 Feb. 2014.

Churchill, W. 1941 [Online], Winston Churchill Addresses A Joint Session Of Congress on December 26, 1941 by Winston Churchill; Source: https://www.winstonchurchill.org/learn/speeches/speeches-of-winston-churchill/1941-1945-war-leader/288-us-congress-1941; accessed: 1 Feb. 2014.

Collins, D. 2011 [Online], “Five Dangerous Pain Meds That Can Kill You Due to Adverse Drug Reactions”; Underground Health Reporter; Source: http://undergroundhealthreporter.com/adverse-drug-reactions-pain-meds#axzz2sj5H5fNU; accessed: 9 Feb. 2014.

Collotta, M., Bertazzi, P.A. & Bollati, V. 2013 [Online], “Epigenetics and pesticides”; PubMed.gov; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23380243; accessed: 11 Feb. 2014.

Colwell, R.R., Brayton, P., Herrington, D., Tall, B., Huq, A. & Levine, M.M. 1996 [Online], “Viable but non-culturable Vibrio cholerae O1 revert to a cultivable state in the human intestine”, in World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology – WORLD J MICROBIOL BIOTECHNOL , vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28-31; DOI: 10.1007/BF00327795; Source: http://journalogy.com/Publication/34489425/viable-but-non-culturable-vibrio-cholerae-o1-revert-to-a-cultivable-state-in-the-human-intestine; accessed: 7 Mar. 2014.

Cuong, N.L., Barrion, A.T., Langellotto, G. & Chen, Y.H. 2010 [Online], “Potential nontarget impacts on leptidopteran-based food webs from Bt transgene flow into wild rice in Vietnam”; Presented at the International Rice Research Conference, 8-12 November 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam
OP09: Pest, Disease, and Weed Management; Source: http://ricecongress.com/previous/extPdfs/OP09-3867-Cuong-fgh-edited.pdf; accessed: 1 Mar. 2014.

Coventry, P. 2001 [Online], “O.F.I. Occasional Papers No. 53 Forest Certification and Genetically Engineered Trees: Will the two ever be compatible?”; Oxford Forestry Institute Department of Plant Sciences, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB; Source: http://www.plants.ox.ac.uk/ofi/pubs/OP53.doc; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.
References cited in the quote:
Bauer, L.S. (1997) Fibre farming with insecticidal trees. Journal of Forestry 95: 20-23.
Saxena, D., Flores, S. & Stotzky (1999) Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature 402: 480.
Speight, M.R., Hunter, M.D. & Watt, A.D. (1999) Ecology of insects: concepts and applications. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Tabashnik, B.E., Cushing, N., Finson, N., & Johnson, M.W. (1990). Field development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83:1671-1676.
Tabashnik, B.E. (1994). Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annual Review of Entomology 39: 47-79.
Talekar, N.S., & Shelton, A.M. (1993) Biology, ecology and management of the diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 275-315.
Tang, J.D., Gilboa, S., Roush, R.T. & Shelton, A.M. (1997) Inheritance, stability, and fitness of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in a field colony of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) from Florida. Journal of Economic Entomology 90: 732-741.

Cox, C. 2003 [Online], “HERBICIDE FACTSHEET SULFOMETURON METHYL (OUST)”; JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM/WINTER 2002 • VOL. 22. NO.4; Source: http://www.oregon.gov/odf/board/docs/ffac_120707_comment_jpr_oust.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Crews, D. & Gore, A.C. 2011 [Online], “Life Imprints: Living in a Contaminated World”; in Environ Health Perspect 119:1208-1210 (2011) (ehp ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103451; Source: http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1103451/; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.

Dales, R.E., Zwanenburg, H., Burnett, R. & Franklin, C.A. 1991, “Respiratory health effects of home dampness and molds among Canadian children”, in Am. J. Epidemiol. 134: 196-203.

Dekker, C., Dales, R., Bartlett, S., Brunekreef, B. & Zwanenburg, H. 1991, “Childhood asthma and the indoor environment”, in Chest 100: 922-926.

Disponible en Español 2011 [Online], “50% of Rats Given this Died — Why is it On Your Dinner Plate?”; Mercola.com; Source: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/05/how-did-weedkiller-wind-up-in-most-us-rain-samples.aspx; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Donohoe, M. (Dr.) 1998, Killing Us Softly; Chemical Injury and Chemical Sensitivity 1.2 (internet Creative Commons release 2008), Source: http://web.mac.com/doctormark/DoctorMark/KUS.html; accessed: 13/12/2008.

Donohoe, M. (Dr.) 2008 [Online], Killing Us Softly: Chemical Injury and Chemical Sensitivity (internet Creative Commons release 2008); Source: http://docmarky.com/DoctorMark/KUS_files/Killing%20Us%20Softly%20(KUS)%201.2_2.pdf; accessed: 30 Jan. 2014.

Donohoe, M. (Dr.) No date [Online], MCS – A Medical Perspective; Australian Chemical Trauma Alliance Inc.; Source: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~actall/page7.htm; accessed: 30 Jan. 2014.

Douville, M., Gagne, F., Masson, L., McKay, J. & Blaise, C. 2005 [Online], “Tracking the source of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab endotoxin in the environment”, in Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, Volume 33, Issue 3, March 2005, Pages 219–232; Elsevier B.V.; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2004.08.001; Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197804002467; accessed: 28 March 2014.

Douwes, J., Thorne, P., Pierce, N. & Heederik, D. 2003 [Online], “Bioaerosol Health Effects and Exposure Assessment:
Progress and Prospects”; in Journal: Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 187–200, 2003; 1: 39-42; Source: http://annhyg.oxfordjournals.org/; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Douwes, J., Thorne, P., & Heederik, D. 2003 [Online], “Monitoring and evaluation of bioaerosol exposure”; in Journal: Arbowetenschap 2003; 1: 39-42; Source: http://www.arbeidshygiene.nl/~uploads/text/file/2003-01_Douwes%20et%20al_extended%20abstract%20IOHA%202002%20conference%20bioaerosol.pdf; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

drmyhill.co.uk 2012 [Online], “Nickel toxicity and detoxing”; drmyhill.co.uk; Source: http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/wiki/Nickel_-_toxicity_and_detoxing; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

eatherbs.com 2013 [Online], “THE LOCAL DIFFERENCE Buying Local is Supporting Your Community”; eatherbs.com; Source: http://eatherbs.com/?page_id=45; accessed: 18 April 2014.

Edlund, M.J. (M.D.) 2011 [Online], “Legal Drugs That Can Kill You”; Psychology Today; Source: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-power-rest/201107/legal-drugs-can-kill-you-2; accessed: 9 Feb. 2014.

EFSA Journal 2009 [Online], “Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance haloxyfop-P (haloxyfop-R)”, in EFSA Journal 2009; 7(11):1348; European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy; Source: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1348.pdf; accessed: 16 April 2014.

Ellstrand, N.C. (Prof.) 2001 [Online], “When Transgenes Wander, Should We Worry?”; in Plant Physiol. Vol. 125, 2001; http://www.plant.org/; Source: http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/125/4/1543.full.pdf+html; accessed: 21 Feb. 2014.

epa.gov 2001 [Online], “Bt Plant-Incorporated Protectants October 15, 2001 Biopesticides Registration Action Document (C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT)”; Source: http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/bt_brad2/3-ecological.pdf; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Eshetu, T., Desalegn, S. & Ramayya, A.V. 2005 [Online], “DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF A REGENERATIVE RECHARGEABLE SOLAR STOVE SYSTEM”, in ESME Journal Vol. V, No.2 December 2005; Source: http://images.wikia.com/solarcooking/images/c/c5/Development_and_Testing_of_a_Regenerative_Rechargable_Solar_Stove_System.pdf; accessed: 16 Mar. 2014.

EuphoricOrganics, No date [Online], “GMOs and food safety: questions and answers”; Source: http://www.euphoricorganics.net/gmo/q_a.html; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Extoxnet 1996 [Online], “HALOXYFOP”; E X T O X N E T, Extension Toxicology Network, Pesticide Information Profiles; Source: http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/haloxyfo.htm; accessed: 16 April 2014.

farmlandgrab.org 2010 [Online], “Stop land grabbing now!”; farmlandgrab.or; Source: http://farmlandgrab.org/12200#sthash.8T0aSYaz.dpuf; accessed: 27 Feb. 2014.

Farmstyle no date [Online], “Alternatives to chemical weed control”, Farmstyle, Specialised Small Farm Advice; Source: http://farmstyle.com.au/news/alternatives-chemical-weed-control; accessed: 22 Jan. 2014.

Ferre, J., Van Rie, J. & Macintosh, S.C. 2008 [Online], “Insecticidal Genetically Modified Crops and Insect Resistance Management (IRM)”; in Progress in Biological Control Volume 5, 2008, pp 41-85; Solurce: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-8373-0_3; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Flanagan, R. 2007 [Online], “OUT OF CONTROL The tragedy of Tasmania’s forests”; The Monthly; Source: http://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2007/may/1348543148/richard-flanagan/out-control; accessed: 17 Feb. 2014.

Forest Stewardship Council, No date #1 [Online], “Pest Management”; Source: http://pesticides.fsc.org/strategy-database-entries/10303; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Forest Stewardship Council, No date #2 [Online], “Pest Management”; Source: http://pesticides.fsc.org/strategy-database-entries/10265; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Forest Stewardship Council, No date #3 [Online], “Pest Management”; Source: http://pesticides.fsc.org/strategy-database-entries/10277; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Fox, M. 2010 [Online], “Common weedkiller turns male frogs into females”; Reuters.com; Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/03/us-weedkiller-frogs-idUSTRE6204RG20100303?feedType=RSS&feedName=environmentNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2Fenvironment+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Environment%29; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Fractured Paradigm 2013 [Online], “Monsanto’s Dirty Dozen: The 12 Most Awful Products Made By Monsanto”; Fractured Paradigm; Source: http://fracturedparadigm.com/2013/04/15/monsantos-dirty-dozen-the-12-most-awful-products-made-by-monsanto/#axzz2qslJhDeG; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Francis, M. 2014 [Online], “Natural Born Killer: Sustainable Ways to Defeat Weeds”, HGTV Gardens, Source: http://www.hgtvgardens.com/garden-basics/natural-born-killer-sustainable-ways-to-defeat-weeds; accessed: 21 Jan. 2014.

Frompovich, C.J. 2014 [Online], “What’s the Scoop on Genetically-engineered and Pandemic Viruses?”; Activist Post; Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/whats-scoop-on-genetically-engineered.html; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Garrett, L. 2001, Betrayal of Trust: The Collapse of Global Public Health; Hyperion. ISBN 0-7868-8440-1. Source quoted: https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/12627.Laurie_Garrett; accessed: 8 Feb. 2014.

AREAS IN SOUTH-EAST QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE FAMILY MYRTACEAE”; PhD Thesis: School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Griffith University; Source: https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/3b8573fc-d508-3027-d491-3f4fb5be43f1/1/Gibbs_2007_02Thesis.pdf; accessed: 8 Mar. 2014.

Global Justice Ecology Project, EcoNexus, Friends of the Earth International, Global Forest Forum and World Rainforest Movement, No date [Online], “Briefing Paper on Transgenic Trees – Agenda Point 26.1 – SBSTTA 11 recommendation “; Source: http://econexus.info/sites/econexus/files/GE-Trees_COP-8_Brief_1.pdf; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Global Research, i-sis.org.uk, 2009 [Online], “Monsanto’s Bt Cotton Kills the Soil as Well as Farmers”; Global Research, i-sis.org.uk,; Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/monsanto-s-bt-cotton-kills-the-soil-as-well-as-farmers/12432; accessed: 3 Feb. 2014.

GRAIN 2012 [Online], “Slideshow: Who’s behind the land grabs?”; GRAIN; Source: http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4576-slideshow-who-s-behind-the-land-grabs; accessed: 27 Feb. 2014.

Grandjean, P. & Landrigan, P.J. 2006. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet 2006; 368: 2167–78. Published Online November 8, 2006. http://www.sciencedirect.com. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69665-7. Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. (Prof P Grandjean MD); Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA (P Grandjean); Department of Community Medicine (Prof PJ Landrigan MD); and Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA (PJ Landrigan). http://sciencedirect.com.

Grandjean P., Bellinger D., Bergman A., Cordier S., Davey-Smith G., Eskenazi B., Gee D., Gray K., Hanson M., van den Hazel P., Heindel J.J, Heinzow B., Hertz-Picciotto I., Hu H., T-K Huang T., Jensen T.K., Landrigan P.J., McMillen I.C., Murata K., Ritz B., Schoeters G., Skakkebæk N.E, Skerfving S. & Weihe P. 2007 [Online], “The Faroes Statement: Human Health Effects of Developmental Exposure to Chemicals in Our Environment”; in Nordic Pharmacological Society . Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 102, 73–75; Doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00114.x; Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00114.x/pdf; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.

Graves, L. 2011 [Online], “Roundup: Birth Defects Caused By World’s Top-Selling Weedkiller, Scientists Say”; Huff Post Green; Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/24/roundup-scientists-birth-defects_n_883578.html; accessed: 9 Feb. 2014.

GMWatch 2013 [Online], “US farmers’ misgivings about how glyphosate affects soil”; GMWATCH, 2013 articles; Source: http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/15069; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Grubinger, V. (Ph.D; Director, University of Vermont Center for Sustainable Agriculture) 2000 [Online], “SUMMARY OF CONCERNS ABOUT TRANSGENIC CROPS “; Source: http://www.uvm.edu/vtvegandberry/factsheets/transgenic.html; accessed: 2 Mar. 2014.

Hansen, M. (PhD) 2000 [Online], “Possible Human Health Hazards of Genetically Engineered Bt Crops”; Organic Consumers Association; Source: http://www.organicconsumers.org/ge/btcomments.cfm; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Hanson, E.M., No date [Online], “Immanuel Kant: Radical Evil”; IEP (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy); Source: http://www.iep.utm.edu/rad-evil/; accessed: 27 Feb. 2014.

Hatherill, J.R. (Dr.) 1999 [Online], ARE TODAY’S TEENS MORE TOXIC?, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, Ill; Jun 15, 1999; pg. 19; and http://www.veg.ca/lifelines/sepoc99/teens.htm; accessed: 2006.

Heath, D. 2013 [Online], “Erin Brockovich’s Biggest Debunker, Debunked”; MotherJones.com; Source: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/05/erin-brockovich-hinkley-california-junk-science; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Heidelberg, J.F., Shahamat, M., Levin, M., Rahman, I., Stelma, G., Grim, C. & Colwell, R.R. 1997 [Online], “Effect of Aerosolization on Culturability and Viability of Gram-Negative Bacteria”, in Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63(9):3585; Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology; Source: http://aem.asm.org/content/63/9/3585.full.pdf; accessed: 7 Mar. 2014.

Helander, M., Saloniemi, I. & Saikkonen, K. 2012 [Online], “Glyphosate in northern ecosystems”; in Trends in Plant Science xx (2012) 1–6; Elsevier Ltd.; Source: http://www.charcoalfinland.fi/Helander%20et%20al.%20Trends%20in%20Plant%20Science%202012.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014. [ References cited in article are:
[15] Laitinen, P. et al. (2009) Glyphosate and phosphorus leaching and
residues in boreal sandy soil. Plant Soil 323, 267–283.
[17] Roy, D.N. et al. (1989) Persistence, movement, and degradation of
glyphosate in selected Canadian boreal forest soils. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 37, 437–440.
[19] Laitinen, P. et al. (2007) Glyphosate translocation from plants to soil –
does this constitute a signi?cant proportion of residues in soil? Plant
Soil 300, 51–60.]

HerbiGuide, No date [Online], “Sulfometuron”; Source: http://www.herbiguide.com.au/Descriptions/hg_Sulfometuron.htm; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

HESIS 2008 [Online], Understanding Toxic Substances: An Introduction to Chemical Hazards in the Workplace; HESIS Occupational Health Branch California Department of Public Health; Source: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/hesis/Documents/introtoxsubstances.pdf; accessed: 11 Feb. 2014.

Ho, M. [head of the Bio-Electrodynamics laboratory at the Open University in Milton Keynes, UK] 2000 [Online], “Turning the Tide on the Brave New World”; Institute of Science in Society and Biology Dept. Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, U.K.; Source: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/tide.php?printing=yes; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Ho, M. 2013 [Online], “The New Genetics and Natural versus Artificial Genetic Modification”; in Entropy 2013, 15, 4748-4781; doi:10.3390/e15114748; Source: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/Entropy/entropy-15-01416.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb 2014.

Ho, M. 2014 [Online], Answer to questions/interview: “Mae-Wan Ho Answers 11 Questions on GMOs, Science, and Life”; The Permaculture Research Institute; Source: http://permaculturenews.org/2014/01/16/mae-wan-ho-answers-11-questions-on-gmos-science-and-life/; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Ho, M-W, & Cummins, J. 2009 [Online], “New evidence links CaMV 35S promoter to HIV transcription”; in Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. 2009; 21: 172–174; http://www.academia.edu; Source: https://www.academia.edu/6167527/New_evidence_links_CaMV_35S_promoter_to_HIV_transcription; accessed: 25 Feb. 2014.

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ 2008 [Online], “Chromium Toxicity What Are the Physiologic Effects of Chromium Exposure?”; http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry); Source: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/csem.asp?csem=10&po=10; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

http://www.gmofreeportland.com/ 2010 [Online], “Here we go- GMOs spread to fungus/ Are GMOs against your religion?”; http://www.gmofreeportland.com/; Source: http://www.gmofreeportland.com/2/post/2010/12/fungus.html; accessed: 9 Mar. 2014.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/, no date [Online], “GM CLAIMS HIT BUFFERS”; Source: http://www.organicconsumers.org/patent/exposed091702.cfm; accessed: 18 April 2014).

http://www.remembersarowiwa.com/ 2008 [Online], Remember Saro-Wiwa: Remembering the Past, Shaping the Future, http://www.remembersarowiwa.com/, accessed: 18 Jan. 2008. [see also: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/08/brazil-land-indigenous-people-killings; http://www.landaction.org/spip.php?article479; http://www.landaction.org/spip.php?article457; http://www.landaction.org/spip.php?article542%5D.

Huff, E.A. 2011 [Online], “Monsanto connected to at least 200,000 suicides in India throughout past decade”; Natural News; Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/030913_Monsanto_suicides.html; accessed: 14 Feb. 2014.

Huff, E.A. 2013 [Online], “U.S. virologists intentionally engineer super-deadly pandemic flu virus”; http://www.naturalnews.com/; Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/038901_virologists_flu_virus_pandemic.html; accessed: 8 Feb. 2014.

inchem.org, No date [Online], “UKPID MONOGRAPH ANTIMONY POTASSIUM TARTRATE”; http://www.inchem.org/; Source: http://www.inchem.org/documents/ukpids/ukpids/ukpid37.htm; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Institute of Science in Society 2003 [Online], “Unstable Transgenic Lines Illegal”; http://www.i-sis.org.uk/; Source: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/UTLI.php; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Jayasumana, C., Gunatilake, S. & Senanayake, P. 2014 [Online], “Glyphosate, Hard Water and Nephrotoxic Metals: Are They the Culprits Behind the Epidemic of Chronic Kidney Disease of
Unknown Etiology in Sri Lanka?”; in Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 2125-2147; doi:10.3390/ijerph110202125; Source: Personal Email from Channa Jayasumana, 27 Feb. 2014.

Jenkin & Tomkins 2006 [Online], Pesticides IN PLANTATIONS The use of chemical pesticides by the Australian plantation forest industry Summary report; FWPRDC, PO Box 69, World Trade Centre Melbourne 8005, Victoria; http://www.fwprdc.org.au; Source: http://www.fwpa.com.au/sites/default/files/FWPpestreport.pdf; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Jha, A. 2013 [Online], “A deadly disease could travel at jet speed around the world. How do we stop it in time?”; The Guardian; Source: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/12/deadly-disease-modern-global-epidemic; accessed: 16 Feb. 2014.

Jopson, D. & Pollard, R. 2007 [Online], “Name your poison – you’ll find it’s legal”; The Sydney Morning Herald; Source: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/21/1192940905013.html; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Julius, H. 2002 [Online], “Glyphosate – Environmental issues – Heimen Julius”; Friends of the Earth; Source: http://www.nvlv.nl/downloads/Glyphosate_environmental_issues-Heimen_Julius.pdf; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014 (Julius’ [54] reference: Nomura N.S. et al. 1977. The adsorption and degradation of glyphosate in five Hawaiian sugarcane soils. Weed Research 17: 113-121).

Karesh, W. (Dr.) 2013 [Online], “7 Common Myths About Pandemics and New Diseases”; HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING; Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-william-karesh/pandemics-common-myths_b_3498381.html; accessed: 16 Feb. 2014.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/File%3AKeating_Statement_on_GE_Eucalyptus_trees_5_August_1992.pdf; Accessed: 24 June 2014.

Kenneth F. Raffa, K.F., Kleiner, K.W., Ellis, D.D., & McCown, B.H. 1997 [Online], “Environmental Risk Assesslnent and Deployment Strategies for Genetically Engineered Insect-Resistant Populus”; in USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-297. 1997 (Section V Biotechnological Applications, Chapter 32); Source: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_rm/rm_gtr297/rm_gtr297_249_263.pdf; accessed: 1 Mar. 2014.

Kleter, G.A., Peijnenburg, A.A.C.M., & Aarts, H.J.M. 2005 [Online], “Health Considerations Regarding Horizontal Transfer of Microbial Transgenes Present in Genetically Modified Crops”; in J Biomed Biotechnol. 2005; 2005(4): 326–352; doi: 10.1155/JBB.2005.326; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1364539/; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Knight, S. 1997 [Online], “Herbicide Bibliography GLYPHOSATE, ROUNDUP AND OTHER HERBICIDES — AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY”; Source: http://www.forestecologynetwork.org/herb.htm; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Koller VJ, Fürhacker M, Nersesyan A, Mišík M, Eisenbauer M, Knasmueller S 2012 [Online], “Cytotoxic and DNA-damaging properties of glyphosate and Roundup in human-derived buccal epithelial cells”; in Archives of Toxicology [2012, 86(5):805-813] DOI: 10.1007/s00204-012-0804-8; Springer-Verlag 2012; Source of Abstract: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22331240/reload=0;jsessionid=JgtrTBCXvwL9Zx3XikLZ.0; accessed: 10 Feb. 2014.

Koskinen, O.M., Husman, T.M., Meklin, T.M. & Nevalainen, A.O. 1999, “Adverse health effects in children associated with moisture and mold observations in houses”, in International Journal of Environmental Health Research, Volume 9 Number 2: 143-156.

Krimsky, S. 2002 [Online], “ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE RELEASE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS”; Encyclopedia of Pest Management, Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker. Inc.; Source: http://www.tufts.edu/~skrimsky/PDF/env_impacts.PDF; accessed: 1 Mar. 2014.

Lacey, J. & Dutkiewicz, J. 1994 [Online], Abstract in: “Bioaerosols and occupational lung disease”; in Journal of Aerosol Science, Volume 25, Issue 8, December 1994, Pages 1371–1404; ScienceDirect; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(94)90215-1; Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021850294902151; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Ladeau, S.L. & Clarke, J.S. 2006 [Online], “Pollen production by Pinus taeda growing in elevated atmospheric CO2”; Source: http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar_url?hl=en&q=http://www.researchgate.net/publication/227561502_Pollen_production_by_Pinus_taeda_growing_in_elevated_atmospheric_CO2/file/3deec529392c24fb9a.pdf&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm2qwYx5UO9Z9rmETdrmv35_5kY3Uw&oi=scholarr&ei=owkKU4y-IoGRkwXDooDoDQ&ved=0CCYQgAMoADAA; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Lamour, V., Haouas, A. & Moranville, M. [online], Chemo-hydro-mechanical behavior of concrete at early ages, LMT Cachan 61, Avenue du Pdt Wilson 94235 Cachan Cedex France, http://arw-bled2004.scix.net/Files/acceptedpapers/Accepted/NATOVL.pdf, accessed: June 25, 2004.
Lendman, S. 2014 [Online], “Potential Health Hazards of Genetically Engineered Foods”; Global Research: Center for Research on Globalization; Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/potential-health-hazards-of-genetically-engineered-foods/8148; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Leu, A. 2007, ‘Monsanto’s Toxic Herbicide Glyphosate: A Review of its Health and Environmental Effects’, Organic Consumers Association, http://www.organicconsumers.org/, accessed: July 17, 2008.

Levitan, J. 2010 [Online], “Die-off of pathogens and assessment of risks following biosolids application in pine plantations”; Murdoch University; Source: http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/5101/; accessed: 23 Feb. 2014.

Link, J. 1999 [Online], “Corn Gluten Herbicide”; Garden Mastery Tips from Clark County Master Gardeners (June 1999); Source: http://clark.wsu.edu/mg/gm_tips/CornGluten.html; accessed: 24 Jan. 2014.

LRAN 2013 [Online], “Media release of La Via Campesina / Grain / ETC”; Land Research Action Network; Source: http://www.landaction.org/spip.php?article727; accessed: 7 Feb. 2014.

Lu, B-R 2008 [Online], “Transgene Escape from GM Crops and Potential Biosafety Consequences: An Environmental Perspective”; The Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China; Collection of Biosafety Reviews Vol. 4 (2008): 66-141
© International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) Padriciano, 99, 34012 Trieste, Italy; Source: http://www.icgeb.org/~bsafesrv/pdffiles/Bao-Rong.pdf; accessed: 21 Feb. 2014.

Luther, D. 2014 [Online], “What’s the Scoop on Genetically-engineered and Pandemic Viruses?”; The Organic Prepper; Source: http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/whats-the-scoop-on-genetically-engineered-and-pandemic-viruses-01052014#sthash.s2Xv60oz.dpuf; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Manikkam, M., Guerrero-Bosagna, C., Tracey, R., Haque, M.M., & Skinner MK 2012 [Online], “Transgenerational Actions of Environmental Compounds on Reproductive Disease and Identification of Epigenetic Biomarkers of Ancestral Exposures”; in PLoS ONE 7(2): e31901. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031901; Source: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031901; accessed: 11 Feb. 2014.

Manikkam, M., Tracey, R., Guerrero-Bosagna, C. & Skinner, M.K. 2012, “Pesticide and insect repellent mixture (permethrin and DEET) induces epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease and sperm epimutations”; in Reproductive Toxicology, Volume 34, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages 708–719; Elsevier, ScienceDirect com; Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890623812002948; accessed: 11 Feb. 2014.

Marsh, K., No date [Online], “Genetic Engineering A concept in need of environmental assessment?”; Sonairte, Organic Trust and the Irish Environmental Network; Source: http://www.epa.ie/pubs/conferencesandevents/gmoconf/Mrs%20Kathryn%20Marsh.pdf; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Marshall, T. 2010 [Online], “Bacteria spread genes to fungi on plants”; http://www.gmwatch.org/; Source: http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/12615-ignacio-chapela-on-new-landmark-study-on-gene-leakage; accessed: 9 Mar. 2014.

Mason, R. 2013 [Online], “GLYPHOSATE: DESTRUCTOR OF HUMAN HEALTH AND BIODIVERSITY”; Source: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/glyphosate/glyphosate_report_by_RosemaryMason.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

McGrath, Patrick F. Ph.D., 2000 [online], Water Permeability vs Waterproof – ASCE Met Section Construction Group, Cooper Union Student Chapter, May 25, 2000.

Mercola, J. (Dr.) 2013 [Online], “Monsanto’s Roundup Herbicide May Be Most Important Factor in Development of Autism and Other Chronic Disease”; Mercola.com; Source: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/06/09/monsanto-roundup-herbicide.aspx; accessed: 7 Feb. 2014.

Miller, G.T. 2004, Sustaining the Earth, 6th edition. Thompson Learning, Inc. Pacific Grove, California. Chapter 9, Pages 211-216.

Montague, P. (National Writers Union) 2001, ‘#726 – Science, Precaution and Pesticides, 06-Jun-2001’, in http://www.rachel.org/en/node/5340; accessed: 16 July 2008.

Moreno, N.M. 2008 [Online], “Agro-Homeopathy — An Alternative for Agriculture”; hpathy.com; Source: http://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/agro-homeopathy-an-alternative-for-agriculture/; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Mossop D, Kellar C, Jeppe K, Myers J, Rose G, Weatherman K, Pettigrove V & Leahy P 2013 [Online], “Impacts of intensive Scientific Report agriculture and plantation forestry on water quality in the Latrobe catchment, Victoria”; EPA Victoria, Monitoring and Assessment Unit Centre for Aquatic Pollution Investigation and Management 2012; Source: http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/~/media/publications/1528.pdf; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Muir, P. 2012 [Online], “A. HISTORY OF PESTICIDE USE”; Oregon State University; Source: http://people.oregonstate.edu/~muirp/pesthist.htm; accessed: 9 Feb. 2014.

Navdanya, No date [Online], Source: http://www.navdanya.org/; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Neltner, T.G., Alger, H.M., Leonard, J.E. & Maffini, M.V. 2013 [Online], “Data gaps in toxicity testing of chemicals allowed in food in the United States”; in Reproductive Toxicology, Volume 42, December 2013, Pages 85–94; Online source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890623813003298; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

News.com.au 2011 [Online], “Erin Brockovich joins campaign for Australian Government to review pesticide laws”; News.com.au Environment; Source: http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/heat-on-australian-government-to-review-pesticide-laws/story-e6frflp0-1226075604359#ixzz2Ml4Fw5Cq; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Obendorf, D. (Dr.) 2010 [Online], “Dr David Obendorf, Wildlife Veterinary Pathologist – Interview Transcript PROGRAM TRANSCRIPT: Monday, 22 February , 2010”; Australian Story; Source: http://www.abc.net.au/austory/content/2007/s2827187.htm; accessed: 17 Feb. 2014.

Ollivry, M. 2013 [Online], Quote attributed to GILLES-ERIC SÉRALINI, in: “The Price of Truth”; Paris Match; Source: http://www.gmoseralini.org/the-price-of-truth/; accessed: 23 Feb. 2014.

PABA, E., TRANFO, G., CORSETTI, F., MARCELLONI, A.M. & IAVICOLI, S. 2013 [Online], “Indoor Exposure to Airborne Endotoxin: A Review of the Literature on Sampling and Analysis
Methods”; in Industrial Health 2013, 51, 237–255; Source: https://www.jniosh.go.jp/en/indu_hel/pdf/IH_51_3_237.pdf; accessed: 1 Mar. 2014.

Pesticide Action Network Updates Service (PANUPS) 2009 [Online], “‘Superweeds’ jam pesticide treadmill; Philippines seeks banana plantation spray ban; Endocrine disruptors; more”; Pesticide Action Network Updates Service (PANUPS); Source: http://www.panna.org/resources/panups/panup_20091112; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Petermann, A. 2008 [Online], “Genetically Engineered Trees: Some Answers to Frequently Asked Questions”; Global Justice Ecology Project globalecology@gmavt.net ; Source: https://www.cbd.int/doc/external/cop-09/gjep-tree-en.pdf; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Platt, S.D., Martin, C.J., Hunt, S.M. & Lewis, C.W. 1989, “Damp housing, mold growth and symptomatic health state”, in Br. Med. J. 298:1673-1678.

Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J.A., Förster, J-D & Pöschl, U. 2013 [Online], “Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols: the spectral fingerprint and taxonomic trends of pollen” in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques; Vol. 6 Issue 12, following p3369; Source: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/92990005/autofluorescence-atmospheric-bioaerosols-spectral-fingerprint-taxonomic-trends-pollen; accessed: 7 Mar. 2014.

Pope, C. 2011 [Online], “RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SHREDDING GREEN WASTE AT MOUNTS PLANTATION, EAST ALLINGTON”; DWM Composting; Source: http://www.devon.gov.uk/plandoc_5_3983.pdf; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Preston, R. 1992 [Online], Source: http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=82218; accessed: 8 Feb. 2014 (Original book: The Hot Zone: A Terrifying True Story; Transworld Publishers (Doubleday), Moorebank NSW Australia).

Preston, R. 1994, The Hot Zone, Transworld Publishers (Doubleday), Moorebank NSW Australia.

Quist, D. 2010 [Online], “Vertical (Trans)gene Flow: Implications for Crop Diversity and Wild Relatives”; Third World Network, 131 Macalister Road 10400 Penang, Malaysia; Norsk institutt for genøkologi (GenØk), Tromsø, and Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, 2010; ISBN: 978-967-5412-26-4; Source: http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/biosafety/pdf/bio11.pdf; accessed: 21 Feb. 2014.

Richardson, J. 2011 [Online], “Why Is Damning New Evidence About Monsanto’s Most Widely Used Herbicide Being Silenced? It turns out that Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide might not be nearly as safe as people have thought, but the media is staying mum on the revelation”; AlterNet; Source: http://www.alternet.org/story/150733/why_is_damning_new_evidence_about_monsanto%27s_most_widely_used_herbicide_being_silenced/?page=entire; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Robbins, J. 2012 [Online], “The Ecology of Disease”, The New York Sunday Review | The Opinion Pages; Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/sunday-review/the-ecology-of-disease.html?pagewanted=all; accessed: 18 Sept. 2012.

Rowe, R.K. 1994, “Diffusive transport of pollutants through clay liners”, in Landfilling of Waste: Barriers, eds, T.H. Christensen, R. Cossu and R. Stagmann, E. & F.N. Spon, London, UK.

Royal Commission On Environmental Pollution 2007 [Online], “Twenty-sixth Report The Urban Environment”; Royal Commission On Environmental Pollution (http://www.rcep.org.uk or from the Secretariat at Third Floor, 5-8 The Sanctuary, Westminster, London SW1P 3JS.); Source: http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm70/7009/7009.pdf; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.
References cited in the quote:
7 Laumbach, R.J. and Kipen, H.M. (2005). Bioaerosols and sick building syndrome: Particles, inflammation, and allergy. Current Opinion in Allerg y and Clinical Immunolog y, 5(2), 135-139.
8 Wolkoff, P., Wilkins, C.K., Clausen, P.A. and Nielsen, G.D. (2006). Organic compounds in office environments – Sensory
irritation, odor, measurements and the role of reactive chemistry. Indoor Air, 16(1), 7-19.

“Russ” 2014 [Online], “Volatility GMO News Report 2/14/14”; Source: https://attempter.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/gmo-news-report-21414/; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Rylander, R., Persson, K., Goto, H. et al. 1992, “Airborne B-1,3-glucan may be related to symptoms in sick buildings”, in Indoor Air 1:263-267.

Rylander, R. & Snella, M.C. 1983, “Endotoxins and the lung: cellular reactions and risks for disease”, in Prog. Allergy 33: 332-344.

Salleh, A. 2012 [Online], “New study queries pesticide safety levels”; ABC Science; Source: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/06/05/3517745.htm; accessed: 29 Jan. 2014.

Samsel, A. & Seneff, S. 2013 [Online], “Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases”; in Entropy 2013, 15, 1416-1463; ISSN 1099-4300, http://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy; doi:10.3390/e15041416; Source: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/Entropy/entropy-15-01416.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Sanchis, V. 2010 [Online], “From microbial sprays to insect-resistant transgenic plants: history of the biospesticide Bacillus thuringiensis. A review”; in Agron. Sustain. Dev. (2011) 31:217–231; c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2010, DOI: 10.1051/agro/2010027; Source: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/93/04/76/PDF/hal-00930476.pdf; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014.

Sanchis J, Kantiani L, Llorca M, Rubio F, Ginebreda A, Fraile J, Garrido T, Farré M. 2012 [Online], “Determination of glyphosate in groundwater samples using an ultrasensitive immunoassay and confirmation by on-line solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry”; in Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012 Mar;402(7):2335-45; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5541-y. Epub 2011 Nov 20; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22101424; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Scammell, M. 2010 [Online], Comment in: “Something In The Water Part 1 – Transcript”; abc.net.au; Source: http://www.abc.net.au/austory/content/2007/s2820402.htm; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.

ScienceLab.com 2013 [Online], “Material Safety Data Sheet Antimony potassium tartrate MSDS”; ScienceLab.com; Source: https://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9922956; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Shiva, V. 2014a [Online], “GMO: The biggest food con”; The Asian Age, Jan. 29th 2014; Source: http://www.asianage.com/columnists/gmo-biggest-food-con-268; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Shiva, V. 2014b [Online], “Why GM Foods Are a Multi-Front Attack on Human Life; Pushing for genetically modified organisms is polluting our seed and food, our science and democracy”; Asian Age — AlterNet.org: Source: http://www.alternet.org/food/why-gm-foods-are-multi-front-attack-decent-human-life; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Shrestha, A., Moretti, M. and Mourad N. 2011 [Online], “Evaluation of thermal implements and organic herbicides for weed control in a non-bearing almond (Prunus dulcis) orchard”; in Weed Technology, on-line Nov. 18, doi: 10.1614/WT-D-11-00083.1; Source: http://wssajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1614/WT-D-11-00083.1; accessed: 24 Jan. 2014.

Sierra Club 2014 [Online], “Genetic Engineering at a Historic Crossroads”; Sierra Club; Source: http://www.sierraclub.org/biotech/report.aspx; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

Slavo, M. 2014 [Online], “CDC Prepares for Perfect Storm: “The Next Plane Could Bring a Pandemic
” “; SHTFplan.com; Source: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/cdc-prepares-for-perfect-storm-the-next-plane-could-bring-a-pandemic_01302014; accessed: 23 Feb. 2014.

Smith JM 2013, “Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality”; http://www.responsibletechnology.org/; Source: http://www.responsibletechnology.org/article-gmo-soy-linked-to-sterility; accessed: 7 Feb. 2014.

soilassociation.org, 2002 [Online], “Seeds of doubt North American farmers’ experiences of GM crops”; Soil Association Bristol House 40–56 Victoria Street Bristol BS1 6BY, UK; Source: http://www.soilassociation.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=6lQJZLPalqo%3D&tabid=390; accessed: 18 April 2014.

SourceWatch.org 2013a [Online], “Water pollution in Tasmania”; SourceWatch.org; Source: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Water_pollution_in_Tasmania#cite_ref-Leaman_14-0; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.

SourceWatch.org 2013b [Online], “Water pollution in Tasmania”; SourceWatch.org; Source: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Water_pollution_in_Tasmania#cite_ref-Leaman_14-0; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014 ([87] reference: Vidal, J. The GM tree plantations bred to satisfy the world’s energy needs.,The Guardian 15 November 2012).

SourceWatch.org 2013c [Online], “Water pollution in Tasmania”; SourceWatch.org; Source: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Water_pollution_in_Tasmania#cite_ref-Leaman_14-0; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014; (References cited in the quote:
[87] Vidal, J. The GM tree plantations bred to satisfy the world’s energy needs.,The Guardian 15 November 2012.
[96] National Research Council (2000) Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation (Natl Acad Press, Washington, DC).
[97] Sears, M.K., R.L. Hellmich, D.E. Stanley-Horn, K.S. Oberhauser, J.M. Pleasants, H.R. Mattila HR, B.D. Siegfried and G.P. Dively Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment Proceedings of the National Academies of Science USA, 2001 Volume 98, pages 11937–11942.
[98] Rosi-Marshall, E.J., J. L. Tank, T. V. Royer, M. R. Whiles, M. Evans-White, C. Chambers, N. A. Griffiths, J. Pokelsek, and M. L. Stephen Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science USA, Volume 104, pages 16204–16208).

Spengler, J., Neas, L., Nakai, S., Dockery, D., Speizer, F., Ware, J. & Raizenne, M. 1994, “Respiratory symptoms and housing characteristics”, in Indoor Air 4: 72-82.

Stevens, K. 2013 [Online], Comment to Tomkins 2013 article: “FSC Changes Chemicals Criteria Again … Incorrect, says FSC Australia”; TasmanianTimes.com; Source: http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/fsc-changes-chemicals-criteria-again-simazine; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Stoppler, M.C. (M.D.) 2014 [Online], “Prescription Pain Relievers Can Kill You”; Medicine.Net.com; Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=22204; accessed: 9 Feb. 2014.

Strom, S. 2013 [Online], “Misgivings About How a Weed Killer Affects the Soil”; The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/); Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/business/misgivings-about-how-a-weed-killer-affects-the-soil.html?_r=0; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Sun, H., Xia, M., Austin, C.P. & Huang, R. 2012 [Online], “Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling”; in AAPS J. 2012 Sep;14(3):473-80. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9358-1. Epub 2012 Apr 20.; PubMed.gov; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22528508; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.

Sustainable Pulse 2013 [Online], “US Military Tracks GMO Campaigners and Independent Scientists (English Exclusive)”; Sustainable Pulse.com; Source: http://sustainablepulse.com/2013/07/13/us-military-tracks-gmo-campaigners-and-independent-scientists-english-excluusive/#.UvOQBhCSwrU; accessed: 7 Feb. 2014.

Sutton, P. 2009 [Online], ADVANCING THE PRECAUTIONARY AGENDA; Science and Environmental Health Network; Source: http://www.sehn.org/pdf/Advancing%20the%20Precautionary%20Agenda.pdf; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Swadener, C. 1994 [Online], “BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (B.T.)”; http://eap.mcgill.ca/; Source: http://eap.mcgill.ca/MagRack/JPR/JPR_22.htm; accessed: 28 Feb. 2014 (Citation given at the end of the above Swadener article: Swadener, Carrie, 1994, ” Bacillus Thuringiensis (B.T.)”, Vol. 14, No. 3, Fall 1994, pp. 13-20).

TasmanianTimes.com 2011 [Online], “Support Alison Bleaney to clean up our water”; TasmanianTimes.com; Source: http://www.tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/support-alison-bleaney-; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Thompson, M., Sporl, D., Hunter, W., Sinclair, R., Harvey, R. & Mogster, I. 1998 [Online], ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, The Impact of the Castlereagh Liquid Waste Disposal Depot on the Londonderry Terrestrial Environment (including the Hawkesbury River); Murray Thompson; Source: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/castlereagh/Castlereagh-Liquid-Waste-Disposal-Depot.pdf; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Thompson, M. 1998/2010 [Online], 1997 REPORT SHOWS TOXIC CHEMICAL LEAKAGE OUTSIDE TOXIC DEPOT; Murray Thompson; Source: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/castlereagh/Toxic-Chemical-Leakage-Outside-Waste-Depot.pdf; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Thompson, M. 2000 [Online], “ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PATHOGENIC FUNGI (LITERATURE REVIEW) WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO A DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING SYDNEY UNIT INFESTED WITH TERMITES – POTENTIAL FUNGAL IMPACTS”; Murray Thompson; Source: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com/termites/mycotoxin_research.pdf; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.

Thorn, J. 2001 [Online], “The inflammatory response in humans after inhalation of bacterial endotoxin: a review”; in Inflammation Research, May 2001, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 254-261; link.springer.com; Source: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s000110050751; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Timonen, K.L., Pekkanen, J., Korppi, M., Vahteristo, M. & Salonen, R.O. 1995, “Prevalence and characteristics of children with chronic respiratory symptoms in eastern Finland”, in Eur. Respir. J. 8: 1155-1160.

TMOrganics 2012 [Online], “Weed Management Society of SA Third SA Weeds Conference 8-9 May 2012: The use of organic herbicides in environmental weed control”; Source: http://www.wmssa.org.au/documents/Organicherbicides.pdf; accessed: 24 Jan. 2014.

Todhunter, C. 2012 [Online], “Slow Death and Fast Profits: The Globalisation of Pesticides and Poison”; Global Research, Center for Research on Globalization; Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/slow-death-and-fast-profits-the-globalisation-of-pesticides-and-poison/5302563; accessed: 2 Feb. 2014.

Togbe, D., Grivennikov, S.I., Noulin, N., Couillin, I., Maillet, I., Jacobs, M., Maret, M., Fick, L., Nedospasov, S.A., Quesniaux, V.F.J., Schnyder, B. & Schnyder-Candrian, S. 2007 [Online], “T cell-derived TNF down-regulates acute airway response to endotoxin”, in Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 768–779; Wiley InterScience (WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim) [DOI 10.1002/eji.200636371]; Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eji.200636371/pdf; accessed: 28 March 2014.

Tomkins, B. (Dr.) 2013 [Online], “FSC Changes Chemicals Criteria Again … Incorrect, says FSC Australia”; TasmanianTimes.com; Source: http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php/article/fsc-changes-chemicals-criteria-again-simazine; accessed: 6 Feb. 2014.

Toxnet 2013 [Online], “Toxnet Toxicology Data Network, Clopyralid”; Source: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+6593; accessed: 16 April 2014.

UC Davis Weed Research and Information Center 2013 [Online], Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States; UC Davis Weed Research and Information Center [the book can be purchased from: http://www.cal-ipc.org/resources/booksandcds/weedcontrol.php%5D; Source: http://wric.ucdavis.edu/information/natural%20areas/wr_B/Bromus_inermis.pdf; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Unsworth, J. 2010 [Online], “HISTORY OF PESTICIDE USE”; International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; Source: http://agrochemicals.iupac.org/index.php?option=com_sobi2&sobi2Task=sobi2Details&catid=3&sobi2Id=31; accessed: 9 Feb. 2014.

USEPA 2012 [Online], “Haloxyfop-methyl (CASRN 69806-40-2)”; U Environmental Protection Agency Integrated Risk Information System; Source: http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0467.htm; accessed: 16 April 2014.

van der Werf, H.M.G. 1996, “Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment”, in Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 60 (1996) 81-96, Elsevier Science B.V.

van Frankenhuyzen, K. & Beardmore, T. 2004 [Online], “Current status and environmental impact of transgenic forest trees”; in Can. J. For. Res. Vol. 34, 2004; doi: 1O.1139/X04-024; NRC; Source: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/233558469_Current_status_and_environmental_impact_of_transgenic_forest_trees; accessed: 21 Feb. 2014.

Vereecken, H. 2005 [Online], “Mobility and leaching of glyphosate: a review”; in Pest Manag Sci. 2005 Dec;61(12):1139-51; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16211661; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Victorov, A.G. 2008 [Online], “Influence of Bt-plants on soil biota and pleiotropic effect of o-endotoxin-encoding genes”; in Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, November 2008, Volume 55, Issue 6, pp 738-747; link.springer.com; Source: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1021443708060022; accessed: 20 Feb. 2014.

Waegemaekers, M., van Wageningen, N., Brunekreef, B. & Boleij, J.S.M. 1989, “Respiratory symptoms in damp houses”, in Allergy 44:192-198.

Wagner, J. 2014 [Online], “How to Kill Weeds Without Chemicals”, HealthGuidance; Source: http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/14538/1/How-to-Kill-Weeds-Without-Chemicals.html; accessed: 21 Jan. 2014).

Walters, M., Milton, D., Larsson, L. & Ford, T. 1993 [Online], “Airborne Environmental Endotoxin: a Cross-Validation of Sampling and Analysis Techniques”; in APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Mar. 1994, Vol. 60, No.3, p. 996-1005; Source: http://aem.asm.org/content/60/3/996.full.pdf; accessed: 1 Mar. 2014.

Wan, G-H., & Li, C-S. 1999b, “Indoor endotoxin and glucan in association with airway inflammation and systemic symtoms”, in Archives of Environmental Health. Vol. 54 Number 3: 58,60.

Watts, M. (Dr.) 2013 [Online], “Poisoning Our Future: Children And Pesticides”; PANAP, Pesticide Action Network Asia & the Pacific; Source: http://www.panap.net/sites/default/files/Poisoning-Our-Future-Children-and-Pesticides.pdf; accessed: 23 Feb. 2014.

Wikipedia 2014a [Online], “Precautionary principle”; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle; accessed: 31 Jan. 2014.

Wikipedia 2014b [Online], “Pine oil”; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_oil; accessed: 22 Jan. 2014.

http://www.envirohealthpolicy.net 2001 [Online], “Children, Cancer, and the Environment”; Source: http://www.envirohealthpolicy.net/kidstest/Cancer%20Pages/Individual%20Cancers/Leukemia.htm; accessed: 23 Feb. 2014 (References cited in article:
3. Sandler DP, Ross JA. Epidemiology of acute leukemia in children and adults. Seminars in Oncology 1997; 24:3-16.
10. Zahm SH, Ward MH. Pesticides and childhood cancer. Environmental Health Perspectives 1998; 106 Suppl 3:893-908.
11. Daniels JL, Olshan AF, Savitz DA. Pesticides and childhood cancers. Environmental Health Perspectives 1997; 105:1068-77.
17. Buckley JD, Robison LL, Swotinsky R, Garabrant DH, LeBeau M, Manchester P, Nesbit ME, Odom L, Peters JM, Woods WG, et al. Occupational exposures of parents of children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group. Cancer Research 1989; 49:4030-7.)

http://www.globaljusticeecology.org 2008 [Online], “GE Trees, Cellulosic Biofuels & Destruction of Forest Biological Diversity”; http://www.globaljusticeecology.org; Source: http://globaljusticeecology.org/files/GE%20Trees=%20Cell%20Eth-comp.pdf; accessed: 24 Feb. 2014.

http://www.osha.gov, No date [Online], “Cadmium”; Occupational Safety & Health Administration (United States Department of Labor); Source: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/cadmium/; accessed: 5 Feb. 2014.

Zhao, B., Zhang, J., Gong, J., Zhang, H. & Zhang, C. 2009 [Online], “Glyphosate mobility in soils by phosphate application: Laboratory column experiments”; in Geoderma Volume 149, Issues 3–4, 15 March 2009, Pages 290–297; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.006; Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001670610800373X; accessed: 4 Feb. 2014.

Zurlo, J. 2012 [Online], “No Animals Harmed: Toward a Paradigm Shift in Toxicity Testing”; thehastingscenter.org; Source: http://animalresearch.thehastingscenter.org/report/no-animals-harmed-toward-a-paradigm-shift-in-toxicity-testing/#refmark-4; accessed: 18 Feb. 2014.


1.  The amazing power of Chemical Diffusion:

The objective of controlling the hydraulic conductivity is clearly one of limiting advective contaminant transport (ie the movement of contaminants with moving water) through the liner. However, despite more than a decade of research and the existence of good supporting field data, it is only recently that it has been generally recognized that there is a second contaminant transport process which will occur even through a very low hydraulic conductivity clay liner: that process is chemical diffusion. …diffusion may be the dominant contaminant transport mechanism in a well- constructed clay liner. Furthermore, contaminants can escape from a waste disposal site, by diffusion through a liner, even if water flow in the liner is into the landfill (Rowe,1994:219).

2.  Note the article: “Monsanto’s Bt Cotton Kills the Soil as Well as Farmers”:

The soil, its fertility, and the organisms which maintain the fertility of soil are a vital aspect of the environment, especially in the context of food and agricultural production.

A recent scientific study carried out by Navdanya, compared the soil of fields where Bt-cotton had been planted for 3 years with adjoining fields with non GMO cotton or other crops. The region covered included Nagpur, Amravati and Wardha of Vidharbha which accounts for highest GMO cotton planting in India, and the highest rate of farmers suicides (4000 per year).

In 3 years, Bt-cotton has reduced the population of Actinomycetes by 17%. Actinomycetes are vital for breaking down cellulose and creating humus.

Bacteria were reduced by 14%. The total microbial biomass was reduced by 8.9%.

Vital soil beneficial enzymes which make nutrients available to plants have also been drastically reduced. Acid Phosphatase which contributes to uptake of phosphates was reduced by 26.6%. Nitrogenase enzymes which help fix nitrogen were reduced by 22.6%.

At this rate, in a decade of planting with GM cotton, or any GM crop with Bt genes in it, could lead to total destruction of soil organisms, leaving dead soil unable to produce food.

The ISAAA in its recent release has stated that there are 7.6 mha of Bt-cotton in India. This means 7.6 mha of dying soils (Global Research, i-sis.org.uk, 2009).

3.  Note, in terms of a urine and water test for glyphosate:

We have found a USDA certified USA lab that is willing to test urine and water for glyphosate! Test will be offered to MAA [Moms Across America] supporters at a reduced rate from $145.00 each down to $90.00 each from now until Jan 31st 2014 due to the volumn expected. Moms Across America does not receive any financial gain from any transaction connected with this lab what so ever. We simply want Moms to be able to care for their families knowing all the infomation they can.

In addition to empowering families, we see this as a great opportunity nationally to further our cause of health and freedom in America. The EPA analyzes glyphosate again in 2014 and we want to weigh in on whether or not they approve it again. Your test supports our national cause as well.

Click here to follow the guidelines and get your water and/or urine test. http://www.momsacrossamerica.com/glyphosate_testing (Moms Across America 2013, Email).

4.  How uncontaminated is your water?

In a report titled ‘Permeation of potable water piping systems’ prepared by an Ad Hoc Committee on Permeation convened by the US Plastic’s Pipe Industry high levels of hydrocarbons (toluene, xylene, petroleum hydrocarbons) in soil have been reported to contaminate drinking water supplies. The report also details the results of testing undertaken that indicates that at ‘high concentrations’ of hydrocarbons permeation can occur through pipe material as well as through material used to join pipes. At ‘low concentrations’ of aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons permeation was found to be similar for high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) pipes. Permeation is claimed to be related to the type of pipe, presence of joints and duration of exposure. (http://www.health.qld.gov.au/ph/documents/ehu/15078.pdf)

5.  In the former Fraser National Park (now called the Lake Eildon National Park) at Eildon in Victoria, herbicide (likely a 2,4-D or 2,4,5-T form) was sprayed by employees randomly over a hillside in the early to mid-1970s in order to use up their quota so they could quickly go back to base for their “smoko”. This was, to my knowledge, never officially documented. The park borders Eildon Lake, the water supply for the township of Eildon. Within a relatively short period of time from the date of this pesticide ‘application’ statistically significant related morbidity COULD have occurred within the town’s population, which could be supported by a judicious investigation of the former Eildon Hospital’s and then local doctors’ records (e.g. Dr. Austin Tuohy, and others). On the other hand, if the pesticide, instead of being washed quickly into the Lake, made its way into the township’s drinking water supply via the local geology, then morbid results in the townsfolk would likely have dissipated so broadly as to be indistinguishable from all other usual conditions. Nevertheless, toxicologists should be able to identify morbid TRENDS or slants on background morbidity. 6.  The hidden truth:

U.S. patent 7,771,736 issued August 10, 2010 was for glyphosate as an antimicrobial. One group of beneficial microbes named in the patent directly killed by glyphosate is the pseudomonas microbes. Pseudomonas soil bacteria are important phosphate mobilizers and suppressors of fusarium pathogenic fungi. Pseudomonas and most beneficial soil microbes additionally have an important function in making soil minerals available for plant use…

…there is a two pronged mechanism occurring with glyphosate, trace mineral chelation and pathogen proliferation. These mechanisms have extended consequence. Not only are nutritive minerals directly chelated out of the system, but the proliferation of pathogens effectively converts additional nutritive mineral to unusable form leading to further nutrient deficiencies in growing crops. This process is occurring throughout the entire food chain as glyphosate residue in food is becoming common. Glyphosate is essentially “rusting away”the fabric of our soils leading to the proliferation of disease pathogens and nutrient deficiencies throughout the food chain.” (Andersen 2013; actual quote source: http://cabecahealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/FoodPlaguePrimer.pdf; accessed: 25 Jan. 2014).

Advancing nutrient deficiencies in soil treated with glyphosate will see crop and plantation yields inevitably decrease. 7.  THE famous rat study:

A measure of how desperate the GM proponents are is the recent decision of the journal editor to retract a thoroughly peer-reviewed paper – the famous Séralini study – published a year ago, basically because it found serious health impacts in rats fed GM maize and/or exposed to Roundup herbicide compared to controls. An open letter has been posted for signing to demand reinstating the paper and pledging to boycott the publisher unless and until that is done ([3] Open Letter on Retraction and Pledge to Boycott Elsevier, SiS 61). The letter has already attracted thousands of signatures from around the world. Please sign on and forward widely. We need to stop this unprecedented censorship on scientific knowledge and information crucial to public health and well-being (Ho 2014).

8. Wan & Li 1999b:172 were referencing Rylander, Persson, Goto, et al. 1992: 263-267. 9. Wan & Li 1999b:172 were referencing Rylander & Snella 1983: 332-344. 10. Koskinen et al. 1999 was referencing: Waegemaekers et al. 1989:192-198; Brunekreef et al.1989:1363-1367; Dales et al. 1991:196-203; Dekker et al.1991: 922-926; Brunekreef 1992:79-89; Sprengler et al. 1994:72-82; Timonen et al. 1995:1155-1160. 11. Koskinen et al. 1999 was referencing: Martin et al., 1987:1125-1127, Platt et al. 1989:1673-1678, Waegemaekers et al. 1989:192-198, Dales et al. 1991:196-203, & Braback et al. 1995:487-493. 12. My unpublished PhD Thesis is titled: The Universal Demand for Immortality The Code of Everything inside Creation and Destruction An Investigation of the Human Condition of Fear, Conflict & Unconsciousness, of Creators Who Destroy, Destroyers Who Create & the Hidden Reality of Universal Secrets ========================================== Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health 1998; Honors I Social Ecology 1999; Ex Sociology PhD Student; University of Western Sydney) EMAIL: murraythompsonphd@gmail.com WEBSITES: http://poisonedpeople.com; http://poisoningandlegalaction.com; https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/

Worldwide Disease Pandemics From Pesticide







This document is: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/essays/essay1-worldwide-disease-pandemics.pdf


Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health with Distinction 1998, Hons I Social Ecology 1999, Sociology PhD Postgraduate student: University of Western Sydney)

PO Box 605

New Norfolk TAS 7140


8 April 2012

Email:  poisonedpeople@gmail.com

Web sites:  http://poisonedpeople.com


Hundreds of thousands of people are dying around the world each year from the effects of the use, or misuse, of pesticides(Konradsen, et al., 2003).  Most tragically, suffering, illness and disease surround us today in a way we would not have imagined a half century ago.  We have banished some diseases only to have them replaced by a grumbling yet profound toxicity which is stripping our children of their rightful future (Donohoe, 1998:38).




Professor Wai-on Phoon, A.M., M.B., B.S., F.R.C.P.,(London, Edin. & Glasgow), F.F.P.H., F.R.A.C.P., F.F.O.M., Hon.F.A.C.O.M., Hon.F.A.F.O.M., D.I.H., D.C.H., D.I.H.S.A., F.R.F.P.S., F.A.F.R.M., F.A.M.S., Occupational & Rehabilitation Consultant, Emeritus Professor of Occupational Health, has described this letter as well-researched and interesting, and the problem addressed by this letter as one of an appalling nonchalance about the possible ill effects on human health from toxic exposures in the general and work environments (Prof. Wai-on Phoon, Letter, 12 December 2008).


Dr. Chris M. Reading, B.Sc., Dip.Agr.Sc., M.B., B.S., F.R.A.N.Z.C.P., F.A.C.N.E.M., Environmental & Orthomolecular Psychiatrist, has described this letter as an excellent article” (Dr. Chris Reading, Letter, 31 December 2008).


The Australian Human Rights Commission noted in response to this letter “[we have] in the past inquired into complaints from people with sensitivities where agencies have undertaken policies that exacerbates their conditions” (Elizabeth Green, Australian Human Rights Commission, Letter, 19 December 2008).


The Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) has investigated my complaint and “has informed the Golf Club that under the Pesticides Act 1999, Sections 7 and 10, it is obliged to take note of neighbours’ concerns and take some action in response to them…” (Penny Finlay, Environmental Protection and Regulation, Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, Letter, 1 December 2008).


The Office of Louise Markus, M.P. (Federal Member for Greenway) was investigating my complaint, but then suddenly stopped (including answering my letters).


The SOMA Health Association of Australia Newsletter has stated in response to this letter: “We have received a most impressive set of papers describing the predicament a family find themselves in as a result of environmental contamination…  As Murray Thompson’s research wisely points out – chemical contamination targets the brain…  If the brain is not centred or balanced correctly, then behaviour is out of kilter” (SOMA Newsletter: Nutritional & Environmental Medicine, SOMA Health Association of Australia, Vol. 30, Number 3, April 2009).


The Journal of the Australian Chemical Trauma Alliance (participating member of the National Toxics Network) has reprinted the above SOMA Newsletter article in its entirety.

 The Union of Concerned Scientists thanked me for the comments and ideas expressed in this letter (Laura McKusick, Union of Concerned Scientists, Letter, 5 January 2009).


My name is Murray Thompson.  I graduated top of my Degree in Applied Science Environmental Health at the University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury (Award for Best Overall Graduating Student, Australian Institute of Environmental Health, NSW Division).  I have First Class Honours in Social Ecology.  Currently I am doing a PhD in Sociology.  I am also one of many POISONED PEOPLE (including my pesticide poisoned child) dealing with a raft of pesticide poisoning symptoms that have devastated my life.





 This letter/essay (as an earlier and slightly less developed version) has been sent to: over 250 recipients GLOBALLY. See the end of this letter for a full address listing.



THE CONSEQUENCE OF WHICH IS CHEMICAL POISONING ON A GLOBAL SCALE AND A MOVEMENT TOWARD THE ELIMINATION OF NORMAL REPRODUCTIVITY AND LIFE ON EARTHIt is a matter that needs addressing now, because otherwise, and without profound change, we are sentient and yet blind ‘caretakers’ stampeding an entire planet toward a morbid technologically-induced devastation, brutally failing an enlightened intellectual concern for readily available scientific research and its exposition of CHEMICAL CAUSE & EFFECT!



 “…pesticides[1] are strongly linked to birth defects…  science will not solve this problem for us.  Isn’t it time to consider a human rights approach, an ethical challenge to the poisoners?…  The old science-based strategy has failed us.  Perhaps a new, precautionary path can get us where we need to go.  The precautionary principle says, ‘When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically’. ” (Montague, 2001)

And, on a Chernobyl and Iraq nuclear note:

“What became evident after the accident was that children who received exposure to Chernobyl fallout, while still in the wombs of their mothers, experienced an elevated risk of developing leukemia by the time of their first birthday [6,7].  Relevant to this discussion is the fact that a gene mutation occurring in utero is one cause of infant leukemia [8,9].)   In countries where unimpeachable data was collected for levels of fallout deposited in the environment, doses to the population, and the incidence of childhood leukemia, an unmistakable, uniform trend emerged: the studied population of children born during the 18-month period following the accident suffered increased rates of leukemia in their first year of life compared to children born prior to the accident or to those born subsequent to the accident after the level of  possible maternal contamination had sufficiently diminished.  This was confirmed in five separate studies conducted independently of one another: in Greece [9], Germany [10], Scotland [11], the United States [12], and Wales [13].  Again here is evidence that defects are being induced in fetuses that we are told by the radiation protection community are not possible.  According to the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR), these results provide unequivocal evidence that the risk model of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) for infant leukemia is in error by a factor of between 100-fold and 2000-fold, the latter figure allowing for a continued excess incidence of leukemia as the population of children studied continues to age [6]

Further, numerous in vitro and in vivo studies conducted in the last twenty years have proven that uranium is genotoxic (capable of damaging DNA), cytotoxic (poisonous to cells), and mutagenic (capable of inducing mutations) [27].  These effects are produced either by uranium’s radioactivity or its chemistry or a synergistic interaction between the two.  These findings lend plausibility to the idea that the observed increased incidence of deformed babies in Iraq is related to depleted uranium munitions [26].”

(Zimmerman, 2010)

Can I alert you to the fact of a new inclusion on my POISONED PEOPLE web site, that being: http://poisonedpeople.com/index8.html#BACKYARDS_SPRAYED_AGAIN.  This section of my website shows multiple photographs taken at the back of my son’s Public Housing residence in May 2008 in McQuade Ave., South Windsor, north-west Sydney.  These photos are of a very substantial, unknown and highly questionable green coloured plant spray application (probably HERBICIDE) that has occurred without prior warning to at least 25 households along the west side of the street.  The spray had been directed against my son’s and other residents’ west-facing back fences situated immediately adjacent to the golf club’s east perimeter 2.5m high wire fence line.  This spraying had occurred over a period of years next to peoples’ homes despite multiple written requests by me (see below) that no herbicide spraying take place in this area because of profound public health concerns.  I collected samples of grass, golf balls, feathers and other items from the 1 meter gap between the club’s fence and my son’s back fence.  All items displayed the green stains.  A previous spraying and likewise extensive killing of grass and weeds occurred in the same location in (at the very least) 2005 (Photos located on my website at: http://poisonedpeople.com/index8.html#FAMILIES EXPOSED MCQUADE AV).  Is this, especially in light of my multiple letters of objection sent over the years, ultimately representative of irresponsible environmental and public health vandalism?  The Paris Appeal: The International Declaration on Diseases Due to Chemical Pollution says:

§9. Whereas, regarding toxicology, a number of these substances or chemicals are hormone-disrupting chemicals (endocrine disrupters), that can be carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (CMRs) for human beings, and therefore susceptible to induce cancers, congenital malformations and/or infertility; whereas some of these substances or products can be, among other effects, allergenic resulting in chronic respiratory diseases, such as asthma; whereas some are neurotoxic chemicals, leading to degenerative diseases of the central nervous system in adult[s]… and to intellectual impairment in children; whereas some are immunotoxic, leading to immunodeficiency, particularly in children, causing infections, especially viral infections; whereas pesticides are deliberately spread in large amounts in the environment, while a great number are toxic… for animals and/or human beings and for the environment…

§10. Whereas children are the most vulnerable and exposed to contamination by these pollutants…

§11. Whereas these polluting substances or products can induce diseases in children population, such as those listed in §9; whereas one out of seven children in Europe suffers from asthma, whereas asthma is made worse by city and home pollution; whereas incidence in pediatric cancers has been on the rise for the last 20 years in some industrialized countries; and whereas these considerations all lead to the fact that Children are now in serious danger… (IDEA 2006).

I weeded this spray impact area with bare hands for 20 minutes in May 2008 (and which later displayed dead grass) before noticing the green spray application.  During the following days I demonstrated some new symptoms, such as joint pain, although this appeared to be more an aggravation of knee and hip joint pain already established by my original pesticide exposures[2].  Thankfully, I did not ask my son to help me weed.



I had contacted and warned the golf club by hardcopy letter 5 times and by email 4 times (over a 3 year period) of, at least, the general nature of pesticide toxicity and, at most (and in most cases), my son’s CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY[5] (letters were sent: May 23rd 2005, January 10th 2006, April 20th 2006, January 25th 2007, May 28th 2007; emails were sent in May 2008).  This sensitivity and debility is due to a prior serious exposure to a pesticide treatment forced on me at my Public Housing unit in 2000 (unrelated to this golf club issue).  In this instance, my son and I (and my neighbour) were severely poisoned by a termite pesticide.  The golf club finally responded to my letters in mid-2009, but only committed to not spraying near my son’s backyard!  What about the other 24 households?  Currently the Office of Louise Markus, M.P. is investigating this issue.  Since 2005 (and likely well before), spraying repeatedly occurred behind more than 25 homes along McQuade Ave. and Cox Street.  The Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) also investigated the golf club after I alerted them to this issue: “DECC has informed the Golf Club that under the Pesticides Act 1999, Sections 7 and 10, it is obliged to take note of neighbours’ concerns and take some action in response to them” (Finlay/DECC, 2008).  The only ‘action’ I’ve noted has been continued spraying over at least a known and documented 3 year period despite my concerns.


 In contrast, I have previously applauded the Hawkesbury City Council’s oblique recognition of our health issues.  They had stated to me that they would no longer spray herbicide in the public laneway against my back fence in Bligh Park or in the street area of McQuade Avenue in Sth. Windsor (Daley, no date, letter [http://poisonedpeople.com/index8council-may2007medium.html]), areas declared to be “sensitive”.  And yet, a resident in McQuade Avenue recently informed me (November 2008) that the Council had sprayed yet again in that street.  As well, the Council yet again sprayed at the back of my unit in Bligh Park in late 2010, so “sensitive “ protocols obviously do not work at all (see: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/photos/council/councilsprayresult(27thOct2010)-2.pdf; http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/photos/council/councilsprayresult(27thOct2010)-1.pdf).  Why do corporate bodies seem predisposed to consistently failing a responsible, humane and public health Duty of Care?  They typically do not demonstrate an adequately precautionary-based, broader and sophisticated scientific (let alone, ethical) appreciation of the implications of the hugely disturbing research that is readily available to all with access to the internet[7].  Specifically, in this case, Council have tended to minimize my warnings of massive environmental risks through appealing to the perceived greater imperatives of “limited funds and staff” (S. Perry 2005, letter).  Perhaps it is not convenient to believe the studies showing “genetic damage and abnormal development” in frogs through the use of glyphosate or “Roundup” (Cox, 2004), or “damage to agricultural land, fisheries, fauna and flora [through] chemical inputs such as pesticides” (Wilson & Tisdell, 2001).  Further, PESTICIDE-MEDIATED IMMUNOCOMPETENCY, by force of evidence, becomes the most likely mechanism for the limb deformities in frogs (Kiesecker, 2002; Hall, circa 2002) and, thereby, the best morbid theoretical fit for explaining much of our current global frog genocide.  Ms. Louise Markus MP and the HNCMA might be particularly interested here vis-à-vis the health of the Hawkesbury River west of Sydney, since “the Hawkesbury River is as important as the Murray-Darling” (Markus, 2008).  If we locally and everywhere dispense pesticides freely and incompetently, soon we will find we have nowhere to run to situate ourselves in a healthy environment.

As a result of my original termite pesticide poisoning in Public Housing in 2000/2001, I have had brain damage explicitly revealed through brain scans and at least two extensive batteries of neuro-psychological testing.  My neurological deficit includes stress anxieties and huge memory/sequencing problems[8] or, in other words, “confusion, emotional lability, loss of short term memory, delayed reaction times and learning difficulties” (Donohoe 1998:34).  As well, I have had or still experience a variety of explosive joint pains, back and neck pain that is getting worse, headaches and nausea, chronic fatigue, EMF Sensitivity (my mobile phone, TVs and power sub-stations make me nauseous and dizzy[9]), various kidney pains, kidney stones, skin irritation, chronic nose bleeds, an echogenic or fatty liver, Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), and considerable heat intolerance.  I can’t drink alcohol any more (nausea, again); I’m hyper-sensitive to perfumes, deodorants, vehicle exhaust fumes and herbicide residues; my bone density has reduced; my eyesight has deteriorated markedly; my hearing is impaired in the high range; I get constant tinnitus (ringing in the ears), and I’ve been very, very suicidal.  Pesticide exposure significantly increases the risk of depression and suicide (Parron, et al., 1995).  As well, my reproductive system has been compromised.

Pesticides impair spermatogenesis (Hirsh, 2003), and pesticide exposure = sperm DNA damage (Bian, et al., 2004).  My nerves are shot and some days I am completely incapacitated and require large doses of pain killers which have other negative effects.  It is pathetic feeling like this when your health goes from just bearable (still inside the MCS syndrome) to suddenly taking a dramatic and unpredictable turn for the worst.  It takes massive effort and months for me to put a letter/essay like this together because my brain can’t do what it once could do quickly and efficiently.  Imagine living every day within a blur of symptoms battering you around like a cat with a mouse, and yet you appear normal in appearance.  I feel like I’m half dead and hanging over the edge most of the time.  For those of you who are still truly alive, please intellectually recognize pesticide’s design and purpose (to KILL).  Then, translate this characteristic laterally and apply it to the human species.  You cannot poison pests and weeds without poisoning OURSELVES.  No distinctive intelligence is required to appreciate this truism.  Even Homer Simpson said: “What?!  Spider poison is people poison?! !” (The Simpsons, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Date Unknown).

It seems it is left to the chemically injured and neurologically damaged ‘walking wounded’ to argue against and sue those who are freely allowed to poison indiscriminately, stupidly, ignorantly, negligently and even callously.  Overall, the poisoning of people is permitted by a society and Government institutions that fail to protect their members from the flagrant dissemination of TOXIC SUBSTANCES, with few genuine and meaningful restrictions and precautions in place[10].  I am in my 7th long and utterly exhausting year of litigation against those who poisoned me and my child originally in 2000/2001.  This is not fair.


Even though my legal team are performing a magnificent job of prosecuting my case and revealing a vast array of critically pertinent information for the upcoming trial (on the 15th November 2010 in the Supreme Court in Sydney, Civil List [http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/supreme_court/ll_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_visitsc]), THE STRESS OF LEGAL ACTION adds immeasurably to the physical pain, the fear, the anger, the depression, and the suicidal ideation that are the legacy of pesticide exposure.  This stress can destroy what is left of a family after the toxins have already ruined one’s health and the once better potential to be aware, compromise, communicate, empathize, care, love, be effectively employed, feel like a useful member of society, and excel at what life has to offer.  When one’s very intersection with all life processes has become distorted, fatigued and made dysfunctional by chemical impact, there is little left to anticipate with an abused and joyless mind.


I AM REQUESTING THAT INTERESTED PROFESSIONALS ADDRESS THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE & THE OVERALL PESTICIDE CONUNDRUM IN LIGHT OF THE TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION IN THIS LETTER.  Perhaps University of Western Sydney Environmental Health BAppSc students & staff could analyse my spray samples & conduct an epidemiological survey along McQuade Ave. & Cox Street?  I will ultimately forward some of my samples to the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine and elsewhere for independent testing and post the results on my web site, http://poisonedpeople.com.

Why aren’t those with power and influence, who aren’t poisoned and crippled, doing more to elevate awareness of this massive and expanding EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT, and assertively advancing the making and changing of laws, e.g. Chemical Trespass legislation such as the Tasmanian Chemical Trespass Bill 2004 (defeated).  OR ARE WE ALLOWING, THROUGH OUR NEGLECT AND LETHARGY, THE CONSISTENT POISONING AND RAPID DESTRUCTION OF AN ENTIRE PLANET ON PURPOSE AND IN DEFERENCE TO THE WEIGHT AND BLOAT OF DISINTEREST, PESTICIDE MANUFACTURERS’ VESTED INTERESTS, AND PERHAPS A CLIMATE CHANGE IMPERATIVE THAT DOES NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THIS ISSUE?  Given the extent to which my son and I were previously poisoned and the increased potential now for developing an ORGANIC DEGENERATIVE DISEASE, I don’t even know if we are going to be alive in 5 years to continue fighting against the irresponsible splashing around of chemical agents that bear a relationship to what has been used in times of war.  Roundup (glyphosate) and other pesticides have NERVE AGENT and other toxic properties (see later).  They cause NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE.  Why?  Because pesticides contain solvents, hydrocarbons, surfactants, etc., along with the ‘active’ pesticide ingredients.



(Dr. Mark Donohoe, 2001, pers. comm.). 

dan best photo-1

My beautiful son: he’s older now, but he’s still my baby!



How much damage has to be done to innocent people; how much sicker do I have to get; how many more negative impacts does my child’s body need to absorb into his still developing and maturing hormonal and DNA profile FOR THE SAKE OF MERE COSMETIC CHEMICAL CONVENIENCE before laws will be changed preventing companies (and Councils) from EXPOSING THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO  PROVEN  HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS?[11]

Theoretical: If I’m standing at my friend’s back fence with my son, and a golf club or council employee, or even a neighbour (who is likely not adequately protected him/herself from herbicide vapours and spray drift[12]) approaches with a herbicide spray pack, must we stand there quietly and allow him/her to spray our faces and arms, and also our clothes through the gaps in the wooden fence?  Is there absolutely nothing anyone can do to prevent a person pumping a KNOWN TOXIN all over them, and onto the back lawn where they, their children and their pets walk and play?  WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN STANDING IN THEIR BACK YARD ON THE DAYS THIS LONG FENCE LINE IN WESTERN SYDNEY WAS SPRAYED?  A toddler?  A loved pet?  What’s missing from within a society and culture that supposedly champions human rights?  Answer = HUMAN RIGHTS! 

We have not applied FUNDAMENTAL AND BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS to the ludicrous CHEMICAL WARFARE DEPENDENCY we have dumbly accepted over time, wherein we now allow ourselves the freedom to throw toxic nerve agents at each other!  How ridiculous is this?!  Reality: The herbicide spray entered private back yards in McQuade Avenue (my photos are proof of this).  Directly or indirectly, adults, children and pets have inhaled herbicide vapours and walked through spray residue and taken it INDOORS.  Forensic investigation and/or industrial hygiene testing would substantiate what is logically and physically obvious in this case.





 How many children live in McQuade Ave and Cox Street, South Windsor?  How many children live in or walk along Davies or Barnett Roads (next to Bardon Park) in Ashgrove West, Brisbane; Kylie Avenue (next to Keperra Golf Course) in Keperra, Brisbane; Stewart Ave. Blacktown, Sydney (next to Ashlar Golf Course); Lucerne Crescent (next to Latrobe Golf Course) Alphington, Melbourne; or Tunstall Ave (next to the Australian Golf Course) Rosebery, Sydney?  How many children WORLDWIDE have their basic right to a SECURE environment taken away from them every single time DNA, non-DNA factors, and immune function and hormone-damaging RESIDUAL chemicals are sprayed near them or even over them through spray drift and vapour drift?  In March 2005, the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) stated that children are more vulnerable to gene-damaging chemicals than adults, that children two years old and younger might be 10 times more vulnerable than adults to certain chemicals, and that children between the ages of two and 16 might be three times more vulnerable to certain chemicals[14] (Dingle, 2005).

We put so much effort and emotion into protecting our children at crossings.  We worry about teen binge drinking, we prohibit smoking near playgrounds[15], and we are suitably disturbed by stalking monsters called paedophiles.


Stalk them with endocrine disrupting and neurological impacts emasculating and reconfiguring little bodies and minds that desperately need a foundation of MAXIMUM HEALTH FOR LIFE AND THE SAKE OF THE FUTURE OF THIS WORLD!  This is neither a small nor local matter.  It is literally a matter of the survival of humanity.  What we allow to be poisoned now establishes a reduced potential for later, and sometimes not that much later.

Effects and debility from pesticide exposure can arrive quickly, OR be hidden for decades for an incomprehensible later regret.

I have provided quite enough research data on my website (http://poisonedpeople.com/) to show unequivocally that pesticides (including weedicides/herbicides) are toxic to all aspects of all life.  Further, pesticides promote the classic symptom of abdominal pain in children (Dr. B. Grabau, 2005, pers. comm.),  or, “non-specific abdominal gastric pain” (Grabau, 2005) and aggressive behaviour and delinquency in teens (Hatherill, 1999; Tvedten, 1999, 2002:2), as well as cancer, foetal death, miscarriages, and premature births (NCAP, 1999:3; Bonn, 2005; Cox, 2004).  In fact, what are usually classified as ‘non-specific’ symptoms can be themselves a characteristic or major signature of pesticide and other toxic chemical poisoning dynamics.

A “study showed there was approximately [a] 2-fold greater risk of having a stillbirth if the mother lived within 1 mile from an agricultural area which used organophosphate – pyrethroid[16] – carbamate – or chlorinated pesticides[17]

Glyphosate… is a non-selective, systematic herbicide.  This organophosphate compound is the active ingredient in the weedkiller Roundup

[18] (Royal Society of Chemistry 2009).

Perhaps some of the mysterious “cancers of unknown primary site… a special pathological entity with distinctive features” (Bishop, 2008) that “represents 4% of all cancers, but sadly 8% of cancer deaths” (Firth, 2008) in New South Wales (Australia) can be explained through the huge increase in ENVIRONMENTAL SATURATION BY PESTICIDE PRODUCTS?  And what does this kind of saturation produce in terms of understanding we presently have?  Note: “Two separate studies in Sweden have linked exposure to Glyphosate to Hairy Cell Leukemia and Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.  These types of cancers were extremely rare, however non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is the most rapidly increasing cancer in the Western world.  It has risen by 73% in the USA since 1973.  Another study has found a higher incidence of Parkinson disease amongst farmers who used herbicides, including glyphosate” (Leu, 2007 citing Cox, 1998; Lehmann & Pengue, 2000; Nordstrom, et al., 1998; Hardell & Eriksson, 1999).  NONE OF THIS COULD POSSIBLY BE BECAUSE ROUNDUP IS NOW THE WORLD’S MOST POPULAR HERBICIDE, COULD IT???


And, in the plant kingdom, are GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT WEEDS[20] enough of a comprehensive ‘victory’ for this FATALLY FLAWED TECHNOLOGY?  No.  ENTER, AN IMPENDING GLOBAL HUMAN DISEASE HOLOCAUST.

It should be noted with grave reserve that organophosphates have been implicated by some researchers in cattle becoming more susceptible to Mad Cow Disease [BSE – Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy].  However, opinion on this matter is divided.  Certainly, OPs cannot improve any public health issue.  Please note that: “the Purdey/Brown chemical poisoning model matches with the epidemiological spread of CJD [Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, the human form of BSE] clusters in humans.  It also predicts the incidence of BSE-type diseases in animals.  The accepted infectious model fits neither” (Dunne 2000, cited by Rotella 2003).


 Further: “OPs can persist in the environment for long periods of time.   Indeed, OPs are detected in soils years after application…  conditions can occur in soil whereOPs are preserved and transferred to humans through food.  Areview of the literature shows that OPs are highly toxic andthat human exposure is undesirable.  Evidence suggests that OPsare mutagenic and teratogenic and that a large number of modern-daydiseases of the nervous and immune system of mammals can belinked to these pesticides.  These include BSE (mad cows disease),CJD, Gulf War syndrome, Parkinson’s disease and multiplesclerosis, arguing for a thorough examination of the environmentalfate and toxicology of OPs as well as their use” (Ragnarsdottir 2000).

Further still:  “The possibility that organophosphorus (OP) compounds contribute to motor neuron disease (MND) is supported by association of paraoxonase 1 polymorphisms with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the occurrence of MND in OP compound-induced delayed neuropathy (OPIDN), in which neuropathy target esterase (NTE) is inhibited by organophosphorylation” (Rainier, et. al., 2008).

 Cause and effect just become all the more interesting the more links we put together.  Therefore… we should all be very afraid.

“Other studies show that GLYPHOSATE and commercial herbicides containing GLYPHOSATE cause a range of cell mutations and damage to cell DNA.  These types of changes are usually regarded as precursors to cancer and birth defects” (Leu, 2007; my emphasis).  GLYPHOSATE [Roundup] is persistent (NCAP, 2000:2, citing US EPA, 1993-2) and may last up to 3 years (NCAP, 2000:2, citing Torstensson et al., 1989), while its metabolite, AMPA [aminomethylphosphonic acid], may persist even longer, “with a half life in soil between 119 and 958 days” (Buffin & Jewell, 2001, citing WHO, 1994).  GLYPHOSATE is toxic to fish, aquatic organisms, soil life (including earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, micro-organisms and arthropods), plants (through disease susceptibility), and beneficial insect species (Leu, 2007; van der Werf, 1996).  “Studies show a reduction in the species that build humus, thus [GLYPHOSATE] contributes to the decline in soil organic matter” (Leu 2007).  ROUNDUP causes genetic mutations in cell tests (NCAP, 2000:2, citing Vigfusson & Vyse, 1980; Kale et al., 1995; Rank et al., 1993) and is linked to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (Cox, 2004; Vachani, 2007), miscarriages and Attention Deficit Disorder (Cox, 2004).  ROUNDUP contains surfactants that are acutely toxic to humans and animals, even potentially causing death in humans (Cox, 1993:4, citing Sawada, et al., 1988; and Talbot, 1991).  “Glyphosate tolerant (GT) crops and glyphosate herbicide (commercial formulation, Roundup) poison nitrogen fixing and other beneficial soil bacteria, increase fungal pathogens, undermine plant immunity to diseases, decrease plant micronutrients available in the soil, and more…  Research findings over the past decades paint a damning picture of the cropping system that has taken over 85 percent of the 134 million hectares of global agricultural land now growing genetically modified (GM) crops (see [1] Scientists Reveal Glyphosate Poisons Crops and Soil, SiS 47). The unprecedented rise in GT crops has been accompanied by a sharp increase in the use of the glyphosate herbicides worldwide, especially in the US…  The ecological disaster has been unfolding amid mounting evidence of the herbicide’s adverse impacts on human and animal health” (Institute of Science in Society 2010. Original research: Ho & Cherry 2010).  ROUNDUP has also been heavily implicated in thyroid, liver and pancreatic tumours in test animals (Cox, 1993:4, citing Dykstra & Ghali, 1991), and in poisonings shockingly misdiagnosed as aneurysm, head trauma, diabetic acidosis, severe bacterial gastroenteritis, pneumonia and whooping cough in infants (Reeves, Schafer, Hallward & Katten, 1999:17, citing Solomon & Mott, 1998; Zweinerd & Ginsburg, 1988).


And it also means that exposed children may have their entire lives ruined at critical developmental stages by the formula: child + glyphosate = ADHD (Cox, 2004).  For adults, a “study of 56 men exposed to organophosphate pesticides detected memory problems and difficulty in maintaining alertness and focusing attention” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Annual Reviews in Public Health, 7:461, 1986 [Sharp, et. al., 1986]).

But, who gives a damn?  How interesting it is (in retrospect, now that I understand what happened) that my son’s daily abdominal pains started in early 2001 at age 8 ½ within a few weeks of my unit’s chemical barrier termite pesticide treatment (the treatment that my public housing landlord forced upon me).  At that very time my body was being increasingly hammered by extensive joint/muscle pains, eye/skin irritation, chronic nose bleeds, fatigue and incoordination.  My son stayed at my place during the school week all that year.  His pains were present each and every morning throughout 2001, the period of heaviest exposure to the detectable pesticide odour inside my unit.  Because of the abdominal pains, my son had to go to school each morning for the whole of 2001 without breakfast.  That meant he ate all his available food (play lunch and lunch) in one hit during recess at primary school and then gorged again immediately after school at his mother’s home.  He put on a tremendous amount of weight.  This response was somewhat incongruent with his exercise levels increasing dramatically from 2000 on (vigorous swimming lessons, extra swim sessions, and a lot of walking).  As well, from 2001 to 2003, my son stayed with his mom at her Cox Street South Windsor public housing unit.  And from 2001 to 2005/6, the no less than 10 termiticide treatments (Public Housing Tenant #1[22], 2005, Letter: 15th Dec.) that took place in the public housing unit immediately next door ensured that my child, while at Cox Street, was continuously exposed to episodes of detectable pesticide vapour (Public Housing Tenant #2, 2002, pers. comm.).  Then, in 2003 in Grade 5 and at around age 11, he and his mother moved laterally into further public housing to McQuade Avenue South Windsor, next to the golf club.  It was then, in becoming exposed to continuous levels of pesticide vapours originating largely from the golf course[23] behind his house, that my son began experiencing negative neurological effects:  irrational anger and aggression on a level such as he had never, ever displayed before.

How interesting that this extremely distressing and brand new neurological issue started at that time, likely (#1) as a chemical-sensitive development from previous exposures to, strictly, TERMITE PESTICIDES in my unit and next door to his mother’s Cox Street unit, but also (#2) because of significant and higher exposures to other varieties of pesticides (herbicides), INCLUDING THE ORGANOPHOSPHATE GLYPHOSATE, emanating from the McQuade Avenue environment.  And during this year (2003), as I became consistently exposed to organophosphate herbicide through my constant visits to my son in McQuade Av., my mental state deteriorated to where, in 2004, I experienced horrific ‘suicidal ideation’.  2004/5 became the worst years of my life, I believe because of CONSISTENT EXPOSURE TO ORGANOPHOSPHATE HERBICIDE IN MCQUADE AVENUE.  (On a lesser, though still very disturbing level, I noticed then as I do now, that if I stay at this residence for a period of hours with the wind direction notably coming from the golf club over the house, I will end up with an extremely painful sore throat.)

In late April 2005, I photographed extensively sprayed and totally dead vegetation between my son’s back fence and the golf club’s east perimeter fence line.  The spraying likely occurred in February/March 2005.  And that year my son’s aggression became even worse than before, threatening his ability to function at school (only constant reassurance and help from a father who could barely reassure himself saved him).  Note: “He [my son] has suffered adverse health effects as a result of accidental pesticide exposure between 2000 and 2002, and this has adversely affected him in a number of ways… reduced mobility and gastrointestinal changes… [and he] is adversely affected by exposure to a range of common chemicals, including pesticides and solvents…” (Dr. Mark Donohoe, Medical Certificate/letter, 17 June 2005).  A continuum of exposure to different pesticides (mostly sub-surface chemical barrier termiticide treatments prior to 2003), and then from early 2003 in McQuade Avenue even more obscene surface exposures to large quantities of, perhaps, PERSISTENT ROUNDUP and/or other pesticide agents.  And now my son also has tinnitus, EMF sensitivity, a predisposition to joint pains, and a condition perilously close to diabetes (Dr. N. Morris, 2008, pers. comm.)!  As well, he has had a liver ultrasound and that did not produce good news.  Also, he is extremely ‘jumpy’ at my unit (where his largest termite pesticide exposure occurred), but not at his mother’s.  I believe this is analogous to my depression.  My constant depressive state is my particular response in terms of my extreme sensitivity to undetectable levels of chemicals in my unit (P. Turner [Occupational Hygienist], 2005, pers. comm.).

A child does not experience years of continuous pesticide exposure without long-term ramifications.  And me?  Within 2 weeks of pulling the herbicide-laden weeds on May 20th 2008, I developed knee joint pains.  Initially they were exactly the type of pain and debility I was afflicted with after my initial Dec. 2000 poisoning with termiticide.  Now, longer-term, the joint pains are different, more in tune with MCS joint pains in response, for example, to a tetanus shot.  And now in August 2008, I have had the worst chronic fatigue I’ve ever experienced.  How interesting.[24]

How many organic (physical) and psychological/behavioural/sociological problems in residents in McQuade Avenue and elsewhere could be linked to the spraying of various pesticide nerve agents nearby[25], given a thorough medical specialist investigation and epidemiological survey?

Note that Ontario farming populations have been subjected to just such an epidemiological study.  IT SHOWED THAT EXPOSURE TO GLYPHOSATE CAUSED NEARLY A DOUBLING OF SPONTANEOUS ABORTIONS[26]

 Or are these human rights too hard, too politically uncomfortable, or not important enough because the residents may not be upper class or influential?  In a country that is supposedly a signatory to conventions enshrining the rights of children, we must STOP imposing disease and psychiatric disorders on our little ones through, essentially, CRIMINAL CHEMICAL EXPOSURE![27]  Perhaps a legal test case is what is needed…

In real poisoning cases, a massive component of people’s feelings, emotions, physical suffering and dysfunction is NOT THEIR FAULT!  Note:

“Pollution causes some people to commit violent crimes:  In our myopia, we’ve neglected this obvious possibility.  Yet a rapidly expanding body of research shows that heavy metals such as lead and pesticides decrease mental ability and increase aggressiveness (Hatherill, 1999; my emphasis).

This stands as an extreme warning regarding rage attacks and obscene acts of animal cruelty.  A polluted society is also affected MENTALLY.  Are YOU forever upset or angry and don’t know why (as I was)?  Are your emotions see-sawing (like mine did and still do)?  Are your kids like this (mine was)?  Can they focus on school?  Are you tired all the time or too young to be getting joint pains (e.g. in your elbows, wrists, fingers, knees, or ankles)?  Do you get aches across your shoulders when simply standing still?  Do you have ‘ringing in the ears’ (tinnitus), or muscle pains that change locations?  Do you get spontaneous back strains while doing nothing?  Do medications make you sick (e.g. Panadeine Forte and kidney pain, or antibiotics and shocking nausea)?  Do you have “eye irritation, burning eyes, blurred vision, skin rashes, burning or itchy skin, nausea, sore throat [I’ve had a dreadful sore throat for 8 years!], asthma[28] and difficulty breathing, headache, lethargy, nose bleeds, and dizziness” (Cox, 2004)?  Do some people think you’re crazy and assert you should take psychoactive medication for your problems when you know that your symptoms are PHYSICALLY REAL?  Are you weary of people locked into outdated thinking disrespecting you and assuming the tired, time-worn, offensive, medically outdated and dumbly institutionalized stereotype… that you’re a dysfunctional hypochondriac?


Now, why should we be suspicious of chemical technologies?  Let’s see… 1 in 3 people in England will develop cancer[29].  1 in 4 people in industrialized countries will die from CANCER, with only about 5 percent of cancers being attributable to genetic susceptibility, and with even this level of susceptibility being likely a product of “environmental insults”

[30]1 in 8 women have breast cancer[31]Over 30 million people in 2002 in the US alone had been diagnosed with asthma, with over 4200 deaths[32]Over 40 million people in the US alone are afflicted with rheumatic conditions (including arthritis), with this overall condition being the leading cause of disability for those 65+[33].  More than 194 million people worldwide have diabetes[34].  15% of the US population suffers from MCS[35].  4.1 million people in 15 of the world’s largest nations have Parkinson’s Disease, with this number predicted by the journal Neurology to double over the next generation[36]2.5 million people worldwide have Multiple Sclerosis[37]More than 5 million people worldwide have systemic lupus erythematosus[38]So, in other words, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and motor neurone disease mortality has soared in the last twenty years.  The increase is blamed by researchers on PESTICIDES, industrial chemicals, car exhausts and other pollutants[39].

Let’s live in the REAL WORLD and address this BONAFIDE RESEARCH instead of lazily falling back on a repetitive and corporatized dumb faith in internally conflicted, careless ‘professional practice’ and DESTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES.

We need a forum on this issue (which is why I’ve contacted Jenny Brockie, of the SBS program Insight), a very substantial cross disciplinary forum from which we might extract rapid changes to current practices so that THE INJURED ARE NO LONGER FORCED TO SUFFER LONG AFTER THE INITIAL INJURY EVENT THROUGH PROTRACTED LEGAL ACTION!  All contributors to the legal system need to participate in this forum with a view to generating profound improvements in the legal process and, thereby, HUMAN RIGHTS!  See my essay: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/essays/essay3-diminishing-returns-of-complexity.pdf.

For those with political clout, please address this specific issue, and also more generally in relation to any council’s or golf club’s position within the community and their intersection with broader terrestrial and aquatic environments.  Specifically consider past and recent spraying activities (as recorded in the photos on my website) between McQuade Avenue and down to Rickabys Creek, OH&S RESPONSIBILITIES, THE WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT, AND DUTY OF CARE RESPONSIBILITIES TO GOLFERS AND PRIVATE RESIDENTS LIVING NEAR THEM, INCLUDING THE PREVENTION OF CHEMICAL TRESPASS IN RESIDENT’S PRIVATE BACKYARDS.






Those who are responsible for these continuous episodes of pesticide spraying should be required to provide Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all sprays used in McQuade Avenue and along the club’s east perimeter fence since the start of 2000 (because herbicide residues from applications in this year would have still been present when my son moved to McQuade Avenue in 2003), together with an explicit record of the application/spray dates.  It would be responsible to log these identifying details (inc. the composition and toxicology of the sprays) against weather conditions (including wind direction) for those dates and subsequent periods, AS IS REQUIRED BY THE PESTICIDES ACT 1999 & REGULATION[xl].  This information may also be very useful in future epidemiological surveys of the McQuade Ave & Cox Street residents, and the herbicide applicators who used the sprays[xli], studies similar to the Castlereagh Human Health Study (Williams & Jalaludin, 1993) that investigated the increased disease incidence arising through toxic waste leakage from the Castlereagh Waste Management Centre in Londonderry, Sydney.  Note in this regard in the areas affected by depot leachate (leaking toxic waste residues): “the Human Health Study found that the “rate of brain cancer in males [is] more than three times the NSW average”, with “the breast cancer rate between 1979 and 1983… two-and-a-half times the State average, with eight cases identified, while three cases of uterine cancer between 1984 and 1988… [were] more than five times the average” (Kerr, 1995:1-3)” (Thompson, 1998:9).  Strangely, the study’s politically comfortable ‘inconclusive’ outcome was followed by an “alert status [that was] adopted in relation to [the] health outcomes…” (Williams & Jalaludin, 1993:v).

What rate increases IN DISEASES (or behavioural problems) might we find in McQuade Avenue?

This is, at the very least, the variety of study needed in any location where toxic agents have been used over an extended period of time.  As well, behavioural studies could look at any increased incidence of sociological problems relating to chemical exposure, toxic burden AND CONSEQUENT NEUROLOGICAL IMPACT.  Societal aggression and anti-social behaviour has a significant TOXICOLOGICAL COMPONENT woven into it.  This is where law enforcement needs to become more educated (hence, why I have contacted the New South Wales Police Force, Crime Victims Support Assoc. Inc., the Australian Crime Prevention Council, etc.).  We need more knowledge and controls across the board to stop negligent poisoning.  I have contacted Windsor Police on numerous occasions and, despite their concerned, sympathetic and cooperative attitude, they are helpless to prevent this kind of poisoning.  However, at the suggestion of Windsor Police, I am here using mass media to embarrass those who have put my son’s health at risk (Const. Burns 2008, pers. comm. 6th June).

Disappointingly, the Hawkesbury Council appear resigned to a dream world where they are uncertain that herbicide spray comes out of a pesticide spray nozzle upwind from exposed and unprotected members of the public, including babies in prams.  Even though I explicitly photographed this happening on a refreshing and breezy Windsor day (http://poisonedpeople.com/index8.html#SPRAY DRIFT)[xlii].

Certainly, this entire monstrous issue awkwardly straddles political, business, environmental, agricultural, sports, recreational, legal, human health, behavioural and public order concerns.  But that is no reason to avoid it.


The APVMA needs to start recognizing and internalizing this readily available research and make PROFOUND CHANGES TO THE WAY THEY THINK AND DO.  Note:

“…we need to make a huge shift in the way we regulate chemicals…  Our regulators have made yet another mistake and while they will say there are no problems with the existing system and will defend it, along with the manufacturing industry, it will eventually be changed – it will just take 10 or 20 years for it to happen” (Dingle, 2005).

Meanwhile our children get sick and die from pesticide-induced cancers & other illnesses by the truckload[xliv].  These were once illnesses that were reserved for the elderly, but which are now the domain of our precious youth through the flooding of our environment with highly toxic chemicals.

Back to The Paris Appeal:

We call upon national decision-makers, European Authorities, international organizations, and specifically the United Nations Organization (UNO), to take the following measures:


Measure # 1

Banning all products that are certainly or probably carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic (CMRs) for human beings, as specified by competent international scientific authorities and organizations, and therefore applying to these products the principle of substitution; exceptionally, whenever implementation of this principle is not feasible and the use of the product concerned is considered unavoidable, limiting its use to a minimum with particularly stringent measures of fixed quotas,

Measure # 2

Applying the precautionary principle to all chemicals that, regardless of toxicity characteristics specified in Measure # 1 (refer to §9 and §13), and because they are persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic (PBT) or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB), constitute an allegedly serious and/or irreversible danger for human and/or animal health, and more generally the environment, without waiting for the definite proof of an epidemiological link, so as to anticipate and avoid serious and/or irreversible sanitary or ecological damage,

Measure # 3

Promoting the adoption of toxicological standards or international thresholds to protect people, based on the assessment of risks for the most vulnerable, i.e. mostly children and the embryo.

Measure # 4

With respect to the precautionary principle, adopting programs with scheduled deadlines and targets in precise figures so as to achieve elimination or strictly regulated reduction in polluting substances emissions and in the utilization of marketed chemicals, such as pesticides, modeling the reduction in use implemented in Sweden, Denmark or Norway… (IDEA, 2006).

IN THIS INSANE, CHEMICALLY-ADDICTED WORLD IT IS NOT AGAINST THE LAW TO CHEMICALLY ASSAULT A PERSON: TO SPRAY POISON OVER AN INDIVIDUAL VIA THE SHEER STUPIDITY & NEGLIGENCE OF SPRAY DRIFT, OR SPLATTER TOXIC PESTICIDE INTO A FAMILY’S BACK YARD FROM AN ADJOINING PROPERTY.  Even if that TOXIC AGENT amplifies behavioural problems, generates learning difficulties, promotes joint pains, fatigue, leg cramps or restless leg syndrome (ruining sleep for hundreds of thousands worldwide)[xlv], or spurs on the CANCER pandemic[xlvi], or ABORTS FOETUSES in humans, or is a potential SLATE-WIPER in the wider environment!  Even if the use of these chemicals stands as a statement of profound CHARACTER DESTRUCTION ON ALL LEVELS.  



Politicians of Australia & world leaders alike, WE NEED THOSE LAWS.  FIFTY YEARS AGO.

Feel free to write or email me should you wish to follow up on this issue.

Murray Thompson, BAppSc Environmental Health with Distinction 1998 (Australian Institute of Environmental Health [NSW] Division Award for Best Overall Graduating Student), Hons I Social Ecology 1999, UWS Hawkesbury


Postal Address: PO Box 605, New Norfolk, TAS 7140 Australia;  Email: poisonedpeople@gmail.comWebsites: http://poisonedpeople.com & http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au


John Aquilina, MP, Member for Riverstone, PO Box 65 Stanhope Gardens, NSW 2768, Australia;  Ms. Louise Markus, Federal Member for Greenway, PO Box 855 Windsor, NSW 2756, Australia – Ph: (02) 4577 2631;  David Bradbury M.P., Federal Member for Lindsay, PO Box 712 Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia,  The Hon Peter Garrett AM, MP, Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts,  PO Box 6022, House of Representatives, Parliament House, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia & PO Box 249, Maroubra, NSW 2035, Australia;  The Hon Nicola Roxon MP – Federal Minister for Health and Ageing, GPO Box 9848, Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia;  The Hon. John Della Bosca, BA MLC, Minister for Health, Level 30 Governor Macquarie Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia;  Ian Cohen MLC (NSW Legislative Council), Parliament House Macquarie St.  Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia;  Ms. Sylvia Hale (Greens MP), NSW Parliament, Macquarie St. Sydney, 2000, Australia;  Ms. Lee Rhiannon MLC, (NSW Legislative Council) Parliament House  Macquarie St. Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia;  Senator Bob Brown, GPO Box 404, Hobart, TASMANIA 7001, Australia & Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600, Australia & Hobart Electorate Office, 1st Floor, Murray St Pier Hobart Tasmania 7000, Australia; The Hon Kevin Rudd MP, PRIME MINISTER, PO Box 6022, House of Representatives, Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600, Australia & PO Box 476A, Morningside Qld 4170, Australia;  ACTU – Australian Council of Trade Unions National Secretariat, PO Box 6222, Kingston ACT 2604, Australia & Level 6, 365 Queen Street Melbourne Victoria 3000, Australia;  Secretary: Matthew Cossey, Australian Labour Party, Australian Capital Territory Branch, GPO Box 3065, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;  General Secretary: Karl Bitar, Australian Labour Party, New South Wales Branch, PO Box K408, Haymarket NSW 2000, Australia;  Australian Greens National Office, GPO Box 1108 Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;  The Greens Victoria, GPO Box 4589 Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia;  The Queensland Greens, PO Box 5763 West End QLD 4101, Australia;  The Tasmania Greens, GPO Box 1132 Hobart TAS 7001, Australia;  The Greens South Australia, 239 Wright Street Adelaide SA 5000, Australia;  Rural Health Branch (MDP 91), Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, GPO Box 9848 Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;  NATIONAL HEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, GPO Box 1421 Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;  Terri, Bindi & Robert Irwin, Australia Zoo, Steve Irwin Way, Beerwah, Queensland 4519, Australia;  AHEC – Australian Health Ethics Committee, NHMRC, GPO Box 1421 Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;  Medical Services Committee, Level 8, 187  Macquarie Street,  Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  NSW Scientific Committee, PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW  2220;  NSW Medical Board, PO Box 104 , Gladesville NSW  2111;  Pharmacy Board of NSW, LOCKED BAG 2 , Haymarket NSW  1240;  NSW Department of Health North Coast Area Health Service, LOCKED BAG 11 , Lismore NSW  2480, Australia;  Department of State and Regional Development, NSW Office for Science and Medical Research, GPO Box 5477, Sydney NSW  2001, Australia;  Cancer Institute NSW, Level 1, Biomedical Building, Australian Technology Park, Central Avenue (off Garden Road) Eveleigh NSW 2015, Australia & Locked Mail Bag 1, Kings Cross NSW 1340, Australia & PO Box 41, Alexandria NSW 1435, Australia;  Medical Committees (and Sub Committees) under the Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act, PO Box 103 , Gladesville NSW  2111, Australia;  Poisons Advisory Committee, PO Box 103 , Gladesville NSW  1675, Australia;  Nurses and Midwives Board New South Wales, PO Box K599 , Haymarket NSW 1238, Australia;  NSW Department of Health, Greater Western Area Health Service, PO Box 4061, Dubbo NSW 2830, Australia;  NSW Department of Health, Greater Southern Area Health Service, PO Box 1845 , Queanbeyan NSW  2620, Australia;  NSW Department of Health, LOCKED BAG 961, North Sydney NSW  2059, Australia;  NSW Department of Health, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, LOCKED BAG 4001, Westmead NSW  2145, Australia;  NSW Department of Health – Justice Health, PO Box 150, Matraville NSW  2036, Australia;  Mental Health Review Tribunal, PO Box 2019, Boronia Park NSW 2111, Australia;  NSW Department of Health, South Eastern Sydney Illawarra Area Health Service, LOCKED BAG 8808 South Coast Mail Centre, Wollongong NSW 2521, Australia;  Sydney Children’s Hospital – Randwick, High Street Randwick NSW 2031, Australia;  NSW Institute of Psychiatry, LOCKED BAG 7118, Parramatta  NSW  2150, Australia;  Prof. Wai-on Phoon AM (Singapore), MBBS (Malaya), FRCP (London), FRACP (Australia), FRFPS (Glasgow), FRCP (Edinburgh), FRCP (Glasgow), FFOM (London), FFPHM (England), DIH (England), DIHSA (London), DCH (England), FAMS (Singapore), Hon. FACOM (Australasia), FAFRM (Australasia), Emeritus Professor of Occupational Health University of Sydney and Consultant Physician in Occupational Medicine and Occupational Rehabilitation, Pymble Medical Consultants P/L, PO Box 818, Pymble NSW 2073, Australia;  NSW Institute of Teachers, PO Box A976, Sydney South NSW 1235, Australia;  Ministry for Police, PO Box A66, Sydney South NSW 1235, Australia;  Police Association of NSW, P O Box A1097, SYDNEY SOUTH, NSW 1232, Australia;  NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE FORCE, Locked Bag 5102, PARRAMATTA NSW 2124, Australia;  Victim Support Service Inc. (VSS), PO Box 6610, Halifax Street, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia;  CRIME VICTIMS SUPPORT ASSOC. INC., PO Box 8150 Ferntree Gully Vic. 3156, Australia;  Serious Offenders Review Council, PRIVATE BAG 144, Silverwater NSW  1811, Australia;  Youth Justice Advisory Committee, PO Box K399, Haymarket NSW 1240, Australia;  Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, GPO Box 2403, Brisbane QLD 4001, Australia;  Mr. Herbert Weller, Solicitor, PO Box 184 Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Mr. Trevor Boyd, Barrister, Selborne Chambers, Second Floor, 174 Phillip St., Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Mr. Chris Leahy, Barrister SC, Queen’s Square Chambers, Level 1, Beanbah, 235 Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Mark Chapple (Managing Partner), Baker & McKenzie, Environmental Lawyers, Level 27, A.M.P. Centre, 50 Bridge Street Sydney N.S.W. 2000, Australia;  Total Environment Centre, PO Box A176, Sydney South NSW 1235, Australia;  Environmental Defender’s Office New South Wales (Ltd), Level 1, 89 York Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Earthwatch Institute, 126 Bank Street, South Melbourne Victoria 3205, Australia;  Department of Justice and Attorney-General, GPO Box 149, Brisbane QLD 4001, Australia;  The Executive Director, Australian Law Reform Commission, GPO Box 3708, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia & info@alrc.gov.auNew South Wales Bar Association, Selborne Chambers, 174 Phillip Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia;  The Law Society of New South Wales, 170 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Attorney General’s Department of NSW, Parramatta Justice Precinct, 160 Marsden St., Locked Bag 5111, Parramatta NSW 2124, Australia & Attorney General’s Department of NSW, Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, GPO Box 6, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Attorney General’s Department of NSW, NSW Sentencing Council, GPO Box 6, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Attorney General’s Department of NSW, Victims Services NSW, Victims of Crime Bureau, LOCKED BAG 5118, Parramatta NSW 2124, Australia;  Attorney General’s Department of NSW, Office of the Legal Services Commissioner, GPO Box 4460, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Attorney General’s Department of NSW, Office of the Sheriff of NSW, PO Box A4, Sydney South NSW 1235, Australia;  Judicial Commission of New South Wales, GPO Box 3634, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  NSW State Parole Authority, GPO Box 31, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTRE (DVRC), P.O Box 3278, South Brisbane BC QLD 4101, Australia;  Brisbane Domestic Violence Advocacy Service, P.O Box 3278 South Brisbane BC QLD 4101, Australia;  Premier’s Council for Women, GPO Box 5341, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Public Interest Advocacy Centre NSW (PIAC), Level 9, 299 Elizabeth Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  National Women’s Justice Coalition Inc , GPO Box 3148, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia;  Women’s Electoral Lobby (WEL) Australia Office, PO Box 191, Civic Square ACT 2608, Australia;  AUSTRALIAN CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL, Mr. Andrew Paterson, National Secretary and Public Officer, Empower Justice Services, PO Box 242, HAPPY VALLEY SA, 5159, Australia;  INTERNATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA, secretary@ipa-australiapolice.com.auAUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE ASSOCIATION, GPO Box 132, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia;  Juvenile Justice Advisory Council of NSW, Level 24, 477 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Council of Law Reporting for New South Wales, Level 16, Suite 23, 327 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Department of Corrective Services, GPO Box 31, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  New South Wales Crime Commission, PO Box Q566, Sydney NSW 1230, Australia;  Office for Children, Level 2, 407  Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010, Australia;  Children’s Court Advisory Committee, 2  George Street, Parramatta NSW 2150, Australia;  Honorable Al Gore, 2100 West End Avenue, Suite 620 Nashville, TN 37203, USA;  Amnesty International,  Locked Bag 23, Broadway NSW 2007, Australia;  Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission, 133 Castlereagh St., Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Department of Justice, Victoria, 121 Exhibition St. Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;  Civil Liberties Australia, PO Box 7438 Fisher ACT 2611, Australia;  The Human Rights Council of Australia, PO Box 1071 North Sydney NSW 2059, Australia;  INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON HUMAN RIGHTS, ICHRP, 48 chemin du Grand-Montfleury, P.O. Box 147, CH-1290 Versoix, Geneva, Switzerland;  HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor, NEW YORK, NY 10118-3299 USA & 64-66, rue de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland & 1630 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA;  INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS, P.O. Box 91, 33, rue des Bains, 1211 GENEVA 8 Switzerland;  UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS, OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland;  Windsor Country Golf Club, McQuade Avenue, Sth. Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  General Manager, Hawkesbury City Council, PO Box 146 Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Western Sector Public Health Unit – Penrith Office, Nepean Hospital, Great Western Hwy. Kingswood NSW 2747, Australia;  Sydney West Area Health Advisory Council, Michael Fearnside, Chairman, PO Box 63, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia;  Greenpeace (Australia), Level 4, 35-39 Liverpool St. Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Prof. John Bartlett, Head of School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney – Hawkesbury Campus, Building K8, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith Sth. DC NSW 1797, Australia & l.duncan@uws.edu.au;  Professor Stuart B. Hill, Foundation Chair of Social Ecology, School OF Education, University of Western Sydney (Kingswood Campus), Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 1797, Australia;  Dr. Martin Mulligan, Senior Research Fellow, Global Studies, Social Science &Planning (Room: 32, Level: 5, Building: 37), RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia;  Dr. Robert Woog, University of Western Sydney, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences,  Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC NSW 1797, Australia;  Dr. Vladimir Dimitrov, PhD, DSc, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Locked Bag 1797, South Penrith DC 1797, Australia;  Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), PO Box 6182, Kingston ACT 2604, Australia;  Dr. Mark Donohoe MB BS, specialising in the field of environmental medicine, PO Box 328, Mosman NSW 2088, Australia & Banyan Trading Pty Ltd, Suite 224/656 Military Rd Mosman NSW 2088, Australia;  Dr. Rob Apathy, Clinical Neuropsychologist specialising in behavioural & learning disorders, and the effects of environmental toxins on children, 41 Antill St, Downer ACT 2602, Australia;  Dr Hilton Lowe G.P. MBBS Mac/Nem, 680 Victoria Rd, Ryde NSW 2112, Australia;  Dr Chris Reading B. Sc., Dip Ag., M.b., B.S., F.R.A.N.Z.C.P., M.A.C.N.E.M., PO Box 587 Dee Why, NSW 2099, Australia;  Dr. Richard Baker, Level 7, 229-231 Macquarie St, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia;   CFIDS Association of America, PO Box 220398, Charlotte, NC 28222-0398 USA;  ME/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Society of NSW Inc., Suite 204, 10 Help Street Chatswood NSW 2067, Australia;  The ME/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association, C/- ME/CFS Australia, 23 Livingstone Close Burwood VIC 3125, Australia;  The ACT ME/CFS Society Inc., C/- Shout, PO Box 717, Mauson ACT 2607, Australia;  ME/CFS Society of Western Australia, The Centre for Neurological Support, The Nichs, 11 Aberdare Road, Nedlands PERTH, W.A. 6009, Australia;  The Australian Chemical Trauma Alliance Inc., 309 East Bonville Road, Bonville NSW 2441, Australia;  ME/CFS Australia (S.A.) Inc., GPO Box 383 Adelaide S.A. 5001, Australia;  Mr. Blake Graham, Subiaco Business Centre, Suite 5, 531 Hay Street Subiaco, Perth W.A. 6008, Australia;  Dr. Nagwa Morris, South Windsor Medical Practice, 508a George Street, Sth. Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Windsor Police Station, 32 Bridge Road, Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Prof. Constance H. Katelaris, Suite 308, 151-155 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia;  Dr Philip N. Sambrook, Professor of Rheumatology, University of Sydney, Institute of Bone & Joint Research, Level 4 Block 4, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia;  Professor Richard I. Lindley, Western Clinical School, Westmead Hospital, Darcy Road, Westmead NSW 2145, Australia;  Professor Warwick J. Britton, Central Clinical School, Blackburn Building, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia;  Associate Professor John E. Kellow, Northern Clinical School, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia;  Legal Aid NSW (Civil & Family), 91 Philip St., Parramatta NSW  2150 & 323 Castlereagh St. Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia;  NSW Ombudsman, Level 24, 580 George St., Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Prof. Stephen Cordner, Director, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 57-83 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, Victoria, 3006, Australia;  Dept. of Environment & Climate Change (NSW), 79 George Street Parramatta NSW 2150, Australia & 59-61 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia & PO Box A290, Sydney South NSW 1232, Australia;  Department of Environment and Climate Change, Marine Parks Authority, GPO Box 5341, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Department of Environment and Climate Change, Climate Change and Environment Protection Group Environmental Trust, PO Box 644, Parramatta NSW 2124, Australia;  Department of Environment and Climate Change, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mrs Macquarie Road, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  Sydney Catchment Authority, PO Box 323, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia;  Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority, PO Box N408 , Grosvenor Place, Sydney, NSW 1220, Australia;  Lake Illawarra Authority, PO Box 867, Wollongong NSW 2520, Australia;  Lachlan Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 726, Forbes NSW 2871, Australia;  Chipping Norton Lakes Authority, PO Box 867, Wollongong NSW 2520, Australia;  NSW Aboriginal Land Council, PO Box 1125, Parramatta NSW 2124, Australia;  Lower Murray Darling Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 363, Buronga NSW 2739, Australia;  Murray Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 835, Deniliquin NSW 2710, Australia;  Murrumbidgee Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 5224, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650, Australia;  Department of Lands, Office of Rural Affairs, PO Box 1314, ORANGE NSW 2800, Australia;  Agricultural Scientific Collections Trust, Orange Agricultural Institute, Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800, Australia;  National Parks and Wildlife Advisory Council, 43  Bridge Street,  Hurstville NSW 2220, Australia;  Noxious Weeds Advisory Committee, LOCKED BAG 21, Orange NSW 2800, Australia;  Rural Lands Protection Boards State Council, LOCKED BAG 21, Orange NSW 2800, Australia;  Central West Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 227, Wellington NSW 2820, Australia;  Fisheries Scientific Committee, LOCKED BAG 1, Nelson Bay NSW 2315, Australia;  Department of Lands, GPO Box 15, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Councillor Leigh Williams, 345 West Portland Rd, Sackville NSW 2756, Australia;  Councillor Barry Calvert, 5 Clyde Lane, Kurrajong Heights, NSW 2758, Australia;  Councillor Kevin Conolly, P.O Box 5751, STH. Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Councillor Trevor Devine, 81 Woods Rd, Sth. Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Councillor Dianne Finch,  P.O Box 17, Kurrajong NSW 2758, Australia;  Councillor Christine Paine, ‘Sunnybrae’ 12 Fitzgerald St., Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Councillor Bob Porter, 279 Grono Farm Rd, Wilberforce NSW 2756, Australia;  Councillor Neville Wearne, P.O Box 407 Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Councillor Paul Rasmussen, 199 Springwood Rd, Yarramundi NSW 2753, Australia;  CRS Australia, Westpoint Office Tower, Level 18, 17 Patrick Street Blacktown NSW 2148, Australia, & 299 George Street Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Workcover NSW, Locked Bag 2906, Lisarow  NSW 2252, Australia;  Workplace Authority, GPO Box 9842 Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Workplace Ombudsman, GPO Box 9887 Sydney NSW 2001, AustraliaWorkers Compensation Commission, PO Box 594, Darlinghurst NSW  1300, Australia;  The Land and Environment Court of NSW, GPO Box 3565, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment Management Authority, 68 Mileham Street Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Rural Press Limited, Bells Line of Road, Nth. Richmond NSW 2754, Australia;  Diana Buckland, Founder & Global Coordinator, Global Campaign for Recognition of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, 4 Mia St. Kallangur QLD 4503, Australia;  Ms. Carolyn McDonagh, Safety Officer, Richmond High School, Lennox Street Richmond NSW 2753, Australia;  NSW Dept. of Primary Industries, University of Western Sydney, Building M14, Castle Rd., Richmond NSW 2753, Australia & 12 Shirley Road, Wollstonecraft NSW 2065, Australia & Locked Bag 21, Orange NSW 2800, Australia & PO Box 100, Beecroft NSW 2119, Australia;  Animal Research Review Panel, 161 Kite Street, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia;  NSW Dairy Industry Conference, PO Box 833, Mudgee NSW 2850, Australia;  RSPCA, PO Box 34, Yagoona NSW 2199, Australia;  State Water Corporation Fish River Water Supply, 65  Portland Road, Wallerawang NSW 2845, Australia;  Hawkesbury Gazette, 291 Windsor Street, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia;  Penrith Press, 407 High Street Penrith NSW 2750, Australia;  The Sydney Morning Herald, GPO Box 506 SYDNEY NSW 2001, Australia & letters@smh.com.au; The Daily Telegraph, 2 Holt Street Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia & news@dailytelegraph.com.auThe GREENS GREENVOICE, editorial@lists.nsw.greens.org.auJenny Brockie (SBS), Insight, myka.hoffman@sbs.com.auangellegna3@hotmail.comMs. Marian Streicher, Lot 9, Timothy Rd. Londonderry NSW 2753, Australia;  Mr. Steve Krix, 20 Fairfield Av. Windsor NSW 2756, Australia;  Housing NSW Head Office, Locked Bag 4001, Ashfield BC NSW 1800, Australia & Locked Bag 4001, Ashfield BC NSW 1800, Australia;  NSW Housing, Complaints, Locked Bag 7466, Liverpool BC NSW 1971, Australia;  Hazardous Chemicals Advisory Committee, PO Box A290, Sydney South NSW 1232, Australia;  Department of Local Government, LOCKED BAG 3015, Nowra NSW 2541, Australia;  Department of Planning, GPO Box 39, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  Department of Water and Energy, GPO Box 3889, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  NSW Veterinary Practitioners Board, PO Box 6391, Alexandria NSW 2015, Australia;  WSN Environmental Solutions, PO Box 3260, Rhodes NSW 2138, Australia;  Rail Corporation New South Wales, Customer Relations Unit – RailCorp, PO Box K349 Haymarket NSW 1238, Australia;  Environmental Working Group, 1436 U St. N.W., Suite 100, Washington, DC 20009 USA;  Alliance For Justice Headquarters, 11 Dupont Circle NW, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20036 USA & AFJ West Coast Office, 519 17th Street, Suite 560, Oakland, CA 94612-1257 USA;  Defenders Of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 USA & defenders@mail.defenders.orgConservation International, Main Office, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202 USA;  Earth First! Journal, PO Box 3023, Tucson, AZ 85702-3023 USA;  Earth Island Institute, 300 Broadway, Suite 28, San Francisco, CA 94133 USA;  U.S. PIRG – The Federation of State PIRGs, 44 Winter Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02108 USA & Federal Advocacy Office: 218 D Street SE, Washington, DC 20003 USA;  The Society Of Environmental Journalists, P.O. Box 2492 Jenkintown, PA 19046 USA;  Union For Concerned Scientists – National Headquarters, 2 Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02238-9105 USA & Washington Office, 1825 K St NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006-1232 USA & West Coast Office, 2397 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 203, Berkeley, CA 94704-1567 USA;  EARTHJUSTICE – International, 426 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 USA & internationaloffice@earthjustice.orgEnergy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), University of North Dakota, 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018 Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018 USA;  Environmental Defense Fund, 1875 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20009 USA & 257 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010 USA;  Friends Of The Earth, 1717 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036 USA & 311 California Street, Suite 510, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA;  The Pew Charitable Trusts, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1700, Philadelphia, PA 19103-7077 USA & 1025 F Street NW, 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20004-1409 USA & Environment Staff, 1200 18th St. NW, 5th Floor, Washington DC 20036-2506 USA;  National Wildlife Federation, 11100 Wildlife Center Dr, Reston VA 20190 USA;  National Religious Partnership for the Environment, 49 South Pleasant Street – Suite 301, Amherst MA 01002 USA;  National Resources Defense Council – NRDC Headquarters, 40 West 20th Street, New York NY 10011 USA;  World Wildlife Fund, Level 13, 235 Jones St., Ultimo NSW 2007 & PO Box 528, Sydney NSW 2001 & PO Box 408, Canberra ACT 2601 & ; P.O. Box 97180, Washington DC 20090-7180, USA;  The Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NEW YORK 10460 USA;  The Wilderness Society, 1615 M St, NW Washington DC 20036 USA;  Woods Hole Research Center, #149 Woods Hole Road, Falmouth MA 02540-1644 USA;  World Resources Institute, 10 G Street NE, Suite 800, Washington DC 20002, USA;  Society of Environmental Toxicology And Chemistry (SETAC), Prof Mike McLaughlin – President, SETAC Asia Pacific, CSIRO Land and Water/University of Adelaide, PMB 2, Glen Osmond SA 5064, Australia;  Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides, PO Box 1393, Eugene OR 97440-1393 USA;  Beyond Pesticides, 701 E Street, SE, Suite 200, Washington DC 20003 USA;  Environmental Health Network [of California], P.O. Box 1155, Larkspur CA, 94977-1155 USA;  Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), 49 Powell St., Suite 500, San Francisco CA 94102 USA;  Our Stolen Future, comments3@ourstolenfuture.orgAustralian Conservation Foundation, Suite 504, 32 York St., Sydney NSW 2000, Australia;  United for Peace & Justice, PO Box 607, Times Square Station, New York NEW YORK 10108, USW;  2CH EASY 1170, Macquarie Radio Network Radio 2CH, GPO Box 4290, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  702 ABC RADIO NATIONAL SYDNEY, GPO Box 9994, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  ABC NewsRadio, GPO Box 9994, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia;  2SM Radio, 2SM Pty Ltd, PO Box 1269, Pyrmont NSW 2009, Australia;  Radio 2GB, GPO Box 4290, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia;  2UE 954 NEWSTALK, PO Box 954, St. Leonards NSW 1590, Australia;  6PR, Level 1/169 Hay Street, East Perth WA 6004, Australia;  Magic 1278, 43-49 Bank St Sth Melbourne VIC 3205, Australia;  4BH Best Songs of all Time, Brisbane, PO Box 10116, Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia;  3AW Southern Cross Radio Pty. Ltd. , GPO Box 369 Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia;  4BC News Talk 1116 Talking Brisbane, PO Box 10116 Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia;  2GF, P.O. Box 276, Grafton NSW 2460, Australia;  2AD, PO Box 270, Armidale NSW 2350, Australia;  RADIO 2EC Head Office, PO Box 471, Bega NSW 2550, Australia;  2DU, PO Box 1221, Dubbo NSW 2830, Australia;  ABC RIVERINA, 100 Fitzmaurice Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia;  2MG, PO Box 17, Mudgee NSW, 2850, Australia;  2HD Broadcasters PTY LTD, Box 19, HRMC, NSW 2310, Australia;  ABC CENTRAL WEST, 46 Bathurst Rd, Orange NSW 2800, Australia;  2NM – 981AM, 100 Bridge Street, Muswellbrook NSW 2333, Australia;  2RRR, PO Box 644, Gladesville NSW 1675, Australia;  Hawkesbury Radio, 11 Fitzgerald Street, Windsor, NSW, 2756, Australia;  2NBC, PO Box 901, Narwee NSW 2209, Australia;  2NSB, PO Box 468, Chatswood NSW 2057, Australia;  2SSR, PO Box 997, Sutherland NSW 1499, Australia;  SWR FM, PO Box 221, Doonside NSW 2767, Australia;  FBI FM, PO Box 1962, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia;  residents in McQuade Avenue and Cox Streets South Windsor, NSW 2756, Australia;  Wentworth Area Community Housing, PO Box 4303, Penrith Westfield, NSW 2750, Australia.

Note my web site “Natural Organic & Herbal“.  It provides a wide range of Organic Herbal Products to help you burn fat, lose weight, and increase energy and stamina.

As well, my “Body Optimize” web site and my Herbal Hungry web sites are excellent resources for natural weight loss and other natural herbal products.  Don’t put off trying these products.  Right nutrition can transform lives!


Abou-Donia, Mohamed B., 2003,Organophosphorus Ester-Induced Chronic Neurotoxicity’, Archives of Environmental Health, August 2003 [Vol. 58 (No. 8); [50] endnote reference is: Jamal 1997], Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

ACTU 2008, ACTU – Australian Council of Trade Unions, http://www.actu.asn.au/; accessed: 21 Sept. 2008.


American Cancer Society 2008, ‘Overview: Breast Cancer.  How Many Women Get Breast Cancer?’, Cancer Reference Information, http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_2_1X_How_many_people_get_breast_cancer_5.asp; accessed: 22 August 2008.


Bell, et.al (Bell, E.M., Hertz-Picciotto, I., & Beaumont, J.J., Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) 2001, ‘Fetal Deaths Linked to Living Close to Agricultural Pesticide Use During Weeks 3-8 of Pregnancy’,  http://www.chem-tox.com.pesticides (original source: Epidemiology, 12(2), March 2001); accessed: 16 July 2008.

BeyondPesticides.org 2008, Facts and Figures Children, Pesticides, and School, http://www.beyondpesticides.org/schools/sepa/SEPA_fact&figures.htm; accessed: 18 July 2008.

Bishop, J. 2008 (Professor, MD MMed MBBS FRACP FRCPA), Chief Cancer Officer & CEO, Cancer Institute NSW, ‘Chief Cancer Officer’s Report’, in Unknown Primary Cancer in New South Wales (Tracy, et. Al 2008).

Bian, Q., L C Xu, L.C., Wang, S.L., Xia, Y.K., Tan, L.F., Chen, J.F., Song, L., Chang, H.C. & Wang, X.R.2004, ‘Study on the relation between occupational fenvalerate exposure and spermatozoa DNA damage of pesticide factory workers’, Occup. Environ. Med. 2004;61;999-1005, doi:10.1136/oem.2004.014597; downloaded from oem.bmj.com on 15 May 2008.

Bio-Medicine.org 2008, ‘Worldwide Parkinson’s cases will double in next 25 years’, Bio-Medicine.org, http://news.bio-medicine.org/medicine-news-3/Worldwide-Parkinsons-cases-will-double-in-next-25-years-1839-1/; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Boise, P., et al., 2004, ‘GreenCare for Children. Measuring Environmental Hazards in the Childcare Industry: Pesticides, Lead, and Indoor Air Quality’, Community Environmental Council. 2004.

Buffin, D.(David) & Jewel, T. (Topsy), 2001, Health and environmental impacts of glyphosate: The implications of increased use of glyphosate in association with genetically modified crops; the Pesticide Action Network UK.

Bonn, D. (Dorothy) 2005, ‘Roundup Revelation: Weed Killer Adjuvants May Boost Toxicity’, http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2005/113-6/ss.html; accessed: 14 Sept. 2009.

Canuto, A. (Antonio) [Secretary of the National Pastoral Commission on Land (Comissão Pastoral da Terra, CPT)], 2005,Violence and Aggression against Human Rights in the Wake of Agribusiness’, Land Research Action Network; http://www.landaction.org/display.php?article=272; accessed: 14 Sept. 2009.

Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 2006, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Symptoms. http://www.cdc.gov/cfs/cfssymptomsHCP.htm, Accessed January 2, 2007.

Clennell, A. 2004, ‘Brain diseases treble in 20 years, says new report’, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/brain-diseases-treble-in-20-years-says-new-report-556690.html; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Cohen, S.Z., Creeger, S.M., Carsel, R.F. & Enfield, C.G., 1984, ‘Potential for pesticide contamination of groundwater resulting from agricultural uses’, in: R.F. Kruger and J.N. Seiber (Editors), Treatment and Disposal of Pesticide Wastes, ACS Symp. Series No. 259, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 297-325.

Cox, C. 1993, ‘Biotechnology and Agricultural Pesticide Use: An Interaction Between Genes and Poisons’, Journal of Pesticide Reform, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Fall), NCAP, PO Box 1393, Eugene, OR 97440, USA.

Cox, C. 1998, JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM, Fall 1998, Vol.18, No. 3.; Updated 01-02, Northwest Coalition Against Pesticides, Eugene, Oregon.

Cox, C. 2004,Herbicide Factsheet: Glyphosate’, Journal Of Pesticide Reform/ Winter 2004, Vol. 24, No. 4, Northwest Coalition For Alternatives To Pesticides/NCAP, P.O. Box 1393, Eugene, Oregon 97440 USA / (541)344-5044 / www.pesticide.org; accessed: 2005.

CRC For Australian Weed Management 2003,  Search: glyphosate-resistant weed; http://www.weedscrc.org.au/index_flash.html; accessed: 20 Sept. 2008.

Culliney, T.W., Pimentel, D. & Pimentel, M.H., 1992, ‘Pesticides and natural toxicants in foods’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 41:297-320.

CureResearch.com 2007, ‘Prevalence and Incidence of Arthritis’, CureResearch.com, http://www.cureresearch.com/a/arthritis/prevalence.htm; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Davis, D.L. and Bradlow, H.L., 1995, ‘Can environmental estrogens cause breast cancer?’, Sci. Am., 273: 166-172.

Dingle, P. (Associate Professor) 2005, ‘Chemicals, Kids and Cancer: Why kids are particularly vulnerable to toxic home chemicals’, Kindred Spirits, http://www.kindredmedia.com.au/library_page1/chemicals_kids_and_cancer_why_kids_are_particularly_vulnerable_to_toxic_home_chemicals/194/1, accessed: 16 July 2008.

DirectGov 2007, ‘Cancer: 1 in 3 develop cancer during their lives’, National Statistics, http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=915; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Donohoe, M. 1998, Killing Us Softly, Chemical Injury and Chemical Sensitivity 1.2(internet Creative Commons release 2008), http://web.mac.com/doctormark/DoctorMark/KUS.html; accessed: 13/12/2008.

Dunne, F. 2000, ‘Insecticide Causes Mad Cow Disease’, in Mercola.com, http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/17/bovine_spongiform_disease.htm; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Dykstra, W. & Ghali, G.Z. 1991, ‘Second peer review of glyphosate. Memo to R. Taylor and L. Rossi’, US EPA Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Health Effects Division, Washington, D.C.

Eddleston, M., Karalliedde, L., Buckley, N., Fernando, R., Hutchinson, G., Isbister, G., Konradsen, F., Murray, D., Piola, J.C., Senanayake, N., Sheriff, R., Singh, S., Siwach, S.B. & Smit, L. 2002, ‘Pesticide poisoning in the developing world—a minimum pesticides list’, THE LANCET, Vol. 360, October 12, 2002:1163-1167.

Finlay, P./DECC (Environmental Protection & Regulation, Dept. of Environment & Climate Change) 2008, Letter, 1 December 2008.

Firth, V. (The Hon. Verity Firth MP) 2008, ‘Foreword from the Minister’, in Unknown Primary Cancer in New South Wales (Tracy, et. al 2008).

Ford, J., 2008, Dr. Judy Ford Interview, Channel 10 News, Monday 29th December 2008.

Flower, et. al. (Flower, K.B, Hoppin, J.A, Lynch, C.F., Blair, A,,Knott, C., Shore, D.L. and Sandler, D.P.) 2004, ‘Cancer Risk and Parental Pesticide Application in Children of Agricultural Health Study Participants’, in Children’s Health, Environmental Health Perspectices; http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2003/6586/abstract.html [http://www.ehponline.org/members/2003/6586/6586.pdf]; accessed: 14 Sept. 2009.

Gomez-Esteban, J.C., Zarranz, J.J., Tijero, B., Velasco, F., Barcena, J., Rouco, I., Lezcano, E., Lachen, M.C., Jauregui, A., Ugarte, A. 2007, Movement Disorders [2007] 22 (13) : 1912-1916.

Grabau, B.J. (Dr. Brendan), 2005, Toxicology Report: Mr. Murray Thompson.

Gregor, D.J. & Gummer, W.D., 1989, ‘Evidence of atmospheric transport and deposition of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in Canadian arctic snow, Environ. Sci. Technol., 23: 561-565.

Hall, C.T. (Chronicle Science Writer, San Francisco Chronicle) circa 2002, ‘Mosquito Control – Lawn & Agricultural Pesticides Linked to Immune System Weakening and Frog Mutations’, http://www.chem-tox.com.pesticides; accessed: 17 July 2008.

Hardell L. & Eriksson M. 1999, ‘A Case-Control Study of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and exposure to Pesticides’, CANCER Vol.85, No. 6 (March 15, 1999).

Hatherill, J.R. (Dr.) 1999 [Online], ARE TODAY’S TEENS MORE TOXIC?, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, Ill; Jun 15, 1999; pg. 19; and http://www.veg.ca/lifelines/sepoc99/teens.htm; accessed: 2006.

Hileman, B., 1994, ‘Environmental estrogens linked to reproductive abnormalities, cancer’, Chem. Eng. News, 72 (5): 19-23.

Hirsh, A., 2003 [Online], ‘Male subfertility’, 15 November 2003, BMJ 2003;327;669-672, doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7416.669; downloaded from bmj.com on 15 May 2008.

Ho, Mae-Wan & Cherry, B. (Brett) 2010 [Online], ‘Glyphosate Tolerant Crops Bring Diseases and Death’, in Institute of Science in Society, http://www.i-sis.org.uk/glyphosateTolerantCrops.php; accessed:8 June 2010.

Hood, E., 2004, ‘Passing Along Pesticides.  Lymphoma Rises in Children of Applicators,’ Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 112, Number 5, April 2004 (http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/cgi-bin/findtoc2.pl?tocinfo=Environmental%20Health%20Perspectives@112@5@2004), http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2004/112-5/ss.html?section=children, accessed: December 2005.

IDEA (Irish Doctors Environmental Association) 2006 [Online], THE PARIS APPEAL: International Declaration on Diseases Due to Chemical Pollution, www.ideaireland.org; accessed: 10th October 2007.

Institute of Science in Society, 2010 [Online], ‘Glyphosate Tolerant Crops Bring Diseases and Death’, http://www.i-sis.org.uk/glyphosateTolerantCrops.php; accessed: 2 Feb. 2012.  (See Ho & Cherry 2010 for original research.)

Jamal, G., 1997,Neurological syndromes of organophosphorus Compounds’, Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev, 16:133-70.

Kale, et al., 1995, ‘Mutagenicity testing of nine herbicides and pesticides currently used in agriculture’, Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25:148-153.

Kerr, P., 1995, ‘Toxic tip to close’, Penrith Press, April 25, 407 High Street PENRITH NSW 2750.

Kelce, W.R., Stone, C.R., Laws, S.C., Gray, L.E., Kemppainen, J.A. & Wilson, E.M., 1995, ‘Persistent DDT metabolite p,p’-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist’, Nature, 375:581-585.

Kiesecker, J.M., 2002, ‘Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: A link to amphibian limb deformities in nature?’, PNAS, July 23, 2002, v. 99:15, 9900-9904.  Joseph M. Kiesecker, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 208 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802-5301.  E-mail: jmk23@psu.edu;  www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12118118&dopt=Abstract and http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12118118, accessed: November 2005.

Konradsen, F., van der Hoek., W., Cole, D.C., Hutchinson, G., Daisley, H., Singh, S., & Eddleston, M. 2003, ‘Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries—options for restricting the availability of pesticides’, Toxicology 192 (2003) 249-261.

Laurier, J. 2003, ‘WHO report: alarming increase in cancer rates’, World Socialist Web Site, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/canc-a26.shtml; accessed: 22 August 2008.

LeBlanc, G.A., 1995, ‘Are environmental sentinels signalling?’,  Environ. Health Perspect., 103: 888-890.

Lehmann V. & Pengue W. 2000, ‘Herbicide Tolerant Soybean: Just another step in a technology treadmill?’, Biotechnology and Development Monitor. September 2000.

Leistra, M. & Boesten, J.J.T.I., 1989, ‘Pesticide contamination of groundwater in western Europe’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 26: 369-389.

Leu, A. 2007, ‘Monsanto’s Toxic Herbicide Glyphosate: A Review of its Health and Environmental Effects’, Organic Consumers Association, http://www.organicconsumers.org/, accessed: July 17, 2008.

Liedloff, J. 1986, The Continuum Concept, Penguin Arkana, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.

Markus, L. 2008, Progress Report from your Federal Member for Greenway, Louise Markus (Suite 113, 30 Campbell St., BLACKTOWN, NSW 2148).

Mindfully.org 2007, Position Statement on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, Mindfully.org, http://www.mindfully.org/Health/MCS-1999-Definition.htm; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Montague, P. (National Writers Union) 2001, ‘#726 – Science, Precaution and Pesticides, 06-Jun-2001′, in http://www.rachel.org/en/node/5340; accessed: 16 July 2008.  Reference [2] cited: Susan Osburn, RESEARCH REPORT: DO PESTICIDES CAUSE LYMPHOMA?  Available by U.S. mail from Lymphoma Foundation of America, P.O. Box 15335, Chevy Chase, MD 20825.  Tel. (202) 223-6181. ISBN 0-9705127-0-8.  Available at: http://www.lymphomahelp.org/docs/research/researchreport/rr_2000.pdf.  Reference [4] cited: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by the U.S. in 1948, says (Article 3), “Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person.” Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution obligates the federal government to protect the citizenry against “domestic violence” which arguably includes modern forms of domestic violence such as toxic assault.  See  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/Constitution/article04/, or http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A4Sec4.

Montague, T. 2005, ‘#819 – A New Way to Inherit Environmental Harm, June 09, 2005’, in Environmental Research Foundation, http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=2501, accessed: 11th Oct. 2008.

Mulligan, Dr. Martin 2004, ‘Learning the Language of Leaves’, Dialogue, Vol. 23, 1/2004, ACADEMY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN AUSTRALIA, http://www.assa.edu.au/Publications/Dialogue/dial12004.pdf.

National Center for Health Statistics 2008, ‘Asthma Prevalence, Health Care Use and Mortality, 2002′, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/asthma/asthma.htm; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Nordstrom M. et al, 1998, ‘Occupational exposures, animal exposure, and smoking as risk factors for hairy cell leukaemia evaluated in a case-control study’, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER Vol. 77 (1998), pp 2048-2052.

NCAP (Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides) 1999,  ‘Landscaping Nature’s Way: Using Natural Landscaping To Reduce Herbicide Use’, Journal of Pesticide Reform, Vol.19, No. 4, PO Box 1393, Eugene, Oregon 97440 USA.

NCAP (Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides) 2000, Unthinkable Risk: How Children Are Exposed and Harmed  When Pesticides Are Used at School, Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides, PO Box 1393 Eugene, OR 97440-1393 USA (www.pesticide.org).

NKDEP (National Kidney Disease Education Program) 2005, ‘News & Events: World Diabetes Day Focuses on Preventing Diabetic Kidney Disease’, NKDEP, http://www.nkdep.nih.gov/news/releases/world-diabetes-day-focuses-on-preventing-diabetic-kidney-disease.htm; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Overstreet, D.H., Millerb, C.S., Janowskya, D.S. & Russell, R.W 1996, ‘Potential animal model of multiple chemical sensitivity with cholinergic supersensitivity’, Toxicology 111 (1996) 119- 134, Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

O’Malley, M. 1997, ‘Clinical evaluation of pesticide exposure and poisonings’, Lancet 1997; 349: 1161-66O’Malley citations:[11] Tabershaw, I., & Cooper, W.C., 1966, ‘Sequelae of acute organophosphate poisoning’, J Occup Med 1966; 8: 5-10;  [12]Rosenstock, L., Daniell, W., Barnhart, S., Schwartz, D., Demers, P.A., 1990, ‘Chronic neuropsychological sequelae of occupational exposure to organophosphate insecticides’, Am J Ind Med 1990; 18: 321-25;  [13]Savage, E., Keefe, T., Mounce, L., Heaton, R., Lewis, J., Burcar, P., 1990, ‘Chronic neurological sequelae of acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning’, Arch Environ Health 1990; 43: 38-45;  [14]Rosenstock, L., Keifer, M., Daniell, W., et al. 1990, ‘Chronic central nervous system effects of acute organophosphate pesticide intoxication’, Lancet 1990; 338: 223-27;  [15]Steenland, K., Jenkins, B., Ames, R., O’Malley, M., Chrislop, D., Russo, J., 1995, ‘Chronic neurological sequelae to organophosphate pesticide poisoning’, Am J Public Health 1995; 84: 731-36;  [16]Stephens, R., Spurgeon, A., Calvert, I.A., et al. 1995, ‘Neuropsychological effects of long-term exposure to organophosphates in sheep dip’, Lancet 1995; 345: 1135-39;  [17]Metcalf, D.R., & Holmes, J.H. 1969, ‘EEG, physiological and neurological alterations in humans with organophosphorous exposure’, Ann NY Acad Sci 1969; 160: 357-65;  [18] Ames, R., Steenland, K., Jenkins, B., Chrislop, D., Russo, J. 1995, ‘Chronic neurological sequelae to cholinesterase inhibitions among agricultural pesticide applicators’, Arch Environ Health 1995; 50: 440-43;  [19]Maizlish, N., Schenker, M., Weisskopf, C., Seiber, J., Samuels, S. 1987, ‘A behavioral evaluation of pest control workers with short-term, low-level exposure to the organophosphate diazinon’, Am J Ind Med 1987; 12: 153-72.

Parker, Dr. Frances, 2000, The Safe Use of Farm Chemicals by Market Gardeners of Non-English Speaking Background — Developing an Effective Extension Strategy for the Sydney Basin, Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation, Level 1, AMA House, 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 (PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604).

Pearse, W. & Wright, H. 1999, ‘Chemical Assessment and the Precautionary Principle’, in Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle, R. Harding & E. Fisher (eds),  The Federation Press, Leichhardt, pp. 240-253.

Pimentel, D. 1995, ‘Amounts of pesticides reaching target pests: environmental impacts and ethics’, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 8:17-29.

Parron, T., Hernandez, A. & Villanueva, E. 1995, ‘Increased risk of suicide with exposure to pesticides in an intensive agricultural area.  A 12-year retrospective study’, Forensic Science International 79 (1996) 53-63, Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Pimentel, D., 1995, ‘Amounts of pesticides reaching target pests: environmental impacts and ethics’, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 8:17-29.

PreventingHarm.org, no date, In Harms Way: Executive Summary, PreventingHarm.org, http://www.preventingharm.org/execsum.html; accessed: 22 August 2008.

Ragnarsdottir, K. Vala 2000, ‘Environmental fate and toxicology of organophosphate pesticides’, Journal of the Geological Society; July 2000; v. 157; no. 4; p. 859-876 © 2000 Geological Society of London.

Rainier, S.,Bui, M.,Mark,E., Thomas, D., Tokarz,D., Ming, L., Delaney,C., Richardson,R.J., Albers,J.W., Matsunam, N., Stevens,J., Coon,H., Leppert, M.& Fink, J.K. 2008, ‘Neuropathy Target Esterase Gene Mutations Cause Motor Neuron Disease’, The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 82, Issue 3, 780-785, 28 February 2008, doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.018; http://www.cell.com/AJHG/abstract/S0002-9297(08)00143-2; accessed: 26 June 2009.

Rank, et al.1993, ‘Genotoxicity testing of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate isopropylamine using the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test’, Salmonella mutagenicity test and Allium anaphase-telophase test, Mutation Research 300:29-36.

Reeves, M., Schafer, K., Hallward, K. & Katten, A. 1999, Fields of Poison: California Farmworkers and Pesticides, Pesticide Action Network North America Regional Center, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, United Farm Workers of America and Californians for Pesticide Reform (Publishers).

Rotella, P. 2003, ‘Mark Purdey’s Organophosphate Model of Mad Cow Disease’, http://madcow.pamrotella.com; accessed: 29 July 2008.

Royal Society of Chemistry 2009, ‘Soundbite molecules’, http://www.rsc.org/Education/EiC/issues/2005Mar/Soundbitemolecules.asp; accessed: 4th June 2009.

Sawada, Y.Y., et al 1988, ‘Probable toxicity of surface-active agent in commercial herbicide containing glyphosate’, Lancet, 1(8580):299.

Schiavon, M., Perrin-Ganier, C. & Portal, J.M., 1995, ‘La pollution de I’eau par les produits phytosanitaires: état et origine, Agronomie, 15: 157-170.

Schomburg, C.J. & Glotfelty, D.E., 1991, ‘Pesticide occurrence and distribution in fog collected near Monterey, California’, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25: 155-160.

ScienceDaily 2003, ‘Genetic Link May Tie Together Pesticides, ADHD, Gulf War Syndrome And Other Disorders’, ScienceDaily LLC, sciencedaily.com; accessed: 15 August 2008.

ScienceDaily 2008, ‘Best Treatment For Multiple Sclerosis May Depend On Disease Subtype’, ScienceDaily LLC, sciencedaily.com, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080701150830.htm; accessed: 22 August 2008.

ScienceAlert 2008, ‘Another pesticide resistant weed found’, in ScienceAlert: Australia & New Zealand, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 , http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20082608-17859-2.html; accessed: 20 Sept. 2008.

Sharp, et. al. (Sharp, D.S., Eskenazi, B., Harrison, R., Callas, P. and Smith, A.H, 1986, Annual Reviews in Public Health, 7:461, 1986, ‘Delayed Health Hazards of Pesticide Exposure’.

Shomon, M.  2005, ‘Pesticides Targeting West Nile-Carrying Mosquitos May be a Thyroid Danger. Widespread Spraying Taking Place in New York City and Boston’, http://thyroid.about.com/library/weekly/aa072600a.htm, accessed: December 2005.

Sinclair, W. (M.D.; Board Certified Immunology) & Pressinger, R. (M.Ed.) no date, Home and Lawn Pesticides More Dangerous than Previously Believed, http://www.chem-tox.com.pesticides, accessed: 17 July 2008.

Solomon, G.M. & Mott, L.M. 1998, Trouble On The Farm: Growing Up With Pesticides In Agricultural Communities, Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, NY, USA.

Talbot, A.R. 1991, ‘Acute poisoning with a glyphosate-surfactant herbicide (‘Roundup’): A review of 93 cases’, Human Exp. Toxicol. 10:1-8.

The Johns Hopkins University, 2002,  ‘Backgrounder: Epigenetics and Imprinted Genes’, in Johns Hopkins Medicine, http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/press/2002/november/epigenetics.htm, accessed: 11th Oct. 2008.

Tracy, E., Glass, P., Roder, D., Currow, D., Jeffs, P., & Bishop, J. 2008, Unknown Primary Cancer in New South Wales, Cancer Institute NSW, April, PO Box 41, ALEXANDRIA NSW 1435.

Thompson, M. 1998, Global Toxicity: Chemicals – A Worldwide Nightmare (Highlighting the Castlereagh Waste Management Centre and its Impact on Londonderry, Sydney), Murray S. Thompson, PO Box 5761 SOUTH WINDSOR LPO, NSW 2756.

Tortensson, N.T.L., Lundgren, L.N., and Stenstrom, J. 1989, ‘Influence of climate and edaphic factors on persistence of glyphosate and 2,4-D in forest soils’, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 18:230-239.

Tvedten, S.L. 1999, 2002, The Bug Stops Here, compiled from The Best Control II – Intelligent Pest Management, Copyright 1998 and 2002 by Stephen Tvedten.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Date Unknown, The Simpsons, Episode #Unknown, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.

US Environmental Protection Agency, 1977, ‘Waste disposal practices and their effects on groundwater’, Report to Congress, USEPA, Washington, DC.

US EPA 1993-2, ‘Science chapter for registration eligibility document for glyphosate’, EPA Ecological Effects Branch, Washington, DC (May 1).

Vachani, C. (RN, MSN, AOCN) 2007, OncoLink, Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, http://oncolink.org/types/article.cfm?C=10&s=36&ss=820&id =9539; accessed: 16 June 2008.

van der Hoek, W.,  Konradsen, F., Athukorala, K. & Wanigadewa, T. 1998, ‘Pesticide Poisoning: A Major Health Problem In Sri Lanka’, Soc. Sci. Med. Vol. 46, Nos 4-5, pp. 495-504, 1998.

van der Werf, H.M.G. 1996, ‘Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 60 (1996) 81-96, Elsevier Science B.V.

Viartis.net 2008, VIARTIS PARKINSON’S DISEASE PARKINSON’S DISEASE NEWS MARCH 2008, http://www.viartis.net/parkinsons.disease/news.0308.htm; accessed: 18 August 2008.

Vigfusson, N.V., & Vyse, E.R. 1980, ‘The effect of the pesticides Dexon, Captan and Roundup on sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes in vitro’, Mutation Research 79:53-57.

Yb Dato Liow Tiong Lai, 2008, ‘LAUNCH OF WORLD LUPUS DAY 2008’, http://www.moh.gov.my/,; accessed: 22 August 2008.

WHO-UNEP, 1989, ‘Public health impact of pesticides used in agriculture’, World Health Organization-United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.

World Health Organisation (WHO), 1994. Glyphosate. Environmental Health Criteria 159. The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). WHO, Geneva.

Williams, J. and Jalaludin, B. 1993, Castlereagh Human Health Study, Western Sector Public Health Unit, North Parramatta NSW Australia.

Wilson, C. & Tisdell, C. 2001, ‘Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs’, Ecological Economics 39 (2001) 449-462, www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon; accessed: 2008 (no longer available).

Zimmerman, P. 2010, ‘Uranium Weapons, Low-Level Radiation and Deformed Babies’, GlobalResearch.ca, Centre for Research on Globalization, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16726; accessed: 5 Sept. 2010.

Zweiner, R. & Ginsburg, C. 1988, ‘Organophosphate and carbamate poisoning in infants and children’, Pediatrics 81:121-126.






[1]  “Each year an estimated 2.5 million tons of pesticides are applied to agricultural crops worldwide.  The amount of pesticide coming in direct contact with or consumed by target pests is an extremely small percentage of the amount applied.  In most studies the proportion of pesticides applied reaching the target pest has been found to be less than 0.3%, so 99.7% went ‘somewhere else’ in the environment (Pimentel, 1995)” (van der Werf, 1996:81).  The pesticides ended up wherever we are!  Note: “During the 1970s and 1980s, increasing numbers of pesticides were found in groundwater (US Environmental Protection Agency, 1977; Cohen et al., 1984; Leistra & Boesten, 1989; Schiavon et al., 1995), causing great concern, as groundwater is a major source for drinking water in many countries.  Worries about the movement of pesticides in the atmosphere have arisen during the 1970s and 1980s.  Transport and redeposition of pesticides may occur over very long distances, as evidenced by the presence of pesticides in ocean fog (Schomburg & Glotfelty, 1991) and arctic snow (Gregor & Gummer, 1989)…  Human pesticide poisonings and illnesses are the highest price paid when pesticides reach non-target areas.  It is estimated that there are about 1 million accidental human pesticide poisonings each year in the world, with about 20000 reported deaths (WHO-UNEP, 1989)…  Recent evidence indicates that pesticides may damage the immune system (Culliney et al., 1992), and can mimic hormones and may thus disrupt the endocrine system in both humans and animals, causing a variety of disorders (LeBlanc, 1995).  Human health issues such as increased incidence of breast cancer, prostate cancer, testicular cancer, endometriosis, birth defects in the male reproductive tract, and reductions in sperm count have been associated with the presence of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the environment (Hileman, 1994; Davis & Bradlow, 1995; Kelce et al., 1995)” (van der Werf, 1996:83-86).  Dr. Judy Ford says chemicals are a huge issue in terms of the increasing problem of infertility (Ford, 2008).

[2]  As well, in March 2009 I weeded this same area under the assumption that I was simply removing a temptation for the golf club to spray.  However, I was exposed to dust from the weeds’ roots (when pulling and throwing the weeds over the back fence for later binning).  The outcome of inhaling dust from this previously sprayed area was the development of severe chest pain as I was actually weeding (very rapid onset).  I had to stop.  I think it was within a day or two that I then developed aggravated (resident) joint pains from my previous 2000/2001 exposure at my public housing unit, and new joint pains (hands and elbows), severe abdominal pain, elevated sore throat, persistent or clinging chest congestion, profound impact on my vocal chords and asthma, severe headache and neck pain, a persistent head cold, and extremely irritated skin.  These elevated and new symptoms lasted – in part – for over 2 weeks following exposure, with some very persistent symptoms still presenting in May 2009.

[3]  “Presently, there are 72 municipalities in Canada that have implemented by-laws restrictions or have banned outright the cosmetic use of pesticides.  These include West Vancouver, Port Moody and Gibsons in BC, and Toronto, Halifax, Montreal, and all of the province of Quebec.  Also, Vancouver, North Vancouver, Cumberland and New Westminster all have by-laws drafted but not yet fully in force” (http://www.ncap.kics.bc.ca/8pesticides.html; accessed: 6 Nov. 2008).

[4]  “There is far more to genetics than the sequence of building blocks in the DNA molecules that make up our genes and chromosomes.  The “more” is known as epigenetics.  Epigenetics… refers to all modifications to genes other than changes in the DNA sequence itself.  Epigenetic modifications include addition of molecules, like methyl groups, to the DNA backbone. Adding these groups changes the appearance and structure of DNA, altering how a gene can interact with important interpreting (transcribing) molecules in the cell’s nucleus” (The Johns Hopkins University, 2002).  Also: “What’s surprising is that scientists are now revealing that these environmental effects can be passed from one generation to the next by a process called “epigenetics,” with far-reaching implications for human health.  Epigenetics is showing that environmental influences can be inherited – even without any mutations in the genes themselves[1] – and may continue to influence the onset of diseases like diabetes, obesity, mental illness and heart disease, from generation to generation.  In other words, the cancer you get today may have been caused by your grandmother’s exposure to an industrial poison 50 years ago, even though your grandmother’s genes were not changed by the exposure.[1] Or the mercury you’re eating today in fish may not harm you directly, but may harm your grandchildren…  The development of epigenetics also greatly complicates toxicity testing, and chemical risk assessment.  …risk assessors will have to acknowledge that – so far as epigenetics is concerned – they are flying blind…  Of course all this new information makes the control of toxic chemicals even more important than previously thought.  The health of future generations is at stake” (Montague, 2005. [Montague’s [1] endnote: “Here we define a genetic mutation as a change in the sequence of nucleotide bases (C,A,T,G).  We recognize that epigenetic changes are heritable changes to the DNA, but they are not sequence changes”]).  The above makes chemical engineering all the more the worst ‘invention’ in human history, but certainly the ‘best’ and most comprehensive, silent and subtle way to destroy a planet, with most people not being aware its happening, and with industry profits, tied as they are to industrial innovation, suppressing all attempts to enlighten people to the scope of the problem!

[5]  “Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is a clinical phenomenon in which individuals, after acute or intermittent exposure to one or more chemicals, commonly organophosphate pesticides (OPs), become overly sensitive to a wide variety of chemically-unrelated compounds…” (Overstreet, et al., 1996).  “The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recently recognized chemical sensitivity as a symptom of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome” (Mindfully.org 2007, citing: Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 2006).

[6]  Not only are our attitudes intrinsically flawed when science and technological pursuits are valued above nature, but in not valuing the gems science teaches us about real nature we engage in a compounding insult to ecology and our own intelligence.  We thereby destroy our literacy in a world of potential experience and, for too many of us, we may not even be aware of the potentials we have sidestepped (Mulligan 2004:4), as we bludgeon past them with selfish ideas and pursuits.

[7]  “According to researchers writing in the Journal of Applied Toxicology, “immense care is warranted in the use of insecticides, because they not only affect the liver, kidney and other organs but also may alter the activity of the endocrine glands.” (J Appl Toxicol 1996 Sep-Oct;16(5):397-400)” (Shomon, 2005).  Therefore, being ‘professional’ in dispensing pesticide sprays does not equate with being careful.  You cannot be careful with pesticides if you apply them where spray drift, pesticide residues or leachate will eventually find people (or the places they frequent).  It is IMPOSSIBLE to use pesticides carefully, simply by virtue of the fact that these toxins are released into the wider environment where they can be neither monitored effectively nor controlled.  Trying to accomplish either is like trying to herd cats!

[8]  “How much, I wondered, have we managed to lose through this invisible disease?  How much intellectual capacity and function have we managed to destroy, gone before we had the benefit of the asset? ” (Donohoe 1998:32).

[9]  This is why I have not previously included my mobile/cell phone number with this communication.  My head starts to ‘burn’ and ‘explode’ and I become nauseous and dizzy after 20-30 seconds on my phone.  As well, the total stress load of this affliction leaves me with no reserves for dealing with anything other than calls from my immediate family.

[10]   The Pesticides Act 1999 appears self-contradictory.  It says we must not injure people with pesticide, and yet it allows injury through the legal use of legal products!

[11]  See: http://poisonedpeople.com/index8.html#SPRAY DRIFT.  Also: “The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment has taken a strong position against municipalities using pesticides” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date; citing Steve Rauh, Chairman of the Environment Committee for the Social Planning Council of Winnipeg).

[12]  All employees have a right to “work in an environment that is safe” (ACTU, 2008).

[13]  People “must be empowered, to feel that they have control over their own learning” (Parker 2000:170).

[14]  As well note that Parker (2000:91) states: “Pearse & Wright (1999) have discussed chemical assessment and the Precautionary Principle.  They state: “it is worth noting that it is scientifically impossible to prove that no harm can ever come from a particular chemical” “.

[15]  “You wouldn’t expose your kids to tobacco smoke would you, so why pesticides?  They are much more toxic” (Dingle 2005).

[16]  Synthetic pyrethroids are used for termite control in public housing.

[17]  Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Bell, et al., 2001; my emphasis.

[18]  “Many organophosphates are also associated with irritation of the skin and upper respiratory tract…  The controversy over whether neurobehavioural effects persist after recovery from organophosphate poisoning has continued for 30 years.11,12  There have been reports of deficits in memory and abstraction on test batteries and subclinical decreases in vibrotactile sensitivity in workers recovering from organophosphate poisoning, but results of clinical and neurological examinations were normal.13,14,15  Among workers who apply organophosphates but have not suffered poisoning episodes, some studies have shown similar types of subclinical neurobehavioural deficits and subclinical electroencephalographic abnormalities,16,17 whereas others had largely negative results18,19” (O’Malley 1997; my emphasis).  “Various epidemiological studies have demonstrated that individuals exposed to a single large toxic dose, or to small subclinical doses, of organophosphorus compounds have developed a chronic neurotoxicity that persists for years after exposure and is distinct from both cholinergic and OPIDN effects[50]   Our review of the literature indicated that these studies describe a nervous system disorder induced by organophosphorous compounds which involves neuronal degeneration and subsequent neurological, neurobehavioral, and neuropsychological consequences” (Abou-Donia, 2003).  The neurobehavioural controversy exists precisely because, as this information clearly shows, most difficult-to-define poisoning impacts are sub-clinical, or presenting as a condition or illness that is not readily identified by the usual orthodox medical investigations (which are generally fairly obtuse).  This is why sensitive neuro-psychological tests and behavioural assessment are necessary for those more ‘gently’ touched by pesticides. 

[19]  “Doctors at a weekend conference in Winnipeg say there is a disturbing trend when it comes to the rising rate of certain cancers.  They say pesticides are to blame for the increase – especially in childhood cancers” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Winnipeg CBC News – June 7, 2004; my emphasis).

[20]  “Leading weed scientists are urgently appealing to Australia’s farmers to switch to an integrated weed management (IWM) system as the country records its third glyphosate-resistant weed” (ScienceAlert 2008, citing CRC For Australian Weed Management 2003).

[21]  Also see: Submission to the European Review of Glyphosate Products (http://www.mapperleyplains.co.uk/oprus/glyphosrev.htm).

[22]  These tenants’ identities have been concealed because NSW Department of Housing Client Service Officers are well known by tenants and some researchers for being capable of significant levels of vindictive behaviour, especially toward the elderly.  I am personally aware of this problem.

[23]  Golf clubs are known for using fungicides on the putting greens and other pesticides throughout the course (Dr. Mark Donohoe, 16 June 2008, pers. comm.).  Also:  “Pesticides that are used on golf courses fall into three categories: insecticides, herbicides and fungicides.  Insecticides are used to a lesser extent than either herbicides or fungicides.  Herbicides, if used for two to three consecutive years, can pretty well eliminate most weeds of concern.  Fungicides are used because fungal pathogens can cause severe loss of grass on a golf course.” (Source: http://cmte.parl.gc.ca, no date, “3. HISTORY OF PESTICIDE USE” no date, http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/Content/HOC/committee/362/envi/reports/rp1031697/envi01/10-ch3-e.html; accessed: 30 July 2010.)

Also: “THE CONVENTIONAL WAY: There are up to 86 chemicals on the market for golf course use. These are known to have been sprayed while players are still on the course.  Pesticides, herbicides and other chemicals are termed safe but when combined with other chemicals used on the course, the resulting cocktails may be deadly.” (Source: Biological Farmers of Australia 2005, “Kabi Golf Farm: A Fairer Way”, http://www.bfa.com.au/_files/kabi%20golf%20farm%20pg37-38.pdf; accessed: 30 July 2010.)

Also: “…but Friends of the Earth is also concerned that a range of pesticides (herbicides, insecticides and fungicides) will be used on the course after construction and also on the turf grass nurseries.  These pesticides will have the ability not only to potentially pollute Melbourne’s drinking water, but could also (particularly the insecticides), play havoc with native fish that inhabit the river downstream of the development.  One only has to look at what happened to the Warringah Golf Course in 2001 after their misuse of the insecticide Gusathion which led to the golf course having to pay out $500,000 after 10,000 fish (and many species of birds) were killed at Manly Lagoon.  (Source: Friends of the Earth Melbourne 2010, “Objection to Eastern Golf Club”, http://www.melbourne.foe.org.au/?q=node/724; accessed: 30 July 2010.)

Also:  “The governing bodies of golf and golf course designers have recognised the importance of designing, constructing and managing golf courses in an environmentally sustainable manner.  Golf courses can provide significant benefits to the environment if constructed and managed using best management practices.  They can also result in water pollution, pesticide spills and the destruction of native vegetation if managed poorly.” (Source: Australian Golf Course Superintendents’ Association 2010, “Establishing Environmental Principles for Golf Courses”, http://environment.agcsa.com.au/resources/environmental_principles; accessed: 30 July 2010; my emphasis.)

Also: “Councils have a responsibility to maintain the appearance and usefulness of golf courses, and doing this involves preventing and eradicating pests. The pesticides used to do this often find their way into the stormwater system.

Pesticides in waterways can result in dramatic changes within ecosystems through direct destruction of organisms and habitats, and more subtly through small doses which may impair reproduction, cause greater susceptibility to disease and inhibit growth. Aquatic animals are particularly susceptible to pesticides because they can absorb them from the water and sediments in which they live.

The chemicals used by councils can enter the aquatic environment through a variety of routes, including direct application, drifting through the air, migration of contaminated organisms, infiltration through the soil into groundwater, spills during transport and application, poor disposal of empty containers, and runoff from treated land.” (Source: Department of Environment, Climate Change & Water 2008, “Stormwater management for golf courses”, http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/stormwater/whatdo/local+councils/golf.htm; accessed: 30 July 2010.)  More internationally: “To keep expensive imported grasses green, golf courses need large amounts of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.  The average amount of agrochemicals used on a golf course is 1500 kg per year.  This includes zeolite, which consists mainly of silicic acid, aluminium oxide and iron oxide, which may be carcinogenic.

The soil-coagulating agent used to strengthen the foundation of artificial lakes in golf courses uses acrylamid, a strong poison. Its contamination of underground water has caused severe poisoning and disorders of the central nervous system.

As a result of exposure to chemicals, many caddies, greenkeepers and residents near golf courses suffer eye irritations and skin diseases in addition to allergies, rashes and sores.  The APPEN conference heard that at a country club on the Japanese island of Hokkaido, organic copper compounds were spread on the grass to keep it from rotting under the winter snow.  When it rained, the chemical was washed into the water system.  More than 90,000 fish in a nearby aquaculture project were killed.” (Source: GreenLeft , “Off course: golf in South-East Asia”, http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/6189; accessed: 30 July 2010.)

And, in terms of a better way to maintain golf courses: “METHODS OF GREEN KEEPING: Troy MacLaren, Kabi’s superintendent

greenkeeper, has worked on a commercial golf course.  “The members expect the greens to be like carpets,” he says. “Greenkeepers have the mindset that using chemicals is the only way to obtain perfection.  When you think about the greenkeeping methods used though, it’s not an efficient process.  For example, growth regulators have been known to be used followed by a high input of nitrogen.”  Seeing is believing.  Kabi is proof that greens and their surrounds can be kept up to the competitive standard without any chemical use.” (Source: Biological Farmers of Australia 2005, “Kabi Golf Farm: A Fairer Way”, http://www.bfa.com.au/_files/kabi%20golf%20farm%20pg37-38.pdf; accessed: 30 July 2010.)

[24]  I now believe that the most serious consequences of my exposures will likely not manifest until years after my legal action ends.  I have already noted signs of new developmental symptoms, and these have been passed on to my specialists.  If I must die from continuous episodes of poisoning from people and corporate bodies that are too bloody-minded and negligent to recognize good science and see reason, then I may as well die fighting and documenting my symptoms, right to the very end.

[25]  “An epidemic of developmental, learning, and behavioral disabilities has become evident among children (preventingharm.org, no date).  And why?  “We are inventing and releasing thousands of novel molecules every year in the pursuit of commercial gain” (Donohoe 1998:35).

[26]  Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins.  See: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GTARW.php (accessed: 13 Jan. 2011).

[27]  Note: “Now the Lymphoma Foundation of America has pulled together and summarized in a 49-page booklet all the available studies of the relationship between lymphoma and pesticides.[2]  It is an impressive piece of work by Susan Osburn, who directed the project, and a scientific review panel of 12 physicians and lymphoma researchers.  The booklet summarizes 99 studies of humans and one study of pet dogs (see REHN #250) in relation to pesticide exposures.  Of the 99 human studies, 75 indicate a connection between exposure to pesticides and lymphomas…  The Lymphoma Foundation’s booklet lists 12 ways that most of us are routinely exposed to pesticides in our daily lives even if we use no pesticides in our homes: routine spraying of apartments, condos, offices (and the associated lawns), public buildings and public spaces (parks, green spaces alongside highways, power line rights of way), and in motels, hotels, and restaurants…  We might well ask, where did these corporations get permission to violate our well-established human right to personal security?  And why do we allow these toxic trespasses into our bodies to occur without our informed consent?[4]  In other words, we might begin to view pesticide exposures not as a scientific question, but mainly as a question of morals and ethics, a question of human rights…  Pesticide exposures seem to give rise to Parkinson’s (REHN #635) – a horrible degenerative disease of the nervous system.  Pesticide exposures diminish children’s memory, physical stamina, coordination, and [the] ability to carry out simple tasks like drawing a stick figure of a human being. (See REHN #648.)  Pesticide exposures seem to make children more aggressivePesticide exposures seem to contribute to the epidemic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that has swept through U.S. children in recent years. (See REHN #678.)” (Montague 2001; my emphasis)

[28]  “Exposure to herbicides (weed killers) before the age of one is linked to a more than four-fold increase in childhood asthma” (BeyondPesticides.org 2008, citing Boise, et al. 2004).

[29]  DirectGov, 2007.

[30]  Laurier, 2003; citing the 351-page report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a branch of the World Health Organization.

[31]  American Cancer Society, 2008.

[32]  National Center for Health Statistics, 2008.

[33]  CureResearch.com, 2007.

[34]  NKDEP, 2005.

[35]  Mindfully.org, 2007.

[36]  Bio-Medicine.org, 2008.

[37]  ScienceDaily, 2008.  Like my old school friend who had used a blonding agent for her hair since her early teens and now has MS.

[38]  Yb Dato Liow Tiong Lai, 2008.

[39]  Clennell, 2004.

[40]  For example, on Monday 15th Sept. 2008 I spent time at my friend’s in South Windsor.  On that day strong winds came from the west across the golf club and over the residences on McQuade Avenue.  For the 8 hours I spent there, my reward was an unusually elevated sore throat (well over and above what I normally experience), precisely the variety of sore throat I and other UWS-H Systems Agriculture and Applied Science Environmental Health students got after breathing chemicalized vapours from contaminated soil on a farm near the Castlereagh Waste Management Centre in 1995/96.

[41]  “A growing body of scientific evidence suggests there may be an association between parents’ exposure to pesticides and cancer in their children  …Kori Flower of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Public Health and colleagues report the results of their recent study investigating the possibility of INCREASED CANCER RISK AMONG THE CHILDREN OF PESTICIDE APPLICATORS…  The team compared the cancer incidence rate in the cohort to that expected in the general population to generate a standardized incidence ratio, and found an increased cancer incidence rate among children of the Iowa workers.  The risk of all childhood cancers combined was 36% GREATER IN CHILDREN OF APPLICATORS compared to all Iowa children; the risk of all lymphomas more than DOUBLED, and that of Hodgkin lymphoma was 2.5 TIMES GREATERFurther, the team found an increased risk of cancer among children of pesticide applicators who did not wear chemical-resistant gloves during application, as opposed to the children of those who did” (Hood 2004, citing Flower, et. al 2004; my emphasis). .  This represents a massive OH&S issue for all corporate bodies spraying pesticide.  Also, what might be indicated here by way of the previously mentioned BSE?  This mostly invisible public health disaster must be confronted now BEFORE DISEASE EPIDEMICS IN ANIMAL POPULATIONS BECOME DISEASE PANDEMICS IN HUMAN POPULATIONS!  Growing agri-science FASCISM has to be addressed in order to stop pesticide manufacturers continually loading the bases and influencing politics for their financial benefit while a small planet plunges toward a GLOBAL DISEASE HOLOCAUST!  For example: “Violence and Aggression against Human Rights in the Wake of Agribusiness, July 12, 2005.  The agribusiness sector concentrates land, water, and income.  Its production is mainly for export, creating profits for a privileged elite at a very high socio-environmental cost.  The irrigation of monoculture consumes 70% of the country’s water.  Its machines are substituted for manual labor in the countryside, in a country [Sth. America] whose greatest problem is unemployment.  In the states where agribusiness has expanded, privately-sponsored violence is growing, along with repression through the power of the Judiciary” (http://www.landaction.org/display.php?article=272; accessed: 18 Aug. 2008).

[42]  “Glyphosate spray drift from both ground and aerial applications has been measured from 400 to 800 meters from the target site… Drift that is one thousand times less than the usual application rates has been shown to damage surrounding vegetation, including the killing of wild plants.  This is an important reason why it should not be used in national parks and environmentally sensitive areas for weed control” (Leu 2007).  And on any street and in any park because babies and bigger people matter!

[43]  “In the long term the best solution is the promotion of alternative, non-chemical methods of pest control.  This strategy is also of far more importance to reduce occupational exposure than campaigns to promote “safe use of pesticides”.  Such campaigns appear to be irrelevant when farmers are already aware of the hazards and safety precautions.  Non-chemical pest control measures are now promoted by the international agricultural research centers and IPM was identified as a key element in sustainable agricultural development by Agenda 21, the blueprint for action prepared by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.  The next step is for policy-makers to abolish subsidies and other incentives for pesticide use and to strengthen the agricultural extension services for the promotion of IPM” (van der Hoek, et al., 1998).  And: “Integrated pest management encourages use of fewer pesticide applications and more environmentally friendly methods of pest control.  The most toxic pesticides and those with greatest local resistance are identified; their use is then restricted and a regimen of decreased applications is implemented to protect natural enemies of the pests.  This strategy results in reduced pesticide use, increased productivity and profitability, and fewer deaths from poisoning” (Eddleston, et al., 2002).  Gee, fewer deaths would be nice, eh?

[44]  Note:  “A child’s brain is also more vulnerable because of the immaturity of the blood-brain-barrier, which is designed to protect it from toxins.  Even in adults this barrier cannot protect the brain from many heavy metals and synthetic chemicals such as solvents and pesticides.  In infants it is almost totally ineffective against most modern day chemicals.  This dramatically increases the risk of both temporary and permanent damage to the brain.  It’s possible that early exposure to some chemicals may permanently reduce the effectiveness of the blood brain barrier, allowing increased passage of toxins to the brain, and increasing the person’s vulnerability to certain chemicals throughout their life” (Dingle 2005).  Again, how many children live… anywhere near agriculture, parks and golf courses?  Do any of these children matter?  Or does only the convenience of NOW matter everywhere for the businesses, Councils and golf clubs that are more important than OUR VERY FUTURE… the future of this world locked inside our children?

[45]  Note first: “This study explored the frequency of Restless Legs Syndrome in Parkinson’s Disease.  It focused on the clinical differences between patients with and without Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).  They used specific scales : Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS I-IV), quality of life (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire, PDQ 39), sleep symptoms (Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale, PDSS), and diurnal hypersomnia (Epworth Sleepiness Scale).  Over 20% of people with Parkinson’s Disease were found to also suffer from Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).  RLS was found to be far more common in women.  More than two thirds of those with RLS were women.  Those with RLS suffered more from lack of sleep, and body discomfort” (Gomez-Esteban, et. al. 2007; cited by Viartis.net 2008).

Note second: “ScienceDaily (Mar. 18, 2003) — La Jolla, Calif. – Research at the Salk Institute has identified a gene that may link certain pesticides and chemical weaponry to a number of neurological disorders, including the elusive Gulf War syndrome and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).  The finding, published in the March 17 online version of Nature Genetics, is the first to demonstrate a clear genetic link between neurological disorders and exposure to organophosphate chemicals…  “There have been anecdotal links made between rises in ADHD, Parkinson’s disease and other disorders and exposure to pesticides,” said Barlow, an adjunct faculty member at the Salk.  “There also has been suspicion of a link to Gulf War syndrome.  But scientists have been focusing on enzymes that act on acetylcholine neurotransmitters.  This study shows that there may indeed be a genetic connection that explains how organophosphates can cause these reactions; it’s just not what we assumed it would be.” ” (ScienceDaily 2003; citing Salk Institute; my emphasis)  This research shows that even the so-called noncholinesterase inhibiting organophosphate Roundup will become a nerve destroyer via our genes.  Parkinson’s disease and RLS become disturbingly linked via genes and organophosphates.

[46]  “Another 200 chemicals are known to cause clinical neurotoxic effects in adults. [p.2167]

Solvent neurotoxicity in adults is well known from acute poisoning cases and from occupational studies.68  [p.2172]

The five substances recognised as causes of developmental neurotoxicity show similar patterns in the development of scientific documentation of their risks.  This pattern of discovery started in each instance with recognition of adult neurotoxicity, typically in people with occupational exposure, and of episodes of acute, high-dose poisoning in children.

The combined evidence suggests that neuro developmental disorders caused by industrial chemicals has created a silent pandemic in modern society.  Although these chemicals might have caused impaired brain development in millions of children worldwide, the profound effects of such a pandemic are not apparent from available health statistics.  Additionally, as shown by this Review, only a few chemical causes have been recognised so the full effects of our industrial activities could be substantially greater than recognised at present.

The consequences of a pandemic of developmental neurotoxicity extend beyond descriptive data for incidence and prevalence of clinically diagnosed disorders.1,3  Increased risk of Parkinson’s disease97 or other neurodegenerative diseases98 is a further potential consequence of the pandemic.”  [p.2174]

Source: P Grandjean, PJ Landrigan 2006.  Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals.  Lancet 2006; 368: 2167–78.  Published Online November 8, 2006.  http://www.sciencedirect.com.  DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69665-7.  Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.  (Prof P Grandjean MD); Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA (P Grandjean); Department of Community Medicine (Prof PJ Landrigan MD); and Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA (PJ Landrigan).  http://sciencedirect.com.

[47]  A “continuum of expectations” (Liedloff 1986).


By Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health 1998, University of Western Sydney)


WordPress URL:https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/2012/11/25/human-health-environmental-animal-impacts-of-pesticides-in-general-organophosphates-in-particular-including-roundup-2

Essay also available at: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/human-health-and-pesticides.htm & http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/reports/human-health-and-pesticides.htm


1.1 Pesticides Affect Health & Behavior
Pesticides promote the classic symptom of abdominal pain in children (Dr. B. Grabau, 2005, pers. comm.), or, “non-specific abdominal gastric pain” (Dr. B. Grabau, 2005, Private Medical Report). This means that many aches and pains children get may not simply just be “normal”.

This represents a significant problem with regard to herbicide and pesticide use in that mild to moderate pesticide poisoning symptoms can be easily misdiagnosed as stomach-flu, bronchitis or asthma (Reeves, Schafer, Hallward & Katten 1999:17).

“Even severe pesticide poisoning in infants has been misdiagnosed as aneurysm, head trauma, diabetic acidosis, severe bacterial gastroenteritis, pneumonia and whooping cough” (Reeves, Schafer, Hallward & Katten 1999:17, citing Solomon & Mott 1998; Zweinerd & Ginsburg 1988).

Further, pesticide poisoning impacts on the mind. It can lead to aggressive behaviour and delinquency in teens (Hatherill, 1999; Tvedten, 1999, 2002:2). We should here consider pesticides’ contribution to road rage and other attacks, along with the influence of pollution in general on, particularly urban societies.

1.2 Pesticides Are Deadly & Deforming
“Hundreds of thousands of people are dying around the world each year from the effects of the use, or misuse, of pesticides” (Konradsen, et al., 2003).

And when death is avoided, we still find crippling impacts in the form of cancer, foetal death, miscarriages, and premature births (NCAP, 1999:3; Bonn, 2005; Cox, 2004).” In fact, pesticides are strongly linked to birth defects (Montague, 2001).

1.3 Rising Rates Of Disease
“Doctors at a weekend conference in Winnipeg say there is a disturbing trend when it comes to the rising rate of certain cancers. They say pesticides are to blame for the increase – especially in childhood cancers” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Winnipeg CBC News – June 7, 2004).

“Exposure to herbicides (weed killers) before the age of one is linked to a more than four-fold increase in childhood asthma” (BeyondPesticides.org 2008, citing Boise, et al. 2004).

However, cancer and asthma is not enough for this blighted form of chemical technology: “Pesticide exposures seem to give rise to Parkinson’s (REHN #635) – a horrible degenerative disease of the nervous system. Pesticide exposures diminish children’s memory, physical stamina, coordination, and [the] ability to carry out simple tasks like drawing a stick figure of a human being. (See REHN #648.) Pesticide exposures seem to make children more aggressive. Pesticide exposures seem to contribute to the epidemic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that has swept through U.S. children in recent years (See REHN #678.)” (Montague 2001). See: https://poisonedpeople1.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/what-the-hell-are-we-doing.jpg for an image depicting the toxics our children are exposed to.

1.4 Pesticide, Agriculture, Glyphosate & Human Disease/Neurobehavioral Deficits
A “study showed there was approximately [a] 2-fold greater risk of having a
stillbirth if the mother lived within 1 mile from an agricultural area which used
organophosphate – pyrethroid – carbamate – or chlorinated pesticides” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Bell, et al., 2001).

And, further, in terms of organophosphates: Glyphosate… is a non-selective, systematic herbicide. This organophosphate compound is the active ingredient in the weedkiller Roundup (Royal Society of Chemistry 2009).

“Many organophosphates are also associated with irritation of the skin and upper respiratory tract… There have been reports of deficits in memory and abstraction on test batteries and subclinical decreases in vibrotactile sensitivity in
workers recovering from organophosphate poisoning… Among workers who apply organophosphates but have not suffered poisoning episodes, some studies have shown similar types of subclinical neurobehavioural deficits and subclinical electroencephalographic abnormalities…” (O’Malley 1997).

Further, Glyphosate can have high acute inhalation toxicity (extoxnet.orst.edu 1996), can cause diarrhoea, shortness of breath, vomiting and weakness (pesticideinfo.org 2010), and has teratogenic (monster-making) effects in animals (Paganelli et.al. 2010).

“Two separate studies in Sweden have linked exposure to Glyphosate to Hairy Cell Leukemia and Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. These types of cancers were extremely rare, however Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is the most rapidly increasing cancer in the Western world. It has risen by 73% in the USA since 1973. Another study has found a higher incidence of Parkinson disease amongst farmers who used herbicides, including glyphosate” (Leu, 2007 citing Cox, 1998; Lehmann & Pengue, 2000; Nordstrom, et al., 1998; Hardell & Eriksson, 1999).

“Various epidemiological studies have demonstrated that individuals exposed to a single large toxic dose, or to small subclinical doses, of organophosphorus compounds have developed a chronic neurotoxicity that persists for years after exposure and is distinct from both cholinergic and OPIDN effects… Our review of the literature indicated that these studies describe a nervous system disorder induced by organophosphorous compounds which involves neuronal degeneration and subsequent neurological, neurobehavioral, and neuropsychological consequences” (Abou-Donia, 2003).

“OPs can persist in the environment for long periods of time. Indeed, OPs are detected in soils years after application… conditions can occur in soil where OPs are preserved and transferred to humans through food. A review of the literature shows that OPs are highly toxic and that human exposure is undesirable. Evidence suggests that OPs are mutagenic and teratogenic and that a large number of modern-day diseases of the nervous and immune system of mammals can be linked to these pesticides. These include BSE (mad cows disease), CJD, Gulf War syndrome, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis, arguing for a thorough examination of the environmental fate and toxicology of OPs as well as their use” (Ragnarsdottir 2000).

Further still: “The possibility that organophosphorus (OP) compounds contribute to motor neuron disease (MND) is supported by association of paraoxonase 1 polymorphisms with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the occurrence of MND in OP compound-induced delayed neuropathy (OPIDN), in which neuropathy target esterase (NTE) is inhibited by organophosphorylation” (Rainier, et. al., 2008).

“Other studies show that glyphosate and commercial herbicides containing glyphosate cause a range of cell mutations and damage to cell DNA. These types of changes are usually regarded as precursors to cancer and birth defects” (Leu, 2007; my emphasis).

Roundup causes genetic mutations in cell tests (NCAP, 2000:2, citing Vigfusson & Vyse, 1980; Kale et al., 1995; Rank et al., 1993) and is linked to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (Cox, 2004; Vachani, 2007), miscarriages and Attention Deficit Disorder (Cox, 2004).

Roundup contains surfactants that are acutely toxic to humans and animals, even potentially causing death in humans (Cox, 1993:4, citing Sawada, et al., 1988; and Talbot, 1991).

It is “a known carcinogen, neurotoxin, irritant, and has been found to kill human embryonic cells, and can cause kidney and liver damage” (BeyondPesticides.org 2012).

“Now the Lymphoma Foundation of America has pulled together and summarized in a 49-page booklet all the available studies of the relationship between lymphoma and pesticides… Of the 99 human studies, 75 indicate a connection between exposure to pesticides and lymphomas… The Lymphoma Foundation’s booklet lists 12 ways that most of us are routinely exposed to pesticides in our daily lives even if we use no pesticides in our homes: routine spraying of apartments, condos, offices (and the associated lawns), public buildings and public spaces (parks, green spaces alongside highways, power line rights of way), and in motels, hotels, and restaurants…” (Montague, 2001).

2.1 Pesticide Spray Drift Waste & Damage
“Glyphosate spray drift from both ground and aerial applications has been measured from 400 to 800 meters from the target site… Drift that is one thousand times less than the usual application rates has been shown to damage surrounding vegetation, including the killing of wild plants. This is an important reason why it should not be used in national parks and environmentally sensitive areas for weed control” (Leu 2007).

2.2 Glyphosate Environmental Toxicity
Glyphosate [Roundup] is persistent (NCAP, 2000:2, citing US EPA, 1993-2) and may last up to 3 years (NCAP, 2000:2, citing Torstensson et al., 1989), while its metabolite, AMPA [aminomethylphosphonic acid], may persist even longer, “with a half life in soil between 119 and 958 days” (Buffin & Jewell, 2001, citing WHO, 1994).

Glyphosate is toxic to fish, aquatic organisms, soil life (including earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, micro-organisms and arthropods), plants (through disease susceptibility), and beneficial insect species (Leu, 2007; van der Werf, 1996). As well, “Glyphosate is also harmful to the environment, particularly aquatic life and water quality and has been linked to intersex frogs, and is lethal to amphibians in concentrations found in the environment” (BeyondPesticides.org 2012).

“Studies show a reduction in the species that build humus, thus [glyphosate] contributes to the decline in soil organic matter” (Leu 2007).

2.3 Roundup Leading The Way Into An Era Of Animal/Plant Pandemics & Herbicide-Resistant Weeds
Roundup has been heavily implicated in thyroid, liver and pancreatic tumours in test animals (Cox, 1993:4, citing Dykstra & Ghali, 1991). Roundup is also now shockingly linked to Mad Cow’s Disease (Rotella 2003), and to an increase in plant diseases (gmwatch.org 2010).

As if these issues were not problem enough: “Leading weed scientists are urgently appealing to Australia’s farmers to switch to an integrated weed management (IWM) system as the country records its third glyphosate-resistant weed” (ScienceAlert 2008, citing CRC For Australian Weed Management 2003). Our convenient herbicide “magic bullets” have turned back on us!

“The current massive reliance on glyphosate, which has been promoted by the rapid adoption by U.S. farmers of genetically engineered (GE) corn, soybeans and cotton, is a key factor in this epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds. A report released in November of 2009, for instance, found that since the first 13 years of commercial use of GE crops, they have been responsible for an increase of 383 million pounds of herbicide use in the U.S. (1996-2008)”.

“In Southern states, horseweed, ryegrass and pigweed are a concern for soybean farmers, while horseweed and volunteer Roundup Ready soybeans have become problem weeds for Mississippi rice. In Australia, weed scientists have now documented cases of glyphosate resistance in rigid ryegrass across large areas and are encountering it in other weed species in different parts of the world” (BeyondPesticides.org 2012).

Pesticides in general and organophosphates and Roundup in particular are unqualified slate-wipers of normal life processes in soil, in plants and in humans and, as such, represent a chemically-mediated EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT. We are all being poisoned slowly into oblivion. See: http://indiegogo.com/poisoned-people for my particular intersection with pesticides and its impact on my and my son’s lives.

Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health 1998, Hons I Social Ecology 1999, University of Western Sydney) (http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au; http://murraythompsongraphics.x90x.net; poisonedpeople@gmail.com)

Abou-Donia, Mohamed B., 2003, ‘Organophosphorus Ester-Induced Chronic Neurotoxicity’, Archives of Environmental Health, August 2003 [Vol. 58 (No. 8); [50] endnote reference is: Jamal 1997], Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Bell, et.al (Bell, E.M., Hertz-Picciotto, I., & Beaumont, J.J., Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) 2001 [Online], ‘Fetal Deaths Linked to Living Close to Agricultural Pesticide Use During Weeks 3-8 of Pregnancy’, http://www.chem-tox.com.pesticides (original source: Epidemiology, 12(2), March 2001); accessed: 16 July 2008.

http://www.beyondpesticides.org/schools/sepa/SEPA_fact&figures.htm; accessed: 18 July 2008.

BeyondPesticides.org 2012 [Online], “Increasing Documented Cases of Glyphosate Resistance Discussed by Scientists”, Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog; Source: http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=3034, accessed: 21 Sept. 2012.

Boise, P., et al., 2004, ‘GreenCare for Children. Measuring Environmental Hazards in the Childcare Industry: Pesticides, Lead, and Indoor Air Quality’, Community Environmental Council. 2004.

Bonn, D. (Dorothy) 2005 [Online], ‘Roundup Revelation: Weed Killer Adjuvants May Boost Toxicity’, http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2005/113-6/ss.html; accessed: 14 Sept. 2009.

Buffin, D.(David) & Jewel, T. (Topsy), 2001, Health and environmental impacts of glyphosate: The implications of increased use of glyphosate in association with genetically modified crops; the Pesticide Action Network UK.

Cox, C. 1993, ‘Biotechnology and Agricultural Pesticide Use: An Interaction Between Genes and Poisons’, Journal of Pesticide Reform, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Fall), NCAP, PO Box 1393, Eugene, OR 97440, USA.

Cox, C. 1998, JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM, Fall 1998, Vol.18, No. 3.; Updated 01-02, Northwest Coalition Against Pesticides, Eugene, Oregon.

Cox, C. 2004 [Online], ‘Herbicide Factsheet: Glyphosate’, Journal Of Pesticide Reform/ Winter 2004, Vol. 24, No. 4, Northwest Coalition For Alternatives To Pesticides/NCAP, P.O. Box 1393, Eugene, Oregon 97440 USA / (541)344-5044 / http://www.pesticide.org; accessed: 2005.

CRC For Australian Weed Management 2003, Search: glyphosate?resistant weed; http://www.weedscrc.org.au/index_flash.html; accessed: 20 Sept. 2008.

Dykstra, W. & Ghali, G.Z. 1991, ‘Second peer review of glyphosate. Memo to R. Taylor and L. Rossi’, US EPA Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Health Effects Division, Washington, D.C.

extoxnet.orst.edu 1996 [Online], “EXTOXNET | Extension Toxicology Network | Pesticide Information Profiles | Glyphosate”; Source: http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/glyphosa.htm, accessed: 21 Sept. 2012.

gmwatch.org 2010 [Online], “Brazil battles spread of “mad soy disease””; Source: http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/12554-brazil-battles-spread-of-qmad-soy-diseaseq, accessed: 21 Sept. 2012.

Hardell L. & Eriksson M. 1999, ‘A Case-Control Study of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and exposure to Pesticides’, CANCER Vol.85, No. 6 (March 15, 1999).

Hatherill, J.R. (Dr.) 1999 [Online], ARE TODAY’S TEENS MORE TOXIC?, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, Ill; Jun 15, 1999; pg. 19; and http://www.veg.ca/lifelines/sepoc99/teens.htm; accessed: 2006.

Kale, et al., 1995, ‘Mutagenicity testing of nine herbicides and pesticides currently used in agriculture’, Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25:148-153.

Lehmann V. & Pengue W. 2000, ‘Herbicide Tolerant Soybean: Just another step in a technology treadmill?’, Biotechnology and Development Monitor. September 2000.

Leu, A. 2007, ‘Monsanto’s Toxic Herbicide Glyphosate: A Review of its Health and Environmental Effects’, Organic Consumers Association, http://www.organicconsumers.org/, accessed: July 17, 2008.

NCAP (Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides) Landscaping To Reduce Herbicide Use’ 97440 USA.

NCAP (Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides) 2000, Unthinkable Risk: How Children Are Exposed and Harmed When Pesticides Are Used at School, Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides, PO Box 1393 Eugene, OR 97440-1393 USA (www.pesticide.org).

Montague, P. (National Writers Union) 2001, ‘#726 – Science, Precaution and Pesticides, 06-Jun-2001’, in http://www.rachel.org/en/node/5340; accessed: 16 July 2008.

Nordstrom M. et al, 1998, ‘Occupational exposures, animal exposure, and smoking as risk factors for hairy cell leukaemia evaluated in a casecontrol study’, BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER Vol. 77 (1998), pp. 2048-2052.

Paganelli, A. (Alejandra), Gnazzo, V. (Victoria), Acosta, H. (Helena), Lopez, S.L. (Silvia), & Carrasco, A.E. (Andres) [Laboratorio de Embriologia Molecular, CONICET-UBA, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155, 3° piso (1121), Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina] 2010 [Online], “Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Produce Teratogenic Effects on Vertebrates by Impairing Retinoic Acid Signaling” in Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2010, 23 (10), pp 1586–1595; DOI: 10.1021/tx1001749; Publication Date (Web): August 9, 2010; Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society; Source: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/tx1001749, accessed: 21 Sept. 2012.

pesticideinfo.org 2010 [Online], “Glyphosate – Identification, toxicity, use, water pollution potential, ecological toxicity and regulatory information”; Source: http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC33138, accessed: 21 Sept. 2012.

Ragnarsdottir, K. Vala 2000, ‘Environmental fate and toxicology of organophosphate pesticides’, Journal of the Geological Society; July 2000; v. 157; no. 4; p. 859-876 © 2000 Geological Society of London.

Rainier, S., Bui, M., Mark, E., Thomas, D., Tokarz, D., Ming, L., Delaney, C., Richardson, R.J., Albers, J.W., Matsunam, N., Stevens, J., Coon, H., Leppert, M. & Fink, J.K. 2008, ‘Neuropathy Target Esterase Gene Mutations Cause Motor Neuron Disease’, The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 82, Issue 3, 780-785, 28 February 2008, doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.018;
http://www.cell.com/AJHG/abstract/S0002-9297(08)00143-2; accessed: 26 June 2009.

Rank, et al. 1993, ‘Genotoxicity testing of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate isopropylamine using the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test’, Salmonella mutagenicity test and Allium anaphase-telophase test, Mutation Research 300:29-36.

Reeves, M., Schafer, K., Hallward, K. & Katten, A. 1999, Fields of Poison: California Farmworkers and Pesticides, Pesticide Action Network North America Regional Center, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, United Farm Workers of America and Californians for Pesticide Reform (Publishers).

Rotella, P. 2003 [Online], “Mark Purdey’s Organophosphate Model of Mad Cow Disease”; Source: http://madcow.pamrotella.com/, accessed: 21 Sept. 2012.

Royal Society of Chemistry 2009, ‘Soundbite molecules’, http://www.rsc.org/Education/EiC/issues/2005Mar/Soundbitemolecules.asp; accessed: 4th June 2009.

Sawada, Y.Y., et al 1988, ‘Probable toxicity of surface-active agent in commercial herbicide containing glyphosate’, Lancet, 1(8580):299.

ScienceAlert 2008, ‘Another pesticide resistant weed found’, in ScienceAlert: Australia & New Zealand, Tuesday, 26 August 2008,
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20082608?17859?2.html; accessed: 20 Sept. 2008.

Sinclair, W. (M.D.; Board Certified Immunology) & Pressinger, R. (M.Ed.) no date [Online], Home and Lawn Pesticides More Dangerous than Previously Believed, http://www.chem-tox.com.pesticides, accessed: 17 July 2008.

Solomon, G.M. & Mott, L.M. 1998, Trouble On The Farm: Growing Up With Pesticides In Agricultural Communities, Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, NY, USA.

Talbot, A.R. 1991, ‘Acute poisoning with a glyphosate-surfactant herbicide (‘Roundup’): A review of 93 cases’, Human Exp. Toxicol. 10:1-8.

Tvedten, S.L. 1999, 2002, The Bug Stops Here, compiled from The Best Control II – Intelligent Pest Management, Copyright 1998 and 2002 by Stephen Tvedten.

US EPA 1993-2, ‘Science chapter for registration eligibility document for glyphosate’, EPA Ecological Effects Branch, Washington, DC (May 1).

Vachani, C. (RN, MSN, AOCN) 2007, OncoLink, Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania,
http://oncolink.org/types/article.cfm?C=10&s=36&ss=820&id =9539; accessed: 16 June 2008.

van der Werf, H.M.G. 1996, ‘Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 60 (1996) 81-96, Elsevier Science B.V.

Vigfusson, N.V., & Vyse, E.R. 1980, ‘The effect of the pesticides Dexon, Captan and Roundup on sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes in vitro’, Mutation Research 79:53-57.

Zweiner, R. & Ginsburg, C. 1988, ‘Organophosphate and carbamate poisoning in infants and children’, Pediatrics 81:121-126.

This Essay is also located at: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/human-health-and-pesticides.htm or http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/reports/human-health-and-pesticides.htm.


By Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health 1998, University of Western Sydney)


Essay URL:  https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/
Short link:  http://wp.me/p2DVqC-3t

Varieties of localized and empire-extended civil and military dictatorships have typically ruled over peoples in times past and still do today, despite the fairly recent aberration of government that many of us in the West have grown up with: ‘democracies’ that pretend to be genuine democracies. However, times do change. Corporate industry now boasts vast financial resources, and it uses that new world power to play God in the re-structuring of the entire agricultural, business, population and ecological morphology of this Planet.

A New World Order sees vaccine intrigues, stampeding GMO and herbicide innovations and monolithic and draconian factory farming at the heart of excruciatingly fascist corporate notions of world domination. And these main causes and effects produce side-effects, with one of the most notable being global GMO and pesticide pollution and poisoning on an unimagineable scale. What we are witnessing in this modern era is the forcible alchemic turning of an entire Planet into a profit-based Holocaust experiment: a global pesticide gas chamber and massive Frankenstein genetics waste receptacle.

So, what does this mean to all of us locally? “New European pesticides legislation (article 3, paragraph 14 [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:309:0001:01:EN:HTML]) now recognises that residents living in the locality of sprayed fields are “subject to high pesticide exposure over the long term” (Downs 2012).

Also: “Things are worse than Rachel Carson might ever have dreaded and will certainly get worse yet before there is any hope of improvement. Will any of us have the quiet, dignified, deeply intelligent courage that lay behind her work? Capitalism cannot change track. It is condemned to measuring success and failure in terms of profit and loss” (Don 2012). That being profit and loss that is interpreted in a global market and workforce context and planned for in terms of a New World Order. It is a regime where, it is assumed, power can generate predictable order and profit. Strangely though, those elites who worship at the feet of this power do not appear to understand that utter chaos is the inevitable outcome of every forcing of that anti-Nature governmental, legal, military and, especially, TECHNOLOGICAL control (all for the sake of that faithless anti-Nature sense of control).

And so, while the globalists connive, while industry advertises, and while we still bask in a somewhat unsettling reflected trust in all things science (when we trust in science, the scientists, industries and governments smile back at us…), the slate-wiping effects of science continue: “Hundreds of thousands of people are dying around the world each year from the effects of the use, or misuse, of pesticides” (Konradsen, et al., 2003).

How many? “…Georgina Downs from Sussex who has run a vigorous campaign for over a decade to highlight the dangers of pesticides… estimated in a 2008 World Bank report to kill 355,000 people worldwide each year” (Metcalf 2012).

“So, 50 years on from Silent Spring, why has there been such a lack of action on pesticides?” (Downs 2012). Is it partly because we are too busy living at the speed of life? And working and paying out for what technology says we must own? That we are anesthetized in a type of mesmerized awe at the tangible and “goodies” boon end of technology? That all this distracts us so effectively that we can easily and weakly accept an almost silent capitulation to a largely invisible pesticide horror? And, given that the persistent barking of advertising confronts us with ever more “improved” techno goodies and technological fixes, can’t that easy distraction, forgetfulness and capitulation even extend our dreamstate further into an utter obscenity of apathetic characterlessness, the worst possible waste of a human mind other than conscious and wilfull evil? And on that broad point of the wilfull denial of the truth of toxicant cause and effect (whether the aberration be man-made pesticides and direct human poisoning or man-induced tick over-population through the disturbance of Nature via environmental replacement) I can apply this generously wise quote originally applied to Lyme disease: “one of the most shameful episodes in the history of medicine because elements of academic medicine, elements of government and virtually the entire insurance industry have colluded to deny a disease” (Liegner 2010).

What of:

BHOPAL: a gas leak disaster in India, “one of the world’s worst industrial disasters”. Potentially, “3,787 deaths related to the gas release”.

THREE-MILE ISLAND: “a partial nuclear meltdown…” that occurred “in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania”, USA.

CHERNOBYL: “a catastrophic nuclear accident…” contaminating “much of Western USSR and Europe… [where] long-term effects such as cancers and deformities are still being accounted for”.

MEXICAN GULF OIL SPILL: “An oil spill… which flowed unabated for three months in 2010, and may be continuing to seep… It is the largest accidental marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry…” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/)

GMO WHEAT AND BARLEY: An altered protein GM wheat variety could cause serious liver problems, according to some scientists. Enzyme inhibition in the two crops could translate into glycogen inhibition in humans, and could lead to death by age 5 in children born without this enzyme working (Huff 2012).

GMO SOY: Hamsters fed on a GM soy diet suffered growth problems, high pup mortality and sterility, with the third generation growing hair inside their mouths (Smith 2010).

GMO CORN: Rats fed GM corn and trace amounts of Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup suffered huge tumours, organ damage and premature death (Adams 2012).

And Fukushima; and 911; and the Exxon Valdez oil spill: “25 to 32 million US gallons” of oil spilled in some estimates (and the Torrey Canyon and Amoco Cadiz).

And the Piper Alpha North Sea oil platform disaster.

And the “Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in New York City” in 1911 (more than 100 died).

And the “Kader Toy Factory fire” in Thailand in 1993 (188 workers died, mostly young women).

And the 1906 “Courrières mine disaster in Courrières, France” which killed 1,099 workers.

And the “Benxihu Colliery disaster in Benxi, Liaoning, China” which killed 1,549 workers.

And the “Baia Mare cyanide spill” in Romania which is considered “the worst environmental disaster in Europe since Chernobyl”, released “100,000 tons of cyanide contaminated water”.

And the Oppau fertilizer explosion in Germany in 1921 “killing 500–600 people and injuring about 2,000 more”.

And the 1947 Texas City Disaster where ” minimum of 578 people lost their lives and another 3,500 were injured”.

And the 1976 Seveso disaster in Italy where “due to the release of dioxins into the atmosphere and throughout a large section of the Lombard Plain, 3,000 pets and farm animals died and, later, 70,000 animals were slaughtered to prevent dioxins from entering the food chain”.

And the 1986 “Sandoz disaster in Schweizerhalle, Switzerland, releasing tons of toxic agrochemicals into the Rhine”.

And the 2012 Karachi, Pakistan industrial disaster that saw 289 people die (“workers were suffocated or burnt alive”).

And the Port Chicago munitions explosion of 1944.

And the 1962 Centralia, Pennsylvania coal mine fire (still burning today!).

And Challenger, and the faulty levees of New Orleans (Hurricane Katrina) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/).

And when waste dumps leak (http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au/castlereagh/Toxic-Chemical-Leakage-Outside-Waste-Depot.pdf).

And… my son’s and my (http://indiegogo.com/poisoned-people) pesticide poisoning.


Further, and even more insidiously than our above-noted dreamstate, is the fully conscious and willful LEGAL (see: http://indiegogo.com/the-good-samaritan), MEDICAL, CORPORATE and GOVERNMENT hiding of real knowledge that would help to protect us from toxic dangers! These irresponsible authorities, corrupted as they are by industrial vested interests, cannot imagine fully identifying our techological woes for what they are, so utterly intertwined with the modern fabric of life are they! Our “protectors” see the repudiation of bad technology and a full accounting of our insidious techno impact on our natural environment as an introduction to smaller paypackets, and perhaps even some form of immediately uncomfortable and undesirable social chaos (large protests over the discovery of the extent of the toxic coverups?).

Deception and ignorance are commodities that are historically “chaos in the bank”, accruing a very deadly form of degenerate ‘interest’ that typically plays out at the end of civilizations: “History shows that degeneration of the criminal justice system contributes greatly to the downfall of states, and is a sign of rot within a political system” (Aulich 2006).

So, we continue to embrace (and are encouraged to embrace) what is also strangling us. And in so completely embracing technology, natural dynamics have been muted and cast far away from us. We have therefore lost ourselves on the treadmill of science. Further, as blatantly obvious our loss of a direct communion with Nature is to so many, and as blatantly catastrophic as the cascade of techno nightmares that confront us is, we still — given the “sins of omission/neglect” deficiencies of Human Nature and the “sins of commission” deceptions of industry and government — tend to ignore the catastrophes in favour of a now tattered hope in scientific salvation. Such are the repetitions of human thought at the ends of ages.

A degenerating civilization indeed: we the people are so paralyzed by our contradictory and conflictual relationship with technology that “we are monitoring our own extinction” (Prof. Stuart Hill, University of Western Sydney 1999, pers. comm.).

But it is time now for us to grow up and be mature and wise and understand that our now dull hopes in toxic technology are funded by mis-information from luminaries that are stationed at our radio, in our governments and regulatory bodies, inside our legal and medical systems, on our TVs and throughout the Internet by corrupt and civilization-destroying industrial vested interests.

Adams, M. [Mike] 2012 [Online]. “New GMO study: Rats fed lifetime of GM corn grow tumors, 70% of females die early”, Alex Jones’ InfoWars.com, September 19, 2012. Source: http://www.infowars.com/new-gmo-study-rats-fed-lifetime-of-gm-corn-grow-tumors-70-of-females-die-early/; accessed 20th Sept. 2012.

Aulich, S. [Graduate of the Lazarski School of Commerce and Law in Warsaw (Master of Laws) and the George Washington University Law School (LL.M.)] 2006 [online]. THE CORROSION OF THE AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, in The Europen Courier, September 23, 2006. Source: http://europeancourier.org/CriminalJustice_9_23_06.htm; accessed:
25th April 2010.

Don, M. [Monty: gardening broadcaster & Soil Association president (http://www.soilassociation.org/aboutus/whoweare/president)%5D 2012 [Online]. Quote in Leo Hickman’s article: “What is the legacy of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring?”, The Eco Audit with Leo Hickman, The Guardian, Thursday 27 September 2012. Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/blog/2012/sep/27/rachel-carson-silent-spring-legacy; accessed: 2 Oct. 2012.

Downs, G. [Georgina (UK Pesticides Campaign: http://www.pesticidescampaign.co.uk/)%5D 2012 [Online]. Quote in Leo Hickman’s article: “What is the legacy of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring?”, The Eco Audit with Leo Hickman, The Guardian, Thursday 27 September 2012. Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/blog/2012/sep/27/rachel-carson-silent-spring-legacy; accessed: 2 Oct. 2012.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 2012 [Online], Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_industrial_disasters; accessed: 3 Oct. 2012.

Huff, E.A. [Ethan, Staff Writer at Natural News.com] 2012 [Online]. “Children born to parents who eat GM wheat may DIE before age five, warn scientists”; Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/037261_GM_wheat_liver_failure_fatalities.html#ixzz28mmKFkht; accessed: 9 October 2012.

Konradsen, F., van der Hoek., W., Cole, D.C., Hutchinson, G., Daisley, H., Singh, S., & Eddleston, M. 2003, ‘Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries—options for restricting the availability of pesticides’, Toxicology 192 (2003) 249-261.

Liegner, K.B. [Kenneth] 2010 [Online]. “LYMEPOLICYWONK: Speaking Truth to Power: Dr. Liegner Lays it Out for the IOM”; LymeDisease.org. Source: http://lymedisease.org/news/lymepolicywonk/554.html; accessed: 5 Oct. 2012.

Metcalf, M. [Mark] 2012 [Online]. “Masking the truth – are residents of Billinge being made ill by pesticides in crop spray”; Fighting Talk by Mark Metcalf, published: WEDNESDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2012; Source: http://writemark.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/masking-truth-are-residents-of-billinge.html?spref=fb; accessed: 5 Oct. 2012.

Smith, J.M. 2010 [Online]. “Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality in Hamsters”, HUFF POST GREEN (The Huffington Post, April 20th 2010). Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-smith/genetically-modified-soy_b_544575.html; accessed: 3 Oct. 2012.


TITLE (Note: This is an online Campaign)

By Murray Thompson (BAppSci Environmental Health 1998; Hons I Social Ecology 1999, University of Western Sydney)


Essay URL:  https://poisonedpeople1.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/the-human-right-to-no-pesticide-poisoning

Short link:  http://wp.me/p2DVqC-3o





The ‘legal’ right to freely enforce pesticide applications (without fear of prosecution and charges of negligence and disability discrimination) is currently being stitched up globally, and particularly and perversely in Western nations under the political influence of Big-Pharma. These legal dynamics demonstrate “rot within a political system” (Aulich 2006) and clearly describe the closing stages of a corrupt and technology-obsessed civilization that puts the convenience of pesticides ahead of its literal future.

What Do We Really Want?
Note: “Most tragically, suffering, illness and disease surround us today in a way we would not have imagined a half century ago. We have banished some diseases only to have them replaced by a grumbling yet profound toxicity which is stripping our children of their rightful future” (Donohoe, 1998:38).

Also: “…pesticides are strongly linked to birth defects… science will not solve this problem for us. Isn’t it time to consider a human rights approach, an ethical challenge to the poisoners?… The old science-based strategy has failed us. Perhaps a new, precautionary path can get us where we need to go. The precautionary principle says, ‘When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically’ ” (Montague, 2001).

“Now the Lymphoma Foundation of America has pulled together and summarized in a 49-page booklet all the available studies of the relationship between lymphoma and pesticides.[2] It is an impressive piece of work by Susan Osburn, who directed the project, and a scientific review panel of 12 physicians and lymphoma researchers. The booklet summarizes 99 studies of humans and one study of pet dogs (see REHN #250) in relation to pesticide exposures. Of the 99 human studies, 75 indicate a connection between exposure to pesticides and lymphomas… The Lymphoma Foundation’s booklet lists 12 ways that most of us are routinely exposed to pesticides in our daily lives even if we use no pesticides in our homes: routine spraying of apartments, condos, offices (and the associated lawns), public buildings and public spaces (parks, green spaces alongside highways, power line rights of way), and in motels, hotels, and restaurants… We might well ask, where did these corporations get permission to violate our well-established human right to personal security? And why do we allow these toxic trespasses into our bodies to occur without our informed consent?[4] In other words, we might begin to view pesticide exposures not as a scientific question, but mainly as a question of morals and ethics, a question of human rights… Pesticide exposures seem to give rise to Parkinson’s (REHN #635) – a horrible degenerative disease of the nervous system. Pesticide exposures diminish children’s memory, physical stamina, coordination, and [the] ability to carry out simple tasks like drawing a stick figure of a human being. (See REHN #648.) Pesticide exposures seem to make children more aggressive. Pesticide exposures seem to contribute to the epidemic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that has swept through U.S. children in recent years (See REHN #678.)” (Montague 2001).
My Son & I Poisoned
My son (at age 8) and I were both poisoned (me severely) when we had two pesticide treatments forced on us by the New South Wales Department of Housing (see: http://poisoningandlegalaction.com.au). I, the pesticide injury victim, was blamed wholly by Housing’s Barrister in my trial for our poisoning! See: http://www.indiegogo.com/poisoned-people.
What Do We Need To Do?
We, the people, need to demonstrate true character and tell our politicians that we fiercely object to the present corruption of our legal and political systems in their protection of authorities and government departments from claims of negligence. We want fairness in the assessment of such claims, and we want our basic Human Rights back.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by the U.S. in 1948, says (Article 3), “Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person.” Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution obligates the federal government to protect the citizenry against “domestic violence” which arguably includes modern forms of personal physiological invasion (domestic violence) such as toxic assault/injury and chemical trespass. See
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/Constitution/article04/, or http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A4Sec4.
The Paris Appeal
“We call upon national decision-makers, European Authorities, international organizations, and specifically the United Nations Organization (UNO), to take the following measures:

Measure # 1
Banning all products that are certainly or probably carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic (CMRs) for human beings, as specified by competent international scientific authorities and organizations, and therefore applying to these products the principle of substitution; exceptionally, whenever implementation of this principle is not feasible and the use of the product concerned is considered unavoidable, limiting its use to a minimum with particularly stringent measures of fixed quotas,

Measure # 2
Applying the precautionary principle to all chemicals that, regardless of toxicity characteristics specified in Measure # 1 (refer to §9 and §13), and because they are persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic (PBT) or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB), constitute an allegedly serious and/or irreversible danger for human and/or animal health, and more generally the environment, without waiting for the definite proof of an epidemiological link, so as to anticipate and avoid serious and/or irreversible sanitary or ecological damage,

Measure # 3
Promoting the adoption of toxicological standards or international thresholds to protect people, based on the assessment of risks for the most vulnerable, i.e. mostly children and the embryo.

Measure # 4
With respect to the precautionary principle, adopting programs with scheduled deadlines and targets in precise figures so as to achieve elimination or strictly regulated reduction in polluting substances emissions and in the utilization of marketed chemicals, such as pesticides, modeling the reduction in use implemented in Sweden, Denmark or Norway…” (IDEA, 2006).
What Do We Really Want? Health & Perpetuity!
We want our children to be safe from the transnational chemical giants-sponsored, anti-Duty of Care, anti-Precautionary Principle, unexamined and utterly irresponsible, CRIMINAL and worldwide love-affair with toxic and reproductive capacity (fertility)-destroying chemicals. We want this Extinction Level Event stopped! Think this statement is too crazy? Note:

“We’re monitoring our own extinction” (Prof. Stuart Hill, University of Western Sydney 1999, pers. comm.).

“Hundreds of thousands of people are dying around the world each year from
the effects of the use, or misuse, of pesticides” (Konradsen, et al., 2003).

A “study showed there was approximately [a] 2-fold greater risk of having a
stillbirth if the mother lived within 1 mile from an agricultural area which used organophosphate – pyrethroid – carbamate – or chlorinated pesticides” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Bell, et al., 2001).

“§9.  Whereas, regarding toxicology, a number of these substances or chemicals are hormone-disrupting chemicals (endocrine disrupters), that can be carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (CMRs) for human beings, and therefore susceptible to induce cancers, congenital malformations and/or infertility; whereas some of these substances or products can be, among other effects, allergenic resulting in chronic respiratory diseases, such as asthma; whereas some are neurotoxic chemicals, leading to degenerative diseases of the central nervous system in adult[s]… and to intellectual impairment in children; whereas some are immunotoxic, leading to immunodeficiency, particularly in children, causing infections, especially viral infections; whereas pesticides are deliberately spread in large amounts in the environment, while a great number are toxic… for animals and/or human beings and for the environment…
§10.  Whereas children are the most vulnerable and exposed to contamination by these pollutants…
§11.  Whereas these polluting substances or products can induce diseases in children population, such as those listed in §9; whereas one out of seven children in Europe suffers from asthma, whereas asthma is made worse by city and home pollution; whereas incidence in pediatric cancers has been on the rise for the last 20 years in some industrialized countries; and whereas these considerations all lead to the fact that Children are now in serious danger…” (IDEA 2006).

Pesticides promote cancer, foetal death, miscarriages, and premature births
(NCAP, 1999:3; Bonn, 2005; Cox, 2004).

“Doctors at a weekend conference in Winnipeg say there is a disturbing trend when it comes to the rising rate of certain cancers. They say pesticides are to blame for the increase – especially in childhood cancers” (Sinclair & Pressinger, no date, citing Winnipeg CBC News – June 7, 2004.

WE ARE KILLING OFF OUR OWN CHILDREN! Most CERTAINLY, we humans are engineering the dumbest Extinction Level Event in the long history of this Planet!

Aulich, S. [Graduate of the Lazarski School of Commerce and Law in Warsaw (Master of Laws) and the George Washington University Law School (LL.M.)] 2006 [online]. THE CORROSION OF THE AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, in The Europen Courier, September 23, 2006. Source: http://europeancourier.org/CriminalJustice_9_23_06.htm; accessed: 25th April 2010.

Bell, et.al (Bell, E.M., Hertz-Picciotto, I., & Beaumont, J.J., Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) 2001, ‘Fetal Deaths Linked to Living Close to Agricultural Pesticide Use During Weeks 3-8 of Pregnancy’, http://www.chem?tox.com.pesticides (original source: Epidemiology, 12(2), March 2001); accessed: 16 July 2008.

Bonn, D. (Dorothy) 2005, ‘Roundup Revelation: Weed Killer Adjuvants May Boost Toxicity’, http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2005/113-6/ss.html; accessed: 14 Sept. 2009.

Cox, C. 1993, ‘Biotechnology and Agricultural Pesticide Use: An Interaction Between Genes and Poisons’, Journal of Pesticide Reform, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Fall), NCAP, PO Box 1393, Eugene, OR 97440, USA.

Donohoe, M. 1998, Killing Us Softly, Chemical Injury and Chemical Sensitivity 1.2 (internet Creative Commons release 2008),
http://web.mac.com/doctormark/DoctorMark/KUS.html; accessed: 13/12/2008.

IDEA (Irish Doctors Environmental Association) 2006, THE PARIS APPEAL: International Declaration on Diseases Due to Chemical Pollution,
http://www.ideaireland.org; accessed: 10th October 2007.

Konradsen, F., van der Hoek., W., Cole, D.C., Hutchinson, G., Daisley, H., Singh, S., & Eddleston, M. 2003, ‘Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries—options for restricting the availability of pesticides’, Toxicology 192 (2003) 249-261.

Montague, P. (National Writers Union) 2001, ‘#726 – Science, Precaution and Pesticides, 06-Jun-2001’, in http://www.rachel.org/en/node/5340; accessed: 16 July 2008. Reference [2] cited: Susan Osburn, RESEARCH REPORT: DO PESTICIDES CAUSE LYMPHOMA? Available by U.S. mail from Lymphoma Foundation of America, P.O. Box 15335, Chevy Chase, MD 20825. Tel. (202) 223-6181. ISBN 0-9705127-0-8. Available at: http://www.lymphomahelp.org/docs/research/researchreport/rr_2000.pdf.

NCAP (Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides) 1999, ‘Landscaping Nature’s Way: Using Natural Landscaping To Reduce Herbicide Use’, Journal of Pesticide Reform, Vol.19, No. 4, PO Box 1393, Eugene, Oregon 97440 USA.

Sinclair, W. (M.D.; Board Certified Immunology) & Pressinger, R. (M.Ed.) no date, Home and Lawn Pesticides More Dangerous than Previously Believed, http://www.chem-tox.com.pesticides, accessed: 17 July 2008.